 This study conducted a scoping review to identify knowledge gaps and set research agendas using inconsistent methods in the literature. The authors searched nine electronic databases for published and unpublished literature on scoping review papers, methodology, and reporting guidance. They found that most of the 494 scoping reviews were conducted in North America or Europe and reported a public source of funding. Only 13 percent of the scoping reviews followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidance for scoping reviews. The results of the scoping review were used to identify evidence gaps, provide recommendations for future research, or identify strengths and limitations. There are no guidelines for reporting scoping reviews or studies that assess the quality of scoping review reporting. The authors suggest further research on scoping review methodology and a guideline to standardize reporting. This article was authored by Andrea C. Trikko, Erin Lilly, Wasifa Zarin, and others. We are article.tv. Links in the description below.