 Yeah, now this is, he's barely been there three years. Marfield's tasked with autonomous car and pouring profits in there. Never promotional, really linked to the U.S. largely. Domestic has peaked. Did he take actions overseas the way that Mary Barra had? Well, you could argue no, Mary Barra was much more aggressive in getting out of bad markets. Ford was late to China, but that was not his fault. He had heard of a kind of so-so business in Latin America. He chose not to pull out. Mark Fields had a very good dividend and I feel like that he got the shaft. I mean, I think he was doing it as good a job as possible. Autonomous vehicles cost a fortune. It's not like GM has outperformed, Fiat has too. But I think that what happened is that Mark did not talk the stock up. I've had many, many talks with Mark and I visited their autonomous plant out in Silicon Valley. I've had many talks with him and he just said, look, we're linked to the U.S. auto and U.S. auto is not going to be good and there's not much we can do to break out of that cycle. And I think that just wasn't good enough for Ford. I think it's interesting they picked a guy from Steelcase. Steelcase, obviously, they did move a lot of manufacturing in Mexico from the U.S. That's something Mark Fields kind of committed to staying in the U.S. with the president. Now maybe with the new CEO they can move and maybe that's what's going to happen. I would say this. This was a firing because the stock wasn't up and there are a lot of CEOs whose stocks aren't up. Is this the shot across the bell first one? I don't know. But it's really a family company and the family, I guess, turned on Mark and he just didn't get enough time, I think, to really work some magic here.