 All right, well, let's call this meeting's order. So the first thing is to review and approve the agenda. I think we had one. Right. I just wanted to add that we had a very short discussion about our summer. Great. Any other changes? So we don't actually consider the agenda approved. So general business and appearances. So this is a time for any member of the public to address the council on a topic that is otherwise not on our agenda. And if you would keep your comments relative in brief, that would be helpful. So if you come to say your name and where to go. Back again, Marie smart notes. We'll see you up on Scribner Street next month on that affair. Two things I just wanted to ask if there was any more conversation about the crosswalk on River Street. And then the second thing I wanted to let people know that I have contacted Colin O'Neill over at the rightsville reservoir where they have the disc golf course. We've nailed down a date where we're going to have a tournament there in the third week of October. I've contacted hotels to find out if that's a slow weekend for them so that we can fill those. I've contacted a marketing company in Montreal and I've contacted a marketing company in Boston. Our goal is to have this start out here and I'll pay your live is on board and I've got a meeting with them next week. If you don't know already, Vermont has the highest ratio of disc golf courses in the nation. If we want young people to come here and see this nation, this country, this state, we've got to get young people here. Colin is also building one in Norwich University and he's got two more, one for Berry City and one for Berry Town. 31 years of marketing and sales. I picture in five years that we have a four day tournament similar to a professional, but we don't want professionals here. They don't spend money. You've got to pay them to come. We want young people and we want novices and it's best held in the fall after the leaves are down so that they can see the course. And then I'm also going to be talking to the local bars and breweries because I picture having a different brewery sponsor each hole and see if we can have them a tasting site. And then when you expect to have fans, I have a five year goal that we're going to be bringing about 30,000 people into this city for this in five years. And I hope they're all under the age of 30. But over 21 for that. But then the other thing is I want food trucks there and eventually camping and maybe we can have it in all four of those locations. And central Vermont will be known as a drawing card for young people. And suddenly they see, wow, wouldn't it be great to be able to live here? Maybe it'd be great to invest here. So I have a reason to come back every year for this. I'm passionate about this. We need to get young people here. And both my sons are 28 and they're down flatlanders and they said to be the first ones to sign up. And they'll bring both bring a four summer. So I've already got eight people caught. So just on your first point about the question about the crosswalk. So just so you know how I'm thinking about that, there have been a number of requests that we've gotten for speed bumps in different places and other crosswalks in other places, even other than that. And so one of the things that the Office of Transportation Infrastructure Committee is taking on right now is if we want to add traffic, traffic calming or those kinds of changes, what's the process to go through. And so my hope is that we can get a process from them in the near future and then run all these kinds of requests through that process. And so we haven't forgotten, there just may be a process to it. And then the second thing about the disc golf tournament as a fellow lover of disc sports, I'm very psyched to participate in your next course. And I did speak to our manager about the pilot program. So I was really pleased to give that information. Thank you. And we did look at you didn't for your specific request to be. Sorry. Anyone else. Okay. Moving on to the consent agenda. We have a motion. So moved. Second. And no one wants to go on anything. Awesome. Okay, any further discussion? I'll try to say aye. I opposed. The tax increment financing. Hearing. So we should. Yeah, we're going to open the hearing. I guess we'll start with. If you have any things you want to add or kick us off here with. And then afterwards, if there are other further comments from the public, then. We'll start with that. As someone once said. Sorry, I didn't have time to write a short letter. I wrote a long one instead, I think, but lucky for you, I have made this presentation very concise at the urging of your management. So. So I'm just going to dive right in. You know me, Stephanie, Haley with Whitenberg real estate investment advisors, we've been counseling the city since last July on the. By ability of a tax increment financing district and then preparing the application that will go to the state. Just a quick refresher because it never hurts to hear what Tiff is one more time and also because the public is listening. And this is a public hearing for the purposes of education, continual education and tax increment financing is a funding mechanism intended to catalyze private sector development. And to do that it is the city's investment into the public infrastructure that is acting as a barrier to that private development. And the way that the city pays for the infrastructure is not through the use of taxes on the base, but rather using the new taxes that are generated by the new development projects that come about as a result of you taking away the barriers. So it is this cyclical cycle that happens with cyclical cycle. All right. All right, we're starting strong. It is a nice cyclical tool that ends up using a portion of this state education fund taxes that would not have otherwise occurred if the city did not make the investments into the infrastructure. So but for the city making the investments that the public can use and that will catalyze the private development, these things would not otherwise occur. With that in mind, what we did as a team was to work with city management, some of the city council, local stakeholders, property owners, and Montpelier Development Corporation and Montpelier Alive to pull together a list of all of the infrastructure barriers that were really posing a problem for private developers who wanted to make their projects happen but have been stalled for years. We all know that the cost of development in downtowns is really high and the additional infrastructure barriers based on aging infrastructure or problems that have pre-existed maybe even that property owner's ownership can add to that cost and make it unfeasible. It does not pencil out. So as we worked together as a group, we came up with this boundary for the TIF district in the orange. That is our proposed TIF district. It connects the east and the west sides of the downtown core to incorporate the housing parcels out at Saban's Pasture and Vermont College of Fine Arts and also the downtown core. The green line that you can see there is the designated downtown so the TIF district is almost entirely within that and the purple line is actually collinear on the northeast corner there. Hard to see but that purple line is the growth center boundary and we are entirely within the growth center which was an important distinction when we were trying to bring this application to the state and as you know the process is to get this approved and bring this through the city council but also then it needs state approval from the Vermont Economic Progress Council from VEPC. So this is our district and within that district we have identified eight different infrastructure projects that would catalyze nine, we have nine technically within different phases, private development projects. So starting from east and moving west there are two housing projects that have long been talked about along Berry Street at the Vermont College of Fine Arts and Saban's Pasture. They are in desperate need of the infrastructure along the Berry Street corridor but both the utility work and road transportation improvements including the roundabout or the intersection I should say of Berry Street and Main Street. The granite sheds which are number four on this list are on this map are along Berry Street underdeveloped underutilized parcels that could be redeveloped into commercial and or housing projects but they also have brownfield issues. So with some assistance from the state assistance through TIF those could be mitigated and those parcels could be developed into more robust and higher value parcel private development parcels. Moving downtown there's the pit which would then if there was infrastructure assistance with the sewer and water lines there as well as the intersection traffic signal the Vermont Mutual Site might get redeveloped and the state and Governor Davis lot would also could also see some more further development if there was improvements to the infrastructure. And then finally at the core of the downtown is the Capital Plaza project. Capital Plaza project is has been worked on concurrently alongside this TIF district development since the TIF was reauthorized by the state and that project has been developed with a partnership in mind with the city to help with the parking problem. The parking shortage and the cost of structured parking being quite a burden on the cost of the project. There's also price church housing at this site that also needs affordable housing and needs parking and there are other uses in the area that public parking would help to incentivize other development. So a parking garage that would serve lots of uses downtown is one of the possible options. Again I use the word possible and could because this is simply a menu of options that doesn't commit the city to anything at this stage but gives you the option to use this if the tool is approved. Bullet point numbers. We are projecting if everything was done in this district which we don't expect would happen over the course of 10 years a lot of things can change and evolve but if it did happen $7.8 million of infrastructure investment just using TIF but that also leverages additional funds through state match and federal match with some of the projects through that infrastructure investment we could see a $66.5 million increase of the grand list and incremental new property value over the course of the next 10 years that's the investment period that you have to do the infrastructure and then the incremental taxes gained over the next 20 years will be used to pay down the debt service for that $7.8 million infrastructure. That's the high points. You have all the materials in front of you within this TIF district plan. We have to put together the TIF district plan because it is a comprehensive document that really explains more than I was able to do in the last five minutes but puts together all of the background data for how we came to these assumptions. They really are assumptions in our model that it's not perfect and we know that those are likely to change. As these projects become more granular and crystallized, the city council will have in front of them a development agreement before any project goes forward where you would look at the numbers in more detail. But we put together those projections. We've also then packaged this up into the TIF district plan for you to approve. All of that gets wrapped in another blanket that gets sent to the state for the application. That application includes more data so that the state can get more familiar with your specific community. Why do you need this? I should mention that the TIF districts exist across the state. They are authorized to be used in St. Alvinsbury, Burlington, Hartford, Bennington. So, Montpelier is not unique in using this tool, but there are a limited number of spots authorized by the state for this particular use of this tool. And this would be used in conjunction with lots of other tools to make these private infrastructure, private development projects catalyzed through public infrastructure. We plan on applying to the state within the next week, in which case pending decision on this TIF district plan tonight, and hopefully be heard by the Vermont Economic Progress Council Board this summer, so that if the city council chose to go forward with a bond vote, you'd be prepared to do so with TIF in your pocket for the November vote. That was what we were working toward. We're on track for that timing. But again, right now, this is just an authorization of the tool. How long? Seven minutes, something? Okay. Good. Any questions? I just want to, I received a lot of questions about this, and I had an opportunity to ask my questions, but I'm just going to ask them so everyone who's here and everyone who's watching can hear. So just to be clear though, so if we approve TIF right now, we are not wed to any of these potential projects. So we're not wedded to a parking garage or the housing projects that are proposed in there at all. Those are all separate things that would need to come before the city council for it. Absolutely. Okay. You guys will always ask lots of good questions along the way. Yeah. This is good. And you improved the maps. Right. I got the mapping, the mapping line. Thanks to Glenn. Yeah. This is good. And I documented all this process in our package to the state. So they know, and they've got video and minutes and they get to see that the municipality has been brought along throughout this entire process, but knowing that you get to have further conversations at further meetings. Further questions? So I will just say that the piece we need tonight is a resolution that there is statutory requirement for specific action to be taken, which is why the resolution is so specifically worded. We are also asking that the, I get a little bit technical here, the original taxable value that is the existing tax base within that district that you saw that let those lines, every parcel has been identified in a table called table five H that gets certified today by the mayor and by the assessor to say, this is our baseline. Going forward, everything is built off of that baseline. So between that and the resolution, that's all we need to make. So this is also time for the public to ask questions. So if you would like to. We have no idea at this point that this vote just authorizes a district tool to potentially be used. If, if there were a public private bond vote, obviously we would know the numbers and release them, but at this point we're not even close to guessing. So we don't know that there's going to be a bond. The, the goal was in order, if the city chooses to work with capital plausible parking garage, which we publicly owned would have to be, if we use 10, they want to get started by fall. So we would need to be on board. So that one of the reasons for the timing of this application was to allow that opportunity if we chose to do it, but there's been no. I mean, you know, obviously, I'm not trying to play coin. I mean, obviously, well in advance of a warrant bond vote, and they would be vetted publicly and discussed here. We just, we're not there yet. We're not there yet with discussions. Sam working on Cherry Avenue. A couple of questions. One was there was an early slide that had a couple of different numbers on it, but they seem very different from each other. It looked like it was talking about bonding for about $8 million for the infrastructure. And then it talked about an increase of $66 million and new property value, but that's not value to the city. That's value to individual owners that couldn't be taxed on. My question is if the city bonds for millions of dollars, the comment I believe was that the incremental change increased taxes on the new development or increased value would that make the bond payments? But wouldn't that be extremely back loaded because you can't tax it until it's making money. It's already been built. So how are the bond payments made for the first 10 years or would have to process it? Sure, it's a great question. There's a table that has this kind of mapped out really specifically, but it has to do with cash flow. So you're right that the cash flow of that 66 million, that property value doesn't all hit in those first few years. So there are first few years, but ultimately the tax taxes paid on the 66.5 over 20 years pays off the debt service of the 7.8 million initially. There will be initial years of cash flow where there's not, you don't have a perfect match, but over time that's the whole point of a district is that the money continues to go into the pot over the course of 20 years to pay down that debt service. June, explain before that how you back loaded in your initial money so you can make the payments, which I think is Sam's point. Can you explain that to him because I can't localize it? Yeah, so there's 20 to 30 years of bond debt service payments based on that investment. And you start retaining cash flow, it depends on what bond you use, a 20 year or 30 year, and you start using that retained incremental tax revenue to pay down those debt service payments every year. But those debt service payments aren't 7.8 million every year, they're maybe 300,000 a year at certain times depending on what you've bonded for. So I don't know if you're getting at the initial gap, is that your main question or is it just about gross? Because in gross? The initial gap in how the debt is serviced before any of this. So the city would have to do cash flow management. I think that's the short answer. We either borrow from one of our other funds and we do it in a full transform. Is the tip a thing that makes that different than any other bond that we'll pay back? Because now you get to retain also a portion of the state incremental taxes. I think that's the key factor, is that anything finance to tip of that new revenue, 70% of the school tax also goes into tip fund, which wouldn't happen for normal grantless growth. And my second question was about the certification from the mayor as to the section of the grant list within the borders. Is the assumption that any increase in the risk value of those properties would be due to the tip as opposed to what happened anyway to the growth of those that haven't any way separated from growth, that it's going to be different? That's a really good question. So it isn't separated. If anything new from this point forward goes into the tip fund, and the point, the reason for that is the assumption that a lot of this catalyzed, this is a lot of infrastructure catalyzing a lot of different development. Maybe there's stuff that would have happened otherwise. But, you know, somebody was already planning on redeveloping their property in a year. But as you do this as a district, you do that in order to make sure you have enough money to pay your debt service over the course of the 20 years. And ultimately all of that money, if there's a surplus, goes back to where it was, both the general fund and the state. But that's used to pay down that debt service just within that portion too. It's not the whole city. It's a very small portion of the whole city. What percentage of the value of the grand list is within the board? I have that somewhere. It's really small. It's in terms of, do you mean in terms of grand list or in terms of acreage? Grand list, all right. I can find that number. It would be the original taxable baseline value. Is that right? It's going to be $9,276,900. That sounds right. Sounds good. The PDF doesn't match. That's 10%. That sounds about right. In terms of value. Acre twice is tiny. So if 70% of the taxes that would be paid on that new development goes to the city to pay off its debt, how does the state make up that 70% of the money that would normally be in the education fund? Do they have to raise the property tax on everybody who's doing taxes now? What you're getting at is a great question that is the heart of TIFF which is that these would not otherwise happen if it weren't for this investment. So the state education fund is not giving anything up because it wasn't going to happen anyway. That wouldn't happen to as desirable a manner. I would add that all the taxes that the state is collecting right now, they will continue to collect because this is the portion that we are using to pay down debt service for public infrastructure is just the improvement on the property. So they're not getting any less money. Arguably, they are going to get more money just over time. In the meantime. In the meantime. So it's basically the rate would be paid at the same value as it is right now and then anything above that we would retain the 70% and the state would get the remaining 30%. They're probably getting 30% of the new revenue. Okay. So the assumption is that taking this parking garage as an example. That would not go forward without to applying that same. Okay. Great question. Any other questions? And we will put these on the website as well. These are good FAQs. So I'll be on the website. All right. I guess with that, then we will close the public hearing and so at the end of the attachment to this item, there's a resolution that to pass motion about that. The agenda format is very blurry. If you go to it from the agenda, it's the very last few pages, but the spacing is kind of strange on everything. It's hard to It is the last two pages of the attachment online. It's below the page. Oh, if you go to the agenda and click on this item, it says download I again. It's like yes. Oh, tricky. Sorry that it's tricky. You got it. You got it. Okay. Do we have to read it out? Can we just pass the resolution? I don't know your rules. Yeah. Perhaps perhaps we should just because dotting I see as people haven't had a chance to see it. Do you mind? Okay. It says resolution and I think it's a critical tool for the city to have in its economic toolbox to provide revenues beyond normal municipal revenue sources for those infrastructure improvements that serve the proposed TIF district and are essential to enable and stimulate development or redevelopment within the district provide for employment opportunities improve and broaden the tax base and enhance the general economic vitality of the municipality, the region and the state see 24 VSA 1893 and whereas for the city of Montpelier to remain a healthy and economically vibrant regional center it must continue to make substantial public investments that encourage private investment and development in the Montpelier community and whereas a tax increment financing district will provide the city with the supplemental funds necessary to make public investments that enable beneficial plan development and redevelopment provide for employment opportunities improve and broaden the tax base and enhance the general economy of the city and whereas the city of Montpelier is responsible for developing and maintaining all public infrastructure and facilities necessary for the continued success and development of its downtown area and whereas Montpelier will be economically strengthened through continued improvements to public infrastructure and facilities and private investment in property development and redevelopment and whereas new real property development and redevelopment would not likely occur or would occur in a significantly different and less desirable manner without the use of tax increment financing and now therefore be it resolved that pursuant to 24 VSA section 1892 a the city of Montpelier city council hereby finds expressly that the creation of the city of Montpelier TIF district as shown on the map attached here to as exhibit A in which proposed public improvements as described in the city of Montpelier TIF district plan represent improvements which could not occur without the availability of TIF district financing as a tool and but for the availability of TIF district financing the city would not be able to make these improvements that serve the district and related costs which in keeping with the purpose of tax increment financing as described at 24 VSA section 1893 will stimulate development or redevelopment within the district provide for employment opportunities improve and broaden the tax base and or enhance the general economic vitality of the municipality the region and the state and be it further resolved that the city council establishes the city of Montpelier tax increment financing district with boundaries as shown on the map attached here to as exhibit A which map shall be recorded with the office of the city assessor along with this resolution and be it further resolved that the city council pursuant to 24 VSA 1892 hereby approves and adopts the city of Montpelier TIF district plan concurrent with the TIF district financing plan attached here to as exhibit B which plan shall be recorded with the office of the city assessor along with this resolution and be it further resolved that the city council authorizes the city manager or his designee to submit the full application for the city of Montpelier tax increment financing district to the state of Vermont economic progress council with this resolution representing the city's positive vote to establish the city of Montpelier TIF district as delineated on exhibit A and its pledge to reserve 100% of the incremental city property tax revenues received from properties within the Montpelier TIF district towards the retirement of the TIF debt incurred and be it further resolved that the city council pledges that a 100% of the incremental city property tax revenues received from properties within the city of Montpelier TIF district shall during the legal life of the district be allotted allocated solely towards the retirement of the debt incurred pursuant to the approved TIF district plan stated today in Montpelier. Well done. Thank you for indulging me. I would move that we adopt the resolution that the City Council and just read from . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .