 I'd like to call the seventh regular meeting of the Sheboygan Common Council to order. Would the clerk please read the quote for the day? Thank you, Mayor. The most important single ingredient in the formula of success is knowing how to get along with people. Thank you very much. Then we'll go on to the roll call. There are 12 present. Alderman Donahue, Thiel, and Herman are excused. Alderman Maticek is not excused. Next, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. The United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Next, we'll go on to the approval of the minutes from our last meeting, Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move to approve. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. Those minutes are before us. Is there any discussion? See none. All those in favor, please signify by seeing aye. Opposed? Motion passes. Next, we'll go on to resignation. City attorney. Thank you, Your Honor. There are two. One is from Marge Segali, advising that the no longer able to participate on the library board of trustees for the health reasons and as resigning in our last meeting would be June 26th of this year. And the other is from Vicki Hall, advising that she's resigning from the board of Marina Park and Forestry Commission, Shpoigan Sustainable Task Force, just from the board of Marina Parks and Forestry Commission. Thank you very much, Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move to accept and file. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. That motion is before us. Any discussion? See none. All those in favor, signify by seeing and I? Aye. Opposed? Motion passes. Next is council appointments. City attorney. It's a date of today's date. Honorable members of the Common Council hereby submit the following appointment for your consideration. Sarah Swiefel to be considered for appointment to the board of Marina Park and Forestry Commissioners to fill the unexpired term of Vicki Hall whose term expires four, 25, 2016, signed by the mayor. That will lie over. Next, we're gonna move on to a presentation by Derek Mink, the director of our parking and transit group. Derek, a few months ago it took over. Derek, you wanna step up to the front? Took over this role and I think he's done an excellent job beginning and he's made a lot of changes, all positive and he's here to give us a little report of what happened in the last year. Flores, here's Derek. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. First, I'd like to introduce myself again. I am Derek Mink. I am the director of transit and parking. I guess I've been in the role for maybe about four months now. My experience includes about seven years in public transit, public administration, both with the city of Manitowoc and now the city of Sheboygan. So I'm gonna kind of go over the sheets and they were emailed out this afternoon, correct? Okay, so I'm just gonna focus on the two areas, transit and parking and pretty much just go over the first page on each one of those. The back side just covers expenses and you're more than welcome to browse at it. It's your convenience. Well, first start with transit. In the last year, we've had some really good success with ridership. We've done some very exciting things in transit to not only improve the system, but also bring a whole new facade and value and view of the transit system for the residents of Sheboygan. We've implemented many new things such as Google Transit, a trip planning app that's available through Google Maps. We've done significant updates to our website, created a Facebook page, social media. We've done some rearrangements with routes, route designations at a transfer point, all things that have made public transit easier for people to use in our community. And I think that's showing in the support that we are receiving from our passengers. 2013, we saw almost a 10% ridership increase, which at the same time statewide, was relatively high compared to what our peers were. So we could see that some of the things that we were doing in transit around the Sheboygan area was making a great impact. Public transit does service, roughly about 70,000 residents within our, excuse me, within our service area. And we average about 1,657 trips daily. If we were just to include weekly trips, we'd be over 2,000. We do operate 10 routes throughout Sheboygan, Sheboygan Falls and Kohler. We did top 500,000 trips again in 2013. What's impressive about that is the fact that we had about $600,000 in service cuts at the end of 2011. So we lost ridership going into 2012, but then was able to rebound that and then capitalize on increasing ridership through some of the changes we made, which is very significant. Some of our outlooks and goals for this year and beyond, like I said, we launched our Google transit trip planning application. That was actually a little bit ahead of schedule, so we're very excited about that. We're gonna continue to market, we're gonna continue to look at route improvements. We're set to do a survey later this year through our MPO Bay Lake Regional Planning Commission, which will help us identify future needs and some of the assessments that transit needs to become a better system. And then also we wanna keep engaging with our customers and really continuing to boost the support that we have here and also look at ways that we can literally do more with public transit here and essentially doing it with less money from the federal and state funding sources. So that's the update I have for transit. Some of the more noticeable changes that our department has been probably engaged in over the last six months to a year happens on the parking side of things. Over the last year, we've had some very exciting things and it's a great honor to be working with some of the other departments in the city, really got to know people, some of the aldermen in the room and then also some of our department has through the parking utility. But one of the noticeable differences is some of the signage, the facade, the cleanup of some of the parking utility areas. We installed all new lot entrance signs in the last, actually in the last three months, which has greatly increased the awareness of public parking available for individuals in downtown, both that live here and our tourists and guests. We also did some cleanup work in Riverfront and on South Pier to significantly reduce weeds and some of the areas that had some, I guess not so friendly looks to them in our area. We also did some rehabilitation on some existing signs in Riverfront and those that saw the A Street Island, just on South A Street, that one was rehabbed as well. So there's a lot of things that we've been working with, especially with the bid district in improving the facade of our downtown. And I think that has been a fantastic asset to Sheboygan this summer. Some of the things that we continue to work on, we have been working with Department of Public Works and the Parks Department on rehabbing some of the areas downtown, continuing weed control, really improving the overall downtown appearance. And we really enjoy working with those departments and we will continue to do that. I guess some of the goals that we continue to do in parking, especially, we're not just here to be another department, we're here to actually service our customers' needs. So we continue to look at ways that we can be more of an asset to the community, not just by providing parking, but providing adequate parking and the parking that is needed based on businesses and what our customers are telling us. So that's what we continue to do and that's what we will continue to work on in the year ahead. So that's, I guess, all I have. Derek, thank you very much for that report. Appreciate all the work you do. Thank you. Next is the public forum. There is none this evening. Thank you. We'll go on to Mayor's announcements. Well, we had a great Fourth of July and that Fourth of July celebration wouldn't have happened in the fashion that we saw it if it weren't for three sponsors who have picked up the tab for all the expense of Johnsonville Sausage, stepped up with the Big Bang Celebration, Festival Foods took care of the Festival Food Fireworks and Community Bank and Trust was a sponsor for the parade on the Fourth of July. Now, we also have to thank our partners over at City, the Chamber Tourism and Lisa Hartman, Amy Wilson, and George Dewick there did a super job. And then we also have to remember our city departments, Chad Pellecek oversaw tourism and the planning department participated in this. The DPW got all the equipment where it needed to be so that everything could take place and the police department handled all the security and other arrangements. Fire department was involved and also the senior activity center. So thanks to everyone for all the work that was done to pull off a great Fourth of July for the city of Sheboygan. Next, we'll go on to hearings. 2.1 is a hearing scheduled for this evening for the proposed assessments for the water lateral replacements and 1217 South 7th Street. And if there's no objection, I'll take these together. And 2.2 is a hearing scheduled for this evening for the vacation and discontinuance of a portion of the paved alley between North 14th Street and North 15th Street between St. Clair Avenue and Erie Avenue. Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Is there anyone wishing to be heard? Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move to close the hearings. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. Is there any discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion passes. Next we'll move on to the consent agenda. Consent agenda will include items 3.1 through 3.23. Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move to accept and file all ROs, accept and adopt all reports of committee, put all resolutions and substitute resolutions upon their passage. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. The consent agenda is before us. Does anyone have any questions on any of those items? Seeing none, will the clerk please call the roll for the consent agenda? Okay, I'll mark you. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Next is report of officers. Items 4.1 through 4.5 will be referred to various committees. I should point out that 4.3 will be withdrawn. Under resolutions, item 5.1 is a resolution by Alderman Hammond authorizing payment for asbestos and lead removal of the former Boston store property to the seller of the property. Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. First, I'd ask to suspend the rules. Make a motion to suspend the rules. Second. Thank you for that motion and second on suspension. All those in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Under suspension, go ahead. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I move to put the resolution upon its passage. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. The resolution is before us under discussion. Alderman Hammond. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I just want to briefly explain what's going on with this as part of the offer to purchase of the Boston store, as many of you recall. There was a contingency for a phase two inspection and part of that phase two inspection came back indicating that there was asbestos in the building. So we went back to the seller, discussed with them options as far as paying for that. The bid was about 166,000. So they agreed to pay half of that cost. So the reason for the suspension and the asking for this is we want to try to get this cleaned up before we take possession because part of the offer would be that it would have to be acceptable to us that everything was cleaned appropriately. As you recall, we've allocated about 250,000 to the tear down of the Boston store. And this would go in as part of that 250,000. So just want to give everybody a brief explanation of why we were asking for that. Thank you for that information. Alderman Coss. Thank you, Mayor. I understand that there was the $250 that was allocated for the demolition. When that bid was put out, I mean, did they not see the asbestos or was that brought to anybody's attention? I'm just curious why that showed up at this time. Alderman Hammond. The 250,000 when we got the initial for the tearing it down, it was not taken out to formal bid process yet. So no one had gone through. This was part of the phase two that was done before we even got to that point. So the $250,000 was the, Jim, correct me? I can't remember which or yet. Who was the, who'd we go to? Field Vogels, you know, best estimate at what it would cost, but they hadn't gone through it at that point. But you should, well. Alderman Coss. Thank you. Well, what if that $250,000 is actually less? I mean, should we get a firm bid on that first and then maybe we won't even need this? Jim, would you like to respond to that? Alderman Boren. Thank you, Mayor. I'm not a real estate person, but that problem with the building, the asbestos, wouldn't that be the seller's problem and not the buyer's problem? Or if we make them do the full 166, then do we have an accepted offer at $500,000? Or if we have them do the full 166, are they gonna want more for the building? But I just, it seems to me that they would be, that would be their problem, an existing problem in the building. That shouldn't be our problem. Maybe somebody could enlighten me. Well, the current arrangement calls for us to delay the closing date by a month and that their share of the asbestos cleanup would come out of their proceeds from the sale. So that price of $500,000 is being decreased by that. Alderman Hammond. I'd like to ask Dave Gass, or I move for open the floor to Dave Gass. Is there a second? If you'd be willing, you've been doing the negotiation. If you'd be willing, can you come to the podium, please? All in favor, please signify by saying aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? David, the floor is yours. Just from a context, David's been doing most of the negotiating with the seller and he reached out to the seller at this point and was given a pretty firm. We weren't interested in incurring any more additional cost, but we would partner with the city. David, if you'd elaborate on that a little bit, please. Yes, that's exactly right. Remember when we start up the conversation with the developer, we essentially talked to them and said, you've got a property here, we've got an anxious buyer possibly. If you're willing to move fast at a very low price, we think we can get this done. And they basically said, you know what, we're probably interested in doing that. But the price of $500,000 was viewed as sort of a bottom price. They were like, okay, if you can get this done fast, okay, we'll do it. We said, well, the only contingency of merit that we have to have is environmental because we gotta be careful that we don't buy something that could really create some problems for us going forward. They understood that. So we didn't think there was gonna be an issue, but fortunately we went and had a full environmental done and found out that there is asbestos primarily in the basement area, pretty much on down there and the old bakery that was down there one time if any of you remember that. And so we went back to them and said, you know what, you should pay for the cost. They said, no, we'll let the thing go then because we're already taking this at a bargain price, $500. They're gonna have other costs involved, title costs and whatever they're gonna reduce that even further. So we went back and forth a number of times. We got some firm bids and they then said, okay, we'll share the cost if you'll share the cost. And we went back to, we'll share the cost but have to be a max of 80, 82, 82.5. So if by chance, and then you have to do the demolition because we don't wanna have responsibility and if we take responsibility for removing it, there might be other issues that arise that increase our cost even more. So if you agree to do this on your own, we'll agree to reimburse you up to 82.5 which was half of that bid. If it costs them more than that, they have to eat it. They agreed to do that. So that's what we got right now. So 82.5 of their side or more will come out of their 500 plus whatever. So I think that's a really good deal. I mean, granted, normally you might say the seller should bear it but a lot of times the seller is selling their property at their market value. Again, this property is assessed at 3.8 million. Now granted, it's a different market but they're selling to us for $500,000. And when we look at this property, I think the sense of getting this done and as quickly as even more so. I mean, I have a prime view of Seagull Valley up there and you look at the building and you see the problem it is and when you don't have it in your possession, how difficult it is to deal with that. So I think that's just one example of how I think the seller is being cooperated with us. It's a reasonable offer. I think it's actually an extremely reasonable offer. And as soon as we can get this done, the bet. That's my view. Thank you for those comments, David. Alderman Hammond. Tommy. Alderman Coss. Thank you, Mayor. Okay, this body has already voted to allocate $250,000 for demolition. If the highest bid is going to be 200,000, there's an extra 50,000 to play with there. So why are we doing the 83? Just why not the 33,000? We approved it, but we never appropriated it. We approved to transfer it in finance and then we voted at the council. I have the document here. I understood, but we haven't approved where the money's going to go to. We approved 250,000 for the demolition, which is now only going to be 200,000. So we're 50,000 ahead. Steve, the man. City attorney? Well, all I can say is that the original offer to purchase was at 500,000 contingent on us doing an environmental to our satisfaction. We found it wasn't satisfactory, so we could say, okay, we're not going to buy the property, but I guess our feeling is we should buy the property and therefore the agreement to split the costs on the environmental is I think is a good move. If down the road the demolition comes in, so the demolition plus this 83,000 for environmental is more than 250,000. I guess the council have to deal with that and find additional funds to cover that cost. What I should point out there right now with this 83,000 plus the quote that we have from Spiegel, Bogle, we feel that they should cover the $250,000 should cover all of our expenses. Alderman Cough, did you have anything else? Yes, thank you. On the finance, we allocated from the general fund on reserve fund balance. We moved it to the general fund land acquisitions for 250,000 and then this 83,000 is coming out of, where's that coming out of? That's coming out of, where's that coming out of? Help me out here. That's coming out of a different fund. This is authorizing the payment. Alderman Cough, put set number of funds into an account but there's still gonna need to be approved by the council of a contract for whatever the ultimate cost of the demolition is gonna be. So Steve, with what you're saying is what we're actually doing is approving $83,000 of the 250 to be spent for this purpose, is that correct? There's 250,000 available there and 83,000 would be coming out of that appropriation. So the 83,000 is coming out of the 250,000? Yes. Well we already allocated 250,000 so then there's no need to vote on this 83,000? Right, you've allocated 250,000 for the total demolition but this is really part of the demolition. I mean you need, in order to demolish the building you've gotta remove the asbestos. You can't demolish the property without dealing with the asbestos so it's basically an additional cost of the demolition. If you didn't demolish it, you wouldn't have to deal with the asbestos but if you're assuming we're gonna be demolishing it that's part of the cost of demolition. Alderman Ditters. Given the timeframe involved the 250,000 that was allocated for demolition overall the sense of you guys, is that a time sensitive thing if we sit on this any extra time are those numbers gonna go up according to the spiel logo or the abatement people? Alderman Hammond. Thank you. I guess I'm not sure what you mean by time sensitive other than that we wanna keep this process moving along so that if there's development out there we can be in a position to take advantage of it. So by delaying this and sitting on it A doesn't make the problem go away and B it just takes that much longer to develop the sites and along with the bid master plan we wanna develop that as soon as feasibly possible. Not sure if that answers your question. I don't know if the costs particularly go up if we wait a year or two years with respect to cost of inflation would drive those costs up but again our goal is to get that into a state of where we can develop it as soon as possible. Alderman Lussard. I just wanna have some clarity. We've already approved 250, we're not asking for 83 more we're just going into that 250 needing a vote to allocate the 80 however many thousand. And I also be pointed out that there is some time sensitive with getting the asbestos taken care of so that we can close on the property. Alderman Bellinger. Thank you, Mayor. I was gonna just reiterate your point that you just made to Alderman Bitter's the time sensitive nature of this would be the fact that the seller wanted to reach a mutual agreement which we have come up with and do it in a timely fashion to put forth, to delay this is gonna put that agreement in jeopardy. And once again this is coming out of the already allocated $250,000 and it appears that the 250 is still suffice to take care of the rest of the demolition. So I don't really see an issue with this other than just being made aware of it in approving it. Thank you for those comments. Any other discussion? Seeing none. Will the clerk please call the roll? Two. I'm an aye. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Next we'll proceed with item 5.2 through 5.6. Those will all be referred to various committees. Item 5.7 will be withdrawn. Under number six reported committees. Item 6.1 is an RC by law and licensing recommending denying a taxicab driver's license under number 0377 based on her failure to accurate review all relevant convictions on her application, her record of violations related to the license activity and her failure to cooperate with the committee. All in favor of the anger wheel. Thank you Mr. Mayor. I move that the RC be accepted and adopted. Thank you for that motion and support under discussion. Is Renee Hampton here this evening? She's not here. We did invite her to our meeting on two separate occasions and she did not show up. Thank you very much. Any other discussion? Seeing none will the clerk please call the roll on the motion. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Item 6.2 is an RC by law and licensing recommending denying a taxicab driver's license number 7368 based on his failure to accurate reveal all relevant convictions on his application, his record of violations related to the license activity and his failure to cooperate with the committee. Alderman Vanderwill. Thank you. I move that the RC be accepted and adopted. Second. Thank you for that motion and support under discussion. Is Tom Sanders here this evening? And for him it was the same thing. He did not appear at either of our meetings. Thank you very much. Any further discussion? Seeing none will the clerk please call the roll and passage. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Item 6.3 is an RC by finance recommending authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2014 budget establishing an appropriation for engineering services for the Mead Library Chiller Project for uncollectable charge to the tax roll for... Well this would be for the Chiller Project. Alderman Hammond. Thank you Mr. Mayor. I move to accept and adopt and put the resolution upon its passage. Second. Thank you for that motion and support. Is there any discussion? Seeing none will the clerk please call the roll. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Next we'll move on to item 6.4. That will be referred to salary and grievances. And then we'll go to 6.5. Alderman Hammond. Thank you Mr. Mayor. I'd move to file. Second. Moved and seconded to file 6.5. Any discussion on that motion? Seeing none all those in favor. Please signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? Motion passes. Under matters laid over. Item 7.1 is arrow number 62 of 1415 by the city planning commission recommending vacating a portion of the paved alley between North 14th Street and North 15th Street between St. Clair Avenue and Erie Avenue. Alderman Hammond. Thank you Mr. Mayor. I move to accept and file and put the ordinance upon its passage. Okay. Thank you for that motion and support. Alderman Hammond. Alderman Boren. Thank you, Mayor. Is that the property over by the, where the new CVS pharmacy is going? Yes, that's correct. And by vacating that, I know we had some questions on there from the residents about being able to park back out of their garages, et cetera. What does that exactly mean by that we're vacating that? This is vacating the portion of the alley on the properties that they purchased. So there's still gonna be an alley between the homes that exist there. And they've also reserved an extension of the alley onto their property so that they can maneuver their cars even in the winter months. Okay, thanks. Any other discussion? Would the clerk please call the roll on passage? 12 ayes. Motion passes. Item 7.2 is an RC number 59 of 1415 by public protection and safety recommending prohibiting the use of sky lanterns in the city. Alderman Carlson. Thank you, Mayor. I move to accept and adopt and pass the ordinance. Thank you for that motion and support. The motion is before us. Is there any discussion? Seeing none, will the clerk please call the roll for passage? Got it. 10 ayes and two noes. Motion passes. Next is item 7.3, general ordinance number 14 of 1415 by Alderman Donahue Vanderweel, borne recommending amending the 1975 municipal code as to add or delete various positions to the police department table of organization. Alderman Dassler. That's what I need to say here. Motion to pass. Move the pass the ordinance. Second. Thank you very much. We have a motion on the floor. Is there a second? We have a second. Any discussion on the motion? Alderman Van Akron. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. I guess if the chief could maybe come up and just give an explanation of what changes are being made and how that's going to affect his budget as well as the operations of the police department, that'd be great. Chief Domagolski, would you like to come up and explain that please? Sure, what we're doing is trying to better align the department. So the retirement of Captain Wallace last month gives us an opportunity to move some positions without affecting any individual person. So what's gonna happen is through the promotional process, a lieutenant will get promoted to captain. We'll leave a vacancy in the lieutenant's position. We're gonna eliminate that position and use the money savings from that to create two sergeants positions. So it's essentially downgrading the one lieutenant's position to a sergeant's position and then use the savings from that to change a police officer to a sergeant. So it'll better align and give us another sergeant's position in the administrative division, which right now, one of the problems that we have is all of our operations. People are spending too much time doing administrative duty so they're not spending the time supervising and coaching, mentoring our employees that's needed. So it's really gonna do three basic things for us. Number one is it's gonna allow for better development of our personnel. It's gonna allow more opportunities at that first line level supervision for sergeants to gain different experience. So they'll be able to get patrol experience, then they'll be able to get investigative experience in the MAG unit and the SKU unit and administrative division there. So they'll become better rounded, more rounded supervisors as they move up. And that will assist both with alignment within the department and eventually what succession planning. Thank you for that information. Is there any other discussion? Seeing none, will the clerk please call the roll for passage. 12 ayes. Motion passes. Next we'll go on to other matters, city attorney. Thank you, Your Honor. 8.1 is an R.O. by the city clerk submitting communication from P.E.T.S. Meyer requesting a waiver from the Sex Offender Residency restrictions in order to live at 1020 Bell Avenue. That'll go to public protection and safety. 8.2 is an R.O. by the city clerk submitting communication from all the person born along with an article from the Milwaukee Journal entitled, Digging Deeper to Cover Health. That'll be referred to salary and grievances. 8.3 is a resolution authorizing appropriate city officials to execute a contract between the city and McMahon engineers, architects, the amount of 18,000 for sanitary sewer design for the Calumet Drive Reconstruction, Main Avenue to North 26th Street State Project. That'll be referred to public works. 8.4 is a resolution authorizing the emergency slope repair on broken drive as a result of major erosion. That'll be referred to public works. 8.5 is an R.O. by the city clerk submitting various license applications for the period ending June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016. That'll be referred to law and licensing committee. 8.6 is a resolution authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2014 budget. That'll be referred to the finance committee. 8.7 is a resolution authorizing a transfer of appropriations in the 2014 budget. That'll be referred to the finance committee. 8.8 is an R.O. by the director of planning and development. Submitting and requesting reserved on-street event parking south side of Pennsylvania Avenue from broken drive to North 5th Street and south side of Center Avenue from broken drive to North 4th Street. For two sale Sheboygan sailing championships July 26th to August 1st, 2014 and August 8th to August 15th, 2014 and the closure of Penn Avenue from broken drive to the Lake Michigan. That'll be referred to public protection and safety. 8.9 is a tabulation of bids from the purchasing agent for the structural rebuild and replacement of the three tower roof structures of fire station number four. That'll be referred to public protection and safety. 8.10 is a resolution authorizing the purchasing agent to enter into contract for the replacement of the three tower roofs for fire station number four. That'll be referred to public protection and safety. 8.11 is a resolution authorizing entering into contract for sale of real estate with Becknell Industrial LLC. That'll be referred to the finance committee. 8.12 is an ordinance creating a no parking stopping or standing zone on the west side of broken drive north of Wisconsin Avenue. That'll be referred to public protection and safety. 8.13 is an ordinance creating two hour parking limits on the east side of south a street from Bluff Avenue. That'll be referred to public protection and safety. 8.14 is an ordinance creating a bus stop and banning parking stopping or standing except for authorized buses on North 25th Street. That'll also go to public protection and safety. 8.15 is an ordinance placing four way stop signs at the intersection of North 12th and North Avenue. That'll also go to public protection and safety. 8.16 is an ordinance creating commuter impacted parking on the east and west sides of North 11th street between North Avenue and School Avenue. Go to public protection and safety. 8.17 is an ordinance creating no parking stopping or standing zone on the east side of broken drive north of Wisconsin Avenue. And that'll also go to public protection and safety. Thank you. Next we'll move on to adjournment. Alderman Hammond. Move to adjourn. Second. Moved and seconded to adjourn. All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? We stand adjourned. Thank you very much.