 When you say you tweaked a few things at first, the second half, can you be more specific or...? Yeah, we were just a couple of positional movements in terms of our build-up play and also without the ball. They tend to do the same movements all the time at the ball. We weren't sure, we haven't seen much footage of them. There were talks that they might play it back through or back for, so we saw the way they settled and then some of their movements. It was just making sure that we were in the right position, particularly in our pressing moments and also with the ball as well. We needed to positionally change a few things too. Marco Cassini, Yankee playing him sort of more wide. What's the reasoning behind that one? He's a great athlete. He's a fantastic 1v1 player. Do you think he might... Sorry, do you think he might be better, potentially as a 9? He plays well. Yeah. We played with two 9s. Our balance was better with him at wide. And there's nothing fine for him. If you've watched his games, particularly all the rules in the last season, that's what he plays. So he's willing to do whatever he takes. He's worked extremely hard, Cassini, Yankee. He's never had a full-proof season, so we guide him through the pre-season. I mean, that hasn't missed a beat. Every single session, he's fronted up. He changed his mentality as well. I know there's a lot of talk about Cass, but Cass has missed a lot of games in the last four or five years. And we value him highly at his football club. And so we put together a program for him. Extremely professional, very intelligent young man. Like I said, he'll do whatever he takes. Whether we play two up front or one up front. And the team, more generally, does the performance need to lift for next week, do you think? Based on that, are you going to get a result next week if it doesn't lift? That's the plan. I mean, we put a plan together to try and win every game. But like I said, they'll take a lot of confidence away from that. You know, three points will be very solid, very solid defensively. Everybody understood their roles and responsibilities. The energy was there. They worked extremely hard for each other. And like I said, a very professional performance. Niko put him virtually a complete shift there. We hadn't seen that too many times in the league the last year or two. Was that always the plan to play him late to deep in the game? Niko's a special footballer. I think there's a lot of talk in the off-season about him. He's very determined to make people eat their words. It's fantastic. The more it's said about him, the better. Because he's very motivated. It's a new list of life for him. He's starting at zero again. So there's a lot of talks from around the player. So he's a 30-minute player. I think he shot a lot of people up today. That's only the first game as well. He's only going to get better and stronger for us as far as I'm concerned. He's still one of the best, if not the best 10s in the league. Good win as the gentleman mentioned. But every moment wasn't too convincing. How are you going to assist it with the boys for next week? Knowing that victory will be a strong opponent, they did show that to Sydney last night and they'll be hard to beat. We weren't convincing? Well, you got the win. But there were moments with the errors crept in that you won't want to do that to victory next week because they'll be a strong opponent. Every team is going to have its moments. I don't think anyone is looking as convincing as what you said. Even victory didn't look convincing. They considered two goals last night. Could have been a few more. Sydney had a lot of chances against them. So I'm not sure what your question is. We're at home, we didn't consider a goal. Barely got a shot on. Lawrence Thomas didn't have a safe to make. I thought for a first up game where no team is going to look convincing at this stage of the season, I thought we were one of the best looking teams in round one. And I'm not even being biased.