 First question is from Kani Chiwa. Is it true that shorter walks of 30 minutes or less will primarily burn sugar and carbs, while longer walks will primarily burn fat? Okay, yes, that's true, but no, it's not what you think it is. Okay, so here's what's true, right? When you're doing cardiovascular activity or any activity, you are burning energy, and the first type of energy that your body will burn is in the form of stored carbohydrates. Once that starts to get burned up and used, and believe it or not, you have a small supply of that in your body in comparison to the supply of fat that you have that you could burn for energy. Once that is burned up, then your body starts to burn fat for energy. Now, here's why it's not what you think. It's not what you think because just because your body's burning fat for energy doesn't mean you're going to get leaner later if you're still in a calorie surplus. If you're in a calorie surplus, it just replaces it and it doesn't make any difference. I mean, keto, for example, ketogenic diet, you have no carbohydrate in your diet, you're running off of ketones, which is fat. Theoretically, you're burning fat all the time. And that's how they love to market it too. Right. Can you gain body fat on keto or can you not lose weight on keto or lose body fat on keto? Absolutely. Sure. So calorie deficit is necessary for fat loss regardless of this, you know, how much cardio you do and whether you're burning sugar carbs or fats. And the real benefit of comparison here is that a longer walk is going to burn more calories. Yes. You know, so if I had to compare a 30-minute walk versus somebody who walked for 90 minutes, well, the person who walked 90 minutes is going to burn more fat. That's right. Because they walked longer. And they burn more calories, which will then help them be in a more of a calorie deficit than the other person. Yeah, you cannot get around the simple... This is a rule. This is a law, okay? You can't get around the... It's a law of thermodynamics and physics where you must take in less calories and you burn in order for your body to search for fuel from itself to burn. If you're eating more calories and you're burning or the same amount of calories you're burning, your body's not gonna... First off, let's say you're eating more calories and you're burning and your body burned calories from its stored fat. Well, where do those extra calories go, right? They have to go somewhere. In other words, energy cannot be created nor destroyed. It gets transferred. It turns into other things. And so you can't get around that. So you have to be in a deficit to burn body fat. And you can do all the mixing things around, the magic you want, supplements and all this stuff. But if that's not happening, you're not gonna lose body fat. Yeah, at the end of the day, that's all that matters. I mean, people will deplete themselves, a glycogen, and then do these crazy intensive workouts and everything just to get quote-unquote burning through all the sugar and everything else to then the rest of the day try to burn fat. But if the calories, if you're still in a surplus, it's all washed. Well, and yeah, somebody who, for average people, this is the type of content I can't stand that gets spread in our space. It's like, for the average person, this is so splitting hair, different type of conversation. It's like, focus on, you know what will help better than all this? Build five pounds of muscle. That's a, yeah. You wanna trump walking for 30 minutes or an hour or, you know, short walks versus long walks. Go build fat-burning materials. That's right. Go build five pounds of muscle on your body. Which, by the way, five pounds of muscle distributed amongst your entire body looks like nothing. It won't look like a big difference. It's just tighter. Yes. And your body will naturally, on its own, you know, burn more calories, burn more body fat than any of those walks will.