Loading...

USAF in Vietnam 2: UAVs Suck—Can't do Airborne Forward Air Controlling

6,480 views

Loading...

Loading...

Transcript

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading...

Loading...

Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Mar 23, 2009

In this amazing documentary, you see WHAT RIGHT LOOKS like when the SMART USAF officer is forced to adapt; paratroops and supplies are dropped to maneuver ground forces and assist civilian under attack by the VC/NVA.

http://www.geocities.com/paratroop200...

"Ranch Hand" C-123 Provider planes sprayed defoliants to clear out swaths of jungle that should have cleared out swaths of border areas to create DMZs to create linear situations.

http://www.defensereview.com/the-afgh...

The amazing AC-47 "Puff the Magic Dragon" gunship with banks of 7.62mm mini-guns is introduced here; ironically today, the USAF is returning to the smaller, twin-engined AC-27J Spartan as a gunship so these firepower/surveillance means can operate from short (under 2, 000 feet) runways that the larger AC-130 Spectre-type gunships cannot use.

http://www.combatreform.org/ac17.htm

Airborne Forward Air Controllers (AFACs) in observation/attack planes can TALK by radio ("Talk-ons") to both ground units and fighter-bombers and attack aircraft to with PRECISION bring fires to bear on verified enemies—not on civilians who if harmed would go over to the rebel VC/NVAs side. Unmanned Air Vehicles CANNOT DO FORWARD AIR CONTROLLING—only HUMAN BEINGS in aircraft overhead can investigate and verify signs of the enemy to effect 24/7/365 precision close air support (CAS). This is yet another reminder that we need MANNED STOL grasshopper observation/attack aircraft today:

http://www.geocities.com/usarmyaviati...

Coverage of AFACs continues in Part 3.

Loading...

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...