 Holger may has a title that most of us would kill for in our organizations. He is the vice president for advanced concepts at Airbus Advances Holger Thank you Some walk some sit I stand so I want to talk about two points basically And illustrate them a little bit one is society and the indelible relationship of high-tech in particular artificial intelligence With society and then with the economy and the digitalization of economy so The first point is of course on the relationship of freedom and security as it is related to Surveillance and control which we all experience happens every day in all the time more and more now Freedom and security is not a trader of a relationship as it's often being put You have total security no freedom or total freedom no security I think without a certain degree of security We probably have no freedom and cannot enjoy any freedom the freedom of the people in the World Trade Center Was to either jump out of the window or get burned and that's of course not the freedom we mean there are sometimes in some Countries after sunset two groups of people in the streets criminals and victims and that's also not the Freedom we want so we have to look into the question of how we structure and organize all our societies be it China Be it the West whatever in this relationship of security and freedom now I want you to imagine 5 p.m. Rush hour in Paris Washington or any big city and you walk through the streets What do you see almost every intersection is blocked? Because people drive into the intersection although they cannot pass It is because they are unattentive or just selfish and ruthless whatever, but it doesn't work now You have the autonomous car and the artificial intelligence based Traffic control system and you can easily imagine that this problem will be solved There will be a smooth flow of traffic and it and it works So far so good until a person a pedestrian steps onto the street Now the car will stop What does this person learn? Hey, I can walk onto the street whenever I want and all traffic stops So we will experience a complete breakdown of traffic Because of the behavior of people Now the two ways to deal with it either you program the car in a way that it's once in a while overruns of pedestrians And they learn to pay attention Or you have video surveillance anyway everywhere and there is Of course biometric data recognition and you step onto the street and then you will read on your mobile device Well, we just deducted 1,000 euros from your account if you do that again It will be 5,000 if you do it once more you will be in prison for one month. So we learn to behave, right? Now the individual in the past was doing a crime or a terror act, whatever It was a very regional probably only local event But with the empowerment of people in particular with modern technology be you be it biological weapons be it cyber weapons be it misbehavior in a in a society in a in a structure and an environment which is networked You have cascading effects So the impact will be significant and now it's about the relationship between the individual and the collective And I think it doesn't take much imagination that China has a clear idea About the relationship between collective and individual as we have and it's probably a little bit different But it's important to talk about it and to understand that no matter what society we have to have to talk about this Relationship and how we balance individual and collective collective Now I have argued that security is a prerequisite for freedom This is as clear in the social if I mean if you have a hunger you don't ask for Freedom of press as we have heard from Marxist before but this also applies to the security In the streets now. How does a collective protect against individuals whom is behave and How to protect the individual more of course now? I think we should start thinking about something which my friend Parakana argued so nicely We need probably to adapt all our societies to that in a way to think about a Combination of Switzerland and Singapore Switzerland because you did discuss locally about fundamental issues important issues values and Singapore because you have the very best technocrats working in the government and You know, I think we have to creatively think about it because only the combination will probably do it now the economy We all know the answer is digitalization, but what was the question? It is I think about turning art into science at the moment. It is engineering art not science It's the art of war. It's the art of cooking Now if you go to a restaurant with it as a three-star Michelin chef and he cooks a wonderful dish And he gives you the recipe Have the recipe in your hands and you go back to the kitchen and cook the same thing Exactly what is written on paper It will be a nice dish, but not as good as the dish from the three-stea star Michelin cook the chef Why is this so? Because documentation is never complete and there is something which has to do with feeling experience whatever So you read there is take a little bit of thought, but what is a little bit? Now if this is digitalized it is a precise number We call it production data If you have the production data, you know how to do it precisely and Exactly as the three-star Michelin cook So how can Germany in the future? Export or the Mercedes-Benz BMW Porsche if everybody at least most of the countries Can produce use the car in exactly the same quality? Because it is based on a digitalized production where you have the production data at some stage Steal it buy it, you know have spies whatever The problem is how can we make sure that we stay ahead in a sense and the interesting thing that invention Only helps very shortly because if you are an artist the sculptor soon you like a nice sculpture If you put it into the 3d printer you have two million originals It's not distinguishable anymore So Germany invented the telefects, but Japan produced the telefects and marketed it and made the money Even if you are like in China for a long time just a copycat economy You make money not by just inventing things you make it by doing the application and sale it sale it So the problem is that we are challenged with innovation and high quality manufacturing as we move into the digitalization Which is of course without alternative but nevertheless it will be a big big challenge Now I think the problem with the intelligence in this whole part is I'm not so much concerned about artificial intelligence I'm more concerned about human stability The question how we use this and I think if we think it through it's not about intelligence per se That doesn't necessarily do us any good as we see with many modern autocrats and dictators in history They were not necessarily stupid but it is related to civilization to culture to values So the question of reason and reasoning and that is something where we might still have a certain competitive advantage to very intelligent machines As I argued two years ago here at the same place that referring to Ray Kurzweil who wrote an article about 20 years ago And the title was so wonderful the title was the computers will convince us that we are superfluous And if we don't one day end up in the zoo and little Robert babies make fun of us We better start thinking about our own role as human beings And how we use artificial so-called artificial intelligence for the good which is related to culture and civilizations I think we need this debate in all of our societies we call our different societies will deal with this challenge differently Thank you very much