 I'm an urbanist, but if I were a politician showing this picture, I would say more than 50% of the world's population now lives in cities. But this picture says that they are not only living in cities, like the Ganges, North-Western Europe, and Java. They are urbanised rural landscapes in which a lot of these people live. They are productive landscapes, as you can see here in the diagram of rice production. So we have to do here with an urbanisation phenomenon, which is major in the world, is a productive landscape and contains maybe half of the urbanised population. So if that is true, like you see for instance here, it's not only in Asia, it's also in the Netherlands, where in the Westland we have a productive landscape of greenhouses, 24 hours a day with light producing the tomatoes for a whole of Europe, but still being a local agriculture that is tied to the soil and needs a kind of exchange with the villages and towns that are there. If we accept that this is the case, then we have a completely different idea of many politicians and also scientists who say we have to look at the people who start to live in concentrated cities and leave the countryside alone. There are swarms of hybrid micro-economic activities that are starting to invade this landscape. This is for instance a retired Pan Ams Tuodes Katrin who raises alpacas from South America in Switzerland for felt-making courses to old hippies who look in the weekend at Bollywood festivals. And so we have to take it very serious. This is the flavour polar in Amsterdam, near Amsterdam, where there was a hydrological problem that resulted in a wetlands. This wetlands became the most original prehistoric landscape 20 years old in the Netherlands and they started to breed tarpan horses, re-breed tarpan horses who are extinct to export them again to Eastern Europe. These are very outrageous examples of this cultural landscape of dense urban activity in Europe, but also in Asia. So if we accept that, then we have to develop strategies. One strategy is to start urban development with the agriculture, with the forest, with the wetlands, instead of with the construction. So you can see here this is our first experiment in which we first made a layout for the agriculture, for the forests, for the wetlands, where buildings can gradually invade incrementally as patchworks of development, creating this urban landscape where you have a combination of leisure, housing, working, all kinds of amenities, and a very strong relationship with the soil, with the productive soil and with the landscape. It's a very interesting way to look at it and it also looks that in this way you can work on it in a certain promising way. Because these landscapes, they cannot be designed as such. They have to be steered. And so we make the railway station area, high-speed railway station area of Montpellier between the city of Montpellier and the Mediterranean Sea, which the Paris authorities have top-down decided. And so you end up with a high-speed railway station in the middle of the landscape, which automatically will generate an urbanization pressure. So how to canalize this urbanization pressure is to first safeguard the infrastructure lines and the landscape qualities, and then allow certain volumes of built form invade this landscape in a way that you always have a balance between development and between the landscape qualities. You encourage people to use this soil and you also design specific devices, like for instance building the railway development around the infrastructure bundle as a noise and pollution barrier and create a station that is really symbolizing this park-like atmosphere because it's very important. These landscapes are very mobility-independent and therefore the design and the canalization of these mobility systems in these future landscapes are extremely important. And this is also my question. My question is, of course we are having a fact that these landscapes exist. We also have the fact that we are intervening in these landscapes. But the question is, giving this fact, do you think that this is a viable model for a future urbanization condition that can turn into a sustainable condition?