 My name is Herbert Burkert. I'm the president of the Research Center for Information Law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland. There is a way in communication to allow for access to contents itself, but not to meaning. I think this is a very deep observation. I think it was by Dana Boyd. A very deep observation on human communication, which is not only always about communicating, but also about creating groups, finding your identity in self-formed groups. And it's also about inviting people in and keeping people out of communications. I found this very interesting. Privacy in the way in many European countries is being understood as a sort of co-determination about what happens to information, personal information. But also if you take the other side, what happens to government information in the context of freedom of information and access. And the problem here again is that information technology tends to give an advantage to those who are already in power, although it's not absolute, but it is an advantage. And the mechanisms we have in our constitutions for sharing power are not prepared to deal with this informational advance power has today. And this is something I think that needs renegotiating on various levels, social communication, but also for me my background is constitutional law, something that has to be addressed by constitutional long discussions. Lena Bo Bardi designed this recreational area is in a way that left a lot of space to what people actually want to do without prescribing it to them. The whole area is an offer to the population in the area. It is of course also at the same time, to some extent, if you know about her life and about her feelings and her opinions. It's a statement about what she thinks about the relationship between work and recreation. So there is a statement of her, it's not just an open space, but it is sort of kept back so that it could be filled by whatever the people bring into this space.