 लोग अिल्टान् भी की निव्ष्केनी, नमशकार्ठ भी की सब इतिएाजा सो, भंगर्लॉर्ँ से मेरे सात है चूदंशु महन्तीची. सूदंशु महन्ती लेअ थी वी दुल्जित था अगनाता खडरी किना, और खब लेठिया को आप वोगओधाउ से, एक उस्तिटिटीन अशिटिन्म at the top of that, we will talk about it. PM Care, that is, the Prime Minister, is in English, it's called A Chronim. Money, Monkey, stagnation, pain, and release in emergency situations. अनोनी सबाल उड़ार का इसक्तार के में, एक और ख़ौग असे एक संच्ताका when we have the National League Fund, अब्दा में जो लोग उस में दान कर सकते हैं, अलग अलग मुक्य मंद्रिखा रिलीप पन हैं, राहत का एक कोष हैं, साथ-साथ, हमारे जो दिसास्टर मैनजमें अक्त हैं 2005 का, जो अब्दा का प्रबंजन करने के लिए जो कानून हैं, उवहाब ये एक नेजनल दिसास्टर रिस्वान्झ्कान, और राजज सर्कार के पास पी आचे दिसास्टर रिस्वान्झ्वान्ट्चार, साथ बात, एक और पंकत क्या जरुरत था? तो सुट्टन्शू जी ने राम चल्दर भूधान है कि, अर्दान्मद्री का जो पर्स्शनालिती है ये बनाने के लिए थे दिखाने चाहते है की सेर्द्ठ्ठान्मद्री अन्ली तेप्यम केर्ज अन दे वाँद तोएम स्विदांशुजी आद गोन तो इक्स्ट्न्त अप शेँएं न राइतें तीस्वो लिए ख़ागगगग, और वाँद तीश्ट्ट्टारी है विछ्ट्यमन्ट्राल, बाहलेणी डब, चत्रारा माट्ट इसार्कुलार इशू किया इसारे जो सर्खारी अप्षेर है भी वीद्ट्यमन्त्राल है सत्रा माथ इनोने एक सर्कूलार इशुक्या सारे जो सर्कारी अप्सर है, उनको बोला की आनेवाले बारा मैंगना में, अर मैंगना एक दिनका तंखा, आं पीम केर्ज में डाली। और अगर किसे कोई आपती है, नहीं चाते है, तो ये हमारे दिपार्ट्मेंट ड़ेविनु है, जो भिट्ट्य मंत्राले में है, वहांके द्रोंगे डिस्वर्सिंग अप्सर को आप जन रही है, या सीधा आपको मालुं परगा की कोन नहीं देने चाहा है। और सुदांख्शु जी ये बी कहाए, ये एक तरा से, कोवर्स्सिव अच्छन, अप ये वोलन्ट्री कुड्बूशिन आप किसी को दान कर रहे है, या किसी नहीं आपके बोल रहे है, आपको दान करनाई परेगा, जब दस्त आपको देनाई परेगा. तो सुदांख्शु जी दन्यवाद आपने आपके समय, निस्ले कदरषक हो एक बार और दिया, तो तो तो तो तो भी वोलन्ट्री अच्छन जी परेगा।, तो थो वोलन्ट्री जी अप कदरषक है, मैं,klore सृंदा जयसता मता हूए और दोॉner app, अनє और सोत बशार,गुलते आश्वमना �ffffffु ऎज्शी Awardsू अशिया� today। निजोत ही Guru Aalpake कया लगा त музने के शान गयह यह நे कि अ थी रहाॉ तू isolated. दिद भी रेड़ी नीद दिस फन, अप आप इसको एकश्पन् किये है, लेगिन फिर में दुबारा कै रहा हो, इसी फन का तक बिलकल कोई जरुरत भी नहीं ता, अगर इसको बनाए, तो कमसे कम आपको वालिन्ट्री करना चेही है, ये तो मिनिमम ता, ये जो जबर्दस्त ब निच रहा हो बारा मेंगा के लिये बीस भीस रहा हो बीस एकिस का जो फिनआन्शिल एर में ये करना, मैरा क्याल से में खाहुंगा ये वालिन्ट्फ्री नहीं है, अगर ये वालिन्ट्री नहीं है, तो ये अतमाडिक्ली बन जाता इ ये उम्पल्स्वी बतल्प कोई त से� उस्वाय का जो रक्षा मन्त्री मनोहर पारिकर जी उनो नहीं कहाता वाहाके वोर विडूस के लिए एक पन चाही है मगर वो वार्गा कहा, की हमारा नाम नहीं ची, कही भी मगर आप जब देग रहे, जो आज चिपिएम कमिनिच पार्टी वो विड़्िया माक्सी जु माक्स्वादी कमिनिच पार्टी उनका पुड्वूरो का स्टेट्मिन में लिकाती ये पीम केर्ष किलिए जब आब दान मामरे, हर विड्यापन में, हर सुच्च्ना में आप प्रदान मन्त्री का तस्वीर देख, आप नाशनल एंबलेम देख रहे, तो सवाल ये है, आप केरे ये एक नीजी trust है, it is a private trust set up on the basis of a government order. और आप केरे ये जो हमारे CAG है, control and auditor general of India, that they will not audit it, it will be audited separately. और जब एक साकित गोकले ने एक सुच्च्ना का दिकार कानों राइप तो इन्फोमेशन आक्ट के माद्द्यम से ये सवाल उताया, की आप दे बताए एक ये सुच्च्ना केरे में बहुत साथे सुच्च्ना दीखे, उनका जबाब आया की ये एक नीजी ट्रस्त, ये एक पबलिक अठोरिती नहीं है, that comes under the RTI app. आप पबलिक से पैसे लेग, मगर आप पार्दशिकताच के साथ च्यान्सपेरन्सी के साथ पबलिको नहीं बताने चाते है, काई से पैसा आरे, कोन कितने पैसा देरे, इसके लिए कर च्यों है। वाए this lack of transparency, Mr.Mohanty? I think the first question is the very question of setting up a private fund issued by the government where the prime minister is the chairperson and claiming that to be a private trust where the other trustees are, if I remember correctly, the home minister, the finance minister and possibly the defence minister. This itself suggests that this is not a private trust. If it were a private trust on the basis of a notification issued by the government of India, there was no need for a notification at all from the government of India. There is no necessity for using the national emblem, the prime minister's photograph for a private trust. Even more to it, if I may say at this stage, that the kind of things which have been done for this particular so-called private trust of fund is never granted to any other funds including any funds which are raised in the state governments, in the name of the chief minister, like any corporate social responsibility, the CSR funding, the MP lads, the entire range of concessions which have been given to this particular private fund, that itself becomes a very questionable thing. I cannot understand that how the government of India can extend such concessions to a private fund or trustee which is not even extended to the chief ministers of the different states for similar activities. Mr Mohanthi, as you have rightly pointed out, the company's act of 2013 was amended so that funds to PM cares are exempt from payment of tax, the donations are exempt from payment of tax. You have rightly said that the MP lads, the member of parliament, the local area development scheme, have been in this PM cares fund for the past two years. We have already told you that this is not an audit of CAG, there is no right to information. The constitution of the trust, as you have pointed out, this is a private trust set up on the basis of a government order. Even then, Pradhan Mantri has the authority, he is our chief minister, trustee, he is our chief minister, trustee. But if you don't do this, the Pradhan Mantri, the National Relief Fund, the PM's National Relief Fund, if that is indeed which was constituted by our first prime minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Mehru, and at that point of time, if you recall, it was not just the ex-officio prime minister, home minister, defense minister who are members of the trust, but also the leader of the opposition. So I have to say that if Pradhan Mantri, the National Relief Fund, is a member of the Congress Party, that is Sonia Gandhi, is that the reason? This is the real reason that a new organization like PM cares was needed, in which whatever our opposition is, there will be no representation of the opposition. What do you think, this is the reason? I think I wrote a second article for the news click, where I wrote that this fund has many deficiencies, but there is one deficiency, I will say it in the most deficiency, the statements given here are different parties, and you know about Shakit Gokhale, there is no transparency, there is no accountability. When I think about it for the first time, even if it is a private trust, there is trust, I will say it in the sense of trust, this is trust, the trust that people have donated, they should know how to use the money they have donated. And I had specifically mentioned, I think in the last sentence of that article, that my right to know is where the fund, the raison d'etre of the fund begins, and that is my right to know. अगर ये छी जी कही आद्मी चलो पुलेटिकल पार्टिस हुए, प्रावेट सिटिजन्स हुए, जो दोनीज भी विये, इन लोकोत बिलकुल जान ना चेही है, trust is a crucial word, even if it is a private trust, it says that it should be completely transparent and accountable. प्रावेट सिटिजन्स हुए प्रावेट सिटिजन्स हुए, प्रावेट सिटिजन्स हुए, आप बजेट से कोई पैसे नहीं दे से, अब अगर कोई सरकारी संसता है, कोई प्येष्टिजन्स है, पुलिक सेक्ता अगर तेखिंजन्स है, you can't contribute to that. जेसे हम लोग कहा, P.M. CARES अलग है, कोई भी दे सकते है, और आप अप याद है कि यह थाईस मारच जब भूँष्ना क्यादा, तीख लोग्डाूं का चार दिन के बाद, और उस में हमारे जो सांसध है, पालमेंप वस काईंड़ of about to adjourn, that's the time it was put together. And that's not all. कार्टिक, आर्यन, वरुंद, हवन, सच्छन तेंदूल कर, रोहिच, शर्मा, सुरेश, रैना, देन विरात, कोली, अनुशका, शर्मा, करन, जोहर, सोनम, कपूर, आयुश्मान, कुराना. And of course, trust and foundations are controlled and headed by the two richest men in India, विमुकेश, आम्भानी, आन्श्री, गोथम, अदानी. आप पटिशन, आप पटिशन was put up in the supreme court, the supreme court rejected it. It threatened the petitioners and said, you pay a fine. This is a frivolous petition. This has been politically motivated. But the controversies around this fund still hasn't died down. Why? I think the basic thing in this particular country, all along and especially exacerbated in the last six years, is lack of transparency and our love for opaigness. I mean, this transparency should be the bedrock of any democracy. I still recall that when the prime minister of the new government came into 2014, I was an additional secretary then in the ministry of environment forest. There was a demand that we need to upload all important circulars and the activities on the net. And we thought in 2014 that possibly this is going to be the beginning of a new era. But far from that, what we saw as the years, as we went ahead with the years, that the opaigness grew, transparency shrunk. And I still can't understand why the supreme court, I think they used, if I recall rightly, they said that about the PIL that this is misconceived. And he said there is a political color. I mean, this is as simple as clear and simple as daylight. And the least that ought to be done is that this fund should be made completely transparent. Every donation as well as every transaction should be made public. You have already told us how the PM National Relief Fund as well as the National Disaster Response Fund under the Disaster Management Act of 2005 offer you greater flexibility. The State Disaster Response Fund, the Chief Minister's Relief Fund all provide you greater transparency and greater flexibility whether it be for those who have suffered on account of natural disasters as well as man-made disasters. Now let's give it the political color that we wanted to because it's not just the Communist Party of India, Marxist and the Indian National Congress. They both been shouting. They pointed out that an estimated 10,000 crore rupees, 10,000 crore rupees, 10,000 crore rupees came into the PM's cash. In this, almost 4,000 part of the government system and the government employees, the government that is running, they gave 4,000 crores. These 10,000 crores have come. Now they are saying that our old PM's National Refund, 3,800 crores are still corpus, unused corpus. Still, the government of two congresses, one is Shama Mohamad. He was in the Indian Express late Chhapa. And on 5th July, Gaurav Vallam, that too is the government of Indian National Congress, he raised 2-3 questions. He said that you have bought 20,000 crores from the PM's cash fund to buy a ventilator. If you have already ordered 60,000 ventilators, it is not clear that 50,000 ventilators, the first 40,000 ventilators that you have ordered, is it an additionality or a separate? It is not clear. The release that was written in the PM's office, was till 1343th June. Now we have one more thing, that at least 20,000 such ventilators are given in different hospitals till June. Now what is the value of the payment? If you look at the release of the PM's office, then every ventilator is worth 4,000 crores. Then there is one company, Agfa Healthcare, which has got 10,000 ventilators. They are giving it in 1.5 lakhs, but many health centers and hospitals say that we don't want such a ventilator. Even in Gujarat, there was a marriage, that a company called artificial manual breathing unit is being sold by the ventilator. So we are not clear, how this ventilator is being bought, there is open tendering, there are competitive bidding processes, and on top of that, this ventilator, how the government bought it, which company? 20,000 ventilators from scan rate technologies, 10K from Agfa Healthcare, the price, the procedure, and of course what we saw in Gujarat, not so well, so people are actually wondering, if the government is profiting at this time of a pandemic, putting patients at risk, using substandard equipment, these are very serious allegations. What are your views? As I say, transparency is the bedrock of any democracy. If, I mean, if I say that, if transparency ruled here, and everything was put out in the public domain, including, and I repeat including, the procurement, the processes involved, the methodology followed, in the procurement, and the prices there on, I don't think there would have been any controversy. People would have come to know, and also let me say, that one of the biggest advantages of the right to information, if it is a functional right to information, is that, putting out information in the public domain, itself acts as an ombudsman. It is an ombudsman. It is a deterrent to anyone doing, or conceiving, or thinking, or imagining any wrongs. This, when it is not done, the questions which are being raised today, the ones that you mention, these are the inevitable outcome of opaigness, period. तुदन्शु मुहन्ति जे मेरा आप्री सवाल अगर सावाल ये जो RTI का, जो सवाल उठायता सावेत बोखले, जिसका जवाभाया की, ये PM Cares Fund ये नीजी त्रस्ते, प्रवेट त्रस्ते, ये एक सरवजनिक संस्तानी, ये दिस नाद पाबलिक अठ्रूटी, अगर थे जो RTI Act तो सुचना का, अगर अदिकार है, लोगो का मिलना जो कानुनी अदिकार है, वो यो जो नहीं मिलने. गयारा जुन, बआट लोग आश्चज हो गडे, ये जबाब प्रदान मुत्री का दर्फ्तर्स्ते, ये प्यम केर्स इंचाज, गयारा जुन में एक प्रदान मुन्त्री का ये, यो प्यम केर्स का जो वेप्साइत है, अब देट होगया, और उस में वेप्साइत में लिखा है, की एक स्वादीन, याने की इंदिप्प्टिन्ट अडिटर को निवक्त या गया है, ये आज भी एप प्वोईंटेग, कोन है ये? सार्क अई अशोषी ये, ये कोन है, वो आप ज़ेडलमें कोल, सूनील कुमार गुप्ता, उनका अपना वेप्साइत में क्या लिख है, वहाुन, सार्क सूआपके रежौचे गुप्टा, आप ज़ोग हूँँँँँँँँँँँँ, के अपना चीन, अपने ज्डिन को, सार्क सूआपके कोon इप्वोईंटेडलमें, अपना वेप्प्टिन्ट, करने जीत छीचा।, करने जहँक, है, वह तो तो सब ज्यत्ठाप पश़्य था वो थे लीग औगुग सप्टेखाँ, इसो सब ज्यत्ठाप यह बढशीँ सब तो सब थे आख ञय क�심 सीगंता, जळगर वूध,शक्फर्नोध्खाउ, सब जोढवाल बढ़ान यह चिक णईगर, तो सब जिनगाँ, आप सीजी दोग गडhelp पह cousगकर दीख मीझे कम मैं मिझे और रहसा आका रहें Benjamin स्थ़ब अबत्रष्मिsyon खबा आका आभता दि अध़ bank अध़ keep ऍिब Light नद देख वगड़ देख देख रहिक है पिज़ा क मने अधित करतिस because य Donkey मिझे नद आज अदी थी आपको, कि साव swoją सवाथे. आपको, और की इसद्ट तोता, तो भी रगागी देखाट जब सब वंगकितु वीने श्वाथे, कि बतिघय का ही बच्ट बहते है, मैं जा से णाज्ट थी आच्ट पाहले, वाजाय स्वच्चुत कचा, आज इतलतcript प्रस के लेग नहाव. अगर सब अस्ड्छ्छेरुए लेग किट। यहME insulin विनने िेशिक fixing बिबशार. जबों, सु tuo विसगम हरतित अछए दो सग बूरुैं, मैंसदो लेग, तो, जो ईगरर Track himp gre esis gan So that there is no misgivings on the part of the general public. Also the ones who have donated including the ones like the government servants, or the MPs whose MP local area development fund has been taken away for the next two years to this particular fund, could have अब् convergeва। ॔ spontuka Priyam ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ ृ these are the king's they collapse to something which shows the prime minister in great light it shows his kindness his paity and all that he does and cares for the citizens of this country thank you so much thank you you did it you didn't means your words अंजी नियाड़ नहीं ता फोड़ा प्रच़ा को भी आप ड़ा कर कर रहा हैं तो और लोग देखतर रही है नियुस्क्लिए या आप ड़ों भी जाए बगर्टे कर अँप आप देखतर देखतर रही हैं