 Great. Thank you Leonard. And thank you to the speaker because I think it really sets the stage in talking about this campaign and the origins. I've been involved in many campaigns throughout my career and I think that when we began the idea was to try something new. We didn't know if it was going to work, but we recognized that we really needed to be able to put the campaign into the hands of the migrants and put them in the driver's seat. So what I want to do is start by giving a bit of an overview of the campaign itself and talking through the design. As a bit of background, I wanted to talk about IOM role in voluntary return. So since January 2018, IOM has supported over 15,000 migrants in returning to their countries of origin. The vast majority of those are coming from the detention centers in Libya. And we know from the news reports the conditions that are there and the conditions that many of them met along the way. But an important thing to keep in mind is that returning home isn't always the same. In particular, attorneys when they come back to their communities, oftentimes they face obstacles to reintegration. You have to put their code in. This code? A lot of this is difficult to stigma and discrimination that they encounter in the communities when they come back. I think that in particular the challenge is that many of them, the communities had such high expectations for these people. When they left, they often pooled together the resources from the community to send this bright young person to make their fortune. So oftentimes when they return to their communities, they're ostracized and they lack opportunities. So this is where migrants as messengers, as we designed the campaign, we wanted to take a new approach. We wanted to both be able to raise awareness but also to combat the stigma that so many of the returnees face when they're returning to their communities. And so the approach that we took is peer-to-peer messaging, recognizing, as the speakers before me said, that we as IOM or as governments here in Europe, we are not the ones to be sharing the messages and telling people what to do or what not to do. When in fact it's their peers, their communities, their friends and loved ones that they trust the most and have the most reliable understanding of the information shared. So our goal within the campaign was to capture and be able to share these really candid, authentic and powerful testimonies of the returnees through the campaign. The way that we wanted to design it was very much taking a participatory approach, making sure that the migrants themselves were in the driver's seat and were shaping the campaign rather than us coming in with our, here's our plan, here's our key messages, but they themselves through workshops were able to identify what are the messages that they wanted to share with their communities. And it was really fascinating as the returnees came together to discuss their experiences, the networks and the community that they found in these groups of, they're called VFOs, volunteer field officers. And in fact one of the outcomes that we didn't write into a project document we didn't expect was the psychosocial support that the returnees found as they came together rather than being isolated, feeling like, oh I've come home dejected and my family is disappointed at me, but they really found support within one another in these communities that they developed through the campaign. And so how are we going to capture these stories? This was the question. Everyone had a powerful story to tell, but we needed a way to leverage the mobile technology that we all carry around in our pockets that we have in our bags and turn them into community journalists. So this was an aim from the beginning of the campaign to be able to conduct the interviews through using mobile technology, easy video capture, and then allow them to be able to use their social media networks as well. There wasn't necessarily messaging coming from us. And in fact through the process we got a lot of inputs in terms of developing the mobile technology that was used in the project. And the key for us was a mobile toolkit that we developed called Community Response Act. And essentially what it does is it allows for migrants to be able to respond to a series of questions in a very candid way and be able to use those answers to share their stories. And we trained them using smartphone kits, so a small tripod, an external mic, and they were able to take on the role of community journalists in interviewing one another. One of the key things that I'd like to reiterate is that informed consent was critical in all of the activities that we did. And so the Community Response Act also integrates a digital consent form. So before we went to take photos and start interviewing the returnies, that it was shared with them, the project and the campaign, and how the stories were used. And as the returnies went out into the field, we started getting a cold catalog of really powerful testimonies, stories of return, that I think were honest to a level that we would never have been able to do if you or I walked into that returnies home. The willingness to share and the authenticity of those stories showed how genuine the stories were and I think that led to the credibility of the campaign. And also, in addition to the return, the returnies talked about the hope that they had. Many of them were starting new businesses. In fact, through this project, quite a number of returny associations have been formed. My colleague, Monica, will speak more to that, but I think that it gave the returnies more and more purpose. And these stories and folk were also really powerful for this campaign. As they collected stories, they saw kind of a transformation, rather than feeling dejected and ostracized and a few more competent. They became advocates saying, I don't want my brothers and my sisters to experience what I did. And over the process of the project, they became much more outspoken and more willing to share their stories. One of the key aspects of the campaign, in addition to the town halls, which could be about the impact evaluation, was social media. As we know, all of us are regularly on our social media feeds. But one critical component is that the campaign itself was more mechanic. So the spread was not boosted or not paying Facebook to send back these messages, but it was through the returnies leveraging their own networks that the messages went quite widespread to the communities of origin. And so when we compiled the numbers we saw that Leonard suggested 1,000 videos, there were actually over 5,000 videos across the countries where the campaign was implemented. Though a minority of returnies are female, we made a concerted effort to make sure that they were part of this campaign in the countries where it was implemented. And the VFOs, in fact, we had abandoned a smaller number of volunteer field officers, but we got regular requests for people to join this community of returnies that were captured stories. And so it continued to grow. And now we're all in phase two, we're going to expand to seven countries. So the original project, as in three countries, the next phase will be in seven countries. In terms of impact of that, I'll leave to the experts to talk about that. And I think that there's a great video. We'll share the link on the webinar. I don't think we're going to be able to play it at this time. But now I'd like to pass it over to my colleague, Muhammadou, who's going to talk more about the first-hand experience as an improvement. Thank you for introducing me here. It's not easy to speak after you. Well, coming to me first of all to speak on behalf of IA Senegal, and thank you for inviting us in this event. Every project we implement, every activity we carry out is an opportunity for us. And my friends as messengers have been a great experience that gave room for improvement in the planning implementation of other programs with electronics. Just being said, I would like to share with you our experience working with the voluntary field officers, of what VFOs have initiated, said it. Personally, I was tasked with conducting the direction process. So it was quite an easy task because we were receiving requests from the attendee members to join the program. And I would suggest that you can pass it. Yeah, thank you. We're asking them to meet their rights. Okay, if you're hearing us, please do meet your mic. Okay, and I also took part in the training of the volunteers. They had me, as Em said, we did not outline messages to be spread out. We said by volunteers, but they had their own messages. We helped them give them the tools to go outside and conduct peer-to-peer interviews and festivals. And I also had to charge to the coordination and monitoring of their field work. So I can say that I know each one of them pretty well. And I can tell you that I saw the transformation that Amy was talking about a while ago. In the beginning, at the Uptown, I saw them when they felt exhausted, which is my next slide. Yes, I saw them at the airport when they felt exhausted. This happened, worried certainly about the reaction of the families and the feeling of failure. And later on, I saw them gain more self-confidence. They built their self-esteem, become influencers and change makers in their communities. In the beginning, they tried to be from the camera, not wanted to appear public. But later on, they took initiatives, conducted peer-to-peer interviews and facilitated crowd-reviews. May I present that I studied with IOM at IOM with Microsoft's Messenger, and it was hard for me to see that the activities we are doing, the project we are implementing, is having a real effect on the scrutiny migrants. And yes, the migrants, as Amy said, underwent a series of trainings. But before getting to that, I would like to share with you the introduction to one of our volunteers. His name is Ismael Barji. I will tell you where I told him. Ismael Barji is a 29-year-old Brutani migrant who dropped his at least at the university level and tried to migrate to Europe. On his way to Libya, in the desert, his convoy was attacked by harrier robbers and they were stripped of all their belongings, left to his little nothing. Nevertheless, Barji managed to reach Libya, where unfortunately he fell in by hands once again. And was captured and imprisoned. In 2017, with the support of IOM, Barji returned to Casa Mons with his village in the south of Senegal. Here is what he read in his story. Barji said that despite his fears, his family was very supportive and very welcoming. But he did not feel the same, because he felt ashamed. As if he felt them, because they invested a lot of money in his trip, they contributed. So Brutani like this is sort of betraying him. He couldn't go out and spend all his days in those enjoying with the company of two of his friends, who would advise him, who would take him out from time to time and make him realize that finally it was, as he said, the end of the road. I would like to say that this is the story of one of our volunteers, but the volunteers might take the symbols, they might end up with the same challenges, but each of their stories is unique and specific on its own. So if you allow me, I would like to play... I forgot my powerpoint. This is Barji, it's my letter that I introduced to you a while ago. And I would like to play the two short video clips. One is Adama Jalo, he is a Lutheran migrant. He is talking about his experience in Libya. And the second one is the 17 years old Brutani migrant, Amudu Jalo, who is talking about his family welcoming him at his居民. So I would like to watch too. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. This was Adama Jalo, now we are listening to Amudu Jalo. This is Adama Jalo, he is talking about his family welcoming him at his居民. This is Adama Jalo, he is talking about his family welcoming him at his居民. Being a Senegalese and being also the age-mate, because most of the volunteers are between 18 and 25, I can really understand the struggle to meet the pressure they feel when they come home and all the stress they are going through. To help them from the experience and share their stories, we gave them a series of trainings to in public speaking and to help them improve their leadership potential and faster their entrepreneurship. So they conducted, they represented the market, so they conducted peer-to-peer interviews with the community response app. They facilitated debates and they engaged with media, working with people who give the same experience. In fact, I gave them a platform of exchange where they can share and speak to people who can relate, to people who give the same experience. And this sort of therapy, because it was not easy in the beginning for them to search deep down of their experiences and speak it out. So the fact of getting together between peers, between people who share the same history almost, it helped them improve and feel better socially. So after the trainings, they were now ready to go outside and engage with media. As you see in this picture, we see the media. They are talking on radio. They are interviewed by the press. They are interviewed on TV by the local and international media. These pictures were taken with the International Alliance Day. Which was the framework of the TAMF, the Modernization Film Festival. So you see the VF was interviewed in five seconds. And on the other picture, you see them doing the testimony in front of actually a big crowd. Now, I would like to talk a bit about the film type evaluation. I will go deep down in the technical space. This is up to you guys. So I would like to highlight the participation of the volunteers in the impact evaluation. Before we started the impact evaluation, the non-volunteers were invited to a meeting, to a workshop, where they brainstormed on how to facilitate the case. Actually, the questions they were asking to the participants during the impact evaluation were drafted and were chosen by themselves. They are the ones who took the questions and also contributed to the one video that we screened during the impact evaluation. The impact evaluation was in this format. We had streaming, we had debates and were fascinated by the poll and shared, and we had after-data poll. Now, this is the experience that generally will not be comfortable with. It is a good and bad memory. The first test day of the impact evaluation, I remember when we were leaving the office, we were all excited, and we were placing pets here. I was the most hopeful one. I was expecting hundreds and hundreds of people. But when we arrived at the venue, we found that it was not the number we were expecting, actually, and we were so disappointed that we had to go to the office and try to find quite a formula, which we did, fortunately. But imagine during that first day, among the few people that attended that stream, one of them was just a week away from trouble, from taking over. He had his trip already planned, and he was just a week away from trouble. And after watching the movie and listening to the volunteers, he established his mind and said that he is not taking the risk. This is not an isolated case. This is the same reaction we had all over the impact evaluation process. And this is the real impact that Microsoft Messengers is having on the communities. So, in this specific phase, we hope to talk with more people and impact more lives. Thank you. Very much. A slight change in the agenda. We're going to do the coffee break now. I'm very sure I'll understand and jump into the results of the report. So, a big break.