 Felly ei gwrdd ydw i'r amser Oesbydedd Ystod, a fyddwn i ddim yn gwneud cyfleidio am ymgy慧nau barod, rheoli am leioclawn ymgyfrau â ymgynghwyl yn Eur Jobs. Fy li os bod yn gwneud ymgynghwyl ar gyfer seithio cyflaid gwirion cyflaid o gael cyflaidau cyflaid gwirion cyflaid gwirion cyflaid. Yn gweld maen nhw'n i amddangos thatsfynol i'r cyflaid cyflaid i gael cyffyrdd cyflaid yma, oedd hynny chi yn meddwl谢谢u a'r cyd-igelwadau sydd wedi gweld i'r 2030 yma ar gweithio yn cyd-igelwadau. Mae'n cyd-igelwadau sydd wedi'u rhoi'r projekty ar y dyfodol yng Nghymru, ymdweud a'r cyd-igelwadau ar gyfer gweld sydd y cyd-igelwadau, neu'r SDGs. Mae'n gweithio yn cyd-igelwadau yma yn cyd-igelwadau a'r cyd-igelwadau, ac mae'n ddysgu i'r ples yw'r ddechrau sy'n ddiddordeb yn cyd-igelwadau yn y tro o'r bod yn un o'r llos. newydd y rhanieddiaeth yn meddwl am ei hunnw ymlaen llawer yn erbyn. Felly mae'r hyn yn deallu eu pryd peth a gael yn ym raisedd, am adeilad, lleol, mddannol a'r nobi. Mae yw ymdweud ydw i ddweud ddull yn prys, ac mae'r syniadau sydd wedi eu syrgrifennu Minyol, mae'r hyn yn addysg yn edrych yn gwaithol i bod yn sicr i'r cyfnodol sy'n ddrygiad ar hyn nhw. Mae'n ei hun i'r�OS ac'r Llywodraeth yn mas polywyddiad da wedi werthro biadau, ac yn y dod i'r unrhyw unhefyd i'r wrthffletter sydd yn yr 59th yr olyig yn ystafell cyffredinol yn ei ein cwnt calculus. Cyniad hyfeiein gwahanol ar yr ymweld thatadaf arrangedeth wnaethon o wassyl iawn cyfaint wedi wirthoedd cy � John na le neckafun heading digas yn cael sydd fuelwyrfodol idgwn. a we ask these representatives to discuss what have worked well, as well as lessons learnt from running projects. The synthesis identified a wide range of opportunities for co-created projects to contribute in particular to achieving the SDGs, for example, through taking action on particular issues involving citizens in decision making, or through the knowledge or skills that participants gain. But some key reflections also emerged, which need to be considered in the design of such projects. The first relate to initial engagement with communities. While it's not always the case for co-creative projects, in some circumstances, researchers or practitioners may seek out communities to work with. And this requires careful planning. For example, it can be tempting to work with communities whose leaders are most engaged and approachable and have been involved in similar projects before. But these may not be the best communities suited to a particular project. In addition, considerable time and resources are needed to engage communities. This includes investing time in understanding local cultures, building trust and being sensitive to a community's experiences. Many projects we identified emphasise the value of building a project team, including local stakeholders such as local universities, non-governmental and civil society organisations and community leaders. Finding the right local partner was seen to unlock community involvement so that scientists or practitioners are not seen as external actors going in and telling people what to do. In the design phase of a project, co-designing methods and materials with participants were seen as valuable to ensure that they are appropriate for the participant's circumstances. Co-creation of methodologies ensures participation can sit alongside existing daily activities and not to overburden participants. This is particularly important when working with people in resource poor settings. Some projects highlighted the tension that can arise from maintaining data quality standards and ensuring communities are given ownership of projects. Co-creating methodologies and field guides with participants can help to overcome this. Some projects have structured their co-design processes to be iterative and circular so that those involved can learn these best practices by participating in them. It's important that the co-design process includes all members of a community as they may have varying needs and priorities. For example, while digitisation can increase inclusion of some groups, others may feel excluded to a perceived lack of skills. Challengers were also identified in involving women because they have many responsibilities in a high workload. Electricity can also potentially lead to exclusion of some. While examples exist where co-design has overcome all of these issues, it is also recognised that this requires a significant investment of time. When it comes to the implementation phase of a project, sufficient time is also needed for training participants in data collection methods, particularly if they are unfamiliar to participants. Resources may also be needed for participants connecting to the internet, for example, to download apps or upload data. Projects should carefully consider how they can engage citizens in all stages of the research process, including data analysis and dissemination. This gives participants additional skills as well as encourage greater ownership of a project. Finally, outcomes of projects need to be carefully considered. While co-creation can ensure that community priorities are at the forefront of projects, there is a need to be honest with participants and set expectations, especially in low income areas. Participants might expect that when a project focuses on a particular issue, combined efforts will result in a large change, but often this is not the case. Researchers need to be clear with participants about expected impacts, as well as accept that people may not want to participate in a project that they feel will not result in a concrete change for them. In some cases, participants are compensated financially for their involvement if it takes time away from time that could be used to earn a living. If project outcomes are not clear or tangible, this could lead to people only participating for a financial reward. This can be addressed at least in part by allowing sufficient time and resources at the start of a project to engage stakeholders who will use data or other outcomes from projects so that citizens can see action from their efforts. It may be possible to bring local authorities and communities together to come up with shared priorities at the start of a project, although this depends on the local context and nature of relationships. Thank you for listening to these reflections, and I look forward to hearing yours on what makes a co-created system science project work.