 Ah, good evening! Good evening everyone. You're very welcome. Thanks very much for joining me. Just looking at all those comments coming in again. I'm going to be looking at the comments quite a bit tonight because I want to have a bit of interaction with people tonight. Then in case we're out, we're 7th February. I want to talk tonight about cancel culture in general, but very specifically about Bristol. Tonight we're going to cover quite a bit of Bristol. I'm going to be interacting with the comments tonight. I'm going to be looking for volunteers tonight and I want you to volunteer in the comments tonight because this is something that we really have to do. The situation in Bristol is quite a serious one and I'm being very understating when I say quite a serious one. It is extremely serious, but it's part of a wider cancel culture and a very, very much bullying culture and bowing down to bullies. I loathe, loathe, loathe bullies. I loathe it and probably the only thing worse than bullying is coutering to bullying and that is what we as a country are doing. We're bowing down to bullies. Joe Rogan. I know you'll all know this is a bit of a fracas going on, fracas, involving Joe Rogan at the moment. I'm not a podcast fan. I don't say away from social media as much as I can, to be honest. But this guy has a huge following and he's been going for, as I understand it, about a decade or so. He came under fire for having guests on that were, I'm worried about what to say here as well, that were speaking outside the mainstream narrative on COVID and all of a sudden, oh, you must have balance. He must have balance and he actually, again, I'm not familiar. This is my first introduction to him. He said, after a couple of, they may have been big in the 60s or something, artists said they wanted to, he's got his podcasts on Spotify and these people were saying we're going to withdraw music from Spotify if you allow this guy to continue and they wanted him off because he had non-mainstream voices on COVID on his podcast. This has sort of ramped up, but he, then after that, after a couple of artists from yesterday decided to withdraw their work from Spotify, he went on to say that he was sorry and that he would try to be more balanced. Isn't it interesting how people on social media, if they bring in a non-mainstream voice, are required to be balanced, but in the mainstream media, which is all only one narrative, there is no requirement for balance. Nobody is offering a spot on the BBC to Vernon Coleman, for example. So balance here, no balance over here. His first mistake was essentially backtracking and apologizing for that and saying, I'll try to do better. Now they have gone, I'm going to say they, I mean the bullies, the press, the left-wing press, the left-wing artists, all of a sudden, all these celebrities are suddenly jumping up and down about things. They didn't years ago. This didn't happen not that long ago that celebrities were trying to outwoke each other. Now they are constantly trying to outwoke and bullying and picking on and trying to silence and censor anyone who doesn't agree with them. This has become a bit of a celebrity past time now. They are trying to be woke and trying to be as woke, more woke than each other. So now the press has gone hunting. All he did, all he did was have a non-mainstream narrative, a non-mainstream speaker on COVID on his show. So developments since then, I spoke about this on my rumble last week, developments since then, Spotify have engaged in book burning or the digital equivalent of book burning. And removed over a hundred of his past podcasts from their platform. So they're burning books. That's where we are. Now they have gone hunting. This man had been getting on with what I presume to be, he's got millions of followers apparently, what I presume to be quite a lucrative career on social media has now become public enemy number one. And they have gone rummaging through whatever they can find to destroy this man and destroy his livelihood. All he did to deserve this, to bring this on was to deserves the wrong word, but you know what I mean. All he did to get this backlash was to have a non-mainstream voice on COVID. Now they've got him videos about him saying the so-called N-word, a video clip of various different occasions when he said this word have gone viral apparently. I watched it, the one of the compilations of him saying this word, I watched it just about a half an hour ago actually. From what I can see, he is talking about at least most of the clips I saw, he's talking about that word if you like. But there's never any context to all of this. Now they're going looking for him, he was talking about some sort of sexual language about women. The point being they have rummaged through this man's entire online history to find whatever they can. The mainstream press is reporting it and I'm hugely reporting it. It's massive, it's on. Let me see, it's on. Just if you just Google Joe Rogan at the moment, you've got a headline on the Guardian, on the Telegraph, BBC, Independent, another one in the Guardian, another one in the Independent, all of them aimed at destroying this man's life, certainly destroying his livelihood. He has been targeted for destruction, they want to destroy him. And it all started because he had guests not sticking to the mainstream narrative on COVID. This is coming for all of us. Some people, myself for example, have been subjected to this for years, and there's never any discussion, there's never any debate, there's never any chance for him, I mean yes he can put out a clip on social media responding, but look at the headlines, it's just the mainstream press, it's blowing it, it's catastrophic, this whole thing, oh my god, how can he be allowed to, this is the narrative, this is the overwhelming celebration in the press of the destruction of this man's livelihood, and it is coming for all of us. Someone else it's coming for is Jimmy Carr. Now this is another one going on at the moment, and if you Google Jimmy Carr's name, you will get headlines from The Guardian, from The Spectator, The Mirror, Sky News, The Daily Mail, another one from The Guardian, The Daily Mail reports that Boris Johnson and Sajid Javid have weighed into this and condemned Jimmy Carr, an MP, a Labour MP because Labour MPs have nothing better to do, writing to Netflix to have his shows or at least one of them taken down from Netflix, Labour MPs who by the way, nothing at all to say about what you know what they have nothing to say about, the gang rape of girls for example in their own constituencies, silence, but Jimmy Carr makes a joke and they are up in arms. This is the Labour party of today, they want censorship, they want control over what people are allowed to say and not allowed to say, and according to the mail the Tories are joining Labour in condemning a comedian for making a joke. Now I'm not a fan of Jimmy Carr and that's not because he's offensive, I'm not just not a fan, I don't find him particularly funny, I'm not mad about his delivery, I'm more of a Lee Evans fan myself, but his act is to be offensive, that's Jimmy Carr, that's what he does and he'd even made when he told this joke about Roma and the Holocaust, he even made it clear, he makes it clear that his act is to be as offensive as possible. If you don't like Jimmy Carr and you don't like him for whatever, I don't dislike him, I don't know the man, as a community it's not my cup of tea, there's absolutely no way I would try to stop other people listening to him, other people may like him and his delivery and his jokes and the fact that it is part of his act to be offensive, that's Jimmy Carr, that's what he does. Grow up and if you don't like Jimmy Carr, don't watch it, don't watch him, don't go to see him, if you do like him, do go to see him, if you don't like him, don't go to see him, that's a free society. But now our politicians, our politicians are weighing in and trying to get a comedian cancelled. This is, we have gone so far, so fast down this rapid slide towards totalitarian society, this disgusting fear filled, grassing each other up society and that's what these celebrities, these uber woke celebrities, suddenly they're everywhere pointing fingers, they point fingers so they don't get fingers pointed at them, they have to make sure everyone knows how disgusted they are by this joke or this comment and they do that to make partly at least to make sure they don't come under fire. They're trying to protect themselves and I don't know whether Jimmy Carr has apologized, I haven't seen anything to suggest he has, but he might in the way that Joe Rogan has and apologizing is part of the problem. Here's how bad this gets, this is from, I said there was an article on the spectator about Jimmy Carr, let me read what that spectator article says, just a little bit of it, it's from today published today and it's from an SMP councillor, prosecute Jimmy Carr's audience, this is what this SMP councillor wants, it says it seems the most illiberal party in Great Britain is at it again and the nationwide haste to condemn the comedian Jimmy Carr for his remarks about Gypsy Roma and Traveller community in his Netflix special and elected councillor from the SMP has called for prosecutions and not just for Carr himself, Julie Mackenzie who sits on Argyle and Butte Council wants the many members of Carr's audience prosecuted for applauding these remarks. Now let me just, let's be very, very clear about this, an elected politician in this country wants members of Jimmy Carr's audience prosecuted, criminally prosecuted for applauding him, just take that in for a second, this in Great Britain, this, this is where we are and it's not even that shocking, it really isn't and if we keep going in the direction that we are going in, this will become normal, people, we will have calls for people to be prosecuted for laughing, for not laughing, for, let's just go the whole hog, let's thought crimes, facial expressions, why are you wearing that facial expression, what is going on in your head, thought crime, let's go the whole hog and we will and this has happened very, very rapidly as well, it is both absolutely shocking and not remotely surprising that somebody is calling for audience members to be prosecuted for laughing and applauding a comedian, that is where we are but a huge part of the problem is apologizing, we must not apologize to these people, hold our ground instead and I know, understand that people have to make a living but you know what, there are millions of people out there who would greatly, greatly admire a person who refused to apologize and the majors find themselves with a whole new career and plus their integrity would be intact and some people, integrity matters, some, not all. Right, I want to tell you, put a date for your diary this month, 26th of February, please put this, questions are coming in, thanks everyone, please put this in your diary, if you are in or can be in, Telford on the 26th of February, Saturday the 26th of February, we are going to be following up on the event there, God was it only last weekend, time is strange isn't it, sometimes something feels like five minutes ago, sometimes it feels like months ago and it is the same thing. We are following up on that by targeting areas of Telford where we will be advertising our party as the one that stands with Tommy Robinson on this issue and the one that actually would, if people get behind us, actually would put a stop to grooming gangs in Great Britain, we actually would, not jumping on the bandwagon, not saying oh isn't it awful, but actually would stop it. So we are going to Telford on the 26th of February for a leafleting campaign in specific areas of that town, please put that date in your diary and come along if you can. Okay, I'm noticing in the comments that it's Richard Carlin's birthday, happy birthday Richard, I hope you're doing well. Right, let's talk a little bit then about Bristol. Oh before I do, I just want to mention briefly what is happening in Canada and we know that there's a massive protest in Ottawa of truckers and it's been going on for some time. Nine million dollars was raised for them on GoFundMe who despite the fact that it will back up Black Lives Matter and other people involved in violence, happy to help them, won't help the truckers. This is scandalous, truly, truly scandalous and for a while you had politicians there saying that the money needs to be seized and given to the government or redistributed to other people including Black Lives Matter, I had suggested. I mean this is, but it does, one thing it does do is give us some sort of hint, some sort of clue as to what is or could be coming in the future Cushless Society, how much control these always sympathetic to the extreme left tech giants actually are worrying, worrying developments. Okay, let's have a look at Bristol. Now Bristol in 2020 there was a statue, I'll be very brief because most of you will know this but I'll be brief in explaining this, there was a statue of Edward Colston who was a Bristolian businessman and was the MP for Bristol, we're going back to the 17th century. There was a statue of him standing in Bristol and Black Lives Matter mob tore it down in 2020 and tossed it into Bristol harbour. Now the reason for doing that is because they call him a slave trader. This is, there's a couple of things that need to be pointed out about this, one the world was involved in slave trading, it wasn't just Western countries, it was the world and in those in that era that doesn't justify it, I'm not remotely for a moment suggesting that slavery isn't morally important but that was the world then. More hypocritically is that while the Western world no longer practices slavery, there is slavery still practiced in the world but it is people who aren't white so it doesn't matter to Black Lives Matter. The overwhelming slavery that takes place now, the slave trading that takes place now is the buying and selling largely of Black people but that doesn't matter to Black Lives Matter. It doesn't matter to Black Lives Matter because Black Lives don't matter to Black Lives Matter. They are an anti-Western, anti-democracy, anti-capitalism, anti-white organisation using slavery among other issues to attack the West and to bring down the West and they are dressing it up in the language of racial equality so that it is very difficult for anyone to protest against them. They're very well named, these people are very devious, that's what it is, it's not a Black Lives Matter, there's no concern whatsoever about Black people being slaves today, no concern whatsoever of the businesses of Black people that they have destroyed in the United States and beyond, particularly in the United States they've destroyed livelihoods of many Black people, those lives don't matter. They've nothing to say either about Black on Black violence, they've got nothing to say about any of this because it's not about Black Lives Mattering, it's about attacking white people and ergo attacking, attacking the West. So they tore down this statue and tossed it in the harbour and full view of the police and the world's media. Four of them went on trial and here's what I particularly want to focus on, here's the really important part, four of them went on trial for criminal damage. Let me just explain, just to be very very clear about this, let me explain what criminal damage is. It is, I'll give you the legislation itself, criminal damage act 1971, a person who without lawful excuse destroys or damages any property belonging to another intending to destroy or damage any such property or being reckless as to whether any such property would be destroyed or damaged shall be guilty of an offence. The maximum penalty is 10 years imprisonment. So, bank to rights, it's absolutely open and shut case, there is no need really. We don't even need to look for, you don't need to go looking for witnesses because the whole world was a witness to it. They did it in front of the police, okay the statue, it's a whole thing. I mean I'm a little bit of lawyer mode now, it's property, it belongs to another, belongs to the public and they destroyed it without lawful excuse with the intent to destroy it. It is every part, every requirement of that piece of legislation is met. They are guilty of criminal damage in accordance with the legislation. Every requirement, the intent, the property and the destruction, every part of that is there, it is all met. But they walked free from court and the press celebrated it but and some MPs celebrated it and in doing that I genuinely cannot emphasize enough how dangerous this is. The law has been ignored in favour of left-wing politics and even lawyers and I am fully, I fully intend to write to the law society and ask for an explanation as to why these lawyers are, I want, I want the law society, the law society's view on this. I want them, they won't answer me of course because I'm a, I'm a non-person but let's make this public anyway, the law society should be speaking about, should be answering this. This is scandalous what has happened here, absolutely scandalous. So the press ignores objective news and objective truth and propagandises for the left-wing. The police is a tool of the left-wing, we can see that with their, I've forgotten what their real name was, I call them Incinerate Britain, Incilate Britain. So the police are political and now we've got a justice system and lawyers arguing that the law, the letter of the law should be ignored in favour of left-wing politics. It is extremely dangerous but let me just show you some of the press reports on this. This is the BBC, four people accused of illegally removing a, you know, they even reported of illegally removing a statue of Edward Colson have been cleared of criminal damage. The forenames were charged after a monument to the 17th century slave trader. It's not all and everyone in the 17th century in business, especially in international, anyway let's not, there's no discussion of any, that's what he was, a slave trader, was pulled down and thrown into Bristol's harborside last June. It happened during a Black Lives Matter protest in the city. Loud cheers erupted in the public gallery of Bristol Crown Court as the verdicts were returned and they all hugged supporters and cheered and of course one of them took the knee outside the, outside the court speaking outside one of the defendants who had just been acquitted said we just want to say thank you to so many people because we have never been alone in this journey. There were, let me go through this, I don't want to be bringing too many irrelevancies. This, this is, this is what she said, you know, he, this is another one of the defendants. This is a victory for Bristol, this is a victory for racial equality and it's a victory for anyone who wants to be on the right side of history. They committed an offence and all of that is ignored in favour of the so-called right side of history but this is even worse. Now this is what I want to know what the Law Society has to say about this because this is a lawyer. Raj Charda, he represented one of the defendants and said these defendants should never have been prosecuted despite the fact that by the letter of the law they were guilty. They should never have been prosecuted, said this lawyer. It is shameful that Bristol City Council did not take down the statue of slaver Edward Colston that had caused such offence to people in Bristol and equally shameful that they then supported the prosecution of these defendants. Is this, I mean, is it clear to people how, how dangerous this is? Another lawyer said, this case demonstrates the fundamental importance of trial by jury. This is incredible. What would the jury director to ignore the law? Were they? How can a jury, I, I favour trial by jury as well but a jury should be directed to follow the law and the law says that they were guilty and a judge, I don't know, I wasn't there but a judge in that trial should have directed the jury to, if they believe, if the jury believes that they tore down that statue they must be found guilty because tearing down the statue is the offence by the legislation. That's the offence and the jury should have been directed to find them guilty if they believe those people tore down that statue and they would have believed it because they had it on film. They were guilty. So I don't know what the judges directions were to that jury but they should have been to find them that if they believe these people tore down the statue that is the offence of criminal damage. That's how the jury should have been directed. That this lawyer goes on, in this case they, the jury, determined that a conviction for the removal of this statue that glorified a slave trader involved in the enslavement of over eighty four thousand black men women and children as a most virtuous and wise man would not be proportionate. Now let's have a look at what the rotten politicians in this country have to say about this. Actually let me just before I get on to that let me just give you another couple of quotes on this one. In closing statements following at the nine day trial, this is from the Guardian, the defense had urged jurors to be on the right side of history. So essentially the jury was told by the defense to ignore the law, to ignore the legislation, to ignore the criminal damage act 1971 and be on the right side of history. We have dismantled, this is an example of dismantling the process of law and order in Great Britain. It is the dismantling of it. There is no point in us having legislation if a jury is urged by the defense. Again it's more important what the judge said. I wasn't there. But the defense are telling them to ignore the law and go with politics instead. And it seems that that's what they did. After just, after just under three hours deliberation, the jury of six men and six women found the so-called Colston for not guilty by an 11 to 1 majority decision at Bristol Crown Court. This verdict is a milestone in the journey that Bristol and Britain are on to come to terms with the totality of our history. This is ridiculous, said, that's that's mine. This is ridiculous, it's mine. Said David Olisoga, the broadcaster and historian of the slave trade, who gave evidence in the trial. For 300 years, he said Edward Colston was remembered as a philanthropist. He was. His role in the slave trade and his many thousands of victims were airbrushed out of the story. You mean like the many thousands of slaves in the world today airbrushed out of the story? Do you mean like the, we really, I could get in, I could get into various, I could get into the world. We've got a world cup coming up in stadiums built by slaves, but they're not white people. So it slaves are not being owned and bought and sell by white people. So it doesn't doesn't matter. They're airbrushing that out of the story. Clive Lewis, the Labour MP said, a British jury has confirmed that toppling of Edward Colston statue was not a criminal act. This is incredible. This is, this is the member of parliament. Again, I go back to it. The legislation is clear. They clearly broke the law. A jury was told by the defence to ignore the law and to go with politics instead. Left wing, one sided, not debated politics. And the, and a Labour MP, you know the rest of them are going to agree. This is just Clive Lewis, but you know the rest of them are going to agree with this and probably a great deal of the Tories as well. Confirmed that it wasn't a criminal, but it was a criminal act. We're right in there. We are right in. We are right deeply, deeply into 1984. Ask society now. The real crime said Clive Lewis was the fact that the statue was still there when protesters pulled it down. The people of Bristol were asked to vote by the Bristol Post, asked to vote on whether or not they wanted rid of the Edward Colston statue and they said, no, they didn't want to get rid of it. But that didn't matter because the uber, extreme, dangerous, utterly intolerant, utterly violent left wing decided they wanted rid of it anyway. It has the support of MPs and he's not the only one. You know he's not the only one. The legal system has been completely thrown out the window. The law thrown out the window makes no difference. And it's celebrated, celebrated by the press, celebrated by politicians, celebrated by defence lawyers. It's truly scandalous. It is truly scandalous and it's more than scandalous. It's extremely, extremely dangerous. So we are going to go to Bristol. I want some, can somebody keep, go through the comments for me because I'm putting together a team. I want you to volunteer in here and if somebody can go through the comments for me and write down all the names. I want, there's a couple of things you want to do. Find out. There is a group called Save Our Statues. I have been in touch with Save Our Statues to see if we can work together on this. They are also calling for the Edward Colston statue to be put back. If I want to, there's a word for it. I'm sure I would put back up. So I have asked them if we can, if they'd be willing to work together with us on this campaign. I haven't heard from them yet, but it hasn't been long since I contacted them. Couple of things. Is there a legal avenue we can take to challenge this? Is there something we can do to challenge these defense lawyers and their absolute disregard for the law? Is the Law Society AOK with lawyers having absolute disregard for the law? Now, look, I know defense lawyers have a job to do, but this is insanity. It's insanity. They didn't argue that they weren't there. They were trying, that wasn't them. They were trying to make this political and they succeeded. The offence of criminal damage was committed. We must also know from our MPs, we must challenge them on this and we will publicly challenge them on this. Whether or not they support the way this is going, we cannot just throw the law out the window for politics. And I can guarantee you they wouldn't throw the law out the window for my politics. It's only for left-wing politics that this happens. But we want to go to Bristol as well. We want to go to where the statue was. We want to hold a rally there. We want an information campaign in Bristol so that people understand exactly the significance of this. People of Bristol understand the significance of this. These are only some of the ideas that we have to put in place, but this is an important campaign and I really want people to get on board with it. We can't just accept this. And if we were to get some support, just if, just imagine. Just imagine if we, along with others who are campaigning for this, if we work together, strengthen numbers, imagine, just imagine if we could get that statue put back up. Just imagine it. Be the most incredible, incredible victory. Now you may be thinking that's highly unlikely. Perhaps it is, perhaps it's not. But it is an incredible, it would be an incredible victory, not for the Edward Colson statue, not even just for the people of Bristol, but a kickback against the left-wing mob, which has effectively got this country on its knees and under its thumb. Frank just asked me if I would consider giving a speech standing on the Colson plant. Yes, I would. Absolutely. In fact, I think that's where we should do it. That's absolutely where we should do it. So, can someone get me a list of, from the people volunteering down here, can someone get me a list of, come on folks, do volunteer. Get on board with this. This is important. It really, really is important. It's one of the most important things we can do is fight this. This is so insidious, so dark, so dangerous to just dismiss the law. I mean, I've read the offence of criminal damage out to you and yet they're just not guilty because the defence lawyers guilted the jury into thinking, if you don't find them not guilty, you're a racist. You know this is the implication. This is really, really, really important. Please, please do volunteer. And look, you know, they talk about history. Let us talk about history. Let us be a part of history. Let us make our own mark on history by fighting these totalitarian thugs who think they have every right to jack boot their way all over this country demanding that the press, politicians, the police, the judicial system all bow down to their will. Let us claim our part of history and fight them. Fight back. Do not let them get away with this. Fight back. Claim your own little piece of history. I'm going to go to some questions. Oh, and by the way, on the Telford thing, I did send out a message to our volunteers, our subscribers and members across the West Midlands today. But just to mention it one more time, because obviously anyone in the country can get involved, the 26th of February, Telford, put that in your diary. And if you do, if you can come along, because I don't want to, I've asked people in message today to reply to me if they can make it, because I don't want to be contacting everyone on the, I want to basically list of volunteers on that as well. Give Sharon a shout if you can come on the 26th of February. Because as you know, we have to be a little bit careful with who knows exactly what we're doing on any given day. How long before the party streams on Getter, not sure, Stu, there doesn't, you know, we try these other platforms and they just don't have, I mean, I know YouTube censors us to within an inch of our lives. And I know that our viewing numbers are not accurate by any means. But it's, they're still a lot better than the other platforms. I don't know, is the honest answer. Keep going. I'm not prepared to give up on the big ones either, because why should we? You know, why should we? What time on the 26th? We'll say probably about one o'clock. But sign up and we'll, we'll get a little group together and do a well organized, well targeted campaigning literature campaign. John says after BLM vandalized the war memorials and statues and forces veterans have formed a group who will step in to protect war memorials. I will volunteer and help our party. Any day, thanks as always, John. Do you have contact details for that group, John? If you do, can you give them to me please? Because I want to contact them as well. Like I've contacted Save Our Statues. And let's see if we can all work together on this one. Jason O'Brien says, Amri, are you aware that technology exists that can probe us for our emotions and what we believe, agree with, etc? Perhaps, I mean, I, it doesn't, am I specifically aware of such a thing? No. Does it surprise me? Not really. Am I terrified of it? Definitely. Is it science fiction film? Where it definitely goes. I've never seen that. What's that film with Tom Cruise in it? Where they, I don't really, I used to like Tom Cruise, not a massive fan anymore. What is that film where he has, they are arresting people for future crimes or something. Minority report, is that what it's called? I've never seen it. I think I'm going to watch it. Someone just said Top Gun. I have seen Top Gun. I'm a child of the 80s, remember. I have seen Top Gun. I haven't seen it in years. I wonder what I would think of it now. It's the thing, when you watch, sometimes when you watch films that you loved as a kid and you watch them again as an adult and you think, oh, God. I did that recently, actually. Probably one of the worst. Oh, my word. As a kid, I loved, as a kid, I was a huge Bruce Lee fan. I used to do karate as well. I did that as an adult as well. I just got too many injuries. Massive Bruce Lee fan as a kid. And what did I watch? A film I loved in the 80s. Oh, no retreat, no surrender. If you know it. I watched it again, not that long ago. Oh, my word. The things we like is children. It's 80s indulgence, shall we say, and indulgence. Okay, what day is the event in Bristol planned for? Not sure yet. That's one of the things that we need to sort out. Christine has asked me about the Human Rights Act in March. Now, that's something I'd like to talk about in a little bit more detail. So I will come back to that one because, as you know, one of our policies is to scrap it. I'll come back to that in a bit more detail. Actually, I will come back to it and I will come back to it. Christine, next week. What else did I have to say? There was something else. Oh, yes. Yes, yes, yes. Next week, as well as coming back to a little bit more detail on the Human Rights Act. Next week, I'm going to talk about energy. And before we finish, I want to show you an article from today. Someone just said, is that Graham? Yeah, the young Frankenstein is the young Frankenstein I loved young Frankenstein. I mean, it's silly, but I still laugh at it. I think I watched it. I watched it late last year. Again, I was having a bit of a it's melancholic, the right word. And I sort of went on eBay and bought a few DVDs from my childhood. And young Frankenstein was one of them. And I watched it. And it is very, very silly. But I have to admit I have to confess, I still did laugh. I did laugh quite a few times. Okay, but right to finish to finish energy. We all know that we are facing a cost of living crisis. And I'll tell you, energy bills are not cheap as it is. Definitely not cheap as it is. But it's about to explode. And that we're being given warnings. Thanks for that, John. So I've just been given a veterans against vandalism. Okay, I'll give them a shout. Thanks for that. Right. We've been given warning that this is going to get worse and our energy bills are going to go up. I saw I was looking at flicking through social media and people's comments on this the other day. And people are talking about somebody had put on on on social media, they were quoted £200 a month for their gas electricity. That is absolutely shocking. Don't, that's a vouch for that. But that's one of the comments that I'd read. Someone else had said that their bill was going up 146%. So we are being warned that we were being braced. Brace yourselves. There's an energy crisis coming. In one BBC article I read about this, one of the reasons they gave for an energy crisis was that there wasn't enough wind blowing. And so the wind farms weren't producing the enough energy. Oh, if only if only someone had said, as many, many people did, that this won't work. This wind farm thing won't work. But no one listened. And they're still not listening. But have a look at this. I've got to show you this one before we go. If I can find it. Ah, yes, there it is. So this is an article. And I only saw this today. But guess who is having their energy bills paid for by the taxpayer? Have a guess. You'll never guess. Or maybe you will. Let me show you this little snippet here. One multimillionaire Tory claims £6,000 in expenses for his energy bills. He's a multimillionaire claiming expenses for energy bills. Nice, isn't it? Do you think we'll be able to claim £6,000 for energy bills? Do you think they'll do anything at all? Like look at some creative ways they may be able to produce more energy or reduce taxes on energy? Absolutely, absolutely not. And you know why? Because they don't care because they don't have to put, they don't, it doesn't bother them. MPs don't care about this stuff. They have enough money. They have their second homes. And their second homes will be paid for by you and me. And meanwhile, we are left scraping around. I mean, have you tried to get an NHS? I know we're on a different public service. Have you tried to get an NHS appointment lately? We are having everything. And by the way, your taxes are going up to pay for the NHS as well. Let's see if you can get an appointment. It's unbelievable. We are being squeezed and squeezed and pushed and pushed and trampled on and trampled on. And more and more and more and more and more money will be taken from us by MPs who don't care because they don't have to care because they will, their multimillionaires, a lot of them anyway, and they can claim on expenses for, you know, why do we put up with this? You know this Tory MP mentioned in that little clip, that little snippet there. Multi-millionaire claiming £6,000 for energy bills on expenses paid for by the taxpayer who can't afford to pay their own energy bills because they're too busy paying taxes for multimillionaires' energy bills. Do you know what? Probably be voted straight back in again. I have no doubt he'll be voted straight back in again. We had, there was a by-election in South End last week. Tories walked in despite, and this is in the midst of the party gate scandal. So the Tories are telling us, telling the British public you can't visit your terminally ill relative, but we're going to have a party. Those Tories, the very same, the same Tories who will know, do essentially nothing while cost of living sores, claim taxpayers' money on expenses, put up taxes, put up taxes, put up taxes, while the services that those taxes are meant to pay for get worse and worse and worse and worse. And the NHS is the perfect example. I had no idea that the NHS, as we know it, that life as we knew it, was absolutely going to disappear in January 2020. I didn't, but the NHS gone, absolutely gone, put the taxes for it going up. We'll pay more taxes for energy and the available energy, I'm going to go out on a limb here and make a little guesstimate that energy availability will reduce at the same time as the prices for it go up. Energy rationing? Not for MPs, obviously, obviously not for MPs. It is sickening, but oh, we get, we get what we settle for, don't we? We've got to, we've got to, as a country, we've got to stop, we've got to stop accepting this. We've got to stop settling for this. We really don't. We've just got to stop settling for this. The disconnect between the largely Uber rich MPs in Parliament and the people at the bottom of the ladder who are getting poorer and poorer and poorer is, is the gap as wide as something that has been in my lifetime. The power is ours to change that. Eventually that message I hope will slip through the media's toxic filter and maybe, maybe, maybe cost of living will be a step too far. Maybe they will push us the public too far with this. We'll see. Okay. Thank you everyone for joining me this evening, 26th of February, and get your name down for the new Bristol campaign. Actually Sharon, while I think of it, will you please set up a group of all those volunteers so we can communicate and have a discussion. I won't set up a focused meeting, we'll consider a date, but yes, I'm definitely, definitely up for speaking on the plinth there. I think that would be fantastic actually, looking forward to doing that. All right, thanks very much everyone. Be back with the usual stuff, be back with my Hartlepool live stream on Wednesday morning, back on Rumble Wednesday night, and back here live next Monday at eight o'clock, we'll talk about the energy crisis and the cost of living. And I particularly want to look at where the public money in this country is going and how that public money could be better used in providing us with energy without making us go broke to pay for it. That's an idea. Imagine that. Imagine having a government that actually came up with some ideas to not let us go broke, having to, trying to pay to heat our homes, having to struggle to try and pay to heat our homes, almost like we were a First World country. Are we still hanging in there, I think? Scraping by with that status. All right, thanks very much everyone. See you soon. Look after yourselves. See you back here next Monday. Take care.