 One big problem, something we're going to see more of is our disgustingly xenophobic media trying to sort of stoke up fear of Afghans coming to this country. This was GB News this morning. I don't want to show you a clip of it. I'm just going to show you a screenshot of the tweet. How do we know that the Taliban or other extremist groups aren't using this route to get operatives into this country? Nigel Farage gives his take on rising numbers of migrants crossing the channel. Now, as we've spoken about before, this was going out basically exactly the same time that much of the world was looking at images of people falling from planes in the sky because they've been trying to cling on to military planes because they were so desperately in the country. At that moment, you've got Nigel Farage saying, oh, they're probably all the Taliban, right? This is completely designed to stoke fear. It's also ridiculously ill-informed. The Taliban aren't really about that. They did harbor terrorists when it was al-Qaeda, but al-Qaeda weren't part of the Taliban, and most people say the Taliban kind of thought that was a mistake because that was the thing that ended up getting them over-froined. It's not like ISIS. This idea that the Taliban are like ISIS, ISIS did want to prompt terrorist attacks across the globe. That was a big part of their founding ideology. The Taliban aren't. They seem to be interested in putting in place what looks like it might be a pretty horrible regime in Afghanistan, but it doesn't look like they're going to plan any terrorist attack. So this idea that they're going to be sneaking in terrorists across the channel or whatever, it's just nonsense. It's ill-informed. It shouldn't be published on any off-com regulated TV channel, and especially not on a day like today. I mean, Ash, I'm sure you're not surprised that this was broadcast on GB News, but it's pretty, I mean, really disgusting, isn't it? Even more disgusting than I come to expect from that channel. It is. It is disgusting, but this is exactly what Nigel Farage does. Don't you remember in the run-up to the 2016 referendum, that image of desperate asylum seekers, mostly male or brown skinned, and it was blazoned with the title Breaking Point. This is the classic Farage racism, which is take images of people who are in really abject desperate situations and say, these are people to be afraid of because look, they're men, they're brown, they're Muslim, which means obviously they want to come here to tear down everything you hold dear. Now, the bigger conversation about why are there so many people fleeing conflicts that the U.K., the U.S. and NATO have had a role in soaking, silence, nothing to say there. Saying, well, hang on, aren't there easier ways to expand safe and legal routes where you can then process paperwork when people are there and here in this country, can carry out checks then, silence, nothing. All he's interested in is quite frankly soaking a very xenophobic and a very racist narrative to try and make sure that we don't act on our most human and compassionate instincts, which is see people to whom we have obligations because we have been part of an occupying force in their country for 20 years. We invaded, we promised a project of nation building, we've left them worse than when we turned up that we have responsibilities to those people. That is the common-sense thing. And in order to distract people and deflect them away from that common-sense conclusion, Nigel Farage is taking the big red racism button. And I imagine he won't be alone in this. This is going to be something that you start to hear more of in the mail, in the sun, perhaps even in the spectator as well, the more legitimate face of racism and xenophobic nationalism. And this is going to be, I think, a rising drumbeat as we start to see the human cost, the cost of displaced peoples start to reach Europe.