 I want to end the lecture by just raising one more issue. So this is an unadvertised part five. I want to end by asking a question about intellectual humility that maybe doesn't get raised so often, but I think it's a good question. So one thing that I think is true about the literature is that it's dominated by a question about what makes an individual intellectually virtuous. And the implicit assumption behind that question is a kind of one model fits all assumption. So when you ask what does a virtuous person look like, the implicit assumption maybe is that all virtuous persons are going to look the same. And so we get that in virtue ethics as well where we're asking what does a morally virtuous person look like? And we're trying to describe some ideal of a morally virtuous person. Well, we might be looking at a kind of single ideal for an intellectually virtuous person. But suppose we take seriously that we are social beings in the intellectual realm as well as the practical realm. And suppose we take seriously the idea that much of important intellectual inquiry goes on in the context of teams of inquires working together. Well, then we might be less concerned about what does a virtuous individual look like and more concerned about what does an individual team look like? What does a virtuous intellectual community look like? And once you ask that question, it's very plausible that an intellectually virtuous team is one that is not monolithic in terms of the makeup of its individual. So it might be that an intellectually virtuous team is going to have quite a variety in the character and in the intellectual virtues of its individual members. So for example, if you've got a scientific team up and running, you might want some people who are extremely careful about the details. And just really, that's where they excel, whereas you might want other people who are more creative, who are less risk averse, and are willing to float maybe more risky hypotheses. You want some people who are more timid, some who are more bold, some who are more creative, so this is just to raise the question about whether the assumption that we should really be concerned about the virtue of individuals or that we should just be concerned about the intellectual virtues of individuals, maybe a different perspective might make us more concerned about the intellectual virtues of teams or groups working together and open up the possibility that we really don't want everyone to be of the same intellectual character. The group might benefit by more variety in the character traits or in the different kinds of excellences that different individuals might possess.