 Thank you very much, Ambassador Ackerman. We have now, as we got started a bit late, we have about 20, a little over 20 minutes left for discussion. I think that SOSG, Peter Southern, is still online. So why don't we take a couple of questions first and then give him an opportunity to respond and then the rest of the panel. So who would like to be first? I see you're here. It's like, what's your name? Yes, you have the floor. Please. Let me first thank the panelists for a very interesting discussion. And it did. When they look at the MDGs, I think the point was well made. But at the time when the MDGs were being made, they didn't benefit from the thorough intergovernmental process. And in any case, if you recall rightly in the year 2000, I mean, not many people had much hope that the MDGs were leading or would lead to anything at all. So the sort of enthusiasm which we now see was not there. Let's be honest. And it's thanks to the success of the MDGs that we are having the STGs going through this thorough process. And I must say, for the past two meetings, council meetings of IOM, we had mentioned the desire that migration goes into the STGs. And I must congratulate all those who have worked hard to reach to where we are today. And to what Ambassador Swing has shown us, it seems things seem to be moving in the right direction. But I think we should not rest on our oars. Because what we have seen now, we've seen the goals, we've seen the targets, very ambitious. But the devil is going to be in the details. And I think that's why the vigilance is colorful, even more so than what we need to get them in the goals and in the targets. So basically, I would like to say thanks, of course, now we have a formidable international structure addressing migration. And there would be challenges, of course, because when we say, from what we have had here today, is that to actually put these implementation and indicators in place, we'll have to struggle against policies which are not migration friendly. All these are there. And you could see resistance because of that. You could infestage resistance. And the question I asked, I want to ask is, I mean, I think everybody has to be geared. Everybody that's working on migration should be geared to face these challenges. But the vigilance is there. And I just wanted to ask, how would you see that from now until the time when these would go next year to the General Assembly, how would you address some of these real challenges which go deep into migration laws, et cetera, which would have to be addressed if you want migration to play its role in the development? Thank you. Two more speakers, the Netherlands, followed by Mexico. Thank you, Ambassador Swing. My question nicely complements that of our excellency, Ambassador of Sierra Leone. The Netherlands has been actively engaged in the discussions around the outcome document. We support very much the inclusion of migration in the document. What we see now, it is mentioned there. The extent, of course, is still under discussion. I was wondering the MDGs, they were very much quantifiable. And the question would be, if you look at the sustainable development goals and the way migration will be included in there, I would like to ask the speakers, how do they see after the adoption of the sustainable development goals, how they see it in practical terms, how can migration really become a factor in development? Thank you very much. Thank you, Chair, Director-General. Thank you very much for your remarks and the organization of the panel. I think the four speakers have been very clear and eloquent. As you have mentioned, we all know that in the Millennium Development Goals, there was a reference to the development goals of the European Union. There was a reference to migration was not included. However, international migration has a positive impact on the development of countries of origin, transit and destination. This has not only been documented, but has been supported by the entire international community, as has been mentioned. One of the more relevant results of the high-level dialogue on migration was precisely this consensus to include migration in the development agenda beyond 2015. As we know, the consensus of this dialogue resulted from a lengthy process which included migration in the development agenda and highlights the relevance of migration for all involved. How, no doubt, the discussion in the high-level dialogue and the forum and other forum, and also in the context of the IOM, have been considered in the recommendations which exist in the outcome document on the SDGs, as was mentioned, and it shows that we have made specific and concrete recommendations as has been mentioned by Ambassador Ackerman so that migration is indeed included in the development agenda thanks to the commitment of various groups and experts who have set up a number of specific indicators that are intelligent and measurable. We have at our disposal a number of elements and information which will allow us to move forward. However, I'd like to highlight that the role of IOM in this process has been essential and it has contributed its technical and practical knowledge and experience and we know the value of this participation and of course we invite IOM to continue to have a proactive role in this process. Perhaps the most important thing is inclusion of migration in the post to 2015 development agenda should be supported by the council and all member states and one of the most important issues which I would like to put to the panel and Mr. Southern, once we have this consensus and once we have all these tools at our disposal and that we are convinced that the integral treatment of migration under shared responsibility and shared commitment should be included in the context of human development. What will governments do? We know of the discussions held under the second committee and we know that this process will continue. It has not ended and no doubt it will yield further results in September 2015. So the question is what are governments and states to do and what can the council do, this council do to support the entire process? Thank you very much. Thank you very much Ambassador. I'm going to take two or three more and then I'm going to turn it over to the panel for any final comments in the interest of time. So our next speaker is from the signature representative of Morocco. Thank you Director General. I associate my voice with those of my colleagues to thank you for having held this high level dialogue which is important since the preparation of the MDGs of 2000 migration has played a more and more important role at the international level. The number of international migrants has gone from 75,000 to 235,000. Many have died before they have reached their destination. We have a significant increase in remittances, so no doubt the stakes related to migration are important in the context of the post-2015 development agenda. We believe that the SDGs which seek to facilitate migration and orderly, safe management of migration with the planned migration policy that are well managed, this is an essential aspect and therefore IOM should encourage good governance in the area of migration. We believe that the post-2015 development agenda should reflect the fact that many migrants are in vulnerable situations, but they are also an integral part of the solution. Migrants are agents of change. In order to allow migrants to become these agents of change, we should reduce the cost of migration. In order to do this, we need to reduce the exorbitant fees on remittances, combat trafficking human beings and address all the aspects that have been dealt with in the various papers. We need to, for IOM to play an important role in this regard between 2018 and 2012, 140,000 people were displaced because of disasters and this is an increasing problem that we cannot disregard. With a mandate covering all the aspects of migration, international presence of several thousand offices in hundreds of countries and many years of experience in all the areas of migration, we wish for IOM to play an important role in the evaluation of the post-2015 development agenda SDGs relating to migration. Distinguished representative Venezuela, followed by Germany. Thank you, Director General. My colleagues have thanked the panelists for their presence already. We do not have a question per se, but we do have a comment on what has already been said this morning. The former Assistant Director General of the ILO, I don't dare to pronounce her name. You have said that we should not reinvent the wheel. We're thinking that perhaps the problem is not the wheel itself, but where we are taking the carriage. And this brings into this causes us to focus on international instruments. You have said in a frank way that we need to talk about internal displacements but we think that you are right in mentioning this. We say that order begins at home, at home, and this is a problem in many of our countries. There are many capitals where this has not been dealt with. It's looked at, but there is no orderly management of international cooperation. So this is no doubt a problem. We believe that there is a connection between internal displacement and migration at a more global level. And so we think that this needs to be discussed further in the future as you have mentioned. Thank you very much, Distinguished Representative Germany. Thank you, Director General, Distinguished Mrs. Keynote Speaker, Distinguished Panelists and Delegates. Germany comments today's high-level debate. My delegation thinks we would be very good for us if we could have some more of what one panelist called an African women's morning. As the deadlines for achieving the million development goals approaches, preparations for defining a new U.N. development framework are getting momentum. We can build on existing recommendations such as the DACA declaration of 2013, the high-level dialogue on international migration and development, and the report of the open working group on the General Assembly on sustainable goals, and the development goals. We appreciate that the U.N. has embarked on a wide-ranging consultation process to gather the insights and contributions of a wide range of stakeholders beyond government and U.N. agencies, such as academia, media, private sector, employers and trade unions, as well as civil society. And we equally appreciate the announced and upcoming discussions, meetings, advocacy measures that the Director General was referring to. Mr. Director General, as you said it, the current Millennium Development Goals make no reference to human mobility. The post-2015 agenda provides an opportunity to rectify this omission. Germany fully supports IOM's efforts in advocating for migration to be recognized as an essential component of any future development framework and of national development policies and plans. Migration and development are highly independent processes, and it would be impossible to create an inclusive, open and transparent framework without addressing migration issues. Germany also commenced the results of the open working group and its report on the SDGs of July 2014. We appreciate in particular the mentioning of migration in sub-goals 10.7 and 10.C, the letter referring specifically to remittances. Mr. Director General, sitting here and in New York, together and discussing various options is a good way to make progress to move forward. The complex question is that migration involves can only be solved if we talk and cooperate as partners across levels and professions and beyond boundaries. The speech of the distinguished keynote speaker was the best kind of motivation for doing so. Germany is ready to do its share, and we look forward to a fruitful exchange of views now and in future. We are convinced that a clear focus on the upside and on the chances of migration, of course not without neglecting negative effects, will give our common work more impact. I would hope that many delegations in this room could join this assessment as eloquently elaborated by the keynote speaker. Thank you. A good friend, Peter Southern, has been patiently waiting online. And I think Peter, if you're still there, I'd give you an opportunity just to any reactions, final thoughts, responses you'd like to make. Thank you very much for your patience and waiting on us. Thank you, Bill. Well, let me start by saying that the comments in general that have been advanced, I completely agree with. I would make the point that the consensus that is evident in the IOM's Council's deliberations of the past by-level dialogue and the GFMD on this issue is only relevant if that consensus is part of an action plan that works. We've made some significant advances, as we've seen in the latest draft, but there's a lot more to be done before this can be confirmed or supplemented. And I think that the consensus in capitals has been less impressive than what one might have sought. It seems to me that in many capitals, the development and the border control or Department of Justice representatives don't communicate as effectively as they might. And you end up with the situation where it is the representatives of the foreign affairs ministries that are left as the advocates for where we are going. I still think that there is an opportunity for greater coordination at national level, translating into greater effectiveness in pushing the agenda forward in New York. This also implies, as I said earlier, a joiner between New York and Geneva in terms of advocacy and effectiveness. Geneva has become largely the locus for debate on migration. IOM's position is significant, obviously, in that. So I think that there is more to be done. We certainly cannot stand back now and consider that we have reached a point of satisfactory conclusion with regard to the debate that we're on. Specific recommendations, some of them have been referred to, have to be pressed. IOM's role has been referred to earlier as being essential. I would repeat that. IOM, in many ways, is the center of debate for multilateralism in the area of migration. And that centrality has to be reflected, as I know it is, under the leadership of Bill Swing in pressing on behalf of the multilateral community and part of the GMG with the other major institutions, the case that we're trying to make. But I think that the debate has generally been very good and I agree with the points that have been made. Peter, I think, obviously, vigilance is the word. And if we leave this room, this session, and we don't go back to our capitals with the clear message that we are not yet where we need to be, we are not yet certain that migration will be included in post-2015, then we will have done a disservice to the time we spent here. So we need to be very vigilant and send that message home. In any way, we can help you because we're in most of your capitals. Let us know if we do a joint day march. But we really need to get everyone on board and actively working toward this very little time. Let me turn the panelist here. Let me start, first of all, with our colleague from Ghana.