 Another important ethical issues in psychology is dealing with human relations. The first important thing while dealing with human relations is unfair discrimination. Psychologists should not engage in unfair discrimination based on age, gender, race, culture, status, disability, religion, etc. For instance, if a person, a client who is coming from, let's say, supporting another religion, believing on another religion or maybe he is an atheist, so a person who is having a background of another religion, maybe he is having an ideology conflict with that person. But on that basis, you should not let any issue arise in your therapy. And if you cannot control your personal biases, it's better to refer to someone else. Similarly, female professional psychologists, if they experience any bad things and they have certain kind of issues, that men have prejudices against them in their mind, so while they are doing therapy, if a male client feels that they cannot handle properly and their mind is holding a certain kind of prejudice against them, then it's better to keep that gender equality in front of you, not to see that individual as a client in that therapy. Similarly, on a lot of other basis, discrimination can occur, it can occur on the basis of age, it can occur on the basis of race, so one needs to be uphold themselves from all these kind of discriminations. Then, multiple relations. This is another important aspect in human relations while looking at ethical standards that psychologists having more than one relationship with the client without just being a client can be difficult to navigate, which can also lead to conflict of interest. These are a lot of shapes and forms. Let's say we say that there is a client and he is your co-worker and he is your co-worker and he is your very good friend. And you will have conflict of interest with him because you know all his background, all his history, all his personal likes and dislikes. So, at times, come into the problem by giving professional suggestions. Then, to see more than one person at a time in one family is discouraged in the ethical standards of human relations. For instance, a mother has come, she is taking her son's therapy and she wants to take her son's too. So, you know, you just seek one referral and one you have to send to another one, right? Because within the family, after history taking, different problems can be created. Then, sexual harassment. Psychologists should strictly not engage in any kind of sexual harassment. It can consist of single, intense act. It could be the multiple persistent or pervasive acts. Very unfortunately, more recently, we have been learned that some fake psychologists in a way that they are not professionally competent enough, they are involved into malpractice and they are doing sexual harassment with their clients. And they are involved in such activities. This is something which is going on so much around us. So, we need to be very vigilant that when an interaction, a formal party's contract is taking place as a therapy, as a client, in between, any such act violates the ethical standards and one should refrain themselves from doing any such kind of activity. Avoiding harm. Psychologists should take steps to avoid harming people unnecessary or necessary. Giving harm to someone is a violation of the ethical standards of a human relationship and it should try to minimize harm when it is foreseeable and unavoidable. Let's see, if harm is very intense and very big, then we can think about it. For example, we give chemotherapy to prevent cancer disease. In that situation, we know that cancer is giving you a specific drug to cure you. These are painful side effects. These are harm, but its advantage is very big. Similarly, we have temporary side effects of some vaccinations, but its protection is very high level. So, we consider this very safely. Then, informed consent. When psychologists conduct research or provide assessment, therapy, counseling or consultation services, they should obtain the informed consent of individual first. First, if informed consent is taken from an individual minor, then it is necessary to protect individuals' right and welfare. If informed consent is taken, then this is also a violation of a human relationship. Then, conflict of interest is another important thing. Psychologists should refrain from taking on personal role, professional role, where there is a personal conflict, scientific, legal, financial, professional. If any conflict is arising, then to impair your objectivity. It is very important for you to play neutral. In that situation, there should be no therapy, no professional guidance, and in that situation, you should be detached from yourself. In this situation, the side effects of not being detached is that you can harm your participant as well as your psychologist. So, a certain situation is very, very important. Is it better for you to indulge in it or refrain from it? When we talk about human relations in conflict of interest, we all live in a society where we see a different hierarchy. Somewhere, a professional is connected to multiple roles. So, maybe if you have a friend's or a child's consultation, and you know that what kind of parents these children have, then conflict of interest can arise. In such a situation, it is better to give therapy to those children to recommend their appropriate referral. Third party request for services. When psychologists agree to provide services to a person or entity at the request of a third party, they should attempt to clarify all important points of the role of psychologist and identification of client, probable use of services provided. Any, whatever you want to decide in the protocol of therapy, that should be spelled out in advance. If we think that the possible outcomes of that therapy and the chances of the pathological behavior of that problem are 20%. After that, we need to keep the therapy sustained so that we can improve the behaviors. So, it is also important to tell this first because there are some kind of psychological problems that are lifelong conditions. In this, we can do 100% elevation of symptoms, but we cannot control 100% of the thoughts. We need medication. So, we need to tell that we need to engage a person with a psychiatrist as well so that he can be given medical treatment. That is pretty much important. In any psychological behavior, we need a psychiatrist, but we do not recommend it. That is also inappropriate. So, you know, whatever the protocols are, they are properly between the parties. They need to be settled. And if they are referring to any third party, so where we feel that we need a physiotherapist's recommendation, we need a psychiatrist's recommendation, we feel that we need a health psychologist's intervention. So, it is very logical and very important to put up appropriate third party requests there.