 I have one last question and it's going to be short, I think. Mr. Cohn, on page 34 of your testimony, you have a section called Promises Made and Promises Kept Our Record. And you say when Comcast makes promises, it keeps them. And you talk about the conditions that the FCC imposed on Comcast when it acquired NBC Universal. And here's what I found puzzling. You say, out of these conditions, the FCC has only found it necessary to look at one issue. And that was the issue we just talked about on standalone broadband. But isn't it true that the FCC had to look at the neighboring, the neighborhooding condition? That's the condition that prohibited you from favoring NBC content. When CNBC is neighborhooded, you were neighborhooding it with all the other 24-hour cable news channels, with CNBC, or CNBC with MSNBC, with Fox, with CNN. But you put Bloomberg way out in the nosebleed seats so people couldn't find Bloomberg. And because they couldn't find Bloomberg, they wouldn't go to Bloomberg. And Bloomberg could charge less for its advertising. And NBC would get more eyeballs for people who are interested in 24-hour business news, and you could charge more. Isn't that another condition that they looked at? So generally speaking, that characterization is just not accurate. And what we had in the Bloomberg neighborhood area was where interpretive differences between Bloomberg and Comcast as to what the condition meant. And I can go through as much detail as you want, but... The FCC certainly looked at it, didn't it? Ultimately, there was a complaint filed. And when we lost the complaint at the FCC, we have resolved the matter with Bloomberg. We are in compliance with that condition. Okay, but let me ask you, is this true then that out of these conditions, the FCC has only found necessary to look at one issue? Is that still true? It is. What is true is that we were... We only had a compliance issue with one condition. The Bloomberg issue was not a compliance issue. It was an interpretive issue. And when the interpretation was resolved, we were able to resolve our differences and our partnership with Bloomberg. We remain Bloomberg's largest distributor and we have an excellent role. Here is the FCC's order. In this memorandum opinion and order, we affirm media bureau orders that direct Comcast to place Bloomberg television in news neighborhoods consistent with the condition of the Comcast NBC universal order. That is looking at that. And you have to... Right here in your testimony and you're sworn under oath here, you say out of these and then the brackets conditions that's what we're referring to, the FCC has only found it necessary to look at one issue. And you're saying they didn't look at this issue? What I'm saying is it was not a compliance issue. It was an interpretation issue. Okay, well I'll let... Let me go back to the media bureau order because... Let me just go... I'll give you an example because the ultimate order of the media bureau is that we had to neighborhood Bloomberg where I believe it was either four or more or five or more other news channels. The FCC order didn't have that definitional issue. We didn't know what a news neighborhood was. And we tend not to neighborhood our news channels the way you described in your question where all the news channels are together. So one of the interpretive issues that we needed to have resolved was what was a news neighborhood. And that's what the dispute in front of the commission was. I think, and Madam Chair, this is the end, my friend. And by the way, if any of the witnesses have to use the restroom, you really can come back and we'll take you back there. I know it's been going on a couple hours. You really undercut my big conclusion. I was going to say... Senator Franken, please continue. I really meant that. I was just going to say no. Going to say that I think the interpretation here is on what the word look means. And I think everyone knows what the word look means. Thank you. And Madam Chair, if I can, I will acknowledge that the word look may not have been the best chosen word. But the point I was trying to get at was whether there were compliance issues. And I don't think that was a compliance issue. So I will acknowledge that we should have had a better use of words in the written testimony and I apologize for that. Accept it. Thank you.