 at the very beginning that we have some more information coming out about Julie Roy's that I'm hoping to have to you by Monday. But suffice it to say, it's going to blow up the facade of Julie Roy's as an ethical investigative journalist. We have some information about some very unethical, I would say immoral, but certainly unethical things that Julie Roy's has been caught saying and doing and promoting that we're going to be releasing this information hopefully by Monday. So stay tuned to protestia.com for that information. I want to thank you all again for joining me tonight on this live stream. Welcome, welcome, welcome to the BCV channel. I am your host, Pastor Seco Woods. Please do the following. Please like, subscribe, share, hit the notification bell at the bottom of this video that way whenever I go live or post any content or information for you, the viewer, you'll be one of the first to view it. Also, if you'd like to support this ministry financially, first and foremost, thank you. Those of you who have been so gracious and faithful and consistent in supporting this ministry, we do thank you so much for that. Just want to continue to thank you all for that. It is very helpful to help us to do what we're called to do. It is definitely a blessing to see the body of Christ to come alongside and to support ministries like the BCV channel and Love, Life and Master of the Woods. But if you'd like to continue to do so, you can click the donation link below at the bottom of the video. We have Venmo, Cash App and also Zail. Those of you who have been using Super Chat, we would like to encourage you, if you can, if not, don't worry about it, that's fine. We'll get it when we get it. But we've been encouraging our viewers and supporters to utilize the three donation links below because that way we were able to receive the funds and resources in a timely manner, expeditiously, and it would help expedite the process and help us to cut down on costs versus if you use the Super Chat, we won't receive those funds until the following month. And so, of course, you know how things go. It takes money to do ministry and so we do appreciate that. But we thank you nonetheless. Those who would like to be a body lifer, body life for those with no obligation, body life for those who like to support this ministry would like to make the BCV channel and Love, Life and Master of the Woods a part of their regular support, their regular giving to ministries such as ours. And so there's no obligation, you can start, you can stop anytime, you can give anytime whenever you want. We do thank you so much for that. And actually, I just want to give again personal shout outs to those of you who have been supporting us. Again, I cannot stress that enough. I cannot stress that enough. Contrary to what some people may think, you know, people like David Morrill, he's in he's in the in the chat. I definitely tagged him attack protestia because this live is especially for them. This one has their name on it. All right. And so he calls me a grifter. Can you believe it? Me, yours truly, he calls me a grifter. He doesn't think I have a real job. Key word is content creator. Yeah, yeah, that's what I'm doing. I create content. This is my job. This is my manager. This is my calling. But he came up in the chat trying to run his mouth like diarrhea. You know what I'm saying? So, you know, somebody get that get that man some pep the Bismar or some immoral AD, instead of ammonium AD, give him some immoral AD. He's already, he's already immoral. I mean, he has no morals at all. You'll see what I'm talking about in a minute. But nonetheless, thank you, those of you who have been supporting this channel, we do thank you for that. Also, if you'd like to support the ministry, you can do it by also going to the BCV store. You can go to the BCV store, you can click our link there below at the bottom of the video in the video description, and you can support the ministry by purchasing any of the items that are there online. We do thank you so much for that moderators. Thank you for holding it down. Definitely going to probably need you to handle your business because you do know that people like, you know, the morals, the mob and others, they're going to try to, you know, stir up confusion. We already know we don't pull up with that over here. We'll put you out. Simple as that. You can't comport yourself quarterly, can't handle your business, be respectful, already told him to come up. He didn't want to come up. So maybe he'll have another opportunity. He told me an email and I'll show you all the email conversations. There was one that I would not even to populate, David, but I'll read it. Remind me, Dave, because I know you're watching. I'll read the email that you sent me before I went live and I'll definitely relay that to the viewing audience because again, I want everything to be in context unlike you and others. All right? So let's get this party started, y'all. Thanks to the family and welcome. YouTube family, welcome. Moderators, welcome. Everybody, thank you all for joining. New viewers, thank you for joining. Let's get this party started. All right? Listen. So I was doing some thinking because that's what I do, you know what I'm saying? And I remember the conversation, actually another conversation, the video on yesterday and I played it in the, as a matter of fact, I didn't play the introduction. I played it in the minute. Regarding David Morrill and he was with the, he was a guest on the mob, you know, deal woke Christian and all them people, you know, the ones that basically says I'm in sin, but they don't want to come up and prove that I'm in sin, but I've been telling them, let's come up. I have no problem coming up with them, but they're running. I don't know why they want to run. I'm not going to beat them down. I'm not going to take, you know, do what Christians twinkies from them. You know, I'm just going to basically, you know, just have a conversation, debate them, beat them with the facts and leave them bleeding, virtually speaking. Let them bleed out of their own foolishness, virtually speaking, because they've been, they've been causing confusion and raising the records for so long. And then they have people that doesn't, that don't know what they're talking about. But of course, when you hate truth and when you are an idolater and you cape for a man, that is John McArthur, who supports and finances child abusers and sex offenders and pedophiles and white beaters, what does he expect? What does he expect? So anyway, let's begin with some verses. Okay. Because I want to lay down the foundation. You have people like David Morrill who are liars. They're liars. They'll say that Julie Roy's and myself and others who defend truth and who stand up for the, for those who can't defend themselves. And you're going to, listen, I'm not making this up. I can't listen. I couldn't make this stuff up if I was Tyler Perry, writing the script myself. You're going to see this man in his own words, in writing, in black and white, minimize people like Eileen Gray and others who have been abused and survived abuse. You're going to see it with your own eyeballs. Trust me, which makes me wonder, Cory, this is the people that you were talking about that have the other side of the story that you didn't want to tell me who the names were, what you're kind of already knew who they were, bro. This is who you're writing to it. All right. Well, it is what it is. But check this out. Proverbs chapter 12, verse 22, the Bible says, lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who deal faithfully are his delight. Lying lips, liars, liars, liars. They're known to lie. I mean, if protestia is your standard and your source of information, you do better go into CNN. You do better go into MSNBC. You do better go into the mainstream, lane, street media to get your news, to get your information. I'm telling y'all. I'm telling you. If protestia is your source of info, your resource on where you get truth from, God help you in your discernment. God help you in your discernment. I mean, listen, I'm not even lying to you. God help you because he's the only one who can because your discernment is trash. These people are unreliable and you don't take my word for this. Just look at their own content. Exactly. They won't even cover up the abuse from Grace community church because they know what their bread is buttered at. And in this clown going to send me links that he wrote trying to refute Julie Roy's who's a professional journalist. I do have a seat, bro. Have a seat. Proverbs chapter 13 verse 20, he who walks with the he who walks with wise men would be wise, but the companion of fools will suffer harm. Yeah, these people, this verse fits them perfectly. But the companion of fools will suffer harm. Chapter 26 of Proverbs verse 28, a lying tongue hates those it crushes. A lying tongue hates those it crushes. Do y'all think protestia loves Julie Roy's? Do y'all think protestia has love or Julie Roy's has love for me? Has love for those who defend the abuse? You'll see for yourself that they don't when I drop these receipts in just a moment. You're going to see for yourself in just a moment. They have no love for people like Julie Roy's, myself, and even those of you who have been fighting and standing for those who cannot defend themselves. They will tell you that they do, but they don't. April Chapman don't love the body of Christ. Dilworth Christian don't love the body of Christ. Ricky Karl don't love the body of Christ. Ricky Gantz don't love the body of Christ. proverbial life doesn't love the body of Christ. Ked up truth, don't love the body of Christ. If you don't love the word of God, they don't love the body of Christ. Because look at what they do. Look at how they show it. You would think, yes, it's dead. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm going to talk about that just a minute too, bro. Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up, sir. I'm glad you brought that up, bro. Any teen suicide issue based on your bullying? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. We're going to talk about that in just a moment. Yeah, let's do some self-deleting updates and see if there are any. Yeah, these people are who you run with? Okay, anyway. Anyway, anyway. So those are the verses I wanted us to look at. Because, and I got a couple more, but I just wanted to just touch on one thing for a second. I want us never to forget how all of this stuff started. Okay, this whole ordeal didn't start with me. Didn't start with Julie Royce. It started with those who defend people like John MacArthur, who is an unrepentant sin right now as we speak. And listen, I'm telling you, when I drop these receipts of David Nomorel and JD Hall, you're going to hear out of their own mouths what they think about people who've been abused or what they think about cases, abuse cases in churches like Grace Community Church. Don't take my word for it. I don't want you to take my word for it. I want you to be a Berean, but you're going to hear it. You're going to hear it out of their own mouth and your ears. How these people feel, these weak, sorry excuse for men feel about those who have been abused. Trust me. And what they say, if it doesn't piss you off, I don't know what else will. Because they're going to tell you exactly how they feel about abuse survivors, abuse victims and how long they believe, you know, hey, 20 years, they call those cold cases. I'm not lying to y'all. Listen to me. They called the case of Eileen Gray a cold case. You know what a cold case is? As a matter of fact, Proverbs, can you tell the audience what a cold case means? Can you tell us? Can you enlighten us as a people, the viewers, what a cold case means? Because that is what J.D. Hall and David Nomorell have pinned and have phrased the abuse regarding Eileen Gray and others. Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. I want you to, I want you to, I want you to give the definition of that Proverbs because you being in law enforcement, you know a little bit about these things more than us. But that's what they call the abuse of Eileen Gray. And I said, wow, these people are wicked. But they have the nerve, the similarity, the audacity they call Julie Roy's a wicked woman. I know. Ain't it something, ain't it something right of us? Crazy how non, crazy how non-believers will defend abuse victims over believers defending John McGarver. Ain't there something? Ain't there something? Listen, you heard what I said, Isaac, you heard what I said? You heard me? Yeah, a cold case is an old unsolved crime. Well, apparently the crime has been solved because David Gray is in prison for life. That's right, Nikki. April Chapman knows me, my family personally goes to show just how much people will shoot you down over their idols. Yep. And I tried to help her, tried to warn her and she flipped and she turned and she tried to stab us in the back. Yep, sure it did, sure it did. But anyway, anyway, you would think, right, Atee? If it's a supposed cold case, exactly. If it's a supposed cold case, then it would make more of our point that it needs to be dealt with, right? Exactly, because we are, as Christians, we want justice. The Bible tells us we to pursue justice, not social justice, but biblical justice. And this is a social justice issue, which probably is the reason why they did sign that declaration against social justice. But anyway, that's another topic for another time. That's another topic for another time. No problem, no problem. Let's discontinue on, let's discontinue on. Yeah, later. Later, Kurt W. Peace. Glad to see you. But let's look at some more scriptures. 1 Corinthians 15-33. Do not be deceived. Bad company corrupts good morals. Who you run with? Who you associate with? Yeah. Revelation chapter 21, verse 8, the Bible says. Verse 8, notice, but for the cowardly, and the unbelieving, and abominable, and murderous, and immoral persons, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, you see that? There's a little smorgasbord of sins in here. But notice the first sin is the cowardly. Those who won't stand up, those who are afraid, those who have fear of man, and fear of man rules their life. God says if you're a coward, you're not saved. You're going to hell. You will experience the second death. Hades is just a holding tank. Hell is just a holding tank. The lake of fire is where you will spend eternity. If being a coward is who you are. The unbelieving, the abominable, murderers, immoral persons, sorcerers, idolaters, you know, MacArthurites, fanboys, people like Bible Thumping Wingnut, and others. Yeah. And all liars, protestia, David, no moral, JD Hall, yeah. I would wonder that, too. I would wonder that, too. I would wonder that, too, serving right of mass. When Corey was in prison, I bet all my soups he wouldn't fellowship with pedos, but now he's turning a blind eye to them over subscribers. The mob and preferences, saying, hey, try to give my brother the opportunity to speak up and defend himself, but hey, sometimes silence speaks louder than a verbal offense, does it not? But anyway, yesterday I played the video, and I'm going to play it now, again, for context. Because David Morrow, again, was on Dear World Christians channel, and it was dated. Matter of fact, May. Let's look at the date here. I'm going to read the date. Now I can tell you exactly, because I got the receipt right here. Yes, the state of Christian content on YouTube discussion. It was dated May 7th, 2022, so almost a year, almost a year ago. David, no moral, was on Dear World Christians channel, and he gave his thoughts about public sin, deserving public rebuke, and things of that nature. And he mentioned Julie Roy's name in that discussion. And so what I would like to do, I would like to, of course, we play the video. And in replaying the video, I'll let you, the viewer, hear exactly what David, no moral, said. Check it out. Matthew 18 is very clearly for somebody that sins against you personally. But a lot of public Christian figures use Matthew 18 as sort of a trap. So if you critique them in public, they'll say, hey, why did you bring this to me in private? You were required by Matthew 18 to bring this to me in private. And I told Julie in an email, the last one I sent to her before she quit responding to me, I said, look, public error gets public rebuke, because that public error is affecting everybody that hears it. If I go to you in private and you correct it, and I've won my brother, that error is still out there. That error is, especially in the information age, that error is still affecting everybody. So aside from going to that person in private, and then they issue a public correction, they issue the rebuke on their own, which I'd be fine with. If they're not doing that, everybody else can be protected by addressing that in public. And I think what I told her was public error gets public correction, public lies get public rebuke, some formula like that. But basically, because she complained and said, hey, you've never, before you wrote your articles, you never contacted me. This, that, and the other. I said, Julie, that wasn't a sin against me. You're slandering and you're creating falsehood and false belief publicly. This needs a public response. Right. Did I answer the question? No, it doesn't answer the question, but I'm glad you gave that definition and that principle, because I believe that. I believe that, David. I think anybody believes that who holds to public sin, deserving public rebuke, but here's the problem, here's the problem. You slandered Julie Roy's and you tried to have some type of bombshell story that was going to break and relied on someone who was mentally unstable as your source. Now, what I did, as I thought about that video yesterday and last night, I got up this morning, I said, I'm going to reach out to Julie Roy's. And I'm going to ask her. As a matter of fact, I'm going to send her the timestamp. So that's what I did. I sent Julie Roy as a timestamp of the video, of the entire links. I didn't want anybody to think I was taking anything out of context or anything like that. I did not. I sent the link. I said, go to this minute, Mark. I said, here's what David Morrill said. I said, can you confirm or clarify what this man said and is it true? What he said about you? And she said, what's your email, brother? I said, let me send it to you again. So I sent her my email and she sent me with permission, by permission, by permission. The only thing I redacted in the email was the email address. That's it. And so I asked her for permission to share it publicly. She gave me permission to share it publicly and now I'm going to share it with you, the viewer on the conversation in the conversation that between David Morrill and Julie Royce and you be the judge. Who's lying? You be the judge who doesn't have any character who needs to be exposed. Okay, you, the viewer, be the judge. This is the first email. Julie says this. She says, Seco, I say, go. She says, below is the interaction I had with David Morrill in reverse order. She said, start at the bottom to read chronologically. The context is that David published falsehoods about me based on fabricated information supplied by a mentally unstable woman, Megan Stoner. Morrill even accused me publicly on his podcast of doing quote, unethical end quote and quote, immoral end quote things. And of course, Julie being the beast that she is when it comes to the receipts and being the journalist, she said, I captured evidence and tweeted it. And you can go to Twitter. As a matter of fact, I already have the link at my queue and I'm going to share it in a moment. And so she, she sent me the link and cited it. I went to it and read it. Here's the link here and I'm going to share that momentarily. But that's the link and information right there. Okay. The next, the next message was this. She says, when David finally realized that Megan was lying to him, he reached out to me probably because he was scared at that point that I would sue him, which I could have. When I confronted him for failing to do the very basic due diligence before going public with the allegations, he came back with this crap about public allegations, get public rebuttals. Of course, that's not the issue. I never said publishing something about me as a public figure wasn't fair game. Y'all see the point? You see what consistency does? Julia has never said, you would never hear people like Julia or me if I say something publicly, then it's fair game. It's when you are getting information about somebody and you didn't hear it yourself and you just run with it without examining the fact that Bible says test everything and hold fast that was just true. He says, have nothing to do with unfruit for these are darkness, but expose them. This guy didn't do that. And so he comes back and I'm going to read you the whole transcript of the email. She said, of course, but that's not the issue. I never said publishing something about me as a public figure wasn't fair game. The issue was that he published falsehoods without doing the basics required of a journalist. You see that? And so this is David Morrill's email to Julie Royce Tuesday, May 3, 2022, almost a year ago. He writes to Julie and says, quote, Julie, I appreciate you confirming the fabricated emails. I believe they were quite possibly fake since there were multiple fronts and the text was not left justified. Yet Megan continued to insist that she would provide the actual email thread so we tease an upcoming expose. I'm afraid I let my guard down believing she was an abuse survivor, which I realized is quite ironic. It was only after I smoked her out as a liar and a fraud that I was sure the actual emails were never coming. This sequence of events would be in my article. Know that I would know that I would have contacted you if you had not immediately blocked me on Twitter. You're just lame, weak, trash excuse. I would have contacted you if you had not immediately blocked me on Twitter, but I take responsibility for suggesting I had info that was not yet confirmed. Sounds like to me, David did not do his due diligence, is it not? Let's continue on, shall we? He says I was being lied to, but that's no excuse. And I should have seen what was happening earlier. I'm sorry for that. And I will apologize both in the article I'm publishing today and in the next video I do for what I publicly suggested. You think he did that? Stay tuned. He says you always can reach me at this email and at the bottom he says David Morrill. She responds to him May 3, 2022 at the bottom. Julie Rogers writes to David and says David you clearly had the ability to contact me, but you didn't. Being blocked on Twitter is no excuse. I also have a contact page on my website. You have published numerous articles and podcasts about me without once reaching out that is unethical journalism, ironic given that you accuse me publicly of being unethical. You need to own this fully and publish your apologies on your next article and excuse me, apologies on your multiple social media platforms in addition to your next article and video. Yeah, you know David, you know, like you said, public standard deserve public review. So this public repentance. But anyway, maybe you and Corey hold to the same belief now. Ain't no telling. But anyway, let's continue on. So this is David responding back to Julie. He says Julie, I'll do what I said I do. You also had to have the option of responding to my rebuttals of your articles yet you chose to block me. This is a clear indication you were not open to substantive substantive, substantive challenges of what you had published. Public sins get public rebuked. Do you see this? Do you all see this? He's accusing a woman of sin. But then a minute ago, he apologizes, quote unquote, said that he's sorry and that he's going to correct it. But you accused this woman of public sin. Where? But anyway, let's continue on with the foolishness. Public accusations, he says, get public rebuttals. You hide behind journalistic technicalities. Journalistic technicalities. I'm trying to stop, admit, admit reading of this thing because it's just comical. Let me ask you a question. David, are you a journalist? Where did you go? Where did you go, David, to get, you know, what do you get your, did you get any type of journalistic experience at all? I'm just curious. I'm just asking because apparently, if you have, I would love to see your credits, your credibility, and I would love to see it, please. And I've already told him to come up, but he, he said, no. He said, you hide behind journalistic technicalities while characterizing every statement to lead your readers to your predetermined conclusion. And you have conveniently targeted cold cases. I told y'all. I told y'all. I'm not making this stuff up. It's right there. And you have conveniently targeted cold cases that are obviously wide open to reader confusion. I believe your issue with Grace Community Church and John MacArthur is theological in nature. And you take advantage of the fact that MacArthur's longstanding position has been to not respond to these kinds of allegations, excuse me. He says, I, I, I owned all I'm going to own in writing and will address it the next time I'm on a podcast slash video. But if you think I'm going to back down from exposing the reprehensible tactics you employ or the, or the heretical doctrine you subscribe to, you're mistaken. He says, if you are, if you were truly saved, you will repent of the unverifiable accusations you've made against others. We're still waiting on that. We're still waiting on the unverifiable accusations, David. Oh, I forgot my fault, y'all. He says we can go to his protest website and pull up his protest articles. To get that information, protest to you. Yeah, I'm sorry. Let me continue. Let me continue. He says, if you were truly saved, you would repent of the unverifiable accusations you've made against others just as I have. And you would join a biblical church where mutual submission and shepherding could happen. You have absolutely no business claiming to be restoring the church. Or he says, headlining, let's see what else he says here. He says, or headlining. Where did I go with that one? Let me go back. Hold on. Because that was another one. Let me get that one back. Because that's mine. There we go. Here we go. Yeah, here we go at the bottom. Or headlining. Where am I at? Is it this one? Excuse me. I'm my fault. Let me clear that one out. Where's that? I had it in order. That's mine with him. That's he's with me. Let's see. Where are we at? Sorry about that, y'all. That's his with me again. Oh, I know what it is. Let me go back up. I'm sorry. There it is. Okay. And let me close this other one out. Where is it at? Okay, right here. You have absolutely no business claiming to be restoring the church or headlining Christian conferences outside the cover of a body of believers. This is not just my view. It is the view of an overwhelming number of reputable Orthodox Christian ministries. I continue to pray for your repentance. But until God brings this about, I will not stop exposing what you're doing. So notice, notice, notice. This is called deflection. This is called deflection. And the funny thing about it is he accuses me of attacking and slandering John McArthur in our email conversation that I will read to you in just a moment. What's going on, Mr. Rogers? Brother Anthony Rogers is going on. Man, good to see you. So the interesting thing about this guy, he's quick to talk about people being in sin for slandering John McArthur, but doesn't see how he's slandering Julie Royce and others. And all we're doing is stating the facts. John McArthur has been protecting and caping child abusers, sex offenders, wife beaters, and child molesters for almost 50 years. This is documented proof, documented evidence. Nobody has to make this stuff up. When you have a person like Han Show leave after being asked to do an investigation and he comes back with his findings and tells the church, hey, y'all messed up. We need to do justice. He says, we still have time. There's still an opportunity to do justice. And McArthur tells this man, forget it and then give this man an ultimatum. Well, you don't give men with convictions ultimatums. Because there's nothing to choose from. It's not a hard choice to make. And that brother, God bless him, made a choice because he knew to stay there will make him just as guilty as the men that are there now, not saying a word. But this man right here, David Morrill, you will see again in writing and on video, how these people, how these people feel about abuse survivors. Please don't take my word for it, because I have no reason to lie to any of you about anything regarding this. So let's continue. Where are we? What number is this? Let's see. Is it this one? I think it is this one. Yes. This is my email to him this morning at 11, 22 AM after I spoke with Julie Roiz and told her, you know, that I want to use her comment as a response because this man is clearly lying. Because that's what liars do. They lie. They lie. And so I said to David, you appeared as a guest on Dear World Christians broadcast almost a year ago during your dialogue. You and your colleagues made statements about Julie Roiz and myself that were false and still are to this present day. Since I know Jason, April, Michael, Ricky, Bobby, Ronnie, Ralph, Johnny refused to engage me in a public debate or platform. I've decided to reach out to you prior to responding to your statements on my broadcast and extend you the opportunity to publicly respond to the statements you've made publicly. As you said, public sins deserve public rebuke, right? I plan to address your statements regarding myself and Julie Roiz this weekend, Lord willing, I will send you the link for you to join as a guest. He responds back today at 4 11 this afternoon. And he says, quote, he says, Seiko, I appreciate you for reaching out. I reviewed my statements on the video in question and not only did I not reference you by name, even though many listeners knew who I was who I was talking about and I wasn't trying to hide it. No problem. Let's continue. I million endorsed another video. So if I endorse somebody's video that is slanderous, isn't that? Which leads me to a bigger concern. David says, if you truly believe that my inferred mention of you and your behavior via an endorsement of another creator's video amounts to statements about Julie Roiz and you and you that are false, I have to question your motives. To my knowledge, you have recently quit your job to pursue being a full time YouTuber. And my concern is and my concern is that this may lead to a motive to stir controversy by any means necessary for the sake of YouTube views. Yo, yes, he did. Yes, he did. He said, this is merely my opinion and I'm not accusing anyone of sin. But wait a minute, let's do some logic for a second, y'all. He says, and this is what we call a non sequitur. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand. This is a non sequitur. He says, to my knowledge, you have recently quit your job to pursue being a full time YouTuber. And my concern is that this may lead to a motive to stir controversy by any means necessary for the sake of YouTube views. But then wants to couch it and cloak it as this is his opinion. Okay, David. Okay, bro. All right, dude. He says, however, he continues on. However, your continual drumbeat of John MacArthur, the abuse supporter, quote unquote, remains slanderous. Ladies and gentlemen, how am I slandering them? If you put a woman out of a church because she refused, never mind. He's going to explain it. He's going to explain how he feels about women and men and gender roles in the context of abuse. Listen to me. I don't have to make this stuff up. These people make it up as they go for me. Let me continue. He says, however, your continual drumbeat of John MacArthur or J. Mack and the abuse supporter, quote unquote, remains slanderous, as it is based on both gossip. Here we go, y'all. And roundly discredited hyperbolic claims from progressive so-called survivor advocates. Lord Jesus, let me hide behind this thing because I can't. I can't. I cannot. I cannot. I told y'all. I told you. Did I not tell y'all these people are wicked, hyperbolic, progressive, so-called survivor, so-called, so-called. Yes, he said it. Can y'all imagine? Listen, listen, listen, listen, listen, listen. Listen to me, y'all. Can you imagine someone in your family going through what Eileen Gray went through, what Wendy Gray went through, what's her name? She calls her name Jane now. What these women went through, these young teenagers have gone through, the young lady who had to jump out of a moving car. But according to this clown, he says that my John MacArthur, the abuse supporter, remains slanderous as it is based. Notice, y'all, look at these concrete indicative terms. He says, and it is based on both gossip. How would he know this? How would he know this? Let's continue on. On both gossip and roundly discredited hyperbolic claims from progressives so-called survivor advocates and progressive, and he has, in quotes, Christians who believe contrary to scripture on gender roles. What does gender roles, what do gender roles have to do with a woman being beat and their children being sexually assaulted? Somebody help me because maybe it's me or is it this clown who's slower than cold syrup when it comes to what's right and wrong? I'll take the ladder for 500, Alex. And if y'all upset because I'm clowning this clown, then get off my channel because he's about to get all this work. This is why he won't come up. These people are cowards, these people are cowards on the strength on steroids to call people like Eileen Gray and others who we have yet to probably know until John McArthur's off the scene until God takes him out of here, hyperbolic claims. I can't go any further than this right now. I need y'all to feel what that sounds like. And this is who Corey Miner is rocking with. Let that sink in, too. Let that sink in, too. This is who is in Corey Miner's ear, the mob. David Nomorell. These are the people who is in this man's ear. God help them. And it is based on both gossip and roundly discredit the hyperbolic claims from progressive so-called survivor advocates and progressive Christians who believe contrary to scripture on gender roles, among other things. My claims about Julie Royce from that video are simply summations of the multitude of articles and videos I have produced over the last, oh, he's the source, y'all. See, he's the source that he's produced over the last couple of years. But you were wrong in this one. But anyway, she is on record on video supporting women preachers, egalitarianism, which was my main comment about her. You were referenced only as an unnamed topic. Even if she was an egalitarian and she's not, she believes that women can teach in the local church, but she does not support women pastors of any kind. And I will read it in her own words. I've read it before, but people like David Nomorell, the Bible calls them fools. They don't delight in understanding. They only delight in their own mind and what they think, what they believe. He says, if you have substantive disagreements with anything I've specifically written or said, you are clearly free to address them publicly in speech or writing and you are certainly free to address them at this email, which I'm assuming Julie gave you. I won't be camming up to address non-specific concerns or allegations of sin. You said something false. If I say something false, that's a lie because all wrong doing is sin. What if we people are troopers? See, again, slow it and co-serve. Slow it and co-serve. Let me continue on. I won't be camming up, he says, to address non-specific concerns or allegations of sin. You said something false for what I believe is merely trying to drum up controversy to generate YouTube views. You see that? Ladies and gentlemen, the fourth member to Trinity is in the building. David Nomorell himself, fourth member to Trinity. He knows the hearts and minds of people like myself. Yeah, yeah, that's him. And so this is what I said to him. I figured you wouldn't cam up. Typical, LOL, shaking my head. I said your actions would be comical if not sad how people like you take delight in bullying women and those who aren't able to defend themselves, but when you're being challenged by men who aren't intimidated or afraid, you tuck tail and run. Tell you what, David, I'll cam up on your platform then. That way you can feel safe and not be intimidated by another man virtually. As far as me quitting my job and reasons that precipitated it, I thought there were only three members of the Godhead. Since when did they become a fourth? I'm trying to see something. Lastly, regarding your callous and inconsiderate attitude toward abuse survivors like Eileen Gray, Wendy Gray, and others just further reveals your lack of love toward fellow image bearers, which makes me wonder whether or not you're a true follower of Christ. If you believe, I continue, if you believe I'm making slanderous statements about your idol, John MacArthur, then challenge my claims in a public debate. I have enough evidence and receipts to support every claim, do you? The challenge is yours to accept a decline. Given the fact that callous like you only thrive in echo chambers, I know you won't. And then he responds back today at 548, which is why I had kind of started my live a little bit later because I was prepping and gathering up these receipts and he kept bringing more confirmation to what I was saying. And he says this, he says, I probably should have known better than to think you could have a material conversation. Alas, I would give it one more try. You claim people like me, quote unquote collective guilt, delight in bullying women and those who aren't able to defend themselves, generalized, non-specific accusations with no evidence or gossip. You claim I won't respond to your challenge. What do you want? I will repeat myself. You have yet to issue an actual challenge. A challenge is specific. He says a challenge is specific. And so far, you've offered nothing specific. You lied about me. It's no more specific than you sinned against me. Name the sin, bruh. So he thinks that saying bruh is going to be something that I'm just going to be triggered by. But see people like him, see it's people like him that wouldn't survive in the hood trying to pop off and trying to be smart like that. They wouldn't make it. He continues on and says, you claim that I have a callous and inconsiderate attitude towards abuse survivors like Eileen Gray, Wendy Gray and others. This is a heart judgment. My attitude has been and remains to find out the truth. You hear this? Do you hear this foolishness? My first article on this stated again, I have no interest in undermining Eileen's testimony or that of the kids. Do I need to go back to the other email? Do I need to go back to the other? Thank you. Thank you. Be great. Straight cap. Straight cap. It's amazing. See, let a fool talk. You know, tell them themselves. Just let them talk. Let them talk. They will tell on themselves. I promise you they will. Let hold on a second. Hold on a second. Let me see. Which one is this? Is this this one? Yeah. Now, remember what he said now? First, he said this. First, he said this. Right? However, your continued drumbeat of J. Mack, the subdued supporter, remains slanderous as it is based on both gossip and roundly discredited hyperbolic claims from progressive so-called survivor advocates and progressive Christians. So-called. So-called. Who believe contrary to scripture. So in other words, they deserve to get beat? According to you? So what? My wife is a woman. I'm a man. That gives me the right to beat the hell out of her? Just asking. Does that make it right? Beat the hell out of her. Race hell in the household. Be a hellion. And because of a man, that's okay, right? Because she's less than me according to the gender roles. I'm just asking. Just asking. So-called, y'all. So-called. He says, I have no interest in undermining Eileen's testimony. You just called her so-called abuse survivor. Nor in devaluing the pain and trauma David Sin undoubtedly brought to their lives. And I'm just gonna let y'all hear this whole lie and cap that this guy makes. Him and JD Hall. He says, I'm not close enough to- I'm not close enough to any of this to judge any of the most pertinent issues. So then why are you running- So then why are you attacking Julie? Anyway, let me- let me continue on. You might know this if you were willing to do any investigation at all regarding the people you are accusing. Frankly, he continues. Your emotional challenging is embarrassing and unbecoming for someone claiming Christ. Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black? You're slander. Once again, you're slander against John MacArthur. It's very simple. You have ad nauseam accused of supporting abusers and supporting abuse in his church, a claim I and many others have debunked at length with evidence that is widely available. I can't- yo, it's his stuff. You- bro, you a liar. Why would I believe anything you have to say? Why would anybody have to believe anything you have to say? Let me come up. Let me come up, bro. Look, first link, protestia. Second link, protestia. Third link, protestia. Fourth link, protestia. I wanna know, are you a journalist? Matter of fact, scratch that. We wanna know, are you a journalist? We wanna know. He continues on and says, there are several more articles demonstrating her dishonesty, the theological acts she is grinding. Maybe that's where Kara got it from. Anyway, in her attempt to ingratiate herself, notice all these motive terms. Notice, fourth member of the Trinity stuff. Her attempt to ingratiate herself with the abused survivor crowd while being an unrepentant spiritual abuser herself. He said, let's try this. You start with one substantial point, and any of these of those articles, you have evidence proof again, not ad hominem smears like calling people cowards. Well, you are a coward. I gotta call you what I see, as I see it. Cowards, bully, et cetera. Outline it right here in email and assuming it has any validity, whatsoever, we can debate it publicly. No, we can do that right here. We don't need to do no more emails. No, no, no, no, no. You need to be quick on your feet. Let's get it. He says, we'll see if your shallow character attacks and emotionalized white knighting can stand up over my 13,000 published words on just this issue. Given how you called me a coward and a bully who idolizes John McArthur despite several published articles quite critical of him and GCC, I wanna see an article of you calling him to repent for kicking a woman out of the church. Let's have a debate on that on Matthew 18. Let's have a debate on what church discipline is. Let's have a debate on is an abuse survivor who has suffered abuse. Are they grounds for excommunication? Let's talk about that. David, you don't want this smoke. Stop it. Just stop it. He says, again, you'd know this if you were willing to do any research at all. It should be no problem for you to focus on a single falsehood I have promoted regardless. I've been focusing on your falsehood so much. I got catalogs of y'all stuff. I mean, come on now. Really? Stop it, dude. You're embarrassing yourself. He says, should be no problem, right? I'll cam up on your channel to debate this or any other topic you want if you can lay a glove on one point I made. I want you to come on the channel. I don't need to write it. I don't need to write anything else to you. Just come on. Cam up. Bring your information. And what I got to hit you with, you're not gonna come out of. And that's the fact. I said, protest the articles. This is your evidence? Stop it, dude, please. Why don't you stop with all of this back and forth and challenge my accusations publicly? Trust me, I have no problem challenging yours. All I need is a simple yes or no. Other than that, engaging you via email instead of face to face is another cowardly attempt people like you are notorious for. I'll await your response. In the meantime, have a live cast. I have a live broadcast to prepare for. Thanks for the email though. I'll be sure to mention it when I discuss your lies. Peace, coward. Now, as promised, he did email me another one. I didn't have time to state it or post it here. This was at 6.06 PM. He said, I wrote the articles. You do know that, right? Yeah, yeah, we know, unfortunately. I did the research. Okay, I made the claims and I came to the conclusion. I'm not, I'm not making, I'm not making this. It's, it's, it's right here. It's right there. Look, I wrote the articles. You see that? I wrote the articles. You know that, right? I did the research. I made the claims and I came to the conclusion. Dismissing my claims because they are made in articles is like saying, I don't accept what written form, I don't, I don't accept what you've said because it was on YouTube and not in written form. Stupid, right? I'm willing to believe you're smarter than that. I'm not asking for you to write an article, just one substantive challenge here in an email and I will gladly come up with you. No, you need to just come up. You need to just come up. Just come up. What do you have to lose other than more respect that you don't really have anyway? So that's, that's, that's so far what I wanted to share with y'all in that regard. Okay. In that regard. Now, let me, let me also share my screen. Because I want you to see just some other, some other receipts. Okay. And I'll try to remember to put these in the description link below. Now here, as you can see, state of Christian content on YouTube, this is where he was. This is the date, May 7th, 2002, right? This is where he so-called tried to recant his statement, quote, I almost got conned by an abuse survivor. No, you did. You did. Then he says, what you're about to read should serve as a warning for anyone working to navigate the current ties of hot button issues and evangelicalism, especially the emotionally charged issue of sexual abuse. About a week ago, he says, I was in touch. I was put in touch with a young woman who claimed to be friends with Julie Royce, the information she gave me, being cited on Royce's podcast, doing political work, being known within the so-called victim community all checked out. You hear what he's saying? He says, she had been willing to allude to some of Julie Royce's supposed bad behavior publicly, despite the risk to her job and her relationships at our new church. I told this young woman that I'd be happy to talk with her about her experience, and she responded with terrible allegations. And you see the screen shots here, the text there. This sounded almost unbelievable, David writes. Yet the woman followed up with more circumstantial evidence, sharing screenshots of emails purporting to show her inexplicably losing the free housing Julie provided for her to attend Julie's restore conference the next month. And you see all that there, right? So far so good, he says, yet the woman didn't seem interested in exposing what she knew in a public story. No problem. I have other things to do. A couple of days later, and after some other qualifying chit chat, she messaged. You see that there. David continues, knowing from the prior conversation what the story was about, I began working on an article. The only thing missing was the emails proving what she was claiming. She began the signal conversation by saying she expected, quote, full confidentiality, quote, which I agreed to later clarifying that I agreed she could back out of the story if after it was written she was uncomfortable with it coming out. I made it very clear that this special consideration was contingent on her being entirely honest with me. He says, and you see all that here. The email discussion proved, notice the email discussion proved that Julie was encouraging this young lady an abuse survivor to sling allegations online with no regard for her truthfulness. Yet in all of my time reading Julie Roy's this seemed brazen, almost reckless. Very different from the Julie I knew. Do stop. You don't know her anyway. Sure, with what she had written about her relationship with Sarah, quote, unquote, recently coming under scrutiny, I knew such a blind lack of awareness was possible. But this seems too good to be true. Julie's website is the digital embodiment of, quote, it is not the nature of the evidence. It's the seriousness of the charge, end quote. And what these emails showed fit my view that Julie uses her sources and witnesses as journalistic human shields. You see these accusations? So remember he so-called apologized to Julie, right? In the email. This is supposed to be a post apologizing for him slandering her. But notice what he's doing. Still trying to make her look bad to make himself look good. He continues making sure any pushback, especially legal pushback, against what she publishes ultimately entangles her sources rather than herself. Yet these emails didn't pass the smell test, you think? You think, David? The formatting looked odd, but sometimes mobile screens can do funny things. I informed my source that I was ready to publish on Monday and reminded her that, although I had prepared a redacted anonymous version of the story, enterprising internet sleuths would certainly figure out who she was. Obviously, Julie would know immediately. Yet, yet the story was true. I probe. She must obviously still be brave enough to go through with this. I sent her a rub draft with names. Then she later, the later one redacted after she claimed that she needed time to figure out how to proceed. And that, excuse me, if anything comes out now, I'm going to be fired. She says she worked for a state governor. I continue to push her, do the right thing, suspecting that all was not what it seemed. She began to malign my motivation. So you see this? At this point, he says, I needed proof she was lying and proof of what she was lying about. And already teased the publishing of this information and now I had witnesses who was unreliable at best or quite possibly fabricating the evidence she proved she provided. She had broken the terms of my promise to keep things confidential. So I arranged for one of the screenshots to be released anonymously on Twitter for a small amount of time, targeted at a Twitter account I knew she would see, but few others would. Almost immediately, she began texting, calling and messaging everyone she could, hysterically claiming that her boss, the governor, had been made aware of the tweet and was going to fire her. So you see all this? Let's just continue on now. He says, at this point, you may be wondering why I'm not revealing the identity of this con artist. Simply it is because I believe she has serious mental and or emotional problems that need professional help. And I'm not convinced that revealing her identity here would aid the process. As far as Julie Royce's concern, he says, I remain convinced, notice, I remain convinced that her journalistic technique is reprehensible and motivated by false doctrine. What does that have to do with any of the reports that she has made? You see the deflection? Debate and switch? The gaslighting? He says, and while she clearly was in contact with the one, with the young woman in this article, I believe one of the emails I was sent between Julie and this woman is legitimate. And nothing that I was sent demonstrates Julie had done anything wrong. In fact, the emails showing the woman's housing for the Restore Conference becoming unavailable seemed perfectly reasonable. I would have done the same thing. We reached out to Julie last night to confirm what we already suspected. Do y'all see this? The smoking gun emails were fake, but he put the stuff out. Yet he continues and says, yet I eluded to an expose near the end of a recent podcast and in social media posts claiming I had yet unknown proof of Julie's misdeeds. I was led to believe that the actual emails were coming and was too trusting of my supposedly abuse-surviving source. While I was simply the latest target of this woman's con, it was wrong of me to get ahead of the evidence and I have apologized for this to Julie via email. And so it is just showing y'all that this guy, and then you have here corrections and retractions, stories that he messed up on that he says he had to catch the ale on. Right? And here you have Julie Roy's showing here. This is the same email, this is the same video that I played earlier. And I will play it again just for record. Let's see. I said at the very, at the very beginning that we have some more information coming out about Julie Roy's that I'm hoping to have out to you by Monday. But suffice it to say, it's going to blow up the facade of Julie Roy's as an ethical investigative journalist. We have some information about some very unethical, I would say immoral, but certainly unethical things that Julie Roy's has been caught saying and doing and promoting that we're going to be caught. We're going to be releasing this information, hopefully by Monday. So stay tuned to protestia.com for that information. I want to thank you all. So he has nothing. He has nothing. This next article here, The Watberg Watch 2022. Julie Roy's or JD Hall and David Morrow. Who are you going to trust? Now, remember I told you all some of the content in these videos, the slamming, the disregard, the attacks of Julie Roy's and protecting John MacArthur by both of these clowns. You about to hear it. Check it out. We're going to talk about our favorite yellow journalist, Julie Roy's, who has published a hit piece, another hit piece on John MacArthur. I don't know. Let me ask the question. I really don't. This is I'm going to go out on a limb and say five years old. Older. Keep going. Yeah. 10 years old. Older. 15. Almost there. 20. There it is. 20, 20 years old. 20 years old. She's digging up something. Yep. You and I were in college 20 years ago. Yep. It's something. It's something so old that when I started to do research to verify parts of the story, it was near impossible. Even with the it is so old that when this happened, John MacArthur could still do a pull up. Yeah. I just want you to hear the callous, the disregard. So because it's 20 years ago, they don't believe it matters. They don't believe it matters. Nothing to them. And whatever. So what? 20 years, keeping 20 minutes while they care. It says as highlighted above in the Rachel Dallander, then hollering to excuse me, quote, many abuse victims do not want to ever talk about what happened to them. Others may not talk for years for a number of complex reasons. This is why states have discarded statute of limitations laws on sexual abuse crimes. In Roy's article, she gives the reasons why she gives the reason, excuse me, she is writing this article 20 years after the abuse occurred. And we all know the story because she had waited for her children to grow to grow up, become adults. But they're not done. They're not done. They're not done. They continue on. This is an actual example of yellow journalism. And when you got to go 20 years back, I'm going to call this a big fat nothing burger with a side of feminism and also a dipping sauce of who gives a crap. Yep. And they continue on. So it looks like as a result of a church discipline, marital, abusive, maybe situation going on with with Grace Community Church members that was handled by some other elders, the resulting video was MacArthur. This is back at Versailles. Yeah. This isn't even MacArthur in particular. This is the vicariousness of it. He's this is other elders who handle other elders seem to be from what I can tell from the story. The primary doing the primary interaction with this married couple, again, 20 years ago, who knows. But then the video is of John MacArthur behind the pulpit basically working the church discipline process, the public, you know, with the whole church part of the church discipline. Based on this off of what it seems to be what he's being told by his other elders. Yeah. And what probably what he could have possibly known about what was going on. Basically, it's as a hindsight kind of an issue as far as I can tell, because the husband who, I don't think they could verify he was being abusive was convicted of actual abusing against his children and is now in prison. He was thrown in prison in 2005 and he's still there. And so she's looking back and saying, well, the church didn't report this as they were supposed to. And they didn't believe the wife, although as far as I can tell, she may have at least had some summary responsibility. For all we know, there were jurors that didn't believe the wife. Right. I mean, there were enough that they threw with it with when she reported it and he was indicted. And I mean, it was enough that he was convicted. I don't know the details of the trial. Which is like nine out of 12. But for all we know, there were jurors who didn't who didn't believe. So notice, notice how they just dismissed the fact that David Gray admitted in writing, gave his confession to Kerry Hardy that was in charge of the quote unquote counseling and then also tried to dismiss these two clowns, tried to dismiss responsibility for MacArthur who nothing happens at Grace Community Church without MacArthur's approval. He stood there. He facilitated it. He put this woman out. He refuses even now to this very day to apologize to this woman to this very day. Yeah, exactly. These guys don't know MacArthur at all. Exactly, exactly. That's what I said. They're idiots. Straight up fools. Ms. Hillary said, this is what you call hypocrisy. David Morrill is dodging the issue at hand. He claims Seiko is slandering when in fact David Morrill is covering for his idol, John MacArthur slandering Julie Royce and Seiko. Facts. But wait, you thought we were done? Here's what California lost in. In California, for misdemeanor matters and felony matters, a criminal defendant has a right to a jury trial. That right is espoused in the United States Constitution under the Seventh Amendment. In order for a person to be convicted of a crime, all 12 jurors must unanimously agree on the decision of guilt. If the jury, after hearing the evidence, has 11 people in favor of guilty but one in favor of not guilty and that person does not change their mind, that's called a hung jury and as such, the person will not be convicted. Oftentimes, you can get a hung jury, six guilty, six not guilty and many times those cases will not be refiled. Now, I just wanted you to hear that because again, these are the people that are defending and caping for John MacArthur and at the same time, these are some of the people that the mob are defending and caping for. Yeah. He continues on. And by the way, what she Julie Roy's is a good microcosm for what we don't want you to be as a listener to pulpit and pin. And the insults continue. Stinking nut job. I hope that Julie Roy's, she married her husband needs to have a parapet on the roof and just, I hope he camps out out there. As a matter of fact, let's do this, David. Let's research if Julie Roy's is married and if so, let's send him a Coleman tent for his roof. Okay. I'm sure she's married. Tell Cheyenne, Cheyenne will get the address and send him a Coleman tent in the mail. Yeah. Poor guy. Like this is just to give you a break. This is it, you know, everybody needs to go out. We are worried about you. We're worried about your, your, your menopause trauma. Yeah. Twama. Very real. It's a twama. Where are all the menopause trauma counselors? That's what I want to know. Well, and you can see by, by every, every fact that's, you know, delivered the way that it is in this article where, I mean, she says one of the pastors here who is, who is doing the marital counseling between this couple has an MDiv from the master's seminary, but no professional counseling credentials. Of course, the assumption is if you're pointing out this fact, it must be relevant even though it may, it's probably not. Well, let's see what, how do you feel about those who self cancel themselves? Mm-hmm. This is what they did with the police who were involved with George Floyd as well. There was no evidence from that at all that race was a factor, but because the, because the, you know, victim, if you want to call him that, was black and there were white officers. There were actually mostly multicultural officers involved, but because it was a white guy involved. Floyd, well, Floyd was a victim. He victimized himself. Yeah. I mean, anytime you dope yourself up with fentanyl and kill yourself, and then, and then act unruly, then yeah, yeah. He's a victim. He's a self victim, just like a suicide. I hate the term suicide victim. It's a super, you're a suicide perpetrator. You're not a victim. If I was king tomorrow, suicide, people who commit suicide wouldn't even be allowed to have a funeral, but. Now says the person who, who's a drug addict himself, who went to jail, and who's ministry, uh, para ministry, protested, they were moral in them, tried to cover and tried to defend. This guy on the right, JD Hall is so bad, so horrible, that his own church had to put him out. His wife had to bust him. That's how, that's how horrible that this man is an abuser of his wife and children. He's a druggy and tried to blame it on everybody else, except himself. But you want to, you want to mock George Floyd? You're no different. Only difference is, George, you didn't, you didn't, you didn't resist the police. So-called. What makes you better than, than anybody else? But this is, this is the callousness, but of course, he would feel this way about suicide because, you know, he was responsible for the, for the suicide of Brandon Canner. Yeah. Brax, excuse me, Brax and Canner. But we'll, we'll continue on in just a minute. Uh, one more. Yeah. But I did find it funny that Julie Roy's had, and I don't know if you saw this while you were fighting your fights recently. She had none other than Kyle J. Howard on a podcast to talk about racial trauma. I didn't, I didn't catch the podcast, but I caught that, that he was on her program to talk about racial trauma. It was hilarious. Yeah. Did you, did you listen to the podcast? I listened to it as long, but I couldn't stop laughing. And so I just turned it off. He said he's, he's, he's like a, there's not a single one of his stories, same but this way. I have never heard one of his stories of racial trauma that have even come close to the realm of substantiated. It is all anecdotal. There is no evidence for any of it. And this is the woman who's giving credence to a 20 year old controversy at Grace Community Church. Right. I mean, I don't think she really understands among logical thinking evangelicals that do any sort of research at all how much that damages her credibility. She's going to have Kyle J. Howard on to talk about Wastletwama before she goes after John MacArthur. Now notice these two guys mock the speech impediment of another man. Okay. Don't, don't forget that. Don't forget that. The, the, the mock, listen, I don't cover Kyle J. Howard too much, but I'm not going to mock how he talks, especially in the, in the context of dealing with abuse survivors and abuse victims. These two clowns don't care. I mean, they just don't. It's obvious. Now, this guy on the right, JD Hall, he should have been removed from being a pastor ever since he was responsible for the suicide of this young man, Braxton Canner. This will, this will always live in infamy with him. Something about this pastor, blogger, radio host, talking about him has been accused, accused of cyberbullying in the weeks since the death of by a suicide, by a suicide of a Texas teenager, you said in a lengthy confession read to his church on Sunday, the controversy has left him crushed and broken. You're right. You would think he would have stopped doing this, right? Nope. On July 2nd, Hall wandered on Twitter while Canner's 15-year-old son Braxton was posting make-up pics and profanity on social media. Four weeks later, according to an online medical examiner's report, Braxton Canner ended his own life in an upstairs bedroom of his home in Alito, Texas at 6.54 pm on July 29th. Hall initially defended the original post in a brief exchange of tweets with the teenager saying it was relevant to the father's ability to lead in his own home. Later, Hall said he regretted pointing out the teen's online behavior, calling it a distraction and admitting that he should have contacted Canner privately. But this guy says people who self-delete themselves shouldn't get a funeral. What believer, you know talks like that. I'll wait. I'll wait. I'll wait. If you have not watched this video, I would encourage you to watch it. This is the Jordan Hall story. Service Christie, he did an excellent job an excellent job on exposing JD Hall. Here's a description of the notes. Quote, Jordan Hall, founder of protestia and poor pen and pen was recently found to be disqualified from ministry by his church for a purported Xanax abuse. While it's true that he is a Xanax addict and has been lying about it for a long time, they deliberately withheld this mysterious incident that transpired on June 5th, 2022 which was the real reason for his disqualification. It is so much worse than what you were told. The corruption is real. The cover-up is expected and the abuse is absolutely disgusting. And he has the full story at the bottom. Here's the full story and what they are hiding to protect Jordan and themselves while falsely hiding behind Matthew 18 and a fear of gossip. Fellowship Baptist Church in Sydney, Justin Peters, Chris Roseborough, Phil Johnson and all who have aided and abetted Jordan Hall over the years and have remained silent now share in his shocking sin. I have warned this madman since 2018 and many others tried and warned before me as predicted Jordan Hall has been his own undoing. But but he says not before stumbling many. The righteous judgment of the Lord has fallen on this wolf who has plagued the church with lies and has plagued his own family with untold hardship. May God be with his wife and children in this time. Police reports included. Yeah. Police reports. You know same kind of police reports and documented evidence that Eileen Gray and them have but these two clowns talk about oh 20 years ago they're just 20 years ago. See demons, wicked men. No good. Trash. Garbage. He has the links here. I would encourage you if you had not if you have not watched this I would encourage you to watch it. It is worth your time. Yes. It is five hours long but the other one I would highly recommend the death of the sermon. This is eight hours and 26 minutes long. You may have to watch it in parts. That's fine. I did and I was I was deeply. I was deeply appreciative of what this man, this brother did. He says let's see. Let's read the notes a little bit here. The death of the sermon this is August of 2022. The death of the sermon often comes through those who profess the exercise where favoritism partiality exists the sermon necessarily dies and God's providence and arguably in his judgment upon them and their followers if they continue for the hypocrisy the reform camp and many who are connected to John MacArthur have become the unofficial spokesman for all things the sermon. Like those like Justin Peters Phil Johnson of Grace to You Todd Freel of Wretched Radio Chris Roseboro fighting for the faith the Bible thumping Weenut and others have formed a network of deceit whereby they speak of discerning truth from error while actively dealing death blows to the sermon for the sake of self preservation and self advancement. They are storing up judgment for themselves and if you do not depart their company even virtually you will find yourself corrupted by their bad company and receiving of their plagues as well. After their friend and ministry partner JD Hall was recently and unsurprisingly found to be a drug addict in Bezler yeah that means thief he's a thief too yeah he's a thief wife beater yeah he was that too and child abuser yep that too this is who this is who David no moral kicks with yeah this one this guy JD Hall has since been kicked out of the church he once deceived due to his failure to repent of his abuses and deceptions he remains defiant in the face of some of the worst sins imaginable none of these men have addressed any of these updates while this affords a clear window into their corruption it is actually much deeper as I have been warning for quite some time service says when their friends commit atrocious and gut-wrenching evil they look the other way unless they are forced to do some kind of damage control for PR reasons yet they spend their time critiquing those who aren't their friends as though they were modern-day prophets in a sense they are modern-day prophets modern-day false prophets every false prophet thinks he is a true prophet and purports to be so Jesus said of them you are noted by their fruits and so on these men habitually bear wicked and rotten fruit and call it good while reveling or reviling those who hold them to account for their corruptions they join the ranks of their spiritual fathers men like Ahab or the Pharisees and Matthew 23 who shut up the kingdom of heaven against men in the name of God making their converts twice as much the sons of hell as themselves and these are in 11 part videos here again I would encourage you to to watch it to watch it all all of it in its entirety you will not be disappointed you will not let me give you a sample of it this is about David no moral now the co-publisher of protestia the man who takes pictures of people's homes and sends anonymous letters went on a rampage apparently on twitter did y'all hear what he said he's talking about David no moral he docks the woman you know kind of like what Phil Johnson did docks the woman took a picture of their home and and and publicized it let's go back he needed an editor right his now now the co-publisher protestia the man who takes pictures of people's homes and sends anonymous letters went on a rampage apparently on twitter after the police investigation was published by myself and and some others he was trying to intimidate people into silence here's what he here's what he he'd go into bat for his friend the wife beater and child abuser drug addict etc etc how many things do we want to list here releasing investigation documents to the public is generally illegal without a court order okay it makes sense otherwise a person doesn't make sense actually because it's stupid and it's wrong otherwise a person could simply make a false report to the police and the investigation document could be spread around to smear the accused ah so he's implying that perhaps Jordan Hall's wife Mandy is a liar the woman who got beat now now he's saying maybe she's lying about him nice nice David do you hear this this is how wicked these people are these people are wicked there's words fail words fail me to to to describe how trash and how weak these people are and yet nobody wants to talk about it these these these people they don't want to hold MacArthur County because they're just as guilty as he is in case the obvious violation of privacy and immorality of this kind of of this kind of thing isn't obvious allow me to demonstrate this from Montana law well buckle up for a for a law lecture Montana code 44-5-103 defines confidential criminal justice information to include criminal investigative information okay an initial offense support defined blah blah blah okay so he's he's just goes on to claim this is wrong this is confidential information furthermore anyone in possession of confidential criminal justice invest information is according to Montana 44-5-303 assumes equal responsibility for the security of the information making everyone who shares it equally legally liable says David Morrill I hope it makes sense why I would warn people privately that what they were doing is was illegal I suspect a person harmed by this kind of illegal disclosure might very well be preparing a lawsuit against every person who spread such confidential information as I've said repeatedly I do not know what happened two states away but such a flagrant violation of the biblical spirit of innocent until proven guilty that's laughable coming from them via this kind of smear is both sinful and illegal this woman Amy Smith says David Morrill sent me a direct message last night trying to intimidate me about JD Hall and his recent police reports in Montana initial police reports are public record here's what he sent to her I noticed that you claim JD Hall was charged and shared information shared images of Sydney PD confidential investigation documents which is a lie they're not confidential wanted to let you know that he has not been charged that may be true I can't speak for what she wrote but he says if she said he'd been charged I guess that wasn't technically accurate wanted to let you know that he has not been charged and based on insider info I believe it's unlikely he will be oh now he's got insider info beyond that dissemination of the documents you shared is actually a crime in the state of Montana again that's what happens when you get a law degree at Toys R Us apparently I'm afraid you're wrong about the police investigation documents being public record I'll fill in the details in an upcoming article can't wait to read it David but I resent being accused of trying to intimidate you Amy I was merely informing you privately instead of publicly because I thought we were friends well I think David Morrill's got his hat on too tight he might want to tell the chief of police that he broke the law again I read this in the beginning here it is again get him public records request from the chief of police of Montana it is the Sydney it is the policy of the Sydney police department to provide public access to records in a manner that is consistent with the Montana constitution and public records laws Montana code annotated defines both public criminal justice information and confidential criminal justice information 44-5-103 a section David Morrill has read but failed to understand apparently definitions MCA the attached information is what this agency has determined to be public criminal justice information case closed buddy any requested information that was not included in the following attachments was determined to be confidential criminal justice information and cannot be released by this agency if you have any questions please feel free to contact me respectfully Mark E. Kraft chief of police so David Morrill apparently contending that the chief of police doesn't know the law in Montana and broke the law also he could protect his abusive friend Jordan Hall some of the responses to David Morrill this dude is scary and a little crazy glad you called him out on his threats yes he is scary and a little crazy that dude is a major yikes says another commenter this person says I almost feel like JD is in the background talking to protestia about our posts and telling him how to respond you think according to insider info suddenly David Morrill has insider info another person Christine Paak says JD and David Morrill run the protestia site together so yeah that's what's going on just wanted to play a portion of that you all can go to the website I'll put the link in the description below one of tonight if not no later than in the morning depending on what time I finish here but you can go to the website go over to his channel death of discernment service christie the Jordan Hall story service christie you haven't seen it I would encourage you to watch it in its entirety may have to watch it in segments but watch it none the less okay now let me say this I don't know I'm hoping he's okay I need to I need to check and follow up on him and see if I can catch up with him yeah I don't I don't pay attention to people like Montana Viking he's a clown he's a clown people like them they don't they don't have anything that's why it would never come up they none of them none of them so anyway I I'll give it to him in just a minute if someone else that has not yet because this also affects the gospel and how people see christianity when we have this type of wickedness this type of sin this type of cover-up this mindset that it happened 20 years ago and and and since it happened 20 years ago then it doesn't matter because it was in the past well I definitely to believe the bible has a lot to say against that a whole lot to say against that let's look at the scriptures shall we Genesis chapter 49 Jacob is about to about to die but he summons he calls his sons to him to let them know to prophesy to them or what is going to happen to them he's going to talk about their life things that they've done and how is it going to affect them going forward this is uh this is the issue okay well let me just stop for a second give me a minute is mb is mb mb is 07 here if he's here let me let me get him to acknowledge his presence here in the chat mb are you here is mb in the chat if mb is in the chat then we can we can uh I will present the the message to him right now so mb let me let me ask you a question what brings you here do you believe what brings you here is because God and his sovereign providence wanted you to hear the truth and that he uses the means like this channel and others that present the truth and present the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ in a way that if your heart is open and if you are teachable and receptive to the to the message and you turn from your sin and repent you can be saved number one recognizing that you have violated the law of a thrice holy God there's nothing that you could do even on your best day to be pleasing to God why because all of us born of Adam have a sin nature all of us born of Adam are separated from God all of us born from Adam and born in Adam have a relationship with God that is not that is not positive it is a negative relationship in other words the wrath of God abides on those who do not know him we were dead in our trespasses and sins Ephesians 2 tells us we are dead in our trespasses and sins Romans tells us that all of us have sin and fallen short of the glory of God Romans 6 says the wages of sin is death but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord so what we have done we have earned the wages whereby we can spend eternity inhale if we do not repent if God has given you the opportunity to hear this message today the writer Hebrew says today if you hear his voice do not harden your heart and the message is this that Christ came to this earth he lived a perfect and sinless life he fulfilled every righteous requirement that God demanded in his own body because man apart from Christ saving work can never do it we were never born perfect we're imperfect we were born in sin we love sin that's why we always do what is the strongest pull in our nature is to sin but when you become a Christian when the spirit of God comes into the soul and he changes your nature you have a new heart you have new affections you see things differently it doesn't mean that you're not going to sin but it does mean when you and I do sin we know that we have an advocate Jesus Christ those who are not Christians those who are not saved cannot have and cannot call upon Jesus to be on their behalf or to speak on their behalf why? because they have not placed their faith and trust in Christ but you if you do that tonight if you place your faith and trust in Christ then you can be saved you will be saved it is a promise in fact let's look at some scriptures just a second we're going to look at Romans 10 and we're going to start in verse in verse verse nine verse eight excuse me says but what does it say the word is near you in your mouth in your heart that is the word of faith in which we are preaching that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead you will be saved that might be saved you will be saved for what the heart is where begins Enby for with the heart a person believes resulting in righteousness and with the mouth he confesses resulting in salvation for the scripture says whoever believes in him will not be disappointed for there is no distinction between Jew and Greek for the same Lord is Lord of all abounding and riches for all who call upon him for verse 13 for whoever will call upon the name of the Lord will be saved that is the word of God that is the gospel message if you believe this and you don't and you don't doubt what God has said in his word he says you will be saved it's not based on the feeling it's not based on how many bumps you have going up and down your your your arm or your you know how many chills you have run up and down your spine no no you can know today you can know today that you belong to Christ if you believe what he has done on your behalf it sounds simple but it is so profound it's simple to understand it if God has opened your eyes but it is profound once you have opened your eyes and you realize what Christ has done and what God did by sending his Son and not only sending his Son but now sealing you with the Holy Spirit Ephesians chapter 1 verse 3 blessed to be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places just as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world that we would be holy and blameless before him in love he predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to himself according to the kind and tension of his will to the praise of the glory of his grace which he freely bestowed on us in the beloved in him as in Jesus we have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of our trespasses according to the riches of his grace which he lavished on us in all wisdom and insight he said the Bible says he made known to us the mystery of his will according to his kind and tension which he purposed in him with the view to the administration suitable to the fullness of the times that is the summing up of all things in Christ things in the heavens and things on the earth in him also we have obtained inheritance having been predestined according to the purpose to his purpose excuse me who works all things after the counsel of his will to the end that we who were the first to hope in Christ would be to the praise of his glory no verse 13 notice verse 13 in him you that is you NB if you believe this you after listening to the message of the truth this message of the truth is what I just presented to you and others who may listen to watch this you after listening to the message of the truth the gospel of your salvation having also believed you were sealed in him with the Holy Spirit of promise who is given as a pledge of our inheritance with the view of the redemption of God's own possession to the praise of his glory that is what God did that is what God has done for every one of us who has placed our faith and trust in Christ and I hope he has I hope he has done that with you if you have truly placed your faith and trust in Christ then you are in the family of God and let me just say this to you the Bible says that there is rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents just one don't even need a lot just one that that means that salvation is an individual thing there are many being saved but the Bible says heaven rejoices the angels rejoice they rejoice over one sinner who repents let me let me read to you Luke 15 in verse 7 he talks about the lost coin the lost sheep right notice he says what man among you if he has a hundred sheep and has lost one of them does not leave the 99 and the open passion and go after the one which is lost until he finds it when he asks found that he lays it on his shoulders rejoicing notice rejoicing and when he comes home he calls together his friends and his neighbors saying to them rejoice with me for I have found my sheep which was lost verse 7 I tell you in the same way there will be more joy there will be joy in heaven over one over one sinner who repents then over 99 righteous person who need no repentance it's always the one it's always the one so so MB if you have place your faith and trust in Christ I pray that you have then brother I welcome you to the family I'm pretty sure others will and have not have already welcomed you as well too and people are telling me to scroll up in the chat so let me let me do that is this the message I want I want to place my trust in Jesus Christ and confess and believe he died for me and that's all that matters and that's and that's what and that's it that is it if Christ if Christ has has has saved you you are saved you are saved and there's a transfer they have taken place you don't even know it but in the spirit in the spirit realm there was a transfer that took place you've been transferred from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of his beloved son Colossians says and this ladies and gentlemen is what it is all about oh no brother we said we supposed to we supposed to listen y'all do understand y'all do understand that angels they're rejoicing but they don't know what salvation the salvation experience looks like they don't know the writer Hebrew said that they look they intently look at I mean they don't know I mean they see people being saved they had it rejoicing but they don't know what it's like to be redeemed they don't know what it's like to be regenerated the text says the angels long to look into this process into this thing called salvation redemption conversion justification sanctification yes David Morrill this is the purpose of the pastor seco's channel not grifting yeah but it is what it is and now yeah and now what you need you need a bible you can you can see you can download the bible app you can do all that so let's let's let's equip him with the resources online to get him the information that he needs and and then also if you can email me so we can probably try to help connect you to a local fellowship so you can so you can get connected to a local fellowship you don't want to get just get saved and not be and not get sanctified get clean staying clean staying accountable being with other people of like-minded faith it's like a new baby now you need to be you know you get you need to get careful you need to get the milk then you get the milk of the word and then ultimately and gradually progress to the meat but right now you need to be fed on some milk yes and get one get a real one to hold in your hand yeah exactly yes it is a process this absolutely yes it is exactly no no one no one the bible says the earth is the lowest and the full is there of that's what my bible says I don't know about nobody else's bible mine says the earth is the lowest and the full is there of so let me ask you all this are we are we done with this with this this this David moral thing are we good because I you know I got some more but I can I can shut it down off of that but I can just tell you Genesis 49 is it was a day of reckoning and a day of accountability for the things that the sons of Israel did the 12 the 12 sons of Israel or not 12 because well yeah 12 sons of Israel what they did and their life then we also talk about the judgment seat of christ the judgment seat of christ for those who think oh this just happened years ago yeah we all gonna have to stand before judgment seat of christ and give an account for what we've done so let no one fool you David moral JD Hall none of these people they just show you that they don't take sin seriously what they take seriously are their own image and protecting and idolizing those that they worship that's what it takes seriously but I want to read one one section then I'll wrap this up because I want to make this sure this is on record and as promised I need to read this this this chapter in Julie Roy's book because she has been accused of being an egalitarian and she is not she is not we can differ on the roles of men and women in the church but she does not embrace egalitarianism and for people to say that as a lie and David moral is a liar so I want I want to just read this section and then we'll wrap it up but I want to make sure this is on record this is from her book redeeming the feminine soul you see the title at the very top redeeming the feminine soul and in her in the chapter three this is in chapter three of her book she writes quote a sacramental understanding of marriage and family has profound implications for sex roles in the church again instead of focusing on what men and women can't and can't do we need to discern the answer to the larger question why did God ordain different roles in the church for different genders you see this an egalitarian don't talk like that why did God ordain different roles in the church for different genders as I mentioned earlier she says complimentarians historically have based distinctions in men's and women's roles in the created order as Genesis clearly explains God created man first and then the woman this order appears significant because it is reiterated in the New Testament as a basis for sex roles for example in 1 Corinthians 11 7-8 the apostle Paul instructs women to cover their heads while prophesying or praying but not men because man was not made from woman but woman from man again in 1 Timothy 2 to other 14 Paul states that women should not exercise authority over a man because Adam was formed first then Eve however complimentarians rarely mention men's and women's distinct symbolic functions as a rationale for sex roles in the church this symbolism though is implicit in the New Testament text namely that the church is a family with both mothers and fathers in 1 Timothy 3-2 for example Paul says that an overseer in the church should be the husband of one wife then he adds he must manage his own household well for if someone does not know how to manage his own household how will he care for God's church clearly Paul regarded overseers as fathers and saw consistency between a father's leadership in the home and a spiritual father's leadership role in the church which is God's family Paul assumed his paternal role himself referring to the Corinthian believers as quote his beloved children end quote and writing I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel so it seems that our symbolically important roles in the home have corollaries in the church do y'all see this are y'all listening to me are we are we are we still tracking together in the chat I want to make sure everybody is seeing this because this is the accusation this is the accusation oh she's egalitarian well let's let's see it's because so far doesn't sound like it and I've talked to her personally and know that's not true but she continues just as men uh oh just as men should serve as fathers in the home men should serve as overseers in the church let me run it back again as men should serve as fathers in the home should we as men should serve as fathers in the home should we just as men should serve as fathers in the home men should serve as overseers in the church this isn't because Julie says women can't preach teach or lead or are deficient in some way. It's because men and women have different and equally critical symbolic roles. Men are the fathers of the church. Women are the mothers. Both are necessary. Both are God ordained. Neither is interchangeable. If you like this video, please share this video. Please share this video. Please like, subscribe, share. Hit the notification bell. Please let people know about this channel. I would really appreciate it. Let people know about the content that you have heard today, what we do over here at the BCV channel. Please, if you don't mind, if you don't mind not trying to grift, but if you'd like to support this measure of finance, you can do so by clicking the links in what is tickered across the screen by utilizing the resource and donation information below through Venmo, Cash App or Zail. This is what helps us to continue with our ministry, continue to take care of the responsibilities and the costs that incur here. Since we are full-time content creators, that is a job contrary to what David Morrill says. I create content that is a work. The labor is worthy of his wages. That's what the Bible says. If I have sown spiritual things to you, should I not receive physical or carnal things or material blessings from you, it is a give and receive. It is a win-win for all of us. So, if you would like to support the ministry, nobody is twisting your arm, but if you'd like to support the ministry finance, you can do so by clicking the donation links below as well. Again, body lifers, you can do that as well by allowing and making this ministry a part of your regular contributing and regular support for this channel and for the Love, Life and Marriage channel as well to BCV. Merchandise are below at the bottom of the video and also tickered across the screen. You can support the ministry as well by supporting and purchasing our merchandise. It helps us as well to continue on with the ministry that God has given for me to do. We praise God for what he has done tonight. I know I do. And Father, we just thank you for this day. We thank you, Lord, that we pray that Brother M.B., his salvation is made secure. His calling and election of you has been made secure as well. We pray, Father, for those who may watch this video, those who may hear what has been said, we know that the gospel is not chained, that the gospel is able to save those whether they're in a church building or whether they're watching a message that is being streamed across the internet. We ask and pray, Lord, that your will will be done in the fairs and the lives of your people. We pray, Father, for other content creators who are striving to produce and to make godly content for the furtherance of your kingdom and for the edification of souls that have been called to you. We ask, Heavenly Father, that you will bless those of us who have ministry such as this, that we will not grow weary and well-doing, but we will reap if we do not faint. We also pray, Heavenly Father, that you will continue to use those who have a heart and a mind to support people through the prayers, through encouragement, through tangible expressions of love and gifts as well. We know that is how the body of Christ comes together to help one another. We pray, Father, for those who may be sick, those who are in need of healing, those who need encouragement, we ask and pray, Lord, that you will bring someone in their lives as well to be the hands, the feet, the mouth, the shoulder, and, Father, just the presence of others to be able to come alongside and to support us. We thank you, Father. We thank you for what body life truly means. That body life is not just a cliche, but it is a culture because you've called us into one body, but many members. And so, Lord, we thank you. Bless our night, the remaining portion of our night. Allow us to sleep well. Allow us to rise by your grace and by your power and by your mercy that we will be able, Lord, to fulfill the mission and the purpose you have called us to do as ambassadors. We pray and ask this in Jesus' mighty name and all for his sake. Amen. All right. So that is my time. Thank you all so much for yours. Thank you, Facebook family. I appreciate you all. Thank you, moderators. Thank you for holding it down as well. We do appreciate it. And it is a blessing to be able to be your host and your speaker for tonight. So you all have a great and blessed weekend. And y'all know the drill, whatever you do, do all the glory and honor of God. God bless. Thank you for sharing this night. God bless you. Good night.