 I think in the past we have been used to look at natural disasters or at conflicts in a very distinct and separate way. What we realize from the Philippines to Somalia, to Haida and other places is that natural disaster hit societies and countries which are already weak and vulnerable and this leads to new dimensions of the problems. We see more intense and more deep humanitarian crisis emerging. I think we need to be very smart, to be smarter in getting all the knowledge that we have towards the most exposed communities on this planet. It's very nice to have the knowledge for extremely sophisticated places but we need to include vulnerable communities in the way in which we approach risk preparedness. In a situation as devastating as the one we just saw in the Philippines, ensuring a swift and efficient relief and recovery effort is imperative. For example, if the country is unable to replant its rice crop quickly enough, millions will starve and it might take years for the economy to recover. The problem is how to finance and effectively mobilize complex relief efforts as these events become more intense and more frequent. I think what we increasingly realize and all actors, government, humanitarian organization, the private sector, we all realize that we can't do it alone, that each of us has part of the response but not the full response. So we need a new kind of cooperation between government, humanitarian organization and the private sector. Like Swissry, the same age as ICRC, 150 years old. So we need to partner because both of us have different parts of the solution. We have to compare our analysis and how we can find better targeted and better quality solutions to the challenges with which we are confronted. Using the full spectrum of environmental, political, social and health risks into account. We must all come together, share ideas, insights and best practices that can help exposed communities become more resilient to external shocks and secure the path from relief and recovery to long-term growth.