 I would very much love to see that point being raised when our minister comes in a short while. The fact that the question is not so much about making technologies as available as it is about assisting in reforming so that the right policies are there and then technologies will flow by themselves. How interested would you say that Mofaldar that the developing countries are in these issues? I mean, there are many. I mean, have you seen a big interest or? I can just tell you that there is a big interest. African countries understand the relevance of diversifying the energy mix, because as he was saying, they are highly exposed to volatility of oil prices. And most of many of them are big importers. And so what you see is that several, many, many countries have strategies in place which state diversifying the energy mix by 2020, by 2030. But obviously they need support to attain those goals. So if you think about Kenya, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Morocco, Egypt, all of these countries, South Africa have policies, have strategies. They have strategies in place to meet a certain target in terms of diversifying the energy mix by bringing in either wind investments or solar or hydro power. It is on the agenda. It is very much on the agenda. Aarild. Is it working? Good. You were mixed of John Lennon and Lennon. John Lennon was saying power to the people right now. And Lennon said that socialism is planning an electricity and you said maybe development is planning an electricity. Now, one thing, I mean, how important is electricity in the overall development? It's one question I would maybe like to reflect on. But second, what you didn't mention is that in a lot of countries, there is huge subsidies for carbon, for fossil fuel consumption, and you can provide technologies, but you also have to change the basic, the pricing of this. And you didn't mention that, but I'm sure you have some thoughts that would be interesting to hear on this continued subsidies for fossil fuels where it should be the opposite. Yannick. It's clear that climate change will oblige us to rehabilitate long-term integrated planning. Whether it's Lennon or not, we still have to go back to long-term integrated planning. The idea that market forces left to themselves will resolve every single problem. I don't think you really have to be a died-hard to believe that. Often when you want to change the energy mix, it takes 50 years and you have to plan for it. Now, how do we finance the incremental cost? There are different options. I took the least controversial one, the tariff increase and carbon markets. But yes, one possibility is reforming the energy subsidies. The energy subsidies right now for fossil fuel are anywhere between 500 billion to 1 trillion. We actually had a few hundred billion dollars close, we don't know. And so if we could recycle these energy subsidies, we will have enough money to actually cover the incremental cost of renewable energy for the near-term compared to fossil fuel activities, fossil fuel energies. Now, there are plenty of innovative sources of finance when it comes to that. You have, for example, also curbing illegal financial flow. You have 21 trillion dollars right now illegally in some accounts. If it could be taxed as they will be normally taxed, 3% on 21 trillion, you end up with 630 billion. If you taxed at 25, you end up with 200 billion dollars. That is linen, but you have 200 billion dollars to finance renewable energy. So there are mechanisms. If you have the political will, there are mechanisms to do it. And especially if you have done your utmost to ensure that you can do it in a cost-effective manner before. I mean, having said that, let me say that some countries are already heading in that direction. And let us not forget that there are subsidies both on developed and developing countries. And some developing countries in Africa are already heading in that direction. You must have realized that some months back in Nigeria, government tried to reform subsidies and there was some upfield social riots. So these are sensitive agendas and they require considering a lot of considerations that are outside of the energy sector per se. This is one point that I also made during my presentation. Because you cannot reform subsidies alone. Yes. Because nobody wants to give subsidies. I mean, policy makers are not them. They don't like to give subsidies. But often they feel that they are obliged either for social reason or competitiveness reason. Because if they don't give tax breaks, for example, the business will go to another place. So it has to be part of a global effort to reform subsidies. What would you say you say today? About 10% of Africa is electrified. In rural areas. In rural areas. Africa is now the economy is growing very quick. In what kind of hurry are we? I mean, how fast will the need be for more energy? I had a slide there on infrastructure gap deficit that combined basically transport and energy. And I don't recall exactly the numbers, but it's something in the order of 25 to 50 billion dollars a year that is required to close the gap. So we need that we need everything to be in place quite soon with those ideas of the green market transformation. And so to meet those needs and challenges. The reason everybody speak about scaling up is because the window of opportunity is shrinking extremely fast. And the nightmare scenario is that we don't get enough money early enough to basically shift toward a green energy paradigm. And we end up needing a lot, a lot of money for disaster relief. And the time is definitely the essence. We need much more money and we need it fast with instruments that can scale up effort. So in Africa is a good investment because, you know, we don't have the issue of developed countries, which is a lot of retrofitting has to take place. Africa, they are making green field investments. So we do not want to lock in capital. A short last. Based on our first poll we took, Yannick, there's a lot of academics in the room. So all the teachers, when they saw that slide, which showed the dramatic increase in cost all in financing, that's really powerful for the classroom. So I'm stealing it. My question is from Afalda. We've talked a lot today about, you know, sort of the prop and you're a specialist on development environment in Africa. One issue that hasn't come up is the role of China. And it strikes me. We just did a recent study at a data that found that the two largest sectors that China is giving in both the government official flows and private finance are infrastructure and energy. And so we're talking about this huge capital problem. What role is China likely to play here? Can they help close this capital gap? But are they lending in areas that aren't going to be conducive to sort of sustainable development? It's a mix. So China is investing, for example, or will be investing in hydropower in Ethiopia. It will also be investing in railway in some countries. In other countries, it's investing in less environmentally friendly or making less environmentally friendly investments. But they are bringing capital flows to Africa and significant ones. Thank you very much. Very interesting. Thank you.