 OpenAI published a letter in response to Elon Musk's legal claims that OpenAI reneged on its official and initial non profit mission to help humanity. The accusations are because they created a for profit subsidiary that they've broken their promise about not being for profit, even though OpenAI remains a nonprofit. And that is totally normal. If that sounds weird to you, it's just because you haven't encountered this Mozilla does this Mozilla is a nonprofit foundation operates Firefox, but there is a for profit subsidiary of Mozilla that operates as well. So I think the argument is, well, what percentage of their decision is greedy? And what percentage of their decision is safety? I think they should be more open. I look at what meta does I look at what Apple does. I look at what anthropic does and I and stable diffusion and I'm like, you think opening I could be more open. It's literally in their name.