 Australia has no Bill of Rights and it shows the Australian government has been on the receiving end of more and more criticism for its COVID response lately not just domestically but from overseas. There's a lot to criticize from soldiers patrolling state borders and policing the streets of Sydney to people being arrested for merely posting about lockdown protests on social media to police accessing QR tracing information and firing projectile weapons at lockdown protesters to news broadcasters naming and shaming COVID patients who violate isolation orders to the frequently ineffective hotel quarantine system for travelers being replaced with purpose-built quarantine facilities and Sir Orwellian surveillance apps. The states of both Victoria and New South Wales have begun moving toward reopening after the Delta variant proved zero COVID goals unattainable even amid strict lockdowns but we'll do so by adding Australia to the growing list of nations that have implemented the dangerously authoritarian policy of vaccine passports and there are other aspects of this trend which have nothing to do with COVID. One of the most controversial recent developments in Australia is escalating government overreach and potentially the most consequential in the long term has been the hasty passing of a new law greatly expanding government surveillance powers which allows law enforcement to hack into people's devices and collect, delete, or even add to and alter the data therein supposedly in order to frustrate the commission of serious offenses online. Critics tend to lump this sweeping surveillance state of escalation in with authoritarian policies related to the pandemic but the bill makes no mention of COVID and its proponents cite its utility in fighting terrorism and child exploitation. Indeed this bill which will certainly lead to myriad abuses is just the latest in a continuing expansion of government surveillance powers in Australia that has been going on for years. In reality, while the pandemic has certainly been a major factor in exacerbating civil rights erosion, Australia's COVID response has simply added to a problem that already existed and was already getting worse. The 2019 Civicus Monitor, a global research group that tracks fundamental freedoms in 196 countries, downgraded Australia from an open country to one where civil space has narrowed citing new laws to expand government surveillance, prosecution of whistleblowers, and raids on media organizations. And this ongoing trend can be largely traced back to the fact that Australia is the only so-called democracy in the world which has no national charter or bill of rights of any kind. A tremendous amount of faith has been placed in state and federal legislators to simply do the right thing, which has proved foolish and ineffective. Professor George Williams wrote the Melbourne University Law Review in 2006, quote, Australia is now the only democratic nation in the world without a national bill of rights. Some comprehensive form of legal protection for basic rights is otherwise seen as an essential check and balance in democratic governance around the world. Indeed, I can find no example of a democratic nation that has gained a new constitution or legal system in recent decades that has not included some form of bill of rights. Nor am I aware of any such nation that has done away with a bill of rights once it has been put in place. End quote. The state of Victoria has a charter of human rights and responsibilities which supposedly include rights like freedom of movement and peaceful assembly. But such protections have been unceremoniously dismissed as state premiers, harness sweeping powers hardly anyone was even aware they possessed and began imposing strict laws to get the virus under control. Officials have been rewarded for these drastic actions with thunderous public support. And until a few months ago the Australian government enjoyed soaring levels of approval from a very collectivist-minded population who overwhelmingly desired the elimination of the virus even if it meant trading some freedoms. The approval of those strict measures has dipped significantly since the Delta outbreak, but a majority of Australians still believe lockdowns and other restrictions are at appropriate levels for the time being. The absence of any federal restrictions on state government's ability to limit personal freedoms has allowed premiers to chase this public support regardless of potential long-term consequences. Australia is not a free country. Westerners are trained to believe that that's what you call any wealthy English-speaking nation with liberal cultural values, but really it's just a continent-sized US military base with kangaroos. Human rights are only allowed where they are convenient, which is why they are continually disintegrating. The first mistake in believing that Australia is a free country is believing that it is free. The second is believing that it is an actual country. As Julian Assange put it shortly before the Australian government allowed him to be silenced and then imprisoned for journalism-exposing US war crimes, quote, I love my birth country Australia, but as a state, it doesn't exist. Here is why it had a prime minister denounce me, moved to cancel my passport, secretly passed data on to me to US intelligence and has never made representations on my behalf. It is owned by US and UK corporations. Before World War II, Australia was dominated by the UK, of which it was a colony. After the war, it subordinated itself to US hegemony. A brief attempt at an independent Australian foreign policy in 1975 resulted in a US and UK backed constitutional coup, end quote. Anyway, it's a mess. So what to do about all this? If you listen to social media comments from people in the Northern Hemisphere, the answer is that Australians should wage a civil war against their government, which from where I'm standing is hilarious partly because they're talking about a populace whose entire cultural values system is built around being laid back and unbothered. And partly because most of those commenters are Americans living directly under the single most tyrannical regime on earth who have yet to put their much touted Second Amendment toward practicing what they preach. There's a lot that's going to have to shift before Australians gain stable protections for their civil liberties, which will necessarily have to include not just some kind of Bill of Rights, but becoming an actual Republic and finally getting that ugly old woman off our coins and ending the illegitimate US military occupation here once and for all. This will not happen until there's an expansion and public consciousness of the need to do this, which may or may not be born out of conditions getting a lot worse before they get better. It may also be born out of a critical mass of Australians deciding they're fed up and beginning a real push toward becoming a free country. Bottom line, the answer to the question of what needs to happen for Australia to move toward health is the same as the answer everywhere else. We're just going to have to wake up. Human consciousness wants to awaken and it will shake us in whatever ways we need to be shaken in order to make that happen. This is a hell of a time to be alive.