 is one of a few of this whole project, which is to figure out how many we didn't want to teach in the morning. This was in one sense, actually, and when it was a little set up, it was not set up by others, I'm really used to it. The internet is built in advertising, advertising is built on the search, and you can control for a reason or a reason where you search. For a long time, I believed that we should be sharing a love, that we should be giving back to the projects we should be building to my thoughts, to the projects we've been running, to the structures, to the projects we've been doing on our desks, to get our work done again. And generally, in support of the internet, I believe that we should be doing this for the community, as we go to the room, and as we go to the other part. And, unfortunately, at the end of 2015, the stars arrived, and many people were able to give it a bit of light to MOSS, which is the Zillar platform in the source of support, which is our Zillars method of doing just that. Now, MOSS is split into three sort of four tracks. Each of those tracks has a different purpose, and therefore different criteria for a project to be introduced. The first track is called Foundation or Technology, and this track is basically, thank you for all you've done for us. In MOSS, it has already been used in some software, built into Biobots as a library, or perhaps run in on a new structure to provide our services to our own community leaders, or perhaps just blogging from the desktop, that we've already had a handle on that project. And so, what we do to be a Biobots project is to come and provide to us one, and tell us what they've been working on, what's important to them. So, it doesn't count to be something where the internet is a lot, although sometimes it is, but it's a lot to do with that. So, maybe we would really like to improve our presentation. Can we help us to take it from there to be able to pay back? Or something like that? Examples of projects that we now know and explore are Puril, which is the source code management system that we're going to use in support of the source code. Django, which is a framework for both the website and the user's website, and it's going to help us extensively, and comes out, which is a library of tools both by and from the site and the structure. So, in 2016, we gave away this track that we awarded, and now we've shown a million others, although that is really the first track that we're going to decide on. And in 2017, it left us about 600,000. The second track we've lost is the ambition of, that this is only to any group of people, not just one group in which there hasn't been any stimulation, but to the point is they need to be helping us drive forward in our mission. Now, there is a lot more of an issue through the organisation. There are very different ways of formulating the measure of pressing it throughout the research on the internet, that kind of thing. And of course, the words by the mission statement, and we have, in a sense, what we're doing right now, which is a demonstration of our priorities. So, for example, what's going to be the best way to rush the industry, is it's clear that rubbing in the law into the trust is something that's a priority for all of us. So, we've handled the projects that we've plumped on the Machine Partners Act, our NVDA, which stands for One Vision Nescom Access. This is a small way that everybody does, and we've let it in there to make sure that we continue to work on the firebox, to make sure that everybody can access the law, the mission that we have, that they have, is able to access the roadway that we've come up with. So, we provide an enormous network of services to allow people to communicate with our vehicle, to the government and some others, and secure the lock, which is a missile bugger, I thought, used by a number of youth thinkers in the public and brought themselves to allow people to come and see some of their job units, and to communicate with journalists in a second way. So, yes, some of these have been taken from the machine quite a bit, which are a little closer. So, in 2016, we gave it about three years from the big dollars, and in 2017, that's six hundred and five hundred, a subset of the mission partners. So, it's sort of a hard track, is the local mission partners in here, and it started last year. We realised that with the mission partners, we were getting through to what might be international in the sort of community. The sort of people you were representing wasn't it? People who mostly speak English, mostly in the West, and there were lots of open source projects on behalf of the community, but we knew, in particular in countries and regions, that we needed to open source partners who were not so connected to that world, and we wanted to try and reach out and see if they would really make the help and the mission, and it's so well that we could explore, and we had a very different possible job of these nights, and eventually, because there was a lot of extraordinary care, we were ready to work back from policy perspective, we were ready to do net neutrality. So, the criteria that is on the problem of the mission partners criteria, but they're tools so that the R&D has to be an Indian national, and the project must in some ways specifically benefit from what we saw in the past. This was not a successful remote. We got 12 applications, but a lot of the applications were, was that it was also that I really believed in everything we were doing, and I'm doing a open source project, and it's on the internet, so I'd really like me to come, which, while we wanted to, and we really appreciate the expression of support, was not quite close enough to physically further reserve the mission than we thought it would be to come. So, we did find one project called Crementa. Now, Crementa was sort of like a version of Discuss, DGIS, QGIS, one of those that, but extremely large one, so instead of being too many about that, it's a 30k, 30k outward. And we thought that this was useful to the world, and particularly in the rest of Bahia, because if you have a security internet connection, it's not better. If you put it in the common system, you know, it's 100 times more lightweight than some of the other way you're watching that. So, we gave that 19,000 dollars to a woman, but that would be a very, very good thing. So, if we're now looking at that project again, and the program which comes in, we're going to go down to where it got, looking at the way we were going to speak, because you didn't have to get the word out in the wrong places. So, we're going to have another go at that. So, I'm going to tell you. The last project was, factory, a secure open source. Now, in this, you provide code-read manual security on this, the key bits of open source software. There's nothing different from the other two. The other two, we were bought for, the realist committee, which decides whether your project gets through. But this one, we can make suggestions for projects of which we might be in order to. Last, we go to have people on the shoulder, the private, and say, would you have a role where it's going to pass? We raise a high value with the professional level that it is. We want to set that in order. The part where I was involved in the team who fixed the problems, was that we were actually a matter of fact, we were a community. And when they fixed the problems, we were just validating that the fixer was actually going to fix the problems that we were found, and he was right off the normal expectation security level, and it turned out to be complete. And what the tool has done, has happened actually yesterday, we published it. So yesterday, we finished taking a bit from a project called, Not DNS, which is a project that hasn't changed the problem, which is an approach in DNS server. It has not happened until we go on to the confidential, until it is completed, because it is being wiser to not let people know where it is being loaded. So, examples of projects that we've done this before are DNS masks, which is a small gift, DNS server, which it is in a lot of home routers and things like that. So it was advised before, it means that you are on to the end of the interview, the XML part of my group, which is now quite old, but certainly has fullers on that, and an email, which of course, is now on the phone where it is to provide pgpgp, encryption services to email. So we've done a number of projects on which it was free. We wrapped this up, we've managed to do about 200,000 in 2016, 450,000 in 2017, and our idea was to be doing about 500,000 and those of us who are here, because that's about how much money we've still spent on compact programs, and we feel that we should probably spend about as much on prevention as we do in the sense that you. So that's the goal, and if you want to see something that's not done and finished, and we can read your thoughts and we can fix what, about how important it is, and how important it is to live. Now, how important it is for the last second, and the next part of the graph, I want to talk about the success of that. Every time you agree on a project in the sense that it's a success, you know in a different case, I can't do what I want to do. I agree with every case, similar to what I was going to say, somebody can make that a success, but on a page you use, and you can make that a success. Now, you've gone from your creative production of more of a success, and so I want to look back from the particular successes that we've had in the track. So a foundation of technology track, um, we gave $50,000, or we owe $50,000 to what we need to do because it's the gender rest of the year, which is the handle of the gender that we have to manage to do, which is something that we want to hear about because what we need to expect is that basically, we took out $50,000, quit his job, spent six months working on what he had said and what he didn't do, but he also spent the same six months going around with people in the gender and gender community and building up a sponsor base. So now, he has been working on, I think they've been doing it to pay him to work on what he's got on time, and also to employ a part-time community manager in Oxford. And so we have managed to to keep start a sustainability rule for this project using water, which I'm very pleased about. The other success that I want to look back from management and technology is gear. So, um, the internet systems consortium ISE produce a few pieces of kind of crawling for structure software that the internet uses extensively. One of them is the HG server, ISEV HGVT, which is now directly involved and will show the danger. Up here, in that replacement where they have a working woman who is very sure to get a culture and she will have a future character. And so, we are helping to push gear towards future character with ISEV HGVT in this S5-1 in the API so that we will programmatically manage gear regularly using S5-1 as we will be working with the user. And this is just an example of us helping to put in place the following that the internet needs to have an end-of-the-year issue of success. So, um, we have we gave $30,000 to MEO and $50,000 to TIPEO, which is a related project, related to HGVT's IO and Rust. Now, as many people know, if you want to build a service that's scaled to 10,000 connections you can't be scaled up to 10,000 threats and a synchronous IO is normally the way that we can solve that problem. And so, being able to do that well in Rust, particularly as Rust has an emphasis on using power on them is very important. And so, supporting those two particular projects, it's useful that we have a Rust Rust and that we have a more able language to more people. And really to Rust, because we think that the most important thing in Rust the most important thing on the internet would be because the most important thing in Rust is that in enemies, by construction, a large number of types of memory, data-race, by firefighter that have been playing software and is equal to us contribution to the Rust ecosystem. We also we also paid for a consulting firm who so we did a proposal to one of the things we've done to improve the security of the internet in recent years is that it helps staff stick with the coverage of the collection script which provides free tickets to anyone who wants them automatically. Actually, first of all you can add a new order to the standard and the best way is to build directly into a web server so when it was coming to the web server you can just say you're getting a cert and the web server can do the interaction if necessary and the web server is now a new order for you. So having a new order will actually be useful to the web server so you might need it. I think that will help us to be much closer to the new order to secure resources. Now this is one thing when we wanted to live JPE together which is a JPE company the order of staff were a couple of implementation runs a new order which allowed you to build a various of the JPE that in this one run took an hour to return and in this another run took three months to return. And it is figured out by now. Is that allowed? Yeah, but it is allowed and we feel like an admin. That's right. It is our service for the implementation that will be in the standard itself. And so we have to work on it and say that the importance will be and it will be possible to use it so we can suffer because of the amount of money that is found. So we have to include additional lilies for their choice from the outside of the JPE in order to be able to use the sector through the other staff. But that is what we need to do. We focus on one particular area for self-requisition which is the network climate. So the network climate project is the standard by which the computer picks up a natural climate source from service on the internet. The old project in the space is called NTV. It has been going for 20 years. About three or four years ago a group of developers went and looked at and started NTV sector which does NTV secure. And they shipped a 1.0 and it was after we finished doing it last September. And for what we did was we gave both programs at once because one is to do the other to the same order from so that they could use the right to report between synergies of what we were doing in the sector. And they wrote to the report about the relative security of NTV into the sector. And it turned out that NTV sector is more secure than NTV but both of them had another thought of that. But then we went on and we went up to the order of destruction initiative on the internet. We audited a new NTV called crony and it turned out that crony was significantly more secure than what NTV or NTV sector. So by evaluating the few major players in the space we feel we've got to be considered to the order of why how many people understand what NTV is secure NTV of mutation. So there we go. Succesive So that if you feel a project that you already want in or a project that you want to do, or a project that you love a bit particularly in the space, you might be able to handle the cost. If you're applying it or you're going to do this year around, looking at the criteria filling of the board and you will be able to do this year after a successful application or a test or a level or a need to answer the questions that you might be asking as you touch the answers and then we'll have a week to think about it. So as long as you're not actually applying to that as such but you can make suggestions there's also a formal website for that or you can come to me and make the case why will a project become pretty secure with it and I was very happy to do that. Now I didn't need to speak into the resilience in the room I would very much like me to have a think about other open source projects which is coming to appear in the room in particular. Either you're responsible for embedding into five ops or perhaps you are in 19 ops and you've run them on a server to provide services to resilience or anything like that. Or it's just in a way that you know what you need to use and you know what others have been to use just to get work done with anything. If you can think of a project like that and you have to know people that have a project and you can ask that project to be helped but it's not important because we've run them they've worked in a position that that is the thing that they need to run now so projects need to be developed for example but if you can think of a project like that so you should do the task of them because most of the applications of the foundation of technology are acquired which is more of a connection for people in the server reaching out to other people if you do this any business I think if you listen to others please make an application. Every foundation of technology application needs a server champion and if you'd like to do it it's just sort of solved in the server who's willing to teach that part of the money and how to give an eye on what's going on while we're always in progress but if you're not listening then if you have a project that does help so you have to do the mission then you can apply for the mission task and it will be more of a turnaround the option is there are more deadlines in the year except the deadlines and the sensitivity of people starting to work in and to allow us to do more publicity around the deadlines and then the category so it's just this one and then it can be all done so on and so on but if you don't apply then at the end of the weekend the presentation is not to a 90% agree so I'm pretty sure that we can include your application in the app and if you apply for the mission you will promise them your application the next time but please the deadline is the way to help you so I hope you make the continuous basis if your application is going to be very detailed and you haven't mentioned that yet then it can be if you apply to the general first you value the general first first you value the general first first you value the general first first and I don't really remember when we completed the same but in relation to that if your investment is needed or if you have a big influence on application then it could be interesting