 Well, good morning, Mr. Alvalapia, thank you for joining us today. So we're seeing most rotorcraft now, they're still having the same designs, and they haven't really changed since like the 1950s to the 70s. And there's been a bit of stagnation in the aviation market, things like lack of fuel efficiency, performance, affordability, etc. So can you tell us a little bit about why do you think there's been a lack in rotary wing innovation in the past few decades? My way of thinking is that the nature of innovation has changed. It hasn't stopped, it's changed. And you're seeing sort of a mirror of what we've seen in the jetliner business. The optimal shape for a jetliner was arrived at in the 60s, you know, potted engines under swept wings and some kind of rounder oval fuselage. It hasn't really changed very much. And it's the same with a rotorcraft. You've had tremendous progress in avionics, turbine engines, onboard self-protection systems, data connectivity, transmissions, so many other areas that, frankly, they've eclipsed the importance of the airframe shape or configuration. What do you think the prospects are for the future vertical lift initiative? I don't think there's anything important that needs to be done here. And I think this program will probably collapse under its own weight. Around the time it gets going as a procurement program, sometime I expect early in the next decade. The reality is that the value proposition from all the other improvements you're seeing in this business, the engines, the avionics, the what have you, will simply make those upgrades much more affordable and a compelling value proposition. Thank you so much for this interview. Pleasure. Thank you.