 Mass media hastened to help Pentagon exonerate itself in Afghan airstrike. The mass media are full of headlines announcing that a watchdog has concluded an independent investigation that the US military personnel did nothing wrong in an August airstrike in Kabul which killed 10 civilians and 0 combatants. An independent Pentagon review has concluded that the US drone strike that killed innocent Kabul civilians and children in the final days of the Afghanistan war was not caused by misconduct or negligence, and it doesn't recommend any disciplinary action, the Associated Press reports in an article titled, Watchdog finds no misconduct in mistaken Afghan airstrike. The word watchdog appears nowhere else in the article apart from its title, which means it was calculatingly chosen by an AP editor for the public, the vast majority of whom only read headlines to see. When people hear the word watchdog in reference to scrutiny of government institutions, they naturally think of the standard usage of that term, parties outside the institution being watched like Amnesty International or the American Civil Liberties Union. They most certainly don't think of watchdogs being the government institutions themselves, as is the case here. The review, done by the Air Force Lieutenant General Sami Said, found that there were breakdowns in communication and in the process of identifying and confirming the target of the bombing, according to a senior defense official familiar with the report, AP informs us. The US Air Force is of course a branch of the US Department of Defense. So the Pentagon literally did the we investigated ourselves and cleared ourselves of any wrongdoing meme, and the mainstream press is passing that off as a real thing in much the same matter as the famous 1997 New York Times headline, CIA says it has found no link between itself and the crack trade. The claim that the investigation was independent is justified later in the AP report. As Inspector General of the Air Force, Said has no direct connection to Afghanistan operations and thus was deemed an independent judge of the matter, the article reads. So AP was told by their source, a senior defense official, that the report is independent, and then they passed that claim on to their readers as though it's an objective fact when it is in reality an assertion by a US government official. This Pentagon stenography is journalistic malpractice. AP along with Reuters and AFP is one of just three news agencies which write the bulk of international news media reporting in the western world. Corporate media outlets who generally can't be bothered to do their own original reporting on international affairs often run articles published by those agencies along with whatever propaganda, spin, and journalistic malpractice they happen to contain. A quick search shows that this AP report has already been picked up and run verbatim by Politico, The Independent, Yahoo News, and many other outlets as of this writing. Not only is there clearly nothing independent about government officials investigating their own agencies, but the possibility of any actual independent review of the airstrike has been made impossible since the Pentagon's report on the matter has been classified. The full report of the strike, which includes several recommendations on how to avoid similar incidents in the future, is classified, reports Business Insider, who also used the word Watchdog in its headline. The world is dominated by opaque and unaccountable government agencies who are legitimized and normalized by the mass media. The Pentagon killed ten people, none of whom were combatants, and seven of whom were children. Investigated itself and found that those who perpetrated the attack were not even guilty of so much as negligence, then classified the report and called it a day. And then the mass media legitimized this by calling it an independent investigation conducted by a Watchdog. As we discussed previously, this is just one of thousands upon thousands of airstrikes the Pentagon has launched since its war on terror began, a huge percentage of which have included civilian casualties. The only reason this one is gaining special attention is because of the highly politicized nature of President Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal which the mass media aggressively criticized the entire time. It was only because this dynamic led to a New York Times investigation which showed the alleged ISIS-K target the Pentagon claimed it had slain was actually an aid worker named Zamari Ahmadi. Dr. Stephen Kwan, director of the Nutrition and Education International where Ahmadi worked, released a statement on the Air Force Inspector General's conclusion. This investigation is deeply disappointing and inadequate because we're left with many of the same questions we started with. I do not understand how the most powerful military in the world could follow Zamari and aid worker in a commonly used car for eight hours and not figure out who he was and why he was at a U.S. aid organization's headquarters. According to the Inspector General, there was a mistake but no one acted wrongly and I'm left wondering how can that be? Clearly, good military intentions are not enough when the outcome is 10 precious Afghan civilian lives lost and reputations ruined. The most powerful military force ever assembled does not care about human beings and is completely unaccountable to the public. That is why these things happen and that's why they will continue to happen until this entire corrupt power structure ceases to be.