 You know, I believe that when people think about Navy energy, they have certain preconceptions. They think it's just about alternative fuels, but in reality it's a lot more. Most of the energy program that we build here on the Navy staff is about efficiencies. Not efficiencies in terms of just saving money. They may, but what the technological or operational changes really do is give us more combat capability. They help the warfighter be more agile and capable, more spartan. Let me give you a couple of examples. The efficiencies that we're working on for the surface ships help a destroyer be able to steam 10 more days if it has hyperelectric drive or stern flaps. The things that we're doing on F414 engines for F-18s, they're going to mean more F-18s, not just burning fuel to deliver fuel, but more that can carry weapons and be a part of the fight or the flight of the sortie that can do operational business for the Navy. Now, what we're trying to do are changes that can do exactly what Doolittle did at the beginning of World War II when he used B-25s off the end of a carrier to fly further than anyone ever expected and accomplish a mission no one thought possible. The changes we're talking about are ones that can make us more resilient, agile, and capable. And we just completed a conference down in Norfolk with the fleet sailors and commanders to discuss these very issues. And what we're doing both down there and here at Sea Airspace are going to capture the innovation between industry, academia, and the uniformed and civilian sea service members. In essence to capture the fearless ideas, the fearless ideas that will ignite bold invention. And these energy ideas that we're coming up with are ones that will allow us to be where it matters and when it matters in theaters like the Pacific that are defined by a tyranny of distance.