 Lonnie? Yes? I am dealing with one computer screen and I'm not totally sure that I'm going to be able to bring up my presentation. Do you have it available? Yes. I will take a look in the folder and I will get it ready to share if you're having issues. Okay, thanks a lot. I appreciate it. Yeah, no problem. Good morning everyone. It's 1030. I am Sherry Meads, your zoning administrator and I would like to call take order the October 6th meeting of the zoning administrator. Pursuant to Assembly Bill AB 361 and Sonoma County Health Officer recommendation, the zoning administrator is facilitating this meeting via Zoom. Members of the public can participate virtually at www.zoom.us forward slash join or by calling toll free 877-853-5257 and entering meeting ID number 868-2190-2494. This meeting is also being live streamed at HTTPS colon forward slash forward slash www.youtube.com forward slash city of Santa Rosa. Public comment on non-agenda items and agenda items will be allowed during this meeting. Additional information related to meeting participation is available at www.srcity.org forward slash zoning admin. So we're now going to open up a public comment period for any items that are not listed on today's agenda. There'll be a public comment period after each of the scheduled items are heard. So this public comment period is for anything that is within the zoning administrator's purview that is not on today's agenda. Each speaker will be given three minutes to speak and recording secretary Buckeye will explain how that all works. If you wish to make a comment please raise your hand by selecting the raise hand icon on your screen. If you're calling in please press star nine to raise your hand. The zoning administrator means we don't have any hands raised at this time. Excellent then let's move on to item three on the agenda which is zoning administrator business. This includes the zoning administrator statement of purpose which I'll read to you all right now. The zoning administrator is appointed by the planning and economic development director and has the authority to conduct public meetings and hearings and to take action on applications for minor discretionary projects. Any determination or decision by the zoning administrator may be appealed to design review board, cultural heritage board, planning commission or city council as applicable to the decision. There are no zoning administrator reports or consent items today so I'll skip to item five on the agenda which is our regularly scheduled items. Item 5.1 is a minor conditional use permit to allow self-storage and multi-family use at 311 and 319 Santa Rosa Avenue. City file CUP 21-050 and our presenting planner is Senior Planner Murray. Good morning everybody. I'm going to ask that Lonnie, Lonnie you're the best. I'm on a single screen today and wasn't sure how to get my presentation up so the presentation before you or the project before you is as you said it's a minor conditional use permit for storage and multi-family housing located at 3111 and 319 Santa Rosa Avenue. The name of the project is the Avenue 3111 Storage and Housing. Next slide please. When constructed that the 48 units that are proposed as the multi-family component will equate to or provide 1.8 percent of the RENA requirements or the regional housing needs allocation requirements for our area. Next slide please. The project proposes to construct I believe it's three three-story structures that will provide 48 dwelling units. These are market rate and they'll be comprised of one and two bedroom units and then six structures for self-storage five of which will be single story along the periphery of the property and then one two-story structure in the center which really lends itself to you know providing some buffering from noise from Highway 101 and then reciprocating by the the residential unit will block the view of the taller storage unit from Santa Rosa Avenue. The required entitlements or land use permits are the design review which was granted by the design review board on September 15th and a minor conditional use permit that is before the zoning administrator this morning. Next slide. Here's an aerial view of the site. It's been used for several years. I don't know how many as kind of a storage area I suppose for some trailers and whatnot and then Cars Park in that little area along Santa Rosa Avenue on the right side of the screen. If you can just advance one more Lonnie. This is a street view that I took a few weeks ago so it gives you a pretty good idea of what the site looks like now. Next slide. Again an aerial view and Lonnie if you can just advance one more time to give you an idea of the neighborhood context. It's primarily commercial to the north, residential to the east, residential and commercial to the south and residential and commercial across Highway 101 to the west. Next slide please. Project has quite a history. It came in back in 2007. At that time the property was within the within the county. We had a development review meeting at that point it was they were just considering the applicant was considering strictly storage. After some discussions with staff they they decided to include a residential component and 48 very welcome units. We had our first neighborhood meeting back in November of 2019. At that point we were talking about just the annexation portion. We wanted to separate the annexation portion from the development portion so that we would so wouldn't be confusing to to neighbors. So that first neighborhood meeting the only people that showed up were neighbors who were interested in participating in the annexation and when we're included in the pre-zoning process with the city prior to it going to Lafko for annexation and then on January in January the following year 2020 we held the second neighborhood meeting to talk about the the actual development of housing at that point and storage. On May 28th the planning commission made a recommendation for pre-zoning the city council approved it in September of 2020 and the property has since both properties have since been annexed. In March of 2021 we received the formal applications and as I previously mentioned in last month a couple of weeks ago the design review board granted design review. Next slide please. The site is located in an area that's designated as retail and business services on the general plan land use diagrams. Lonnie if you can just fast forward one more. Thank you and it's shown by the the periwinkle star. It is surrounded to the north and south by well as we already talked about residential or commercial and residential uses which are consistent with their their land use designations for the most part across Santa Rosa Avenue there are commercial uses where when developed more will likely come in with residential or at least residential components. Next slide please. When I guess I didn't mention that it is zoned consistent with the general plan land use CG general commercial so oops. Anyways the general plan the general plan we find the general plan design guidelines and some of our specific plans have a lot of overlap in their in their their goals and policies so I just cherry picked a few and first and foremost the project will meet the needs of Santa Rosa residents as again it is providing 48 residential units. It promotes mixed use mixed use sites and that's at least this planner's opinion that it separates it puts a commercial use adjacent to the freeway separating residential use from the freeway which makes a real good combo for that site it enhances and strengthens strengthens the visual quality of major entry routes into the city Santa Rosa Avenue is a is an arterial that's a direct feeder right into our downtown this is not that close to the downtown but what you saw in the photograph previously for existing conditions and what will be constructed housing with landscaping and the the commercial use the storage use which it also has I believe a 25 foot landscaping buffer between Santa Rosa Avenue and the facility so it will definitely beautify that that area so next slide please the project was reviewed in compliance with the zoning code for development standards including lot coverage building height outdoor lighting vision triangles parking etc etc so and all of that is mentioned also in the resolution next slide please here's the landscaping plan it's very very high level I'll say you can see the landscaped areas the green areas around the periphery of the site which will shield the single single level storage building are decorated I should say provide a buffer as well and then as you can see on the right side which is where Santa Rosa Avenue is there is that that landscaped area before before the buildings the the self-storage structures separating self-storage structures from Santa Rosa Avenue the the circulation here they have two expert access points off Santa Rosa Avenue the the northern most is actually I don't have my pointer but the northern most provides access to the storage facility and the storage facility on that property meets its parking requirements independent of the residential parking likewise the residential parking that's in the the lower left hand corner of the the project site has adequate parking as well to in compliance with the zoning code which is something that we we we don't see as much of these days with some of the concessions that are allowed through the affordable housing components um I also want to point out that right now if you look at the the property you can see that that that lower right hand corner is a much smaller parcel than the the larger 3111 parcel this project does require a lot line adjustment to make the that lower left parcel um larger for the residential uses so next slide please Lani so during staff review we encountered a big hurdle it was a compliance with the storm water permit um after going back in two and doing some yeah some engineering work and what have you we that we've the project is found in compliance with our permit and there are no unresolved issues I'm very happy to report next slide please we did receive some comments um the site the site one of the comments was that site is contaminated and housing should not be allowed when the uh the applicant conducted their phase one environmental they learned that the there had been a gas station there many many moons ago and some fuel tanks were removed approximately 70 years ago um it was recommended that they um conduct a phase two which they did uh the property has been monitored over an extensive period of time and they have since received a clean bill of health from the water board which is fantastic um neighboring properties oh I already mentioned this during the um annexation process some neighbors jumped on to the pre-zoning which um worked in their benefit for sure so next next slide please there are six required findings for uh for conditional use permits all of which have been demonstrated can be met on the the draft resolution next slide and into whoops one back in terms of the environmental California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA um the project has been found in compliance as infill development pursuant to CEQA guideline sections 15332 um it's consistent with the general plan and the zoning designation the project will occur occurs on a site that's less than five acres within city limits it's surrounded by developed area the project site has no value value as habitat for endangered rare or other species threatened species or any other species as in its current condition um approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic noise air quality or water quality and the site can be served adequately by all public utilities and services again it's in a fully developed area where those services are available and next slide please so with that it is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the zoning administrator approve a minor conditional use permit for avenue 3111 storage and housing project located at 3111 and 3119 Santa Rosa Avenue and for anybody that might be calling in my name is Susie Murray you have any project or any questions relating to the project you are welcome to call me I'm technically out on vacation until next Tuesday so um if you could be patient and wait for me to respond to you then that would be great you can reach me at 707-543-4348 or by email at smurry at srcity.org and that concludes my presentation the applicant team is available for comments or questions if you have any that I can't answer and but they will not be doing a presentation great thank you Planner Murray so before I get into any questions on comments I may have let's go ahead and open up this item for public comment and our recording secretary Bukkite will again explain how to participate if you would like give me one second here of course so if you wish to make a public comment please raise your hand by selecting the raise hand icon if you're dialing in via telephone please dial star 9 to raise your hands zoning administrator me they don't see any hands raised at this time great so let's go ahead and close public comment on this item I think this is a great project I think it's in a in a it's a great use of the site I love the fact that instead of just doing storage they've decided to include housing which we need so desperately and it looks like it's going to it's going to look nice which is a benefit I do have one I was reviewing the resolution and I noticed that we usually post request that they post a sign on site where people can reach out to the developer if they need to regarding any issues with with project development I'm wondering if Susie you could craft some language and just add that condition to the resolution I can and I reached out to the applicant this morning and confirmed that that condition can be added that's something it's a boilerplate condition for me and I overlooked it this time so that's my bad and it will be added and the applicant has accepted that that's great design review approval has already happened so this is just addressing the uses which are are great for the site and so with that change the resolution I will be happy to sign this as an approved project thank you very much I think there was also there was also a typo in there about mixed instead of Mike there is there is so I should probably call out that in in one of the findings it I'm sure on your behalf auto corrected and it states mixed up development and so we will be changing that and the resolution to mixed use which was implied and relatively obvious but we should go ahead and correct it when we have the chance it will be corrected I'll get that done after the meeting great thank you so much I appreciate it excellent well then let's move on to item 5.2 which is a landmark alteration permit for 1118 Monroe court city file lma 22-012 and our presenting planner is Christian Candelaria welcome Christian take it away good morning zoning administrator Meads let me share my screen now can you see it okay so this is for the Monroe house additions for a minor landmark alteration permit and this is that 1118 Monroe court this will be a minor lineup landmark alteration to allow the applicant to construct a 293 square foot addition for an extended bedroom with a bathroom closet and a new window and a 16 square foot addition for a laundry room at the side of the single family dwelling this is a total of 309 square feet and the project encroaches the rear yard setback by 20 square feet due to the irregularity of the easterly property boundary the project will be going two feet into the northerly rear setback and 10 feet into the easterly rear setback this is for neighborhood contexts it's zoned as PD 0226 in the historic combining district and a central plan land use designation is low density residential and that's also located in the mcdonald avenue preservation district this is a close-up of the parcel you can see the irregularity and the parcel boundary on the eastern side and these are some photos of the house um you can see that on the left photo that will be where the proposed laundry room will be added and then on the bottom right is where they'll be doing the bedroom addition next is the site plan um this shows more clearly where the proposed reduction of the rear yard setback is located um the proposed reduction of the rear yard setback is 20 square feet the home is proposed to go into the setback as architectural design does not normally create a structure that would push inward two feet for a portion of the home designed for a bedroom if the home were to follow normal setback standards it would clearly show it as an addition and it's not part of the home having a different design that follows the 20 square foot setback would create design that is not part of the historic neighborhood style the reduced setback allows for adequately sized bathroom inside the proposed addition i will also show more plans for the interior uh this is for the existing and demo floor plan this is not part of the landmark alteration but it does provide additional context of why some of the things are being proposed and the internal changes there will be a part of their building permit application this shows the brand new floor plan and you can see where the bathroom is located that that goes into the setback and all the other changes here you can see the elevations of the property the north elevations show the location of the proposed laundry addition and its new window as well as a portion of the larger addition the partial south and east elevations show other portions of the new bedroom addition that is going into the setback here are additional photos of the proposed location you can see where the addition is being added onto the property as well as seeing it in the rendering on the right side here you'll be able to see how the proposed addition will be keeping with the historic style of materials this is required for any exterior changes to a building in historic district the addition will be keeping with the historic style of the existing home and historic neighborhood this is clearly shown for the style of material shown for the roof walls and the windows for this particular project it had to follow two required findings that are specific to the historic combining district those two are listed on the bottom and I'm going to go over it more clearly in the next slide so these are the two specific findings that had to be found in order to go into the setback the proposed projects reduced setback will not significantly impair the residential privacy of the proposed structures or any adjacent existing or anticipated residential structures the addition does not abut any adjacent properties residential structures which was found and then for the next one it needs to enhance and protect the historic development pattern of the preservation district the proposed project is keeping with the historic style and materials of the existing structure and part of the historic neighborhood the historic combining district specifically allows for these reduced setbacks if they follow these two specific standards and this parcel is structured in a way that creates an irregularly shaped rear setback which is why we were looking for these findings say before the proposed reduction of the rear yard setback facilitates his superior project as the exterior architectural design would be matching with normal architectural design standards and the historic design of the neighborhood following the current setbacks would create a design that would clearly indicate a change in the historic design and would not follow the historic neighborhood style if the home were to follow normal setback standards it would clearly show as an addition and not part of the home's original current design this project was also been reviewed in compliance with the california environmental quality act and qualifies for a class one exemption under sequel guidelines section 15301 subsection e that the new proposed addition is a minor alteration of an existing private structure and then as an addition it is negligible and does not result in an increase of more than 2,500 square feet or 50 percent of the floor area there have been no public comments or issues with this project at this time and it is recommended by the planning economic development department that the zoning administrator by resolution approved a minor landmark alteration permit to allow 309 square feet in additions for a master bedroom and a laundry room at 1118 Monroe court if you have any questions my name is christian candellaria and you can reach my phone number here listed or my email thank you great thank you so much for that presentation it's a great project it's beautiful i totally understand why they're doing it i appreciate how thorough you were with explaining the findings and how this project definitely meets them i can agree with that so let's go ahead and open public comment and see if there are any questions from our public recording second by kite could you mention again how to um access the raise hand and the i think it's star nine on the phone yes absolutely um sorry it takes me a second to reorient myself um into this next phase um so with that being said if you wish to make a public comment please raise your hand by pressing the icon at the bottom of your screen um if you're calling in please press star nine to raise your hand the zoning administrator means i do not see any hands raised at this time great so let's go ahead and close the public comment period then so the only thing that i would request um for this project and we do this on most all if not all um residential projects is that we um change the approved construction hours to eight a.m to six p.m monday through saturday um just being respectful uh to the neighbors who live nearby and and hopefully this is i mean a quick project anyways but i just and hoping that that would be an acceptable condition um so with that condition i would be able to approve this and sign the amended resolution i do want to note that this uh action is final unless an appeal is filed with the department meaning with your project planner within 10 calendar days of today's decision which is monday october 17th 2022 and that is the same for each of these projects each of these projects is subject to appeal um within 10 count 10 days so for example for the previous project if you were wishing to appeal that decision you would want to reach out to the department or um senior planner murray prior to monday october 17th 2022 so thank you very much yes i can update the resolution with the proposed condition for construction great excellent and i'll be happy to sign it when you send it over thank you thank you okay so let's go ahead and move on to item 5.3 which is minor design review for a facade update at 2705 santa rosa avenue city file is dr 22-036 and our presenting planner is such norbisla take it away good morning zoning administrator me um let me share my screen do you see the presentation not quite yet how about oh go ahead sorry yes there it is i was going to just suggest we could take a recess if you needed to but you've got it right there excellent we can see it just fine um so this is a application for minor design review for the total wine facade update at 2705 santa rosa avenue a quick project description um this is an update to the existing facade and storefront design for the total wine and more including metal panel siding exterior installation and finishing systems and architectural features this is the location of the parcel and here is a zoomed out aerial view the general plan land use designation for this site is retail and business services and it is zone general commercial so here is an example of the plans as you can see the top one is the existing facade and the bottom one is the proposed facade update so they are narrowing down the metal siding and extending it above the existing roof line as well as adding some more windows to the side and elongating the existing window as well and this is the color plans um the proposed development meets the height requirements or sorry the height limits as laid out in the zoning code and here are some of the neighboring structures um this is the rei right next door and this is the mod pizza um just across the parking lot so as you can see the proposed um facade is architecturally compatible with others in the plaza as well and with that planning staff is able to make the required findings for minor design review this project is categorically exempt um as it involves minor modifications to an existing structure and there are no unresolved issues as a result of staff review and we have not received any public comment on this therefore it is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the zoning administrator approve a minor design review to allow the total wine facade update at 2705 santa rosa avenue for any questions or comments this is my contact info um and thank you for your time thank you so much planner brisa so the applicant is available for questions but does not have a presentation is that correct correct okay then let's go ahead and open up public comment for this item if anybody wishes to share recording secretary buckeye will provide the information you need to do so if you wish to make a public comment please raise your hand by pressing the hand icon at the bottom of your screen if you're calling in please dial star nine to raise your hand zoning administrator means there are no hands raised at this time great let's go ahead and close the public comment period for this item i do have a couple of questions i have visited that site many times when it was a former toys rs um and it doesn't it did not look good at that time so i appreciate the improvements that will be made here too um for this use but i do have a couple of um questions of ways that that possibly you know we could improve it more so um i'm wondering if the applicant can provide information about the landscaping that's provided in front of the store there appear to be a couple of trees um further in either direction there are some nice you know uh landscape buckets i guess you would call them ceramic or cement things where plants are are included um the the facades that that planter bees let's show were very attractive and i'm i'm wondering if we could include some of those elements in this project um yeah so i'd be interested to hear your thoughts on that uh yes are you able to hear me hi zoning administrator means uh thank you planter bees i really appreciate both your help here and uh for having us my name is michael mcfadden i'm representing total wine here today uh i know exactly what you're talking about i see it uh i guess to start with we're not opposed to any landscaping the area that we actually can incorporate that is pretty limited um the the sidewalk area there is not particularly wide and we don't have the facade all the way to the end of the structure we have about 103 feet and we are one of at least two possibly three i'm not sure what the adjacent tenant is working on uh design reviews happening here i do know the property owners design review has already been approved uh and whatever everyone else is doing we definitely want it to match everybody benefits from having a cohesive storefront uh currently we have one bench we have one of those self-contained surface planters i also could not figure out what to call them i was googling uh buckets a good way to yeah exactly uh and we have one integrated planter that is built into the sidewalk with a tree and i believe some surrounding shrubbery uh our permit itself does not currently involve any modifications to existing impervious surfaces so if there's a way we can work within those constraints to make the entire storefront the collective storefront match we're absolutely all for it uh and would love to have a conversation about that excellent so planter besa could you add a condition that represents just that that you know that you'll this would go this would be your over-the-counter approval for anything related to updating the zone the landscaping to you know coincide with the rest of the groups and just be consistent because we want it to be an attractive site and i so appreciate the applicant recognizing that and being open to that condition the other question is this is just we don't regulate color so i am just actually curious first of all um is this the typical color palette for your um for your retail operation essentially yes uh it you don't have to you don't have to say anymore if that's okay and let's go with that um that's perfectly fine i i was kind of curious myself because i noticed it going more far more earth tone and warm whereas some of the other sites were more cool toned and and like my hair if you will um so i was just curious how you came up with that but it's it's your typical and that's totally fine um there will have to be a condition added that those trash cans that are there now those stone round ones um will have to have covered trash compost and recycling available for customers um that's just a that's just a standard thing we need nowadays um so i'm hoping that that would be an acceptable condition let's verify that um and if so we can just have um planner b still add those conditions and i'll be happy to sign an amended resolution but are you okay with those conditions uh yeah i have no object objections i am curious about what kind of installment the covered trash and compost would be are those sort of the metal bins that are color matched so they're not so intrusive that that's absolutely fine you can work with um planner bisa on okay anything that'll be an over the counter thing does not have to come back i don't need to see it again we just need to make sure that there's something there um so you can work with her on that okay perfect excellent and i'll be happy to sign that and look forward to seeing the the transformation of that building that needs it so badly um again this is this action is final and unless an appeal is filed with the department work with planner bisa on that within 10 calendar days of today's decision which is monday october 17 2022 so thank you planner bisa and applicant team thank you so much okay let's move on to item 5.4 our last item of the day which is a use permit for a fence at 2021 illinois avenue city files ce 19-1008 and c up 21-032 our presenting planner is once again such norbisla hello again let me share my screen are you able to see the presentation yes man okay so this is a minor conditional use application for a residential fence at 2021 illinois avenue the proposed project is to legalize a fence that was constructed without permits the fence the fence consists of 36 inches of solid fence with a hogwire slash lattice panel on top that makes for an additional 26 and 3 4 inches this is the location on illinois avenue and here is a zoomed out aerial view it is right off of steel lane and 101 the general plan land use designation for this is low density residential and it is in the r16 zoning district um here are some pictures of what they have up at this location um planning staff is able to make all the required findings as a fence up to three feet is allowed in the front setback and for the additional height the proposed project is to keep the kids and pets safe so there is a purpose to the fence and to meet the required findings i have proposed some conditions of approval one of which is to replace that panel labeled a to match the rest of the fence that has the transparency above three feet and to remove the stake labeled b and then to cut down the stake labeled c to meet the height of the fence that way there will be complete visibility in the vision triangle above three feet the project is categorically exempt as it involves the construction of an accessory structure no public comment has been received on this and um note there were no unresolved issues as a result of staff review therefore it is recommended by the planning and economic development department that the zoning administrator approved a minor conditional use permit to legalize the fence at 2021 illinois avenue once again here is my contact information um if you have any questions or concerns and i will stop sharing my screen now thank you great does the applicant have any comments or anything to say it's totally okay if not i just want to give them an opportunity i'm not sure if the applicant is here okay that's totally fine they don't have to be that's perfectly fine let's go ahead and open up public comment for this item and if our recording secretary could once again provide the information on how to participate i would appreciate it if you wish to make a comment please raise your hand by selecting the raise hand icon at the bottom of your screen if you're dialing in via telephone please press star nine to raise your hand um zoning administrator means i do see um a hand raised uh julian garcia i'm going to give you permissions to speak so can you please accept my prompt mute okay hello hi we can hear you okay i i have only one concern about the the fence and is that on the side of the house there is no there's no fence that divides the front of the house to the to the backyard and they have a big dog and that dog starts barking like around six a.m and it's a little bit annoying so my only concern is that they they do something about the dog and keep it on the back part of their house like maybe before nine a.m something like that because we have lived here more than 30 years and we never had any problems with any neighbors uh with their dogs and it's only this and i'm assuming they made this fence because of the dog you know like to keep the children and the pet safe but um and i have talked to some of the other neighbors and they say that they also get waking up early because of the the dog so i don't know if this is like related if you guys can do something about it or not but that's my only thing well thank you very much for providing that comment i am actually not sure if i can do anything about a condition about allowing a dog i believe you would have to um get in contact with sonoma county animal control um they are who handle nuisance barking and that type of thing and and i'm pretty sure they would consider six o'clock parking um an issue but unfortunately i don't have the the you know ability to condition that they can't have their dog in the front yard that goes above and beyond my purview um so if you um would like to uh get get in contact with planter besla after this meeting um i can give her that information or she may already know how to access it and we can provide that to you um are you you could also get in touch with our code enforcement department so um if you did you were you able to catch how to get in contact with the planner for this project because if not we'll put that back up and the number that's the five four three thirty two twenty three i did i did try calling that number but i keep getting their voicemail every time like i try all week and and i haven't talked to anybody because like i am not sure who should i be contacting you know about this absolutely and we want to be able to get those resources to you so um have you received those meetings planter be those messages we several of us have actually been out of town at a planning conference so i apologize i personally am behind on in voicemails and emails i'm not going to speak for um planter besla but she was also at the conference so okay well it could be uh an issue related to my phone that maybe when they call me something wrong with my phone i'm not sure maybe they have tried calling me back but like i say i have no problems or issues with the fence it's just the constant barking whether a car goes by the dog will bark a person walks by the dog will bark uh and because we're so close to the freeway sometimes those noises will make the dog bark and we're talking about when people are sleeping you know six seven a.m. or even on a sunday morning people want to get some rest you know and it's just annoying so uh planter besla do you happen to know if you've received any of those messages and just not had a chance to get back in touch i too am behind on um my emails and voicemails since returning um but i will definitely look into it so the other thing we could do are you um comfortable and i apologize is your name julian no no no that's my son's name because that's what i thought so miss garcia is that right yes i'm miss garcia okay miss garcia are you available to email yes yes i am okay do you nor do you or planter besla do you want to put up that slide again actually it would be lani put up the slide again with um planter besla's email contact information or nor were you sharing that i guess that was you um i was but if lani could stop sharing her screen then i would then i can um okay thank you there you go are you able to see my contact info uh is it the sbs la yes right right yes i i just took a picture of it perfect and that way we can email you the number for sonoma county animal control and our code enforcement department when once you send her an email we'll have your email address okay i will do that thank you very much thank you for calling i appreciate your involvement here very very happy that you that you participated today so given that i can't address unfortunately the the one um issue that has been raised for this project i will be approving this project with the conditions that you have added um planter besla which i wholeheartedly agree with and um would have made the same requirement so nice sorry sorry to interrupt any administrator needs um can you close the uh comment period yes so closing public comment click okay now back to what i was saying sorry um i will be approving this project with the conditions that um planter besla has created their excellent conditions i want to applaud her for that and um so i will sign that resolution and i believe that is the end of our meeting today so with that did i mention appeals no i will mention once again this action and all other actions taken in today's meeting is final unless an appeal is filed with the department and or uh reaching out to the project planner within 10 calendar days of today's decision which would be Monday October 17th 2022 and with that it concludes today's business and the October 6 2022 zoning administrator is adjourned thanks everyone