 Stakeholders on Nigeria address an insecurity consent during elections, arguing that restoring confidence will prevent Nigerians from doubting the outcome of the electoral body. Plus TV Manually He-Genery report is presented from our studio. Stakeholders in Abuja have convened to discuss security challenges during our election. They led by the Clean Foundation, a non-governmental organisation aiming for free, fair, credible and safe elections. Country Director, Guard Peter, highlighted the importance of the dialogue on its potential positive impact on future elections. The conversation we're having today for the next two days is not to apportion blame. It's not to say who is right or wrong. It's for us to be able to fashion a model that will be more acceptable to all of us as citizens of this country to identify where there are gaps and identify areas of improvement and be able to make the electoral process and especially the issue of electoral security more inclusive and more acceptable to people and to reduce the tension that usually comes with election in Nigeria. Election is not supposed to be a moment where people are traveling or stalking food or where people become enemies with their neighbours, secondary school mate, university mate or colleagues in places or work. It should be a moment of celebration. It should be a moment of intellectual discourse, a moment where ideas are discussed and issues are discussed and not people. The event attracted the Northern Police and NCDC stakeholders to discuss experiences and strategies for and lens insecurity threats during elections. Each time a leader like a commissioner of police posted to a particular society people are like to start to assess what kind of person is, what can he do. So first and foremost we have to organise various outings to the traditional rulers, to the civil society and we had a very good interaction with members of the media who will inform the larger society on the kind of person that has been brought to manage the election. So it is based on the interaction that the society will now know that this person is not going to let them down, he is not going to compromise his duties. We are still calling for more improvements in terms of the logistics, in terms of how this logistics is also deployed in the delivery of elections. We want to see a whole of government approach to the conduct of elections where INEC is working with security agencies, is working with the Human Rights Commission, is working with all institutions of the state with mandate to make elections happen, not just elections happening but credible elections happening. It is time for us to sit down to review some of these practices, to review issues around the election violence, to review issues around election security, to review issues in terms of the participation of security forces and security agencies. The events discussed are post-election trauma with L security experts and associate professor Aisha to Amiya providing a unique perspective on addressing the effect of election violence. The instrumentalization of hate speech becomes a tool in mobilization support for either a politician or a political party and what does it do? It contributes to so-in-sit of disharmony which could either be to an individual or to a group as a whole. So it divides us along religious line and the ethno-religious regional fault lines which becomes a problem. The events is attended by various stakeholders including the United Human Rights Commission, the National Police Service Commission, civil society and the media.