 Call the order of public works meeting this evening. Uh, we'll start with a roll call All the person acly ready. Are you online? Looks like She was on so What's that she's back, okay all the person acly what Phillips Suboglio And Ryan is not on yet, but he said he will hop on later on if he gets in between otherwise he is excused Alrighty, we'll start out with the Pledge of Allegiance Alrighty, I think we can skip the introductions. I think everybody here is pretty much The usual So we'll go right to approval of the minutes I'll suck at that that he acly okay Motion made by Marcus second by beddy Any discussion on it all in favor? Any opposed? Chair votes aye motion passes Okay items for discussion 3.1 resolution 92 2021 September 21st 2020 document 5.9 Resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to consent to the assignment of the city's agreement with waste management of wisconsin incorporated For residential refuse and recyclable material transfer and tipping services to gfl environmental incorporated Dr. Bevel Thank you, mr. Chairman. All I'm going to do is to defer to Superintendent Jason Blasio. He's been very instrumental In the waste management contract And our recycling program and he can give you the background on the reason for this change. Thank you. Okay Hello So waste management is in the process of buying advanced disposal And part of the agreement with the department of justice is In the state of wisconsin waste management can acquire all the advanced disposals because they'd have too much of the market So waste is working with gfl Which is green for life environmental. It's actually a canadian firm If we're in 23 states, they just aren't into wisconsin yet So some of the assets are then are being spun off to or sold I should say the gfl One of those assets is the Transfer station that we currently dump at it shaboygon falls. So waste management is going to be taking over the advanced disposal location on pain avenue But since we don't have routes we just drive and dump there Um, I guess part of the negotiations with the department of justice was our contract had to stay with that facility And waste management has decided to flip that facility to gfl And take the better facility which has advanced disposals So thomas david and I met with waste management and the new um, I think regional vice president for wisconsin Um, and he's currently advanced disposal employee. He'll be switching over And working for gfl. He's went to school in shaboygon. He's a shaboygon resident and he'll be out of the shaboygon office which Um made it a little easier for us because we'll be working with a local person as far as the contract Contract stays exactly the same mix. We'll just have to transition to dealing with gfl instead of waste management Okay Any questions for any of the committee? Do we have a motion? Second Motion been made by ryan and seconded by marcus any other discussion all those in favor any opposed Chair votes aye motion passes okay move on resolution 96-20-21 September 20th direct referral resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to enter into a professional engineering services contract with full infrastructure and environment llc for the shaboygon five-year restoration plan Director beville. Thank you, mr. Chairman With with this agreement this basically sets forth the process to start Doing a five-year plan to address 11 or so approximate sites along shaboygon's lakeshore as we have resulted in shoreline erosion with high lake levels Folt is the company that is currently under contract with us doing the the self shore interceptor And as part of that project we also identified other areas of the city And this contract would help us identify A plan in other words in terms of how are we going to address the long-term shoreline protection of these areas within the city Look at programs plans and potential funding sources As a matter of fact, I just submitted a grant application To wisconsin department of emergency management in fema for a grant So that's part of this as well And as well as To help us prioritize the areas in other words, how are we going to address access Funding in which areas have the Are prioritized over others that clearly we cannot do all these projects all at the same time There's just not enough money. They're very complicated in terms of access permitting funding Folt has a lot of experience on the Great Lakes in doing this type of work Uh, and what we're recommending is starting this process entering into contract with them To work with us over the next several years in other words to Get some plans get some funding in place and really try to get some of these areas Restored and build some resiliency and protection for our shoreline Ryan sasmar city engineer has been instrumental in working with them and I in if there's any other questions I I'd also Invite ryan to share some further information if you so desire as a committee Well, ryan's got some other information. It'd be great. It'd be great. I think this is a Really good good idea with all that's been happening with the lakes are So go ahead. Yeah Like david mentioned at this point we we uh, found 11 spots in the erosion. We Made three of them more of an emergency one of our storms to road falls and is inner avenue The lakefront behind blue harbor and also a long broken drive. Those are the three priorities So that's those are the ones that we're probably going to try to go after first to fix But it is like david mentioned is very complicated and expensive because access is always is tough So that's why that's that's that's why we're trying to chase some of these some of these grants. Okay Go ahead I was looking at this and I think the cost was 50,000 if I remember correctly I'm wondering does that include a design or is it just for the study? It's it's just for the study It's just for the study and also for some of the grant writing. It's a determined priority areas essentially Yes, exactly and also. Yeah, also Yeah, it'll it'll give us some preliminary design but not final design like for bidding purposes But yeah, we we'd prioritize three spots that that we really want to fix right away I use inner avenue storm sewer outfall the erosion or the lake bank behind blue harbor and also a long broken drive So in addition in addition to that besides Prioritizing it does it does have some what I would say preliminary engineering that will provide us Some cost estimates that we will need to have some plans in place actually when we go for grants So in other words, they're looking at a variety of strategies To address shoreline erosion and it's not just throwing rock and stone and putting hard surface there they talk about in in their proposal of looking at at dune restoration and and trying to emphasize some natural protection and still have that balance between You know protecting shoreline and infrastructure But yet still making it soft and inviting and have some natural element to it Which is which is key. I mean, we're working with a variety of agencies not only it's the core of engineers but it's the department of natural resources and so Working with this and trying to identify these areas in which strategy Ultimately is the best fit for that area Folth has that expertise and we're looking we're looking forward to working with him on that In decker Yes Yes, thomas just one one minor point of clarification In the the board docs version of this agreement on page six at the bottom the formatting got all all wonky And I'm not quite sure what happens there But staff will make sure that the the cleaned up version He is attached when it goes to council for approval assuming this committee sends it forward with a favorable recommendation Okay, we noted Do noted. Thank you thomas Any other discussion do I hear a motion? Take a motion to approve Motion's been made by marcus second by rose. I believe is that rose? Okay All those in favor any any opposed Chair votes aye motion passes Going on three point three deaf child sign discussion Yeah, the department of public works received requests from the homeowner and parent at 2048 Pine Bluff lane asking for a deaf child area sign to be installed for the safety of their child to make vehicular traffic aware of this Department of public works have always supported this type of signage as long as the request comes from the parent Which it has in this case I'm from talking to thomas and he could probably explain this better. It doesn't need a formal common council approval But I still would like to Have the public works support support the this this signage being installed I think thomas could probably clean up why it doesn't need a full Common council approval. Okay, nature of this sign isn't One where someone's going to be cited for for violating it. It's really an informational sign Just informing drivers that there is that there is something to to be aware of Because it's not something that would would lead to a citation They can be done by the police and the department of public works under their their police power But as as ryan alluded to it's been Quite sometimes since one of these signs Was installed in the city So we thought it was appropriate to to go and and present it to you and At a minimum take the take the committee's temperature about about this type of signage These are signs That there there's a lot of a lot of discussion nationwide about these signs and how both their effectiveness and Sort of how they how they work with the state state sign codes and different Different states have landed in in different places with these signs They're certainly legal in wisconsin to have installed but wisconsin hasn't taken it as sort of as clear a A process as some other states in terms of here's exactly what we want to see I know new york state has a very clear process. They've outlined. Um, there there is a provision for informational signs This this meets that. Um, but again as an informational sign. It's not something that's going to result in a citation Hey, hey dean, I got some questions. Sure go ahead ryan Um, I guess I don't know if this is for thomas or for some of the dpw folks. Um I guess I I am all in favor of these signs have helped the the neighborhood. Um, I guess I just have a few questions just in terms of um Like timeliness of this, um, you know, what if a family moves after we put this up, you know, is there just I mean What's sort of the gauge on that and then? um, what's sort of the general practice and radiance of like, you know, how far out you put these or You know You know how far away from the home you put if you put it right front you put like at the corner I'm just kind of curious just more about like the logistics of that as well We just want to kind of cover those Sure Ryan's got something. Yeah. Yeah, ryan. I talked to the homeowner The homeowner we told them if if they move they should let the department of public works No, because then we'll take the sign down and also when the child turns 18 we also should take the sign down That's also part of the I guess part of the department policy This house is located in the cul-de-sac. So we're gonna put it right at the entrance of the cul-de-sac off of the main roadway So it's that'd be that'd be the best spot for it Well, I for one of them in favor of the of these kind of signs I believe that they're you know, they're good they offer good information for for the public So they know what but you know that there's someone in that area that's deaf and uh, so I I've definitely uh, in for this um I don't know how anyone else Has any other comments on it? Guess that's it then. Thank you. That was just for discussion. So we move on to the next Uh, next meeting is october 13th 2020 Uh, see is is we have exhausted the agenda. Do we have a motion to adjourn? Back in motion made and seconded all in favor I Any opposed chair votes. I we adjourned