 As humans, we're not very well suited for the constant onslaught of information and data. We're not based on data in such a way as a computer would be, the more the better. Because we already see a lot in our real data, with our real senses. So there's a real issue about us always being on, it really messes up our thinking and our contemplation, our being in the moment, relationships with people. I mean, there's many people who have more relationships with their screens than they have with people. So what we need is sort of a right to disconnect, to reconnect to what we are by ourselves. I think in many ways technology has become a religion and connectivity is a drug. And you could say also as a parallel effect, human imperfection is kind of a new indulgence. So what you do online, you can make it perfect because it's just a simulation. But ourselves, we have to live with who we are as humans. Mystery, lies, mistakes, imperfections, all the things that make us not machines. This is becoming a key question because keeping things human has to do with trust. Humans are based on engagement, on relationships. Humans are not living off the data pipeline. And as I say in my book, Technology vs. Humanity, technology is great, but humanity is greater.