 So let's begin our discussion with Epicares, with what question Epicares is trying to answer. And remember, all the philosophers, all the ethicists, we look at the semester are answering the question, how should you live your life? But they're all going to answer that question by answering a different question, a second question. It's just none of them, I mean if you're just going to answer the question, how should you live your life, they're probably going to give you like a list of rules. Do this, do that, do this. But philosophers are interested in actually justifying these sorts of answers rather than simply just giving an answer. So to answer the question, how should you live your life, they're all going to ask and answer a second question, a different question. Now remember with Hume and Sumner, they were each answering the question, how are moral beliefs justified? Hume said that moral beliefs are justified by the passions, what you desire, what you want, justifies your moral beliefs. Sumner had a different answer, and Sumner said that culture justifies moral beliefs. Then we went on to Glaucon, Glaucon is asking the question, who's interest of most important? And his answer is your own, your own interest of most important, therefore justice is bad. Hobbes also was asking the question, who's interest of most important? But he had a different, I mean he said your interest of also, he was agreeing with Glaucon saying your interest of most important, but he had a difference with Glaucon, right? Hobbes thought your interest of most important, therefore justice is good, because you can't survive on your own. Okay, so now we're at Epic Cares, and so far we've had two different questions. How are moral beliefs justified? Who's interest of most important? Is Epic Cares answering one of those two questions, or is he moving on to a different question?