 There are some very significant policy gains made from this perspective influenced by Adam Smith within the mold of Secretary Albert Gallant. Yeah, absolutely. And so however much I criticized the Jefferson administration, I call it failed, a lot of that criticism is especially especially relates to the the second administration. The first administration, there were some crucial moderations, the Louisiana Purchase, had a lot of problems. Overall though, I mean, he was fairly successful, you know, libertarians, beggars can't be choosers, so to speak. So, you know, when there are being steps used to reduce the size of the government, the cut down taxes, the cut military spending, etc. I mean that that's very good. So the first administration, overall my book, you know, gets about an A. Gallatin was the one bright spot in Jefferson's cabinet. He was the Secretary of the Treasury. I don't agree with everything he did. He was pro bank of the United States, which led to some issues, but he was very frugal. He was very influenced by Adam Smith, so he was appreciative of free markets. He was against sort of Hamiltonian mercantilism, etc. And through through the individuals you've mentioned, guys like John Randolph and Nathaniel Macon and Congress, they were able to reform the government in certain respects, get rid of the the whiskey tax, right? Which led to a huge decline in the number of Treasury officials in the government. So it was sort of a quasi permanent reform. They were able to downsize parts of the military. There were some issues with the Navy and that had to deal with the Barbary Pirates, but Gallatin wasn't behind that. That was Jefferson's fault. They did continue to sell off stock in the the government's ownership of the Bank of the United States, which sort of privatized the institution a little bit. These are all important reforms they deserve to be mentioned and really the main credit for them should go to Albert Gallatin as you discussed.