Loading...

Did Apostle Paul corrupt the message of Jesus and the Bible? Debate pt 1 of 8

2,436 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Jan 30, 2013

Arab Christian Prince ex-Muslim debates a stupid western convert to Islam named apostle 13 who claims Paul was a false prophet. To explain their flawed Quran - Koran Muslims today are saying that Paul was a false prophet and created Christianity. Muslims claim that Paul corrupted or changed the Bible. Muslims teach converts or reverts to Islam that Paul was a false prophet like the idiot debating Christian Prince. Moslems bad mouth Paul and say he was a bad person, but they don't know that the early great Islamic scholars heaped praise on Paul. Not only did the great Islamic scholars heap praise on Paul, but also wrote that Paul or Bulus in Arabic was one of the greatest prophets who could create miracles. The greatest Islamic scholars say that Paul not only was a prophet of Islam, but was better than the other two prophets Simon and John, and that Paul could do miracles. This was in regarding to Quran 36:44.

So Paul, who Muslims say was the corrupter of Christianity and the Injeel, was prophet of Islam and a great messenger who created miracles, meanwhile in Quran 3:44 Muhammad could not do any miracles.

So Paul was the best and could do miracles, but Muhammad could not do any miracles.

Paul is a messenger of Allah according to their hadiths, yet they curse his name saying that he corrupted the bible. Where does it say in their islamic texts that Paul changed or corrupt Injeel the Gospel Bible? This is just a stupid lie that some muslims propagate today, when their sacred texts say the contrary. It says that a Church was built in Pauls name in Damascus. Also it shows that Jesus, Isa, was the real messiah

Here is what Ibn Kathir wrote; Shabir Ally MuslimByChoice debate

(so We reinforced them with a third,) means, `We supported and strengthened them with a third Messenger. ' Ibn Jurayj narrated from Wahb bin Sulayman, from Shu`ayb Al-Jaba'i, "The names of the first two Messengers were Sham`un and Yuhanna, and the name of the third was Bulus, and the city was Antioch (Antakiyah).

(When We sent unto them twain) two apostles: Simon the Canaanite and Thomas, (and they denied them both, so We reinforced them with a third) We strengthened them with Simon Peter who confirmed the message conveyed by the other two apostles, (and they said; Lo! we have been sent unto you.

Ibn Ishaq accepted Paul. Those whom Jesus son of Mary sent, both disciples and those who came after them, in the land were: Peter the disciple and Paul with him ... (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasul Allah, p. 653)

Al-Tabari accepted Paul. Among the apostles, and the followers who came after them were the Apostle Peter and Paul who was a follower and not an apostle; they went to Rome. (Al-Tabari, The History of al-Tabari, vol. iv, p. 123)

When referring to Qur'an 36:14, Ibn Kathir quotes early Muslims who had no problem in viewing Paul as an apostle/messenger. (so We reinforced them with a third,) means, "We supported and strengthened them with a third Messenger." Ibn Jurayj narrated from Wahb bin Sulayman, from Shu`ayb Al-Jaba'i, "The names of the first two Messengers were Sham`un and Yuhanna, and the name of the third was Bulus (Paul), and the city was Antioch (Antakiyah)." (Ibn Kathir, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, vol. 8, p. 179)

ibn kathir tafsir, My favorite videos are klingschor, patcondell, therationalizer, pat condell, amazing atheist, thejinnandtonicshow, the jinn and tonic show. This is also re: Shabir Ally video by MuslimByChoice debate dr. zaik naik debating that paul invented Christianity.

  • Category

  • License

    • Standard YouTube License

Loading...

When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next


to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...