 Yeah, what is happening, what is going on? FanDuel family, you are welcomed in here now, live to the week nine, FanDuel Monday Night Football Preview show in Q&A here on the FanDuel channel. I'm Ryan Williams, your host for this evening or day, I guess, if you're watching this live right now and joined always by my good friend, Jim Sonnis. You can find him on Twitter at Jim Sonnis, senior writer and analyst for Number of Fire. And FanDuel, Jim, how are we doing today, sir? Not too bad. You said evening and I think that's kind of appropriate because like the sun goes down in like an hour here. So honestly, like you're not wrong. Yeah, hashtag fallback season. That's kind of the life that we're living in. Man, this is just a rough time, Jim. You know, it's that, it's that hibernation mode. We've already pretty much reached the halfway point and fantasy and we got like the wrinkle in time clock of whatever, you know, this bizarre world that's happening to us here with week nine just absolutely being turning the NFL on its head. So I mean, this game tonight against the Bears and Steelers should prove no differently. I mean, we're probably going to get a 50, 50 point shootout here from Dustin Fields and Ben Rothesberger, Ben Rothesberger going back in time because that's just how the week's been going, right? Right, right. So if we take yesterday as a model, like, do we just guarantee like Zach Gentry scores like two touchdowns or does Benny Snell like or Anthony McFarland like, I guess like if we just assumed that what happened yesterday holds, I guess like, I don't know, right? Ryan Nall touchdowns, like, what are we looking at here? If yesterday is an indicator, what to expect? Or dare I even say Alan Robinson, who I receive a one on the week week. That's it. Oh man, this is going to be fun. We're going to break down the week nine Monday night football game here again with the Bears visiting the Steelers there in Pittsburgh. Shout out to everybody who's joining us on YouTube, joining us on Facebook, Twitch, what have you. We appreciate that. If you guys are watching on YouTube, make sure you subscribe to the channel and go ahead and hit that thumbs up button for us. We appreciate that. That would make Jim very happy. Everybody at Fandle, very happy if you guys do that. So welcome in as we get the questions starting to roll in Jim. I just want to kind of do what we always do here. And let's talk about kind of the state of this game. I mean, we have the, we have the Bears traveling into Pittsburgh, I believe not coming off of the buy, but coming off of a week there, right? Where they're just coming back and you got the Bears here who are going to have naggy on the sidelines. They missed them last week in week eight. And we saw that Justin Fields explosion. This should be an interesting one. Kind of a couple of injuries that we're kind of waiting on on both sides, some injuries that we already know about. What's your opinion and what are you pulling from this game as we get ready to break down the Monday night football show? Yeah, I think it's interesting to watch like what the matchup will look like here because like on paper, it's a really bad spot for the Bears offense because as you know, Ryan, like the offensive line is getting a bit healthier. So that's good, but like there's still not one you expect to hold up against a really good pass rush. And the Steelers have one of the best pass rushes in football. So that would worry me in terms of keeping this game competitive is can they just like prevent Justin Fields from dying? Like basically like that's kind of my fear here. I get getting healthy up front is a good thing for this Bears team, but facing TJ Watt and this Steelers defense, that's a really rough spot to be in. So that's kind of where I'm coming from here from this game is can the Bears prevent calamity on offense? And they look good last week like Fields moved the football. There were some positives there for sure. Can they run it back once again on the road? It gets really good defense. I think that like when the spread is at six points, I like the Steelers a lot. Now that it's seven, I'm okay staying away just because like it's a decently big number. It's a low scoring game. It's tougher to cover a big number in a low scoring game. But I think that like it's hard for me to get jazzed about the Bears offense when they match up so poorly with what the Steelers do best defensively. Yeah, I mean, you know, the best thing that the Bears have shown that they've been able to do so far this year is run the football, right? I mean, even in week eight when you're looking at Justin Fields explosion that's because he's rushing for over a hundred yards something that he hadn't even rushed for half that in the games when Necky had been at the helm. And so we're going to see, you know what they're able to do here on the road in a situation where they're going to be having their buy in week 10. So they're going to have a long break, a long time to rest up and kind of get back after it at the season. Now, you know, you mentioned what the Steelers are good at is getting pressure and stopping the run. And so now we have a situation where the Bears, you know, are we going to get fields rushing? We got Khalil Herbert back there, but oh wait, David Montgomery has been activated off of IR. What are you expecting at all? If anything from this run game in general and does that make you, does it make you even more weary to kind of play them to because we don't know how things are going to go or does this help the offense in general having, you know, basically their whole offense back right now at full speed. Well, I think the issue that I have here with the Bears running backs is that they're both salaried as if neither or that one of them is not going to play. Like Montgomery is $13,000. That kind of assumes that he's going to be the lead guy, but I definitely would not expect that given that, you know, Herbert's played well coming off that knee injury. As you alluded to, they've got the buy coming up. I don't expect a full workload. I'd expect probably 50-50. Like I think that's decently fair. And if it's 50-50 at 13,000 and 12,000, to me it's pretty easy to avoid both. Ryan, I think you probably have a better read on this team right now. So do you have the same read on this Bears backfield? Do you think it could be a pretty even split between those two guys? Yeah, I wouldn't even say even split. I mean, I would be shocked, Jim, unless this game was going differently, I guess, and they were really in desperation mode if Montgomery saw more than 30% of the snaps. I think that they're going to give, I mean, there's just, and again, how many times have I been wrong on this team before? So I'm willing to go to bat for that. But I think that you're looking, again, at the buy being the next week, it just makes no sense in running him a full workload in a matchup that is not favorable on the road here. I just, coming fresh off of the IR, I think there's so much chance for a re-injury there for Montgomery. And really, he kind of dodged the bullet when that injury had happened in the first place. So I think just by making him active, maybe that's insurance if something happens to Herbert with Damian Williams being out. But other than that, I just really can't trust that. So I think I would go Herbert, but again, you're paying 12,000 for a guy who is gonna be in somewhat of a share, we think, potentially, or just not in a good matchup. Yeah, and I think that's, it's a combination of those two things that would scare me off of Herbert. I mean, it will definitely make them far less popular for this, for tonight, but like you look at number fires projections, they project a split, and it's got Khalil Herbert at 8.7 points and David Montgomery at 8.6. And that accounts for the matchup, the situation and all that stuff. I think that that makes it a really tough sell. So I think that I'll probably just avoid it entirely and just kind of let it sort itself out under the assumption that they do kind of cannibalize each other. Right, yes. And I mean, this is really, I think that if we're thinking about how this game is going to go and just with teams having a tough time traveling into Pittsburgh against this defense, I think we really got to look at the past catching options here. And that's really what it's going to come down to. And pretty, I guess the better way that you attack this Pittsburgh Steelers team. So I mean, we got Mooney, who is questionable. I think he's going to be a game time decision, but he's been fields his favorite target. I think he has nine more targets on the season this year than Alan Robinson. Alan Robinson actually still has, you know, quite the target share on the team when you're talking about just target shares in general. I believe Mooney comes in around 24% and Alan Robinson right there at 21. It just hasn't come to fruition. And then the only other people who are seeing reasonable snap shares for this team on offense is Cole Comette. Those are the only three guys who got over 80. Everybody else is slim picking. So I guess that kind of lends me to say, Jim, that even, you know, as I root on this Bears team very frequently, I think that optimal builds probably have, you know, one or two Bears in them. And I'm kind of thinking maybe just one Bear, because we have such a concentrated offense on the other side that we'll talk about. Yeah, and I think that that's the correct way to view it because like you're looking at these usages here, like they're not getting a whole lot. Like Mooney's target share is good at 26%, but it's eight, five, nine targets have passed three games. Like that's, those aren't big numbers. So even though the shares are good because they've been so run heavy, the volume is not that great. And that's the leading target getter in this offense. So I think that I'd agree with you where it's one or two max. And the question is, is Justin Fields one of those guys? Because I think that's kind of the key one. And then you decide, okay, I want to go with Mooney. Do you want to go Robinson? I think that, like you said, Comette's the other guy you could consider here. And Comette definitely works from a salary saving perspective because he is down at $7,500. That's pretty low actually. And there aren't a lot of guys lower than that here. So I would say Comette works out pretty well. Friar Mooth is pretty much same salary. And I think that Friar Mooth is a great option. But I think that it's going to ensure that people go to Friar Mooth over cool Comette. And I don't mind either honestly. So I think both tight ends very much in play for today. Comette's salary relative to Allen Robinson is a lot lower. So like between the two, I'd probably go Mooney one, Comette two, Robinson three, accounting for salary. What about for you? Yeah, I think that from a salary perspective, it makes sense. I think that for tournaments, I'd be willing to take both Mooney and Robinson without taking fields. And just hope that the production is that way. I mean, you're looking at a Steelers defense. That's only given up two rushing touchdowns for running back on the year. So you're hoping the equity you can get is from there. But I think Cole Comette probably would make it into the optimal more often than not, just because of the salary relief that you get there. So that's where I'd be leaning. Fryer Muth is actually interesting. So I definitely want to talk about him, Jim, on the Steelers side, because I believe Eric Ebron set to miss this game. And we have seen heavy targets to Mr. Pat Fryer Muth when Ebron is not out there. Let's get into the chat here. Shout out to everybody that's joining us here on the FanDuel channel, whether you're watching on YouTube or Facebook as DJ. Cassier is, Jim, this is for you. He took the Pittsburgh Steelers in his survival league this week. And there's really no where he can go with that. So it's going to be Steelers, I guess, or Bust unless he wanted to take the bare side of things, which I wouldn't do on the road. So DJ, good luck to you against my team here. It probably feels good to know that there are seven point favorites at home against this team. Shout out to Nick Descanso, Descanso joining us in the chat, asking if Montgomery's playing. We believe that he will play. We just don't know how much. So getting 10 points out of Herbert is what you need. I think that maybe Herbert, hopefully, you're thinking there's a turnover, a short field, and possibly he can get some work there. You do love that he is getting targets out of the backfield as well too. So that definitely can help out as well there. Also wanted to get down to Andrew Carlson here joining us on Facebook as well, asking about tonight a good night to fade both quarterbacks in this matchup. Also this is a game that the kickers could be a decent play in DFS with the low over under. Definitely love this question, Andrew, or just statement because I've been looking at builds with fading both of the quarterbacks as well. You feel good about that. We can talk about Najee in a second. And also the kickers, you know, kickers on a single game slate always makes some sense. And Chris Boswell has been, you know, money for this team for a while, Jim. So how are you feeling about the kickers and how you feel about fading quarterbacks? Yeah, I think Boswell definitely works and I'm very okay with that. And Andrew, I believe my colleague, Brandon Gadoulas, did research on games with low totals and single game slates and kickers show up in more optimals there. So your inclination was correct. So good job on you, Andrew, where it's a lower scoring game which implies fewer touchdowns and quarterbacks more dependent on touchdowns than our positions. That's less true with Justin Fields because of the rushing. So like he's not as touchdown dependent as Ben Rathausberger would be, but overall it's still a position where you need touchdowns for that guy to pay off. So it's more viable than usual. I would say that I'm gonna have a tough time not using quarterbacks or, you know, at least one quarterback in a lineup because it's looking at the like the projections here, the falloff after those top four guys. I think that Deontay Johnson's consideration, it's pretty big. So I feel like to me my default will be one. I might not get to two just because Najee Harris might be in pretty much every lineup and it's tough to go with Najee plus Rathausberger plus Fields. You can make that work, but it's not a pretty lineup by any means. So I would say my default will probably be one because I wanna get to Najee. What about for you, Ryan? Where is your default build for tonight? Yeah, I think of my default build, which I guess I haven't really played around too much with the builds yet, but I do think that for me starts with Najee and Deontay just as far as the volume that these two guys are getting. I mean, I don't think I'll make a team tonight without either one of those guys. I mean, Deontay's been a target hog, this dude's third in the league behind Tyree Kill and Cooper Cup for targets per game and he just is the forgotten about man. So maybe this is a show out game for him. I would definitely love that as I need 21 points for him and that sees a lot to take home a victory. So be happy about that. And then also with Juju on IR, it's just been pretty much Deontay or Najee or bus. So I think that's where I can start. And then with Justin Fields, I mean, really you're playing Fields. I think that the narrative around Fields has to be that you're getting week eight performance around him because the upside through passing hasn't really been there. And this could be a long, long day for him if TJ Watt and those boys in the front seven get home on him. So we could really be looking at a situation where maybe he's not running, maybe Naggy doesn't want him to run. Maybe they're trying to get him more in the pocket. Maybe they're using two backs back there to give him more time to throw. I just feel like you're really paying for upside on that price tag and I'd much rather get to the ancillary options on the Bears and hope that I guess right on who can have the better game than by taking Fields himself. When you're looking at, he's a thousand dollars less than Ben Rathausberger in a much more favorable spot. I think the other comparison too is Fields versus Deontay. And Deontay probably has a better like, like a better ceiling than Fields. Honestly, from like a range of outcomes perspective, because of what you were talking about with all the volume, 13 targets and both games and no Juju Smith Schuster, like he's just a target hog. And we should cover that for sure. So I would say I prefer Deontay over Fields, which doesn't normally happen, but I do think that I agree with you. We're like, you know, I'd rather take shots elsewhere whether it be Fields versus the lower salary Bears or Fields versus Deontay, I'm okay passing over Fields for sure. Yeah. And I mean, yeah, I think for me right now just like throwing to the build, like I think for me the optimal build would be four Steelers, one Bear if Mooney were to play and by playing Najee, Deontay, Claypool and Friar move. So you're getting basically all of the work there that you would expect in the passing game for Ralph Lisberger. And then hoping that, you know, by playing Najee at the captain's spot, you're getting those short yardage runs or he has those explosive run or doesn't catch a pass from Ralph Lisberger, they most so come on the ground. So yeah, I think it's interesting definitely to build tonight. And we'll know more about where to go in these spots once we get that final injury report. But I do want to talk a little bit about Friar move, but just going back into the chat here, Jim, we got a question from, I believe Kyle R on YouTube asking about, would you ever roster both kickers? I absolutely would consider it. Kyle, if you get the guys who are that at the top in the game where you're looking, you know, we talked about Najee, we talked about Ben, we talked about Deontay. Okay, so play those three guys. And then just take the kickers, you know, you're looking at the Bairds getting short fields. Santos has been pretty solid. So maybe they want to take three in a low scoring game. And then on the other side, if Pittsburgh can't score in opportunities too, then we could have a situation where two kickers become viable. I think that almost happened. I mean, there was scoring otherwise in the Colts and Jets game, I believe is what I'm thinking of. But there was, yeah, they had kickers putting up some decent scores as well there too. So kickers are always in play on a single game slate in the same lineup. I thought I had another, saw another question in the chat here, just going through, oh, it's Mr. Jackie Moon joining us on Twitch. Really needs two touchdown passes from Big Ben tonight. Thank you, he'll get it. For you, Jackie, I hope that he does. I hope they're both to Deontay. And we can both enjoy that. And then Medell Davis on Facebook will, Claypool, give me at least 12 points tonight. Claypool and Frymove is the interesting conversation, Jim, that I think we need to get to because you're looking at a pricing discrepancy of 3,500 between the two players. And really, like, I mean, I wanna play Claypool tonight just because of that opportunity target share and the concentrated targets. But what's the, you know, I'm looking at it and it's like there's not really a big enough difference for me with the way Frymove's been used in this offense and getting Red Zone targets. I think I might be leaning on what Claypool did in 2020 and trying to correlate that to 2021, but it really hasn't come to fruition yet. What are your numbers telling you? Yeah, I mean, look at, here are the two games, no, Juju. It's seven and five targets for Claypool, seven and seven for Prep Frymove. And like they kinda, it seems like they wanna get in the ball in the Red Zone. I will also say that that is also true for Chase Claypool. They're getting in some rushing attempts to have three Red Zone targets in week six as well. So I think that Chase Claypool, like, from an upside perspective still has what he did last year within his range of outcomes, it could still do that. But like, if I'm talking one lineup, I just take the Savings with Frymove for sure. I will say though that I think because Deontay has gotten so many targets and because Frymove has a low salary, I would expect Claypool to probably get glossed over from a rostering perspective for tonight. His salary at 11.5 is kinda awkward if you're going like Stars and Scrubs trying to jam in. You know, Najee, Rothesburger and Johnson and Deontay, you're not getting to Claypool. So I'd expect Claypool to probably go a bit overlooked for tonight. So I think from like a single entry tournament perspective where you're trying to find ways to be different without being stupid, Chase Claypool actually grades up pretty well there for me. Like if you are playing a cash game lineup for tonight, this is not Chase Claypool's night. That's not the, you wanna take the Savings with Frymove or take the targets with Deontay, but from like a tournament perspective, I think that Chase Claypool actually is pretty interesting. Would I get there if I had one single entry lineup? Not sure, not sure right now, but I would at least give him long consideration just because I think that his roster rate relative to his upside is probably gonna be a little bit disjointed. Yeah, we got some, you know, injuries on the bare side of the things. I mean, Khalil Mack is gonna be out for this game. Eddie Jackson's been banged up all year. The secondary has actually absolutely been torched by wide receivers all year. Wide receivers against the Bears are, or the Bears are allowing the fifth most fan dual points to wide receivers per game on the year. So you definitely love that from taking both Deontay and Claypool side of things. The secondary has not been able to stop anybody big. Look at Devo Samuel last week in week eight. Yeah, this is gonna be an interesting one, Jim, because, you know, as there's so much that I like, you know, on one side versus the other, that I will try and find ways that kind of makes sense, I think, to get to Bears in there in hope and the chances that this game stays competitive throughout. Are there any other ancillary pieces that we could be looking at here? Grim fan in the YouTube chat asking about score or bust James Washington tonight. And we really haven't seen that third wide receiver, even though the Bears kind of utilize, or the Bears, the Steelers utilize, you know, 11 personnel trying to get three wide receivers on the field pretty, pretty often as compared to the league average. So, but they've thrown in Ray Ray McLeod as well too on some of these plays. And James Washington has kind of been the guy that's been out there preseason favorite for some, for some people. How are you looking at things as it relates to the ancillary pieces on the Steelers side? Yeah, it's hard for me to see Washington doing much here. I mean, even the two games with no juju, he's had two targets total across those two games. I kind of think like this, so Ryan, last week you were a savior in that you talked me out of Noah Gray. Might need you to save me again tonight because I'm kind of interested in Zach Gentry who ran a healthy number of routes last week. Let me pull up the actual number here for Gentry in that game. I think it was 11 total routes, which is not a huge number, but like, you know, 16. 16 routes for him, which is about a little bit less than half the drop backs for the Steelers. Actually, I'm just four fewer routes than James Washington. He had five targets in that game. He is $6,000. And if I use him, like let's just plug him in here, I'm at $12,500 left. That means I can get to Big Ben and I can get to De Yonte and then just have my one bear in there. I kind of don't hate that. So it's probably stupid. Probably don't want to do this. Probably just want to ignore the past 30 seconds of what I've said. But I think in terms of like legitimate salary savers, I don't mind that. I do want to see Jesse James' salary quick because he's gotten some targets. He had a touchdown last week. Yeah, $6,000 as well. I think I'd prefer probably Gentry between the two just because I think that I have higher expectations for the Steelers, maybe just, you know, stumbling in for one, but like, I think they're both at least worth considering for tonight, maybe. Well, and this is, if I'm not mistaken, this is a revenge game for Jesse James. So, I mean, you know, take that for what you will, Jim, as him returning to the Promised Land there in Pittsburgh. I do, I would say I would like Jesse James over Zach Gentry, just in the sense that, I mean, Fields, they have designed this offense in him to give him as many easy reads as they can. And I feel like those are going to the slot in these tight ends who are running these, you know, short A-dot routes so that he can get them and just letting, you know, Robinson or Mooney or whatever the play is calling for, just take the defense up top and just give us whatever is open through the middle. So I could see, you know, Jesse James getting a couple of catches and maybe in the red zone, you know, getting some extra looks there. But we do have, he's been getting some work with Jimmy Graham being in COVID protocols. And I think Jimmy Graham is clear of that now. So he could be out there, which kind of muddies it a little bit, but the, you know, revenge game narrative is always a fun one to look at. What do we, let's go in, because we had a fun one with Kyle Rudolph last week with Anytime Touchdown as we get into the Fandall Sportsbook here before we run out of time. And let's just look at what Jesse James is to catch an Anytime Touchdown. He's plus 1200, 12 to one to catch an Anytime Touchdown in the revenge game. That's an interesting one. I might have to put some, put some Skrilla on that. It's Mr. Jackie Moon coming at us on Twitch. Jesse James, two touchdowns tonight. I mean, hey, you know, if that's what you think, Jackie Moon, put him into your lineups. But I definitely think he has a good chance to get a touchdown there. Andrew Carlson on Facebook with the Jags meeting the bills, the Bears have a chance here as a Bears fan. So, hey, Andrew, I hear you there. I'm hoping that they do too. If you are ever so inclined, plus 260 is what the Bears are coming at on the money line here. And I think I saw our friends at the Fandall Sportsbook tweet out a parlay. I forget how many legs it was, but the last leg for this $20 payout, a $20 buy-in to pay out $68,000 has the Bears winning tonight? Or he could cash out for 12 grand. I gotta keep tabs on that to see what he ends up doing. Cash me out, man. Like, I'll take this payout and run. Man, off of $20? Come on now. That's fun, but that'll be a fun sweat for him either way. As we're kind of getting into the final minutes here, Jim, what on the Fandall Sportsbook is kind of sticking out to you? Are there any props or anything like that? I was looking at the Steelers receiving props. I always just buy into the Ante Johnson's receiving props because they always come in so low. I mean, these yards, you're looking at 69 and a half. I absolutely love getting that. His reception totals might seem high, six and a half for plus money. I'd even be willing to go there just because of the state of the situation with this roster. But Claypool, over four and a half is plus money as well too. So that's very intriguing. You got FriarMove that's over three and a half minus 136. So I mean, they were really expecting him with Ebron out to get favored in this game. Four receptions for him. That's a good number there. What are you looking at on the Fandall Sportsbook? I think the one you mentioned is the best one, Deontay, over 69 and a half. That's a good number for a guy who, again, is at 13 targets in two straight games. And it's not like they were playing catch-up in that second one. They're facing the Browns. They won that game 15 to 10. He's still got 13 targets. So like you mentioned, the Bear Secondary is banged up. I think that's the best prop. Another one that I liked, and I'm sorry to say this, but the Steelers' defense is five to one for any time touchdown. Kind of don't mind that. Just because, again, I'm expecting this to be a game where their pass rush dominates. And the way to generate touchdowns defensively is via sacks, I need to fumbles, via interceptions. And I feel like we're gonna see a lot of chaos for tonight. So five to one for any time touchdown for the Steelers' defense. I don't think that's too bad. I think that that's my favorite of the any time touchdown ones. So fire move that plus 320 is also pretty interesting. But I think that either fire move to the Pittsburgh defense and then the Deontay yardage prop for my favorites here. Yeah, I don't disagree with any of those. I mean, even as explosive as Rayran McLeod has been on returns, you can even get, you don't have to get a turnover to have that happen. He could take one to the house at any time. So I definitely liked that. I am interested a little bit, Jim, in taking the over. The overs actually moved quite a bit as you know, only by half a point, but it has been fluctuating opened at 40. Then got bet down to 39 and a half. Now it's back up at 40 and a half. If it was still at 39 and a half, I was interested in taking the over there just because under the 40 mark, that's ugly for this day and age. But even at 40 and a half, just the way these island games have been going, I think there is some merit there. And especially if you're playing on BFS and just like getting to the bare side of things and really have confidence in Justin Fields, I think it's worth it to kind of take that over there because I think points can come on both sides. I think that the Steelers offense too will do some stuff here. So I think that that makes the over a bit enticing. I looked at their team total, it's 23 and a half. That's a little bit too high for me, but like I think if I'm looking at an over, I would say the game total is more enticing than the team total for the Steelers, I would say. Yes, that is definitely where I would lean as well too. I just wanted to pull up to see what Najee's rushing prop was. And it's at 82 and a half. Yeah, the rushing plus receiving is 112, I think. And I looked at that, but I couldn't quite talk, or it's 14, it's gone up. So it's 114 and a half now. That's appropriate is the way I'd phrase it. I think that's right. So I'm not going to bet that one. Yeah, I think the rushing yards are appropriate too. I mean, this is a spot more often than not where I think we could get 100 yards out of him on the ground if the Steelers are controlling this game. I will say it does lend itself to be interesting, Jim, that rushing plus receiving, if this is a kind of close scoring game and they really need to involve him in other ways in the offense than just by running. So that would be where I would lean to and that. But yeah, that's going to do it, I think, for the Monday Night Football Preview show for week nine. Jim, any final words before we sign off? Now I'm excited to see this game. Even though I was on the Steelers like minus six earlier on this week, I'm excited to just watch Justin Fields play. Like it's fun to have exciting players in the NFL. He is that Ben Rothlesberger kind of not, but like Najee's fun. So like, even if it's not like the most exciting game, there are players I enjoy watching. You know, Khalil Herbert's been fun. I always love watching Dave Montgomery. So like individual fun players, I can get excited for that even if the overall game is not super thrilling based on the overall breakdown of it. Absolutely. And just make sure you guys are setting your lineups there on FanDuel for the single game. Just make sure they tell a story. So make sure everything that you're putting in is making sense. But don't be afraid to take some shots on guys, especially the two kicker lineup. As you know, if you get a low scoring game here, that could pay off more often than not. Signing off for Jim Sinis, you can find him on Twitter at Jim Sinis here, senior writer and analyst for Number Fire and FanDuel. I'm Ryan Williams. You can find me on Twitter at ryanalexander underscore w. We'll catch you guys next week for the Week 10 FanDuel Monday Night Football Preview and Q&A. Until then, have fun, get that money. Peace.