 We often talk about these cultural phenomenons like they're a huge segment of society, but in this story it points out that when we talk about non-binary facilities for certain trans people or what have you, it's really not a huge population that we're talking about. We're spending a lot of money on it, right? Yeah, I think it's 1.9% of students according to the survey that identify as transgender and non-binary. 1.9, Josh, yet how much money is being spent on 1.9% of the student population? And this is the University of California system, which is large. Just over 300,000 students. That 2% or so of students include transgender and non-binary. Now, non-binary students would simply reject essentially being labeled as one or the other. But it's a very tiny, much tinier percentage who are actually trans-identifying students. A biological male, for example, who identifies as a female. And yet they are renovating many of their bathrooms. Probably their goal is to renovate all of them to make them gender-inclusive. And it's at a huge cost.