 That's the question. I have this customer that occasionally receives emails of an access database, so the ACCDB file. Outlook doesn't seem to play nice with that file type for reasons I totally understand. But my question is if there is a way to receive that file type by email and Outlook web app. This client is using Microsoft 365 Defender for Office 365, and I didn't see any policies within threat management that would help me at all. Obviously, I know there are other ways to share this file outside of email, but not looking for that at this moment. Well, is she opposed to sticking a zip extension on it? That's one way. Yeah, I mean, that's one way. I found an article, an article on the docs at Microsoft.com, Office 365 users can't open or view attachments in Outlook web app. And there are a number of simply blocked attachments that are kind of both Outlook on the web and certainly Outlook the client. There's an article that will take care of that for the client, but as far as she was concerned, there's an Office 365 or an Office web Outlook web app. I'll get it right, arrangement. There is an example, there's a couple of examples of Windows PowerShell commands you can add or remove various blocked file types from it. I don't know that that's specific one more reply, but the list is rather lengthy here of what you're carrying you can add and subtract. Yeah, and in addition to what Hal's saying, I dropped a bunch of links into the window that discusses the topic, you know, the submitter of the question indicates she understands the reason why the file's blocked, but there's some discussion around that, some potential techniques for getting around it as well as what you may or may not be able to do, just different things to chew on and process. It's not a file type I typically see. I mean, I understand what it is, but are passing accesses database around common thing these days? No. And depending on the size of that thing too, that would be a beast of a file to open up. Yeah, that'll hit file size limits, but you know. Well, and just basic default file behavior when you open an attachment and Outlook web app, it opens it in the browser version. So if you open a word attachment, what opens it in Word Online or Excel Online, there is no online version of access. So if they're just trying to open it, they're gonna have to download it and then open it. They're not going to be able to open it as the file attachment, right? So that there's that too. So. There was never an access, like an access web app type? They tried to do one with SharePoint. Yeah, that's right. Okay. Horrible. 2010 and 23. Let's just say no. Yeah, exactly. Just like the project, the original like project 2010, when they tried to do project online and yeah, they should face exactly, it's horrible. The reason I ask is that if they still have like an old version, if they still are up and running in SharePoint 2010, if they had that, I don't know, is that even still a thing out there? So access web apps, so here's the thing, if you had an access web app in SharePoint, what you were doing is effectively taking an entire database and shoving it in a SQL column. Yeah. And it was, I mean, I'm sure it caused no end to heartache and heartburn for DBAs trying to deal with, you know, non-structured storage, but there was no data at all. We don't want to track the databases because of that too. Yeah. And I ended up converting a bunch of access databases into connected SharePoint lists that used access as the front end. So. Better solution. Yeah. Better solution. Yeah, so it wasn't the ACCDB file that was storing the data, it was the list. But. Well, you know, and a lot of this was going on is because during that era, you know, that was while I was at Microsoft still, we had a number of customers that were Lotus Notes, you know, migrations over. And so a lot of that effort was trying to, I know, making faces there, Sean, I saw that. Locust Notes, it's a plague. But a lot of that, well, these were people that were making the transition open, but they were trying to make up for that, you know, that capability. The thing that Lotus Notes was strong at, it was problematic as so many things, but those database driven end user created applications on the fly, and it was incredibly powerful. And that's what kept so many customers with their foot over in the Lotus Notes world for so long. It's still struggling. I still have clients who, you know, are converting over and, you know, share point in Power Apps is the closest, but it's not the same. Well, no, you have to completely re-architect, rebuild, and so it's just a matter of time. Yes. Yeah, I think I agree with Sean. That was a major block of supply question. Well, and I became the master of the PACE-to-PEND query to pull data into an access list because you can't just copy and paste it, you can't, it doesn't work, you know, you gotta do the data transformation in the query and then have it paste into the list. You can't just, you know, oh, let me highlight these and paste over here, that doesn't work. Yeah, Neil, to your point, I mean, yeah, it was a blocking factor for a lot of customers over it. And one of the reasons why, like, our strategy for them was parallel. And so up and running, all net new over there until you're able to make that switch. But there was, and it was over to like what Sharon just described, it was re-architecting, recreating, and just when there was enough momentum in that, you know, everything that was new that they could grandfather and then shut down completely, but it could take years. Yeah, that doesn't drain stuff. Yeah, I don't even think there was a, I don't think there was a halfway decent partner solution for the either, other than to do what you explained, maybe steps and just keep moving. No, cause that's the, and that's why, when I left Microsoft and went to ISV and we talked about that as well. I was at an ISV that was one of the award-winning top solutions in migration governance in Lotus Notes. And they re-architected the solution and did the same thing and built the business for the SharePoint world. They knew that side of it, and they knew that the return was not there to invest in creating a solution to help with that process. Although their Lotus Notes products still exists, still out there. They still, I don't know that they're selling any new, but, you know, updates. Like radioactive waste, right? It pays for itself, it actually generates revenue, but yeah, same with managing radioactive waste. Yes, correct. It's a business. It's a business for somebody.