 There will be and there has been poppable tension in the south is the head of the court ruling on a suit filed by a leader of the indigenous people of Biafra, iPop, Namdi Kahnu, Justice Ben Iyer of the High Court sitting in Abia State had shadowed Wednesday to deliver judgment on Kahnu's fundamental human rights suit against the federal government. The suit initiated by Kahnu's counsel Aloy Ejiamako had prayed that the court to declare invasion of the residence of iPop leader in Abia State in 2017 as unlawful and an infringement on his constitutional right. Kahnu in the suit also urged that the court declare his rearrest and torture in Kenya last year as unlawful. Earlier, counsel to the federal government Magaji Laboron informed the court of the 15 count amended charge preferred against the defendant. Let lead counsel to Namdi Kahnu and Michael Zakome objected to the defendant taking his plea as they were served with a charge on Tuesday and has not been able to consult with the defendant. He noted that the adjoinment is for hearing of pending application filed by the defendant. In the case of the $10,000 of writing on the file yesterday and as soon as it was filed it was served on them and they had an interaction with them and of course you are aware of the fact that law requires that charges can be amended on the filed even on the eve of the judgment of any case. So the mere refusal to take the plea today is one of the several antics exploited by the defendants to delay this case. I have been able to give me another clearer copy which is legible and with that we will take the next step tomorrow no one is going away from the plea being taken but the point we made today which the court appreciated is that you can't take the plea to counts that have not even been given to you. We were served some minutes to 10 a.m. yesterday. A 15 count amended charge for a case coming up today. Whereas the last date of adjoinment was 2nd of December so they had well over one and a half months to have done that and served us. They didn't. So I believe that was intended to frustrate today's proceedings. In any event that was the sixth time the amending of the charge.