 That's for tomorrow, that's for today, excellent. Okay, thank you. So I would like to thank everyone for being here today, and I'm thinking how we ended up here. We had originally planned the event to take place in Rome, where I had booked a very nice hotel, and I was looking forward to see all my colleagues in Rome, but unfortunately this did not happen. Nonetheless, I'm very happy that we have the opportunity to still do this event and to have all of you here. Pedro did a very good introduction of the points that I will be talking about right now. And I think that he gave something like a table of contents. And when I would be talking about the Fit for RRI project, I will be also mentioning about Foster, because as Pedro said, these two projects are interconnected in the sense that they used the platform that it was already reputable and very well used, which was the Foster Open Science Knowledge Base. So on the Foster Open Science Knowledge Base, we created the Fit for RRI Knowledge Base, and the purpose was over there to have the training materials with regards to responsible research and innovation. But because Open Access is part of responsible research and innovation, then these could have not been divided into different sections, but all these resources and training materials should have been together. So if you log into the, if you visit the Fit for RRI page on the Foster platform, then you're going to see that we have a variety of materials. For example, if you go to the top resources, you will see that resources have these very small triangles at the end of its window resource. And those triangles indicate the concepts and the projects that these resources were created for. And for example, the resource in the middle that has an orange triangle on the top right hand side. And at the same time, a blue triangle on the bottom right hand side, then this indicates that it's a combination of both the Foster, so Open Science and Fit for RRI, so responsible research and innovation concepts. So you can visit the Fit for RRI page on the Foster Open Science Knowledge Base, and this is your gateway to all the training resources and materials that are in the Foster page and RRI page right now. In the beginning of the project, we created the responsible research and innovation taxonomy. This is not something new because we did this during the Foster project when we were dealing with the concept of Open Science. The reason of creating that taxonomy was to be able first of all to organize our thoughts on how this specific subject field is being developed and what kind of notions and concepts and terms are around it. This was helpful for us to organize our thoughts, but then we also realized that apart from us, there may be others who are not quite knowledgeable on how this brand new concept is being developed around research and what is the umbrella term and which terms have the higher hierarchy or priority over other terms. So when we were creating this taxonomy, we also thought that we would need to create definitions. So if you go on the Foster page and you see that there are, and you see the taxonomy terms and then you click on its term, then you're going to see that you also have an explanation of what this term is about. So it's a very good understanding of the various concepts and it's a very good tool for someone who is not very much familiar with all these ideas to get to know these ideas better so that when this person reads about them, understands what the concepts are about. Another reason for creating the taxonomy was so that we can also organize the content that lives within this knowledge base. So all the content in the knowledge base in the platform, it has taxed from this taxonomy. So in reality, if you want to read about one thing only, you can click on a taxonomy term and you're going to see grouped under this term all the related topics. Alternatively, the other thing that you could be doing is that you would be able to find in all these terms, you will also be able to see which ones do not have any materials uploaded into the platform. This means that you can predict any gaps that are in the area and what is this that you would probably be needing to create as a research support librarians or what kind of questions you should be expecting from your researchers or PhD students or from your stakeholders in general, because this topic perhaps is not so much developed and you need to pay closer attention to it so that you need to know more about it. Of course, as you can see in the right taxonomy right now, the RRI is the umbrella term and then the very first term is the open science. And what we had already created in the foster platform was the open science taxonomy. The open science taxonomy has the same reasoning and logic behind as the RRI taxonomy and area where the knowledge has to be grouped in a hierarchical manner, where the terms are being defined, where the resources are being linked to the terms, where we can have an understanding of what is going on in the field. Of course, while we were creating both taxonomies, all the project partners were not 100% in agreement with the organization of these terms. And then we spent a lot of time brainstorming and moving terms around, but we understood that at some point we had to stop doing this exercise. This is why, even though we understand that perhaps this is not like 100% the representation that you have in your mind, we still believe that it's a very good representation of the knowledge in the field nowadays. And for that reason, we have created the taxonomies as pictures in a good quality pictures so that you can download them. And we have also created the RDF files of those images so that you can have those images integrated into your own systems. And those can be downloaded at the link that it's provided at the bottom of the slide. So apart from the taxonomy, we also created the RRI toolkit. The RRI toolkit is a page which contains courses on Responsible Research Innovation and Open Science, because as we said, those two terms go together. And we wanted to make it a gateway, like a one-stop place where someone could start learning about a specific topic. And we wanted people to be able to go there and find their way around things, not to feel that they are lost in too much information, not to feel that the environment was not clear, but it had a lot of noise around it so that people would feel overwhelmed. We wanted a tool that would be straightforward and it would have content on the most hot topics relating to this specific RRI and Open Science concept. And of course, these courses they were created by experts in the field who understand the topics and are very much knowledgeable about the various concepts and also about the creation of those short courses. And the other concept that we had in our mind is to think of our users, the stakeholders, those who would go and take those courses and get trained. And what we wanted is that we wanted them to leave the page and feel that they have gained skills and they feel that they have gained expertise, so that they know that the time that they have invested it was totally worth it and they can also go back to their daily jobs and apply either to their own research or by training others on those specific ideas. Therefore, we have created courses that are right now hosted at the RRI toolkit. And those courses are short, they are between an hour and a half and three hours to complete. And the kind of features that you're going to find in the course is that we have brief paragraphs, we have images, we have accordions, we have created infographics, presentations, we have short videos from experts or animated videos from resources that we already found available on YouTube, for example. So we did not try to create new knowledge. The purpose was primarily to make a combination of both existing knowledge and then look at creating our own content if we were not in position to find something new. And the courses are in English language to begin with, but they have an open license so they can be translated. And for the time being, the level of knowledge is introductory and the audience varies because our stakeholders vary. So we have a very big variety of audience that those courses are addressed to such as PhD students, researchers, companies, funders, research administrators. And of course we have quizzes. This is something that we practiced a lot during the foster project and we found out that the quiz makes a user understand more the concepts and also gives an incentive to keep taking courses and working on them. And this is why we created the quizzes so that we are able to assess the learners but also be able to give them an understanding of how much knowledge they have gained via this course. Now we have created six courses and all are in basic concepts around responsible research and innovation and RRI. So we wanted to have a course on the introduction of RRI for those who are brand new to the concept and we presented at the very first position in our courses list because this is what we believe the course that everyone should start if someone is not familiar with the concept. And then we took basic concepts around RRI that we thought that they were very popular. So for that reason we created the course on how to engage the public with RRI. What does RRI mean with regards to companies and industry and how this can be conducting business in a more RRI way. And then we tried to combine the concept of RRI with existing or perhaps a little bit more used terms such as data ethics or open science or open and fair research data. And of course the RRI toolkit cannot stand on its own but it is combined also with the existing foster courses that were created and were ready already. So for example this is one slide of the Responsible Research and Innovation for Companies course where over there you can see approximately what kind of features its course has. So for example on the very top you can see a little bit of the text where it tries to explain a little bit the concept and what is happening right now in this specific case at the European Union level and then how a company defines its own RRI strategy. So this section over there it has like very small tips on the side, two videos under it and then at the bottom on your left hand side you can see a sample of the quiz questions for this specific course. So all these courses are for free for anyone to take, you don't even have to log in to take them but you are required to log in only when you would like your progress to be tracked and that's because it is very difficult to track your progress if you don't log in. And you need to log in in order to get the badges for the courses. This has not implemented yet but it's going to be implemented soon and of course before the end of the project. So along with the courses we are going as Pedro has already announced, we are going to create learning paths. The purpose of the learning paths is not something new. Others are doing it already in other projects but we also implemented this during the foster project as well and we saw that it was working very well. We would like via the learning paths to make users be able to make connections between the various courses so that they can then reach the level of understanding and knowledge to a wider concept in the research agenda. And when a user logs into the course, this means that their progress during the course is being tracked and this means that the user can gain those badges which at the end they can be combined together so that the user gets and receives badges for the learning paths that has fulfilled. So for example we have created four different sections of the learning paths and the first one which is the Open Responsible Research Innovator is the ultimate learning path that someone can have. It contains a lot of courses and the courses are a combination between RRI courses and foster courses and the purpose is for someone to gain the vast majority of knowledge that we think that it's needed right now so that this person is able to understand the concepts of RRI and be an Open Responsible Innovator. But apart from this learning path we also have the research communicator with another set of courses and the combination of which can help them understand better this specific concept that relates to research communication. And then we have the learning paths three and four. The one is for the Open Responsible Researcher and the other one is for the ethical research data scientist. So all these are being set together so that the user can go into the RRI toolkit or in the foster platform where the RRI toolkit is and can find their way around it. This gives a quality of information in the platform and it makes it easier for the stakeholders to feel secure about the knowledge that they are getting that it's not leading them nowhere but it is leading them somewhere and it gives them incentives to be able to start working on it. And apart from the RRI toolkit we also have a trainer's directory. Again this is in combination with the foster platform so over there you're going to find the resources relating to speakers relating to Open Science but you're going to be also able to find speakers relating to RRI as well. When you visit the page you're going to be able to see on the very top that there are three filters and the one is a filter where you can choose by topic, a filter where you can choose by audience or a filter where you can choose by the language. So the trainer's directory is an international directory and even if you plan to have an event of your local knowledge, visit the RRI trainer's directory because there are many chances that you're going to find a speaker who will be able to train your local language, who will be able to speak your local language in case you are having concerns whether a presentation in English for example may not be understandable by everyone because we do understand that all these terms are very difficult to conceive especially if they are presented for the first time to someone in another language. So with regards to the specific RRI trainers, this is the people that we have for the time being and these trainers are in position to present results, to present both in RRI and Open Science events but if you are looking for trainers in your own area and I understand that now due to COVID you may be doing online events but let's say in the future at some point if you would like to have a face-to-face event when we come back to the normal and more traditional way of training, those people could also identify other local trainers in various areas but nonetheless if you have any questions or if you would like to use any of these contacts you should send us an email at e-learning at Foster Open Science EU and we would be happy to train to help you with this. So in total what we have found so far is that the project and the toolkit has received a lot of attention from our stakeholders. As Pedro has already announced, RRI has promoted some events during the course of the project but in general at the Foster Open Science platform there were 55 events created which had the RRI tag and 145 on Open Science and the reason that I am presenting these two concepts together is because the Open Science term is something that we had before the RRI term and because as I said at the beginning of my presentation the term Open Science is an important term in the RRI umbrella therefore I am going to be presenting those concepts together here in our statistics and apart from the 55 RRI events we had 145 Open Science events. New users 3433, with regards to the content it was 446 new RRI related materials uploaded into the platform, 22 RRI courses and we had a vast majority of both monthly views and daily views. And this is everything. Thank you so much for your attention and I think I will have to go back to Antonio and I'm going to stop saying. Yes, thank you Nancy for this and without delay I'm giving the floor to Emma Harris from Orion representing the Orion project. Emma, can you please start sharing. Hi, thank you. Right, yes I will start sharing in just one moment when I can get hold of this. Right, share screen here we go. Okay, share and move that, present. Okay, can everyone see that? I don't know why I always ask that as if you're going to say yes but I assume it's all okay, so okay. Perfect, lovely, great, thanks. Yeah, so lessons learned from Orion Open Science and RRI training. So some of this is a little similar to what we've already discussed it was very interesting to hear from all of you about what you've done and we've followed a quite a similar pattern ourselves but I'll try and bring in a few new elements and if we get time I've even got a couple of many meter things we can do to just do a little taster of some of the elements but we'll see how we go for time on that one. Okay, so the Orion project, EU soft project aimed at increasing the amount of open science and RRI in RFPOs. This involves doing a number of things, co-creation experiments, public dialogues, we funded two citizen science projects and one of them is slightly held up by the pandemic but the other one's doing very well in terms of development. We also did an art science piece, that's the picture, the second one down on the left, which was where an artist did a residency at the Maxwell Brook Centre and then represented her ideas about genome editing and aging and that was very interesting. We also do a podcast every other week where we interview people about different open science topics and of course we do the training which is the focus of what I'm going to talk about now. So we're Work Package 4, we're based as I said at the Maxwell Brook Centre in Berlin and we do the open science and RRI training. So that's myself and then the Work Package leader, Louisa Bengson and our colleague Zoe Ingram. Now Zoe did an interesting gap analysis where she looked at the research institutes in the EU life alliance, so flagship microbiology type, life science type organisations and she looked at what training they did and did they have any open science aspect. And as you can see from this big massive grey box, most of them in 2018 did not. I would imagine that picture looks very different now, not least because of the efforts of a number of projects like ourselves and fit for our RRI. And the one that had the most was CRG, who of course were very much part of the foster project that's being mentioned. So they had some of them had elements of science communication or open data, but very few had specific open science training. So having established that there was a need for open science training, we then thought about our audience and those were PhD researchers, research managers, policy makers, funders. So we divided the training loosely into researchers and funders and research managers. So we delivered slightly different training as you can imagine for those two groups. So the training we delivered, we did nine half or full day training workshops where we were the main event, if you will. And then we did 23 conference workshops and seminars where we came in for an hour or two and just did a workshop as part of a bigger event. That was across 13 countries. We also did three webinars. I think that might have increased by now. We did two live runs of the MOOC, which I'll talk about the matter of open online course, and we're doing a trainer trainer in October. So next month. So the in person workshops were structured around different activities. So we'd usually start with a question board where people could raise their motivations. For being there and also ask a question and that was a good way because it meant at the end we could go through all the questions and make sure everybody had their question answered. We do a card activity, which is based on the foster open science cafe cards and also the Heary similar similar development. So we give those out and in pairs people would talk about their card and whether they agreed or disagreed. It was a nice icebreaker and also it got people thinking about the issues behind open science and RRI. And if we get a chance, I'll show you how we've adapted that a little bit to the online world that we now live in. We also did brain walking. This is where people will have a marker pen. There's three flip charts with topics so open access, open data and science communication with the usual ones. And everyone walks around and basically brainstorms in silence by writing any tools or ideas or what have you on that. Case studies, fairly self explanatory role play. This is where someone is the bad guy. And then the two or three other people in the group have to persuade them of open science. And that's always a nice one to do after lunch. It really wakes people up. It's quite a high energy thing. Then we did meet the expert and I think this is really important and kind of goes towards some of the things Nancy was talking about in terms of localised experts. Now this, we didn't do this in a different language, but in terms of having that local knowledge, that institutional knowledge or national knowledge, I think this is really important. So this is our way of trying to get around that, which is we'd have like a librarian or a senior researcher come in and give a presentation about what the status of open science and RRI was like in that institution. We also gave a presentation to kind of ensure everybody understood all the major terms. And then at the end we do something called individual action plans, which was basically people wrote what they would do in one week, one month and one year for open science and RRI. And again, Zoe Ingram did some analysis on this to look at what people were actually saying they would do. And you can see that they've far and away that the biggest one is the almost last one from the bottom is further educate myself on open science. And I think this was really important in showing us that our primary role as trainers were to provoke, you know, that that position change to wait people up to the fact that open science was a thing that they could use and that that you know that they were these tools and things available and to give them that insight into those those concepts as opposed to maybe more hard say open data training which is more of a skills based training. So we what we were doing was more kind of raising awareness than maybe training and detailed, you know, like I say skill training. But we did do more sort of skill based training in the the MOOC, which yes, so hopefully going to show you a video I don't even know I don't think you'll get sound but you might get the the video so this is the the MOOC the massive open online course that we develop. It was six modules across six weeks, each dealing with different aspects of open science, and they were expert contributors from across Europe. Now that did not work. Hold on. Yeah, so hopefully give you a kind of taster of what the course kind of involved so we had forums and so forth to encourage a kind of feeling of community and we ran it live so people did it between set dates as you can see here the last one run the February 2020 that's when it started. And now it's standalone so people can take it anytime and obviously we try and answer questions and so forth for the duration of the project. We hand over 300 participants river 25% completion rate which is, I don't know how familiar with e learning but the completion rates are usually very very low like anything between two and five percent. But I think even those who didn't do the full course and so get the certificate still benefited from doing maybe one or two modules and now it's completely standalone and open people can come and just do whichever modules they wanted. They want to so I mean, we found that was it was it was it was quite challenging obviously, but it was a really good experience and the feedback we got was was brilliant. So yeah I mean if anybody wants to ask me more specific questions about that I'm happy to to talk about that. So yeah this I was going to do the training activity. Do we have time for that it'll take like three minutes I imagine five minutes maybe. Yes, I think it's okay. Okay, so then I've got type of that. So yeah, go to Mentimeter and type in that code and hopefully this will work. Meanwhile, I will ask also if you have questions please type them in the chat. Thank you. Okay, this is working very nicely. It's good to see. Yeah, so this is as I was saying this is like adaptation of the foster card game. And yeah what we would do if we had more time is we do this and then we'd have breakout groups in the discussion. So people could could talk a little bit about why they they formed those opinions. But yeah this is just to show you kind of one of the adaptations that we've made and that, you know to maybe start thinking about I mean I don't think covid's going away anytime soon unfortunately. We need to be thinking about future proofing our research. And I'll say a little bit more about that. Just at the end very quickly. I'm going to give it a couple more seconds and then I'll move on to the next one. Okay, so yes. Interesting the split in opinion actually scientific publishing will always be dominated by commercial publishing houses so that we have, we have some cynics I think that that aren't as optimistic as I would be about the future but that's. Yeah, at the same time perhaps they're just realists so yeah. Okay. So you see how this works and you can see how this could be used to spark discussion. The next one. Best arguments for open science and all right so basically like just elevator pitches just really really just quick arguments that you've heard you know maybe in a couple of words. This is kind of to represent the role play thing so if again if we had more time. You'd have to maybe put the best counter arguments. So why shouldn't we have it, and then you'd have, you know, best arguments for so for and against, and you could do that in groups or whatever. Because obviously the role playing thing doesn't really work in in a video chat situation, because you've you've got a situation where you'd be talking over each other, which really doesn't work in in a video thing you can really only one person can talk at once so. Yeah, this would be a way of, of, again, kind of having that nice just science done right. Having that without the, the, the need for the sort of vocal back and forth if you understand what I mean. So I'm going to give people a little bit more time for that. Because obviously you've got to write things democracy. Yeah, adapting science to a change in society impact visibility transparent open science will improve the reproducibility of scientific results social return on money invested in research transparency trusting and quality of science. These are lovely. This will maximize the investment in science more transparent. So I'll take one more, and then I will get back to the presentation because there was a couple more things I wanted to say. Very quickly. There we go nine perfect. It's nice and symmetrical on my screen, improving transparency and quality of the, of research workflows and outcomes. That's excellent. Yeah. So yeah, that as I said would be an adaptation of the role play exercise. So let me just. Okay, right. So just a quick word about the train the trainer that we're doing. We're running that from the 19th of October to the 4th of November. It's a hybrid model. So asynchronous and synchronous training, which again I have a typo and that's really bothering me actually going to change that. Okay, synchronous learning. So that basically what it is is there's live webinars and then there's new learning course that people can do at their own pace. That's what that means basically. We're going to have 21 participants. We had to actually limit it. Because the course will culminate in the participants in groups of three doing micro training for the Berlin Science Week. So we're going to have a day where there's an open science cafe and twice an hour. So for 20 minutes at like on the hour and then half past the hour, the groups do a micro training in a topic of open science. So we had to limit the number of participants unfortunately because obviously they couldn't have sort of 100 micro trainings. So we had applications and we have our successful applicants represent 17 different countries from from all over the world and that's this is what I actually wanted to say about COVID and future proofing is that while of course there are many advantages of in real life training. It can limit the people who can attend in terms of geography and cost and so forth. So while it's nice to have that human connection and to be able to do certain things. I think even when the pandemic is over we should think about training that allows people who are maybe not in Europe or not in these big institutions to be involved. Because we've got applications from Kenya and Malaysia and so forth and those people would never have been able to partake of this if they if it hadn't been for COVID if it hadn't been the fact that we switched to everything online. So I yeah I just as like I would like to talk about this in the in the next session as well, but going forward I think we really need to think about ensuring that we include more, more people and using online technology to do that and be more, more global if you like. Sorry, Emma, we really need to wrap up. Yeah, I have literally one more slide. That's it, then I'm done. Yeah, no problem at all. Sorry, I knew I was running over time. Yeah, so the key principles that we use we focus on professional benefits kind of what's in it for the researchers or the funders like what can they gain from it encouraged peer to peer learning I think I demonstrated that so it's about people talking to each other not us talking at them. Emphasizing concrete but achievable next step so that's the individual action plans. And the other thing I'd say is utilize existing resources and people, which I think has been demonstrated by the other presentations anyway you know don't reinvent the wheel, you probably have expertise and existing training packages there. Everything that we've made is on Zanodo. And you can, you can use it it's all CC by of course so and also just contact us if you if you have any questions or one thing like that's it. Sorry, there we go. Emma, this is this was really interesting and thank you for your contribution. I think we can make any questions that people may have in the following session because we will be talking about the community involvement. For our eye, and also the contributions of the foster plus projects and fit for our eye and Orion, we will be having a green a kushma from Eiffel. And she's also the coordinator for the community of practice of training coordinators from open air, and also a lawyer Rodrigues for which was the coordinator for the foster plus projects. And so, we will can all meet in the in the next session and we will talk some more on all of these matters. Okay, so thank you so much. You can see the link for the next session in the chat. So, we will be starting in four minutes. Okay, we really need to close here. So, thank you all Emma and Pedro and Nancy for this and let's meet in a few minutes in the next session. Thank you. Okay, perfect. So be aware of the of the link for the next session so we can have five minutes of break and join the other session. So Emma, we can raise some of these issues in the in the next day. Let's discuss. We have also too many meters for the discussion to help the discussion. Just to discuss around this community of practice that's that's too. Okay. Thank you very much. Thanks. So the links are in the chat. So for those that are still connected, feel free to click and access the other session. Okay, thank you.