 On the side of the structure of the model, it is now a recognized benchmark. It is a mature and stable model. It covers 141 countries this year, representing over 95% of the world population and close to 99% of the world GDP. So it can be considered as having a very good coverage. Recording the rankings, what we see is stability at the top. We have Switzerland number one, we have the UK number two, followed by Sweden, the Netherlands and the US, which is fairly close to what we had last year. But if we go further down the rankings, we see that there is significant dynamism, especially among developing countries. So at the top, stability is striking. We have, for instance, Switzerland number one for the fifth consecutive year. We also have the UK for the second consecutive year. This relies very much on the performance, which is excellent across all pillars. We observe that indeed the countries at the top are not outpacing everybody in one pillar and lagging on some others. They are performing well on all facets of innovation. Among the middle-income countries, we see a very interesting dynamics. Basically, we consider three subgroups. In the upper middle-income, we have China, 29th. We have Vietnam also outperforming their peers and showing remarkable dynamism in the area of innovation. In the middle of that group, the lower middle-income, we have also significant dynamism. If we consider countries like Moldova, for instance, showing very interesting things, which translate the impact of innovation policies. And even for the lower segment of that income group, if we look, for instance, at Sub-Saharan Africa, we have a number of countries, including Senegal, including Rwanda, who indeed are also outperforming their peers. So if we compare the performance of these countries to their average income groups, we see good news. We have reasons to think that indeed their success can be replicated in those income groups. And we are going to see even more good news as we continue publishing GII in the coming years.