 Starting off in a career like journalism is a heck of a ride. What you expect, what the reality is, changes in perspective as your hair grew grayer. So, you know, I began my career in IGV, where of course, as mentioned in the previous time of the session, my first few months were spent, you know, translating by thousand years, okay? And one day, I, I think it was when I got this interview, I sent her a reply to a few news points in the headlines. And then somebody asked me, who is Rishabh Baraji? And I said, me. So, you sent Tarkha her headlines and news points from her own interview as a trainee. And I'm going to go, I'm not supposed to do that. Within two to three minutes, a reply came from Tarkha, okay? So, I'm going, okay? So, the people who might not know it, might think that they're watching us on mute, or conversations are not happening. They are happening and their influences. Rahu, who was my boss for six years. The man is a machine. If you want to learn hard work, you learn from him. Seven in the morning, he does his job at night. Every day, he does his job. Brand new restaurant, Dappan Deewal, is an inspiration. Vikram Chandra was just here, watching him doing inspiration. I remember when he was on TV, he was like, wow, this is awesome. So, Rahu, he's back in inspiration. I don't know about this, I'm trying this session. Many of you have read his works. He is an inspiration. He's writing about other inspirational people, how they are. He's a doctor. He's a director. So, yes, in popular culture, if you watch the movies, we are all going to deal with television, and we want to catch a murder happen like on television. And we're all sold out, but I think there is more hope. And I know people sitting here all this time, who try to do their best every single day. And I think there's some hope to take away. How can we lose and make it self-sensitive? I'm going to talk about emotion in this. In the end, you're telling a story to cater to emotion, and not having a plain face. The purpose, as physics tells us, by the very nature of the observation, you are part of what is going on. What you decide to focus on, or you decide to focus on it, is an aspect in which you have some limited agency, and as you train influence within the industry, as you have to make edit of your decision. Influential things can be taken. I'll give you a small example. Two years ago, we decided that the people who come on television, the typical debate is that you want to discuss something, everything in this. You put somebody with a tikka, somebody with a popi, and you have to have an anchor in the sea. Sometimes you are able to do this. So you know that they are talking of the argument, so that you can then come in and receive. You can choose not to happen. You can choose to have power rational people who will slow down, and you see the change happening. So you see one TV channel, the same guest, it gets a little bit similar. You'll be sitting there and you'll be sitting on the power of the lines, but they'll be sitting on a different one, and rationally you'll know what you're doing. So there are choices that you can make if you want to break away. Look at the show Tarantas. He does two shows with us. The amount of effort, the research, the quality of guests, the gravitas that comes in. So he has to work doubly hard. Spend the night to do or we have to do eight times a day. So that is a small luxury that he has, but then in order to engage with an audience that wants to actually listen to the subject, that's a great example. You know, audience also, you know, audience side has to be important. They watch it and love it. That's why people scream. We never raise that point. We always bring the anchor. How well do we want audience also accountable that they also have a choice? If I start shouting and you're outside of the room, people will gather. So I'm going to come back to the sensible argument that if you want people to even hear a snippet of what you're saying, you're going to have to either appeal to some kind of emotion. Emotion in generally deviated to it's linguistic, you want to get pumped up about something, okay? Charge of the language to be a kind of emotion. You want the emotion of hate and fear, okay? Gets you charged up. But there is also hope and inspiration and there's a complicated trend. Look at the number of motivational speakers out there. Life coaches. People who write inspirational books, people who give TEDx talks, they're very, very powerful. So there is an art people wanting to be told not just good news. I don't think it's a bright sunny day. It's not raining because we see bad news. It's looking for inspiration and you're looking at television. You want to be inspired. You want to have an yes, we can hope and opportunity. But for that editors, journalists, reporters, news anchors have to then have the ability, which is what the profession is, is not use its communication. You have to have that gravitas to hold somebody's conversation if you're not, you know, as you use what it's like. It's the difference between a comedian writing the jokes, writing the jokes versus slapstick comedy. I throw pie on your face. Very funny. Get the right intonation and timing. I bring in audience here. We have really need two questions. Quick questions. What goes behind decision making when you think that for the next 10 days, we are going to foreign policy, let other channels do popular stuff, but we'll stick to this. We'll stick to the America, you know, whatever we did in the past last year. What goes behind that decision making process? I'll give you a short answer. In the day-to-day objective, when you're sitting down and making a decision, the small decision you have to make is where is this country going? Right? And what is the additional value you can add? That's my job. I'm not immune to watching a movie. I know what is happening. And I know this is being covered. What is the value addition that I'm bringing to the table if I'm sitting in the chair where I have some decision-making power? And therefore I have that microphone which people might not be listening to somebody mindfully. The decision making has to be done and I'm a very young editing. Every day the team is 25. And this is what I tell them. Apply your mind to everything. You see an observation that this is a bulldozer and this is a riot and this is a provocative speech. Apply your mind. Because every time you also give attention to the guy making the provocative speech, well, it's me. The names are made provocative speech. Then you'll be prime time debate. You know, you have a star who goes to JNU for three seconds. And she's got all the publicity in the world because we are all fascinated by them. So they're doing things which make the name famous. So it's about understanding that the country needs to have a larger world. We need to have an opinion on global affairs. And what is the small role that can be played to contribute to that? I think we're really sorry. And we wait for that to happen. Okay, we can have a conversation on this. Can I just, small thing. My thanks to the exchange of the editing and Dr. Patra for doing exactly what Raul was saying is getting people together. We have to get after people to join this session and we'll do today. All I've had meetings with them. It's very fundamentally important because unless it's journalists, we all sit down together and have a 10-year, 20-year plan. I mean, maybe just one example is the point I wanted to make. Five years from now, if the sexual assault happens inside the meta-words, are you going to have a meta-words meet or reporters with Aftab is reporting from inside the meta-words of the generation? So these are things we need to figure out and it seems to be there as a great platform. Thank you guys for doing this. Thank you, Vishal.