 So thank you very much for the opportunity to speak to you today. My aim in the next eight minutes is to share the methodological process through which we developed a well-being framework that will inform the development of the project's data collection tools starting with the survey. I'm going to present the process we went through as a series of three challenges. So the first challenge is translating conceptual understanding understandings of well-being into indicators for measurement. The second challenge is drawing on the well-being measurements to identify those that can inform refugee well-being specifically. And the third is developing domains and indicators that can inform the research project realigning responses to protract displacement in an urban world. So to begin with the first challenge which is translating conceptual understandings of well-being into indicators. In the existing literature Leon Diete and Medina Lara conducted a broad study that reviewed 2,000 well-being studies and this led them to identify 196 domains and within them 99 indicators. They concluded from this exercise that there is little consistent agreement in the existing literature on how well-being should be measured, how instruments should be designed, and which dimensions should be included. This might need one to narrow down and standardize indicators but Sarah White has argued that this does not call for standardization of well-being indicators but rather recognition of how concepts of well-being are specific to places and places and generated through them. So with these facts and insights in mind the first challenge the IIED team set itself was to develop indicators that on the one hand capture the breadth of well-being while generating insight into how well-being priorities differ across our four research sites. So the second challenge was to go from discussing well-being measurements in general to understanding refugee well-being more specifically. This was a challenge because there has been very little work on well-being enforced displacement. As I will show you in a few slides there are several interesting single studies but not a cohesive body of work or a framework for well-being in situations of displacement as yet. So in order to come up with refugee well-being measurements we looked at three sets of indices well-being indices by national governments well-being frameworks that are used in international development research and well-being studies enforced displacement. I will quickly go through what we learned from each and what they offered our own well-being framework. So national government indices usually combine pre-existing data on domains like life expectancy, economic growth and environmental and climate measurement with cross-sectional surveys of residents. These often combine objective and subjective measures that seek to understand residents' experiences and perceptions of services, civic and social engagement and their feelings of personal satisfaction. Some national governments have also developed indicators to examine specific aspects of well-being such as mental health or well-being in the aftermath of disasters. One example is the National Comorbidity Survey developed by the US government's National Center for Health Statistics with the University of Harvard in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. When it comes to well-being in development several frameworks exist and they were all very helpful and useful for our thinking. The Bath Well-being and Development framework emphasizes the interrelatedness of the material, the relational and the subjective. By looking at the three components together the framework argues that well-being does not belong just to individuals but is produced in interaction with others as well as in specific contexts. Gupta et al's well-being survey provides insights into how to measure subjective well-being in relation to its other components. There are survey used focus groups to identify the well-being priorities of local populations. In the survey that followed the focus groups they asked participants to identify the importance of these well-being domains to them and their satisfaction with these well-being domains in their lives. The capability approach calls attention to the conditions in which people aspire to well-being. It looks at the importance of enabling or disabling environments in supporting well-being that is the dynamic relationship between options, abilities and opportunities. And finally although not a well-being index per se we found the refugee integration scale very helpful for measuring the relational aspects of well-being such as social bonds and bridges, personal and community trust and rights and citizenship. And finally as mentioned earlier while there is no specific framework for measuring well-being in contexts of displacement there are a wide range of very informative single studies that we also consulted. These range from Lintelo et al's work on well-being amongst refugees in Lebanon and Jordan so they applied the Bath well-being a development framework to three domains documentation, housing and economic participation. Other indexes and other studies went on to support indexes like the self-reliance index which was informed by the refugee well-being and adjustment index. In some cases well-being was measured in relations to a particular interrelated set of domains. Betz et al looked at well-being as part of measuring health, food security, leisure and social participation and autonomy. Columbia University's women aspire project in King Hossain Foundation's Information and Resource Center in their projects in Jordan considered well-being in relation to health, mental health, gender-based violence and reproductive health. Handicap internationally looked particularly at well-being among refugees in relation to disability. Some studies make no mention of well-being at all but provide data on refugee experiences such as violence, extortion, discrimination and social and community solidarities that speak to the relational and context-specific aspects of well-being. So after consulting such a broad range of frameworks and studies the third challenge was bringing this learning together. So this is what we ended up ended up with four main domains bodily well-being, economic well-being, social well-being and political well-being and within them a wide range of indicators. So just to go through them very quickly bodily well-being covering things such as physical and mental health, access to affordable housing and health services, clean water and sanitation, food and nutrition, sexual and gender-based violence and trauma, economic well-being including right to work, availability of work, education, recognition of educational degrees, access to education and training, working within field of expertise, exploitation in the labour market, debt and dependency ratio. Social well-being including social support, spiritual support, connectivity with family and friends, volunteering, leisure time, access to green space and access to culture and political well-being covering safety and security, access to justice, legal status, perceptions of stigma and discrimination, diversity, access to information, civic engagement and participation and access to media representation. So this was both an exercise in collation across frameworks and individual studies and parallel to it was an exercise in differentiation that aimed to develop a framework that was specific to contexts of displacement and that recognises well-being as enabled by its environment, relational and produced by social networks and importantly subjectives to account for how priorities and satisfaction are defined by refugees themselves. So what next? Having developed the framework we used it to develop indicators for the survey being carried out by our partner Samuel Hall. The project will be testing out this framework through several stages before we begin data collection. This will include survey panels in each country by being run by Samuel Hall, concept testing focus groups where we seek to understand participants' own definitions of well-being, livelihoods and self-reliance and then the piloting of the survey. Based on report responses we receive at this listening stage we will be returning to the well-being framework in the previous slide and refining it. After that we will then begin the data collection for the project. That's it from us, thank you so much for your time and we look forward to your feedback. Thank you.