 So I suggest that we start with a quick definition of GovTech and the lessons from the COVID crisis, maybe. Thank you very much, Lucia. GovTech is a contraction of government technology. And to put it simply, I define it as the use and purchase of innovative technological solutions by state actors to carry out a defined policy. And I will take two examples. For example, the French government is working with Dr. Leib, that you may know, which is a French private company working on scheduling appointments during the vaccination campaign. And in the US during the crisis, the Trump administration asked Palantir technology to build up the federal database on COVID cases. So basically, GovTech is when a private company is getting involved in a policy that in the past was designed and executed by the state. And the origin of the idea I think can be traced back to the early 2000s when several international institutions such as the OECD, the IMF, promoted the idea of e-government as a way to improve the cost-effectiveness of public services. And in the years 2010, you had a second wave with the rise of civic tech, which tried to improve democratic processes through technology. And if you look at the picture now, the GovTech market today, which can be divided into several sectors such as health technology, education technology, defense security and so on, the market is booming with a growth rate of 15% per year and an estimated value in 2025 at 1 trillion. So it's massive. And in that sense, I think the COVID-19 crisis has not been a game changer. It has been a catalyst of a previous trend. And I think that the trend will go on, especially in three sectors, health, technologies, education, because during the COVID, during the pandemic, you had millions of students that had to go online to attend classes and obviously smart cities. I think there is one point where COVID, the pandemic has been a major game changer that today GovTech is part of ideological and political narratives by some countries. I think of China and in some ways, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, because of this country, the developed narrative around the handling of the crisis is based on a massive use of new technologies, drones, facial recognition, and it has to do with the superiority of their political model. So I think the use of technologies by states actors will become a core aspect of the competition between political models in the years to come. Thank you, Clément. And when it comes to smart city, I think we have a good example, Farouk. Can you tell us the rationale and the motivation of Politeya? Sure. It started with a personal experience actually. So I'm not a techie. I worked in politics before I started public policy and I experienced basically myself from the inside. You can have also more stories to tell probably or disagree with me, but it was frustrating actually to see how the data was used or actually not used in governments. It's like you usually have hierarchical organizations and the reporting that are working, but usually data was not so much a role. The political narrative is important. Sometimes ideology is important. And often leaders wanted data but didn't get it. And the reason is because government lacks digitization, actually collects a lot of data but doesn't bring it together. This space I saw already when I was a policy advisor in one of the big governing parties in Germany. And then I left and co-founded Politeya and we interviewed leaders and they all confirmed the problem. We have a lot of data but we tap in the dark out of making use of it, out of it. And we build products that actually do that. We integrate data from different sources and legacy systems, bring it together, visualize it, aggregate it and show it to the leaders to make better decisions on local level about kindergarten, schools, public spaces, but also in the COVID pandemic we did it for a whole state in Germany monitoring the infectious diseases on the ground in school system for a full state of 300,000 students. And that was my personal motivation. But if you would ask me what I would derive from the experience I had, and I see it's I think a fundamental problem that we have that government is lacking 15 years behind the private sector and digitization. And at the same time, at least in Germany, maybe this counts for France too, like 30% in Germany of the people that work in government of all the public servants are going to retire in the next eight years and we have climate change and we have disasters happening and we have the reorganization of our economy to green. Like this all needs to be done by less people and so we need to digitize and I think it's already urgent to do that. Absolutely.