 We have, in the past, covered a vast array of evidence which suggests the past existence of giants, yet alas, much of what is or has now either unfortunately been suppressed, destroyed, stolen, or forgotten about. With the remains of their initial discoveries now often only to be found remaining, proverbially, in stone, in the form of the library archives of the world, and the news reports now digitally preserved within. Often follow-up reports abruptly ceased, after the mention of the rapid arrival and insatiable interest of the Smithsonian, among others in said finds. However, now, thanks to the popularity of such subjects, the power and speed of modern technology, such finds made during excavations involving a large array of individuals, make modern cover-ups difficult, and are rarely accomplished. With the only modern, almost openly admitted one of note, having followed the discovery of the supposed tomb of Osiris, when all media was immediately banned from the site. When permitted back, the tomb had already been penetrated, and was subsequently claimed as having been found empty, supposedly previously looted. This regardless of its near-impenetrability with Gantt and Brink only making it successful with modern robotics. But I digress. Working in cooperation, a team involving the Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, a team from the Penn Museum, University of Pennsylvania, among others, discovered a sarcophagus academically claimed as having belonged to a, quote, King Sobektaheb, probably Sobektaheb, the first dated 1780 BC, during the 13th dynasty. What we find astonishing regarding the find, however, is its sheer size. Carved from a single-corrid piece of aswan granite, initially weighing hundreds of tons, this finished tomb still weighs a minimum of 60 tons. It was somehow transported to the burial site and placed seemingly with delicacy where it now lay. Its resting place, inner chamber, also some three meters in length. The baffling enigmas of why such size, how were they moved? To explain how these feats were accomplished is far less difficult challenge if one incorporates into their postulations the possibility that the size of these tombs were in fact made to measure, indeed, a match to the height and scale of the civilization who buried them. Could the inclusion of ancient giants into the many other theories surrounding the mysteries of Giza solve the puzzle we still can't solve of how these stones were moved? It is a hypothesis which we find very fitting.