 Welcome back to the 21th Convention 2019 of Warsaw, Poland. Our next speaker will be giving his fourth ever presentation at the 21th Convention live event. His first one being in Orlando, Florida, way back in 2011. He spoke later in 2012 in Austin, Texas, and at our 10-year anniversary special event in Orlando, Florida, 2017. He's an author for many years, many years, over a well over a decade at FreeTheAnimal.com, and he is the man responsible for this hat being on my head. Without further ado, please allow me to welcome back to the stage Richard Nicolai. Thank you, sir. Thanks, sir. All right, gentlemen, it is fun to be here by a show of hands. How many of you have not yet partaken of a chunk of meat the city has to offer? All right, no hands up. Yeah, because I was going to presumptuously give a little bit of an addendum to Jack Donovan's speech, a way of men, you got to have your meat, you know, got to eat your chunks of meat. So we're here in Poland, and as Anthony said, I've spoken, this will be my fourth time, and not taking away anything from the other 16 events. I'd like to say that, man, this place is the right time at the right place, right place at right time. I got that backwards. So a little note of appreciation for our host. What a great country, you know. I am just really enjoying it here. How about yourselves? Is this just... Yes. And another note of appreciation goes out to Mr. Anthony Dream Johnson himself, 17th. What a movement he's created, and everybody knows about, you know, the drama that's taken place over the past few months, which Socrates in the kickoff presentation yesterday framed it very well. I want to add one thing to that, is all of that drama just shows how needed this men's movement is that Anthony is driving forward. Little round of applause for our host here. I mean, I saw so much girly behavior in the reactions for that. It was just, it's like, wow, this is more needed now than ever. Okay, so let's jump into it, see how this works here. As he said, I'm Richard Nicolai. There's two ways to find me online, freetheannibal.com, facebook.com, Richard.Nicolai. So let's start with doing a big justification. Let's do a 30,000-foot view here. That's the way it used to be, classic. And I could, you could use a, you know, get any Renaissance painting, for example. You know, you'll find stuff like this. The men, the woman, the family in their traditional roles there, right? And you're going to hear a lot, I'm going to reference this a lot. A lot of people have heard this thing called the slippery slope. How many have heard about the slippery slope, right? The slippery slope fallacy, what it is is that if, you know, someone proposes an idea to change an idea and someone raised an objection and says, oh no, you do that, then it's going to go to this, going to go to this, going to slide down the slippery slope. It's called the slippery slope fallacy. It's not a formal fallacy, but it's, because it's not really technically an argument against an idea, but people use it a lot. Well, I have, there's so many instances now where I look around and I say, wow, it's not the slippery slope fallacy. It's a slippery slope fallacy fallacy. In other words, it's a fallacy in itself because I see so many things that have slid all the way down. So if we're talking feminism, slid all the way down. If you can see the picture, it's a, you know what, one, two, three, four, five, you know, tattooed, pierced, sluts, essentially, right? Feminists, yeah. Anti-man, anti-woman, anti-family, anti-civilization, all right. I'm going to take this history of feminism breaking into four things. Emancipation, we'll get into each individual, but there's, there's what it's going to be. We're just going to, you can break it up into however many you want, but we're going to do four. Now, I was searching around and I stumbled on this, this website called historyoffeminism.com. It's no longer updated. It was, you know, a few years back in 2013, 14. But I thought, man, there's some pretty good quotes in there. So I stole a couple. Feminism exists as a defender of the selfish, sexual, and reproductive interests of aging and or unattractive women, right? This is its entire raison d'etre, reason for being. The reason it first came into existence with the social purity movement reformers of the 19th century, led by their Herod and battle cry, armed with the ballot, the mothers of America will legislate morality. And indeed, they have. Okay, now, so let's, let's look way back. I mean, you can find the first references to, you know, sort of emancipation of women, what I'm going to call emancipation of women. And when we talk emancipation of women, we're talking, you know, like ancient cultures where that still exists to, to, to some extent in some parts of the, of the world or religions of the world, I should say, without naming names where women are essentially property, you know, they can be bought and sold, they can be killed, they can be raped, right? As a matter of law. All right, so, so I'm calling this valid. I mean, we don't want, we don't want women to be treated that way. So adult women, they're no longer property, as I was saying. And then we have certain things like with the renaissance and then the enlightenment where we start to wake up to the values of women in society as more or less equal, at least in a social marriage setting with their spouses, right? And they become a focus of art. Look at, like that first one where I put up, there's so many renaissance works of art where the, where the woman is really given exalted status as, you know, mother and, you know, and some of our Western religions, you know, celebrate women and, and we celebrate nature as mother nature, right? So all of these ideals that came about from something that was pretty much like a slavery situation before. And then, you know, we have the Victorian era where women become a target of gentlemanliness. I mean, that's why gentlemanliness, you know, came about, really. Although, you know, men are gentlemen to one another as well, but it's in a different context. And also chivalry, women and children first, right? Where did that come about? So these are basic emancipation things for women. And I say that that's a good thing, right? But then we go to pressure and control the competition, which goes to motivation. Okay, so what, when, when, when the whole feminine, remember this, the slide with the long quote about how it was a way for women who are getting older, less desirable to start controlling the marketplace. So you have things like advocacy for restrictions on prostitution. They don't want, they don't want their guys having access to sex in that way. They raise the age of consent from 12 to 16, 18 in some places, right? And, and restricting or closing, you know, traditional male outlets where males would get together with one another because, you know, they might often be served by, you know, cute girls, cute females, right? Okay, so the next step in the history is equality under the law. And remember, you know, the emancipation, I said valid. This I'm going to call it mixed, you know? Some's good, some's okay, some's not so good, right? So basic education, I call that good. You know, we want women to be versed in the three R's, read and write and arithmetic, right? There's no reason why they should not be able to have contracts like men can. No reason they shouldn't be able to own property. But these are basic human rights, really, right? And even separation of divorce rights, right? But not the slippery slope, fallacy fallacy, that has become today. We'll talk about that more. Suffrage, now, I tend to think the, what was it, the 19th Amendment, which happened 100 years ago, I happen to think it's a disaster. But at the same time, cat's out of the bag. You ain't going to do nothing about that, right? So at the end of this, we'll have some practical things, I think, that can ameliorate the situation, right? Women aren't going to like to hear it, but there's none here, at least as attendees. Sorry, Georgia's girlfriend, I see you back there. Okay, so, you know, and then it creeps, okay, now they can vote. So of course, since they can vote, they're going to be holding political office, right? And what are they going to tend to do when they hold political office? They're going to work for, not family issues, well, they call them that, right? They're going to work for their own interests that are separate from their husbands, from their parents, from their household, from even their children, right? They become judges. So now they get to the slope, start sliding, right? Judges, and so they get to essentially make laws, set precedent over cases, and many, many of the family law courts are womaned by female judges now. How do you think that's going to work, right? And they've entered into many traditional male roles in the workforce. And of course, the most prominent time when this began happening is with World War II. So think of that as a consequence of another, just another social consequence cost of war is you have all these women piling in. We're going to talk about the economic part of feminism here in just a bit, well, a little while. And then of course, since they're in the workforce, then eventually they're going to be managers in the workforce, right? And how many of you have heard from women that say they cannot stand working for a female manager? All of us have heard that. OK, now, I love this quote because when we talk about feminism and the way it works, I'm thinking it's like a union, right? All for one, one for all. The history of feminism is the history of a female sexual trade union, growing in political power in exact correspondence with the steady loss of female sexual power caused by the continual widening of the sexual market. The opening up of the sex market, ever increasing opportunities for men to gain access to cheap and anonymous sex is the result of constantly emerging new technology and itself completely out of the hands of feminists or anybody else to control or put a stop to. So a lot of these feminist initiatives are thought to have actually liberated women when the exact opposite has been the case in practice. Because what it has done is it's liberated men to have a much higher, better picking grounds, whatever. Think about it. And it's not only feminism's fault, it's also just a consequence of modernity. And a guy used to be in a rural setting like on a farm or in a small town community, he couldn't screw around. Number one, everybody would know about it. And number two, whoever he's screwing around with, he risk getting killed by the uncles or the brothers of that woman. So urbanization and all these things have really liberated men. And feminism is this effort to keep the cat in the bag. The cat's out of the bag. So that's the history. Now we have the cancer. And it has emerged with, excuse me, metastasis or metastasis, however you wish to. Metastasis is a pathogen. This is actually the true definition, but look how nicely it fits with the cancer of feminism. Metastasis is a pathogenic agent spread from an initial or primary site to a different or secondary site within the host body. And in the body politic society at large, the family and everything, it's infecting everything. The cancer is growing and it's metastasizing. Many of you, some of you maybe know Kurt Doolittle, Properitarianism. The female of our species or more correctly, the female mind in our species is extremely susceptible to individual psychosis and solipsism. Solipsism is the idea that whatever is in your mind is the reality. And even more so, herd panic, trend and consensus, and verbalizing those behaviors by drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping and reputation destruction that never ceases. How's that for a mouthful? Love it, cause it's so apt. Every one of you have been in some sort of relationship probably when that strikes, that rings true to you. Okay, just like with the history of breaking the cancer of feminism into four things. Ideological, political, activist, economic and market driven. The ideological cancer, brain raw, brain tumor, it's cancer of the brain, right? Solipsism as I just mentioned and defined in Kurt Doolittle's quote. It's the primacy of feelings and emotions. Now, it's well known that men tend towards a more rash they had to, they had to run survival for we evolved that way. They have to understand that that sky spells danger or those animal tracks spell danger. That smoke smells danger, right? That the migration of the species may spell danger. Where are they going, why? Where are they coming from? Where are they going to, why? It could spell starvation. Men had to take care of this stuff and they just, it didn't matter what they felt about it. Just didn't, right? But, and it's perfectly fine because of women's nurturing roles and everything that they tend towards a bit more emotional, empathetic and so on. They have children to raise and it's a task and you have to deal with, I mean, kids are crazy emotional, right? So there needs to be some way to somebody who's expert at it, I guess. You could say, right? But the thing is when they become primacy, it's very much related to solipsism. It's like, you ever hear women talk so often? It's like, well, I feel, I feel. Men are more likely to use words like, I think or I judge, you know? Judge is a perfectly, I judge this. I think this. I estimate this. Eschew the word feeling in your speech. I feel like, I just feel, I just feel, use feelings for like, man, that steak made me feel really good, you know? Or, or, or that movie made me feel really good. Something like that. Or this made me feel really bad. But these are just, these are just your own personal states. It's not how you feel about, you know, the, what you have to do to survive doesn't matter. I use this word a lot, hubris. That's probably one of the things that annoys me about feminism more than anything. You know, you know, if you say, well, I just feel this, I just feel this. You know, I desire this. I would like you to do this, da, da, da, da, da. That's fine. But, but having hubris about it is like, God damn it, I'm right. No, you're feeling, right? So that annoys me. So it comes down to that self, everybody's selfish to some extent. And to some extent there's a virtue to that. Everybody needs to take care of themselves, right? Right? But there's, but there's like this, this, this tendency to what I call sacrificial, it's selfishness that isn't just looking out for yourself to the extent that you should be. Keep yourself healthy to keep your, your relationships healthy and so on. Sometimes you have to say no. Sometimes you have to be a little selfish. It's a sacrificial selfishness where you're getting others to harm themselves for your benefit. You want them to sacrifice to your emotions, your hubristic desires and your feelings because God damn it, it's true because my mind thinks it. So that's the ideological part of feminism. And like I say, all of these things, all of these things might very well be to some extent just, just the way the female is, just the way women are, right? It's the unbridled nature of it, which feminism encourages and has it, it's like a chain reaction, blows out of control, the slippery slope fallacy fallacy. Okay, political cancer. Too much is never enough. Now I started using these two phrases here, inch mile and the old have your cake and eat it too. Right? Started using these quite some time back in reference to not just feminists, a lot of the leftist political agenda and it started resonating because I see other people using it too. I think Anthony even used it in an interview we did some months back, he referenced it. So it's like, so it's just kind of a re-statement of the whole slippery slope fallacy fallacy. I told you I was gonna reference that quite a bit. So you know, so you give in, right? It's not good. Okay, great. No, they don't even thank you. There's no show of appreciation. It's like, well, no, it's not enough. We want this. You see it every day in the news. Have your cake and eat it too. So in other words, they don't want it, they feminism tends toward this kind of, there's no negotiation, right? We're gonna have this, but we're not gonna trade it off with anything else. We want it all. If the song goes, it's just never gonna be enough. Then there's the activist cancer, the worst part of feminism. It's puberty, it's ugliness. It's just off the top ugly and bad, right? So we've gone from where, you know, the idea with suffrage, the 19th amendment, is like, well, okay, if we as a family have these political ideals, whether we're more liberal or whether we're more conservative or whatnot, then, you know, there's two votes in the family instead of just one, right? But now it's gone to where they vote, they vote, from voting in league with their husbands and family, you know, could be their relatives as well, to replacing them with the government, right? So in other words, they're working at odds against their own traditional roles because feminism has told them that their traditional roles are bad and wrong, right? Abortion to infanticide. I mean, if you're in the U.S., you've seen all these states now passing along. Basically, you can slice up the baby as it's coming out of the womb, you know? So originally abortion was like, hey, you know, sometimes there's tough situations, there's rape and incest, which amount, by the way, to like less than 1% of all abortions as a cause of rape and incest. So that's a big, fat lie, right? Most of them are for convenience, right? Now, hell, you know, I was supportive for a very, very long time, right? But I thought, okay, it's gonna be reasonable. I've even had girlfriends that had an abortion, you know? But in every single case, they had one, they had it very, when they were very young, young and dumb, and they had it early, like it's pretty much as soon as they found out, and they never did it again, right? But now it's not enough, it's an inch mile. So it's gotta be later and later and later and later to where even people like me, or even who are more liberal about it, are saying, wait a minute, this is ridiculous. And then you have these parade of feminists now who say, I'm proud I had an abortion, or two, or three. And some even say, I wish I never had an abortion, I wish I had, you know? So it's like the greatest thing in life you can do is having an abortion. I'm not gonna get into when life begins, or fetus, or infant, or killing. Well, it's a killing, that's for sure, but whether it's murder, you know? But certainly, you gotta make, you gotta question when, where is this thing? Okay, see if I can, oops, uh-oh, Anthony, oh. I messed it up, sorry. Very sorry. Sorry about that, I won't mess with it again. All right, so now, you know, again, as a modern society, we wouldn't want to be in a situation where, once you get married, you're stuck for life, no matter what a bitch he is, no matter what an asshole he is, right? So legitimate means to dissolve these divorces is certainly a modern civilizational thing to do, and an emancipation for both men and women so that you're not locked into a relationship that you just hate for life, right? But it's gone from that to where the legalities involved have evolved to where it's initiated, most divorces, it's about half of marriages in the US end in divorce, and the vast majority of those, I think it's upwards of 70% of the divorces are initiated by women, and oftentimes they're initiated because she can cash in, right? It's called divorce rape or you call it man rape, you know? She can, with child support, alimony, and all these other laws, right? She can really go to town, so that's another where the slippery fallacy fallacy is gone. And so if you have a divorce and there's kids involved, you know, some sort of shared custody would certainly be a good idea so that the kids get to see both parents, right? But in so many cases it's evolved into, it's slid down into what's pretty much kidnapping now with the help of the family courts run by feminist women sitting on the benches. All comes, what goes around comes around. And employment too, you know? We're gonna talk about women in the workforce, but, and that's another, well, if a woman wants to work, why not let her, and she should be able to advance in the company and so on and so forth, right? But then with the employment laws, sexual harassment, da-da-da, all driven by feminists. So it's gone from a basic at-will employment, right? Yeah, I want you until I don't want you and da-da-da, then she gets to concoct some, you know, some excuse about sexual harassment. So employing, in many cases for many companies, employing women is tantamount to having a Trojan horse and you're gonna have a treason from the inside in similar vein to what recently happened with the 21 drama, right? Okay, so there's a sum that up from, you know, just beautiful classy women to the ranting pussy hats. What a great legacy, right? So I just shortened this presentation by a thousand words. All right, now, interesting little anecdote here, personal anecdote. Paul Stiles wrote this book in 2005, Is the American Dream Killing You? And Paul's an old Navy buddy of mine. In fact, Monday after I leave here, I'm gonna, he lives in Spain, I'm gonna meet up with him and we're gonna hike around in the Alpijara of Southern Spain for a week. So my next section here is built on chapter two of this book. Here's the opening paragraph. It's 1950 and the market is not happy. From the summit of the economic system, it stares down upon America with a jaundice eye. America's most important resource, its labor force, is incredibly unproductive. For one simple reason, most women aren't employed. Homemakers work, of course, but they don't get paid for it, which means they add nothing to the GDP, gross domestic product, and without a salary, very important, and without a salary, the market has no control over, you know, bear with him, he's anthropomorphizing the market here, clearly, but it's for an effect, it's to create an illustration. Without a salary, the market has no control over them at all. The market cannot fire them, promote them, or move them to where it needs them the most. All devoid of relationship with a man, relationship with the kids, the family unit. They're basically off the economic grid. What an enormous opportunity cost. Meltdown, the market versus the nuclear family, that's the title of his chapter two in that book, is the American Dream Killing Him. It's, if you look at it, when women started entering the workforce, and you start sizing up from that last quote, when they got into the market, when they became productive, productive members of the society, that can be accounted for, in terms of gross domestic product, dollars and cents, productivity, right? Keeping up with the Joneses now, is a bigger possibility, you know? Both parents working, about two thirds or more of women work, and most of them work full time. So what kind of pressures does this put on the family, right? So if you compare it to where in traditional family, dad goes to work, mom stays home, makes a home, that's why they call them home makers. She took care of the kids. All this serves, so that the husband can, she's got it handled. I can focus on my work, or my business, whichever the case may be. I can advance in my career, because I don't have these other pressures. She's got it handled, she's great. So I get to advance in the career, so I make more of my business. I make more money, make more money. And soon, it was silly that we'd ever considered that she would work. Now he's bringing in plenty of money, so that if they're frugal, they can work, they can have a household, they can have a household. But the economy needs women, because when women went to work, imagine all of the new industries that had to crop up for the sake of productivity and a growing economy. You have to have more dry cleaners. You have to have ready to eat meals. You have to have instant this and instant that. You have to double automobile production, because now you have to have two cars. All of this benefits the economy. Oh, it's great. Look at how much our economy grew, at what cost? The cost of the family, the family unit. Think about it. Think about all the things. Service businesses. Now you have to have carpet cleaners and window washers. We could make lists all day long about what you need to have so that you have a robust, growing economy that's the envy of the world. Well, our family units aren't the envy of the world. There's a hell of a lot of poor countries who don't envy our families. So all this thing breaks a lot of traditional bonds. It breaks the marital bond, right? She's at work. He's at work. They both come home. They're both stressed out, right? Instead that she gets to, she has kind of, she's like her in business for herself, her own business. Homemaker. She gets to run that. She gets to run that. Everything's calm. She's got everything handled. She knows how to deal with every situation. She's got no boss. Not in a real sense, right? Especially if she's good. She's actually gonna have a client. It's called her husband, right? And then he comes home and instead of a traditional role where he comes home to a refuge that she has created. So he can go, whew, kick back, leave the work at the work. Enjoy this refuge so that when he goes the next day, he's ready to pop on it again. He's not stressed. He's not pissed off, you know? Cause they got home and all they could do, you know, and she was late, you know, take some TV dinners out of the freezer, you know? Let's sit in front of the TV, watch them. Give the kids an iPad to babysit them. In this sense, Paul calls it the Wall Street marriage, you know? It's almost like a merger and marriage is a merger and acquisition. It's like, you know, guys are like, oh, I want to marry her because she makes a good salary. We'll be able to get more stuff. You know, and it was perfectly fine for women to say, well, I want to marry him. He makes a good salary. He's got a secure job that makes me feel safe and secure. That's a valid thing for a woman to feel. And worst of all is the parental bond. You don't have the one parent. Even if you're in a nontraditional where the woman works in the dads at home, that's better than both of them being off at work. And then they come home, they're pissed off because they don't have a great relationship and the kids are annoying. Kids are at each other's throat, sit down in the TV, TV babysitter, and now here's an iPad. You don't even know what your kids are doing on it because you don't know how to work all those parental controls. And then, you know, for the little tykes, you know, the hatchery and conditioning center, which the conditioning center goes on and on and on, right? Because only kooks homeschool their kids. Only kooks who, where the husband works and the wife stays at home and she's a homemaker and a school teacher both. And she collaborates with other similar women. So they kind of have their own little cottage school, right? No, send them to daycare. And then when that's done, send them to school babysitting for indoctrination. So you see how our demand to have a robust and growing economy that's the end of the world comes at a huge cost. And feminism, that's where it becomes what's called market feminism, right? So, you know, feminism isn't all, only about the ideology. It isn't only about the solipsism. It isn't only about the man, the misandry, the man hating. It's partly about that. But it's also partly about being a shareholder in this great economy. You're an actual shareholder now, right? Stakeholder, shareholder, right? Where to now? Where do we go? Now this is a practical part of the thing. You know, can't repeal the 19th amendment. That's just silly, you know? We can't, there's a lot of laws that are already there that are just gonna be there. You just have to contend with them. So it's about education, right? Who goes first? The guys. Cause you gotta take responsibility. Somebody's gotta step up and take some responsibility. Okay, what do men do to help turn this around? At least in their own lives. Attend 21 convention events and subscribe to watch the many videos. Now that's a second or third plug for Anthony so far today, so. All right. I've been saying this for years. Don't, to young people. Don't go to college. Get a job or start a business. You know, unless you're like some STEM genius or you wanna be a surgeon or something like that. You know, probably gonna need some schooling then, right? You imagine. You say the student debt is crazy. Imagine if you just got out of high school or even you dropped out of high school, right? As soon as you have a good idea, you test it and like this can work. I mean, you can be a millionaire by the time these other idiots are getting out of college with 250K and student loan debt, right? Be financially frugal. Huge lesson for young people to learn. And if you have parents, how are they gonna learn that? When their parents are stupid enough to both be grinding the bone, destroying the family. What kind of financial fricality are the kids gonna learn from that? Do it like they did in the old days. The guy saves money so he can get married and start a family. Imagine that. How outlandish. How old fashioned. How silly, all right? Marry a young woman who wants to have and raise kids and is from such a family and holds such family values. Do not marry a woman who has, and this is the first profanity I'm gonna use, do not marry a woman that comes from a fucked up family. Unless she's very outlier and special and knows exactly what's screwed up and why it's screwed up and wants to marry a good man because she doesn't want to repeat that cycle. But that's gonna be rare. Then you live within your means that allow her to stay home, to raise kids and support your career or business growth and advancement. This is about maturity. This is about what Socrates talked about yesterday. This manosphere, this red pill movement, maturing out of just getting your willy wet into taking some real manning up, taking some real man responsibility. Gotta have man friends. Noah's gonna talk about that, I bet. You gotta have man friends, but you want to develop bonds with other family men. Even if you're not yet, so that you know how to do it before you've actually done it, right? Leave the boys to the boys. Get serious, get serious, take on responsibility, marry a good woman, have a family. It's like humanity, man, humanity. Hugh, man, it's he, 101. Okay, I'm glad there's no women here. Shut up already. Now, this is slightly tongue-in-cheek, expressly because it's not a mixed audience. So slight tongue-in-cheek, but not too much, right? Okay, so yeah, not necessarily shut up, but listen, that's a better way to put it. Listen, listen to what these feminists are saying. Listen to what they're trying to get you to do. Listen to what you're being encouraged to do and assess how compatible it is with having a good relationship with a responsible man. And a great family that you have made a home for. So listen to who's encouraging you to do what. And the reason I'm saying you is because I'm sure women are gonna, once this gets up on the web, women are gonna be seeing this presentation. So I do want to be constructive, ladies. So root out the drama. I know you can't root it out completely. Root out the drama, outburst, disapproval, shaming, ridicule, rallying, gossiping, and repot, reputation, destruction of your husbands. And if you recall, that's from Kurt Doolittle's quote that I put up earlier. Look up gaslighting and learn it and stop it. Be a stay-at-home mom with only other women friends who are stay-at-home moms, who support the careers and businesses of their husbands. You don't get women friends. You get together and you compare what a lout each other's husband is. It's like the victim Olympics. Who wins by having the worst husband that you chat about. Very undermining, very destructive. Now a trigger warning here. Vote the way your husband tells you to or don't vote at all. One family, one vote. And there's your solution to the 19th Amendment problem, incidentally, right? And look, you can even make a deal with your husband. If we can't agree to, you know, you can negotiate. That's another kind of tongue-in-cheek. I'm not saying don't discuss it, don't negotiate. Maybe you can have throwaway issues. Like, and if the husband is clever, lets the wife vote against him on all these silly things that don't matter, right? But you vote the same or agree to both not vote if you can't agree. But, and this is the important one. Never ever vote for public policy that undermines men as husbands and fathers or undermines families in general. I mean, it's the stupidest thing. Well, I can vote, right? So I'm gonna vote about this and this and this. Well, you know, look at any chart. I should have put a chart up here about social, the creeping socialism, the slippery slope, fallacy fallacy of socialism. It's like, oh, it's never gonna get that bad. Well, look at where it really starts to take off 100 years ago with the 19th Amendment. Because that's when feminism got its first major huge victory. And from then on, women have voted for socialist policies that replace the fathers, their husbands, the grandfathers, their uncles, their brothers, who were their support networks, and even hell, even their local community churches and whatnot that were a woman's, you know, safety net. Because she likes that safety and security, right? It's like, ah, screw it. I'm just gonna have society in general do it for me. Well, okay, well, then what happens? It's like, oh, well, that's not quite enough. I wanna be able to divorce, rape my husband and kidnap the kids too. Okay, then what happens, you know, the progression, the slippery slope sliding all the way down. Okay, here's a caveat, bone toss for the ladies out there. The women who were red-pilled before boyfriends and husbands. Well, if your boyfriend's not, if you're red-pilled and your boyfriend isn't red-pilled, I'm gonna change that to get rid of, dump him. Go find a red-pilled boyfriend. Or if your husband isn't the soy boy, feminist, socialist, whatever, then now, fourth shout out to Anthony. You need to refer them to the 21 Empire Incidentor right away, get them there, and find other people. Even find any of the past speakers. Find somebody who can talk some sense into the sky, right? I thought I wasn't gonna give you the definition. Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or in members of a targeted group, making them question their own memory, perception, and sanity. Using persistent denial, misdirection, contradiction, and lying. It attempts to destabilize the target and legitimize the target's belief. That's kind of a form of all these traits that we talked about that women tend to have when they get blown out of proportion by a cancer-like feminism. There we go. I think we have a few minutes here. If anyone has a question or two. For stay-at-home moms, what do you think if she's a schoolteacher? Take Stardust School Teaching business in the neighborhood. Incidentally, my former wife was a 35-year schoolteacher. I understand the value of it. She was good. When I first met her 25 years ago, it was very common when we were out and about in town for these big guys. She'd been teaching by then, by like 18, 20 years, right? Fifth grade, sixth grade. And she'd have these big guys run up to her and give her a big hug. That's how well-liked she was. Happened very frequently. But what we're trying to do here is to not only halt the tide, but we want to get something back. We want to rebuild families. And there's many ways to do it, right? So I'm offering, I could have designed this in any way, but I wanted a very general view so you kind of have a sense of, well, how do we get here? And then the practical side of what some of the things we can do about it, but my lists aren't exhaustive. Anyone can have great ideas. I welcome them. Anyone else? Any other questions? Any other, oh, there's one. Yeah, just curious, with the suffrage issue, I agree with what you say in terms of either voting along with the male partner or simply not, you know, a lot of voices in the megtal community are constantly tripping on about taking away that suffrage right. Do you think that's feasible in this? No, no, I'd mention that in the press. It's non-starter as an idea. It's kind of like people who dabble in conspiracy theories, which I call secrets too big to keep. And, you know, people who deal in political activism, fringes, I mean, it's tantamount to saying, well, let's repeal the 16th amendment and have slaves. It's just not gonna happen, right? Even if you're pro-slavery. It doesn't, it's just dumb. So what you have to do is do stuff that's actionable, that you can take responsibility for and put some of the actionable elements into play that actually get some results that you can measure, right? Anyone else? Okay, so I have this question about this. When you talk about the ideological cancer, like solipsism and feelings over facts and so on, and you talk, that's a female way of thinking, but I notice that's exactly the way that the radicalized left and the social justice warriors, that's exactly how they think and they feel and they act, but they're also a hell of a lot of men in those groups. So what's your take on that? Yeah, yeah, oh, absolutely, I agree 100% with you. There's, you know, when I say feminism, I'm not saying women. I'm saying feminism is an ideology and you have tons, tons of these soy boys, beta boys, pussy boys, whatever you wanna call them. And that's a growing thing too, it's awful. I mean, it's actually worse really in some respects than the females because females are just, they're kind of operating from their own basic survival strategy, it's just blown way out of proportion and it's so rewarded in society, but there's no damn excuse for men doing it. Absolutely none, right? We should bring, there should bring hanging back. Since we're talking about the 19th Amendment and slavery and everything, let's bring hanging back. All right, anyone else? All right, let's give it up. Yep, okay, good. Richard Nicolai. Thank you very much.