 a very good morning to all of you. I welcome you all once again to my channel and today I am going to discuss a very important and you can say basic and most used topic in psychology as well as education that is intelligence testing. Okay. And for further update kindly join my telegram group explore education and I am Dr. Rush missing assistant professor department of education SS Khanna girl's degree college University of Alhapa. This lecture is in bilingual mode Hindi as well as in English and subscribe my channel if you like my content and the delivery and this video will be useful for certain teaching examinations. Okay. So, the question is, how do you measure intelligence of a you can say 18 year old boy, 18 year old student, intelligence testing, intelligence testing are series of tasks designed to measure the capacity to make abstractions to learn and to deal with novel situations. Okay. Then an IQ test is an assessment that measures a range of cognitive abilities and provides a score that is intended to serve as a measure of an individual's intellectual abilities and potential IQ intelligence quotient. IQ or intelligence quotient is a name given to the score of the business I'm just a business I'm a test but it is used to generally denote intelligence or a score on any intelligence test. Intelligence tests favor groups from more effluent backgrounds and discriminate against less privileged racial, ethnic and social groups. How did this happen? They are saying that these intelligent tests favor affluent backgrounds and those less privileged people whether they are from racial, ethnic and social groups or from the social perspective they are discriminating against them. How did this happen? Because when the tests are made the questions are covered by the affluent background people who are dying everyday and whose use is it. We have taken a sample for the standardization if that is of the representative affluent background then less privileged people will show discrimination with it. This is what you are able to understand. Common intelligence tests that you should know repeatedly which ones are they? Without Simon it is not the end because when you go to history of IQ you have to study Simon every time. Who made the Simon test? Alfred. Who made it? We have told you before that Louis Sturman made it but his name is not in it. Because it is the adaptation of the test of Binet and Sturman was from Stanford University so students may get confused so they should remember. Then there was a lack of David Bessler You should know all the names if you interrelate them then you will remember. We read the definition of intelligence of global capacity. It is a very famous definition David Bessler made two tests for adults and for children he made it Then Less popular in India but it is read like this Kauffman and Kauffman Woodcock Johnson tests of cognitive abilities Richard Woodcock and Mary Johnson Recently we have read the theory of intelligence of Das and Nagyari who made an assessment system CAS This is one way totally western test of intelligence examples but if we talk about India I have not included that if we talk about Indian adaptation then Bhartiya battery test is very popular in intelligence and psychology in labs, in education in educational psychology Bhartiya battery is very popular and it is very popular in syllabus Bhartiya battery is also available in time so let's talk about it one day So these are some common test of intelligence whose name should be remembered along with its implementation Okay Then it is a little higher it should be a little lower Well, what is the use of intelligence test? What is the usage? What is the usage? When we do an experiment we ask what is the usage of intelligence testing What is the benefit of an intelligence test? Educational assessment and placement We will be able to do the same as you If you are a counselor or a placement officer or you are an ordinary classroom teacher then when we talk about guidance counseling we can give guidance to our students we can do counseling in particular area if your intelligence is above IQ above average then assessment and diagnosis of intellectual ability we can know if the student is a married child or if the student is less than average IQ then we will diagnose his remedy then cognitive research how much intelligence has been done then research uses this testing then job candidate evaluation whenever you read the history of intelligence testing then you will see whoever made the test made it for recruitment because in the army we want the best candidate to serve there because there is problem solving there is an adaptation you have to react according to your situation then there intelligent people can serve better hence whoever made the intelligence test without Simon he has army, alpha, army, beta so job candidate evaluation and whoever gives competitive examination there is some part of intelligence testing we can judge our IQ then assessing cognitive abilities including memory, speed and attention our memory we can quickly remember things in the sequence if they told us our attention span all these things but this is the main usage of intelligence testing then what is the concluding remark about intelligence test Kauffman and Naglieri have expanded the horizon of intelligence testing most of your initial test you are living what is G? general intelligence why? because the theories were telling that this is our unitary intelligence all these things are being used in our abilities these theories tried to make G's notion that it is not just G similarly Kauffman and Naglieri are expanding the horizon of intelligence why? because not only G what will happen if it is G that we will tell you wrong IQ meaning you can be very intelligent because intelligence is not only G but we will give you label that you are below IQ below average so there is a stigma that the IQ which is very good in the class in the top most position and everybody is very good and the IQ which is very good then I cannot do these courses but it depends on the testing you applied what is the right measurement that is why we need to keep the intelligence testing very strict that you are above average you are below average so Kauffman and Naglieri did not do this but these are not only two there are other reformers too all people tried to explain to us how, like Daniel Coolman explains in emotional intelligence Howard Gardner explains in multiple intelligences that there are multiple intelligences not only G Robert Sternberg tells us in the theory that not only academic intelligence these very different theories have one thing in common in all the theories the assumption that traditional theories and tests fail to capture essential aspects of intelligence that our traditional theories and our traditional tests do not make us smart that is why after that we should not label you and you should not give placement that first there should be a strict intelligence test and then it should be discussed okay but still we have to study the old tests because it was the beginning then it was not that information now the new tests are covering a lot of abilities okay so we wanted to talk to you but these are general things so I tried to talk to you separately okay so we will talk about Binet Simon test about Stanford Binet test and about Weshler's time okay then I can I can say that maximum portion if anything is left then I have shared the intelligence so this should be your topic okay thank you thank you all then from my side