 In what has been described as one of the most tense battles of all time, the occupied town of Kirat Shimona was targeted overnight by Lebanese resistance groups, allegedly in response to an occupation airstrike that resulted in the deaths of ten civilians in the heart of Lebanon. Eyewitness reports, although not independently confirmed, suggest that residents heard no fewer than 60 blasts in multiple locations across the northern occupied Palestinian city. The true extent of the attack remains unconfirmed, but if accurate, it would mark a significant escalation in the conflict, potentially affecting the peace of the Middle East for years to come. Despite the challenges, we remain committed to delivering unbiased and truthful news reports that are often overlooked by mainstream media. Your support in liking and sharing this report is invaluable. Subscribe to stay informed about the latest developments in Palestine. Apart from Kirat Shimona, various sites were reportedly targeted, including Rewesat Al Alam in the occupied Sheba farms, Al Rahib, Al Maj and the Nakura naval site, among others, with the aim of neutralizing spy equipment. Additionally, rockets were launched at the Zebdini and Al Samarka barracks, while the Kiryat Shimona barracks faced attacks with Katyusha and Falak rockets, following tragic events in Nabataea and Alsawana. Occupation soldiers around the Zarid Barracks and the Birkat Rishisite were also targeted with rockets. The Lebanese resistance stated that these actions were taken in response to recent events, with the goal of deterring further aggression. These resistance movements, they based their approach. It was based on vision and vigilance and understanding the threats. We have to make it a pool, knowing the goals, and knowing the threats, and knowing the opportunities, and also knowing also the vice of the other truth in God, and His prophet, and His books, and His angels, and the day of judgment, to get what God gives, and also winning as a result. Elements of firmness, vigilance, and vision, which make sacrifice on the ground. This, the enemy, which thinks that by kicks, and many of the leaders in our who were martyred, or killed, or thrown into prison, or this which think, thinks that by killing our leaders and our Mujahideen, and our families, and the women, and children, and that destroying hope make us back down, or make us weaken, or sense maybe weakness or abandon our responsibilities, not at all. According to some reports, which were derived from video footage, at least 100 rockets were allegedly fired from southern Lebanon. These videos purportedly show moments when the occupation's iron dome intercepted some of the missiles, accompanied by blasts that shook the surrounding areas. While these videos have not been independently verified, they portray a narrative of escalating tensions that could lead to a Gaza-like battle in Lebanon. The resistance in Lebanon has accused occupation forces of deliberately targeting civilians, describing it as political terror. They argue that while the occupation possesses the military capability to target Lebanese fighters with precision strikes, they instead choose to terrorize the population in order to gain political leverage. This accusation comes after the resistance media reported that at least ten civilians lost their lives in an airstrike targeting civilian objects in Nabatae, Lebanon, with three fighters also losing their lives in the raid. Tensions continue to simmer, as both sides engage in limited yet intense attacks on each other. It appears that neither side is willing to fully engage in war, as they are wary of each other's capabilities against the backdrop of a sophisticated resistance group in Lebanon. It is believed that Hezbollah has acquired a level of sophistication that could make a war in Lebanon a costly venture for Israel. With the significant arsenal of missiles capable of causing concern among Israelis, Hezbollah's capabilities, coupled with the occupation's technological military know-how and western support, could potentially turn Lebanon into a battleground. Given this realization, the Lebanese movement appears to be proceeding cautiously, demonstrating their striking abilities despite the presence of the Iron Dome. This sends a clear message to the occupation that maintaining peace with Lebanon and ending brutality in Gaza are prerequisites for a peaceful and prosperous administration in occupied Palestinian lands. The occupation, on the other hand, has been reluctant to escalate beyond rhetoric and occasional shows of force, preferring to avoid a full-scale war on its northern borders. However, whether this status quo will persist remains uncertain, as there are indications that both sides are heading towards a full-blown escalation, several points merit consideration when assessing the recent resistance operation in occupied Palestine. Firstly, it has focused on degrading the occupation's ability to spy on military and civilian targets in Lebanon. Secondly, the attacks have primarily targeted naval and spy bases scattered across the northern occupied Palestinian lands. While major population centers have been largely spared, and casualties minimized through evacuations from the zones of hostilities in both southern Lebanon and occupied Kirat Shemona, the strikes on the occupied city disabled numerous military posts used by occupation forces in their defense against perceived threats. Politically, the continued attacks risk escalating into a full-blown crisis that could lead to prolonged disputes among neighboring states. However, the Lebanese resistance may be driven by concerns that Palestinian freedom fighters are on the verge of defeat. Although there is no immediate evidence to support this, the occupation's decision to prioritize targeting civilian enclaves like Rafa could potentially prompt Palestinian surrender. Yet Palestinian resistance remains steadfast, showing no signs of retreat. In this context, the likelihood of escalation in Lebanon may be limited, as the resistance sees no reason to distract occupation forces, which could trigger a massive response. For now, a level-headed approach seems to prevail, with diplomatic efforts still active, likely remaining the case in Lebanon. However, doubts linger due to the occupation's belligerent disposition, as evidenced by its prolonged bombing campaigns not only in Lebanon, but also in neighboring Syria. In military terms, an escalation on the Lebanese front is seen as a risky move for the occupation. The Lebanese resistance, as a well-armed non-state actor, poses significant challenges. While the group may lament civilian casualties, they possess the capability to make the entire occupied Palestinian territory inhospitable for occupation forces. This would severely disrupt economic and social activities under occupation. The occupation currently enjoys a strong economy, largely supported by significant backing from the United States and the status of the World Reserve currency. Their innovative prowess also contributes to a robust economy, attracting foreign investments and resulting in large trade surpluses. However, these economic advantages are contingent upon the occupied lands, remaining safe for business. In the event of a full-scale war with an adversary armed with over 90,000 precision missiles, the security and confidence for peace would be severely undermined. This is a risk the occupation cannot afford to take at the moment. While it may seek to demonstrate strength on its northern flank, there is evidence of reluctance to engage in an escalation that could lead to internally displaced occupier refugees for the first time since World War II. It's crucial to raise awareness and foster informed discussions on this issue. Please consider sharing this information and subscribing to stay updated on developments in Palestine. Until the next update, let's hope for peace and stability in the region.