 All right, well, how do we learn tax law? So you're going to want to question the law. You're going to want to reason with it. You're going to want to debate it. In other words, you don't really want to learn tax law or anything by just trying to rogue memorize it. You're not going to be able to just repeat the tax law enough times so that it's stuck in your head by repetition. It's too big of something to be able to do that. And even if you were able to do that, you don't really develop any conceptual understanding of the tax law because oftentimes there's gray area just like with any type of law. And when you're learning anything, the general idea of learning it is going to be tell a story about it. And even when you're talking about learning a series of numbers, then oftentimes if you can break those numbers into a pictorial format, you can make a picture. You can link the number to an image and then make a story about those images. That's going to help you to basically remember just even a series of numbers. So just from a practical standpoint, when you're learning the tax law for whatever you want to do, you want to make a story about it. Fortunately, the tax law already has a story because everything that the tax law has been put together, someone put that together because they thought it was a good idea. They've been arguing it. It's a process that came out of the creation of the law. Arguments have happened, and this thing came out of that. So the question is, you can ask questions like, well, what were they thinking when they put this law in place? Do I agree with the law that was put in place? Now that this law is put in place, what are the incentives that that's going to have? Is that going to incentivize people to grow the economy? Is it going to incentivize people to reduce the economy? Is it OK that the economy is being possibly depressed in some way or reducing GDP if we can get a more even distribution through redistributional policies? And these kind of questions are things that you will see if you start looking at the tax law. And it's just like any kind of text that you engage with. If it was like a philosophical text or something like that, you're going to be reading it and say, why does this person think that? You're going to debate, and you don't just read it and just kind of take it in. Well, that's what that person thinks. I'm not going to question it. If you're looking at books like the Homer or Shakespeare or something, you're going to be asking questions like, well, why did Achilles do that? He's acting like a baby. I don't know what he's doing over here. You're going to question the motives of the characters. Well, the characters in tax law are the people that put in the law. And so we can basically ask questions in terms of why those laws have been put in place. And then that will help us, at least with the memorization of it. It will also help us to engage it when we're actually trying to do things with the law. And if we have clients or are working with people that are interested in the law, you have something to actually talk about. You can give some opinion as to not just what the law says, but possibly what the incentives or motives were behind it. Now, that could get you in trouble because people have different opinions about what is fair. If you just say, we want a fair tax code, that's a pretty safe thing to say and almost evasive thing to say, right? If you actually get into the details in terms of what you think is fair and those kind of questions, then you're going to annoy people sometimes. But those are more honest debates. And so there would be more engaging debates with the clients. And if you engage in more engaging debates, you might have more clients that actually, hopefully, you genuinely agree with, which would be a better system, usually, if that's possible. But in any case, that's the idea.