 I use the name Ishwar now, but I was born with the name Henrik. What would you prefer to be called? Ishwar. Ishwar? Take your time. I've been, I wouldn't say like use the word professional seeker, but it's been very honest in my seeking for probably the last 15 years, trying different paths and getting caught in different pitfalls along the way. The beauty of what I get from you is that truth wants to connect with this, thisness, or it could be a confusion to put it like these words, but maybe that shows a split inside of me. I love certain aspects of, I want to honor like the, the Advaitic teaching, or even the Neo Advaitic teachings in a way, because I feel connected with that. But when you speak about this kind of soul impulse, it also has, because it feels like that is what is moving me in some regards. It's not, at least that's what I recognize as the most meaning. When I move in life, it's sometimes not that. I'm trying to do that, and I have a sense when you before spoke about surrender that I know in some ways the state of surrender. But there are many moments where I don't know, actually I teach meditation, it's like, but it's still, it becomes a concept, like you say. I try to find my way, but it doesn't, it feels not suited in a way. So the act of surrendering, like the sadhana. I know that much of your teaching is exactly about that, so I get very curious about the other day you said, as I recall it, it's not being present, it's bending to presence. Is that wrong? Could you have presented it like that? What I'm going to do is I'm just going to try to sort of give some contour to this. So what I'm seeing in your current stage, I would even say it's a stage of seeking, is that there has been, perhaps because of neo-advaitan practices, there has been an identification with presence. I am that, or I am. So that is why you say that the soul wants to something, or the soul wants this, or the soul wants that. The soul doesn't want anything, just to put some order into all of this. The soul is an entity that has no intent, it has no will, it has no want, it has no yearnings. Anything that wants something can be ascribed to the ego, just to make it a little bit more, you know, for the sake of understanding, of conceptual understanding. So the reason why this confusion is there is because that I am experience now has to be translated into I am this. And if you take just this evening after the satsang, if you have time, just to see what I mean by this one sentence, I am or is it I am this. If you can make that shift from I am to I am this, then your entire question will dissolve. You know what I'm saying? Because then you know what is in surrender to what. Right now, if I am is the experience, then how can there be surrender? Because what is I am surrendering to if it is already that? So my suggestion to you, just as an experiment is try to move, because if you can be an I am, then you can also be an I am this. That much of agility is there in the system. Try to take this evening to make that shift and see what happens with the business. And I will take up your question if you are here tomorrow as the first question, because you are what I call a professional seeker, someone whose main work in life is to find, you know, to go for the truth and to look for it. In the context of that, it would be important for you to at this point see if you can make that switch and then see if this question is still there. Because I don't want to push you into that. You have to move into that state because it's coming out of one thing into an actually it's like moving into the next stage of your spiritual journey and adventure. So do that. If you are here tomorrow, I will take your question first. It is also the last day I am here, so after that I won't be here. Yes. Thank you for that very much, for that invitation as well. The bell has rung.